We have developed a costed and layered Product Timeline and Planning Cube however we still need more work to uncover significant events and hidden facts mined in this paper. In V1 we are still building on those metric layers, and in V2 we are looking for significant events that deploy hidden margins and markers. In V3 we become conscious of events which are not contiguous and which we should ignore, but since they play into the next timeline of products we need to consider. At the Summary level we should attempt to answer developmental questions and to cost significant events within integral layers.

1. FG
MDIA
Contents
V1 Raising up theTime
V2 Dwelling Place
V3 AllThings New
InsideView

2. Time Events
Products Costs
Assets
T3
T4
TP
From “T Pluribus Unum,” our last paper
To Do
Slide5
Slide 6 Slide 3
Slide 2 T1 T2 T3 T4
TP
&
V1: Our Project is to decide between various instances of
our project timeline related to the production and the
outcome of events. Our Plan has many nuanced
circumstances in it. Events are to be discussed inV2,V3.
Notice that until we actually write the product to a customer
site and then are able to achieve it remotely, we have not
acquired the full ark custom model. And only then can we
produce the more advanced products. Remember that we
are studying the production of assets and intellectual
properties in the Ark Mode of Plait Glass.
Ω
824.881 slide 16
See V2
195,988
Payback
More Carriage
Burden See V3
EventsTimeline Incomplete

3. 18L SA SD
6L Slide 4
Pre-Production
We have not studied
production costs for new
products yet.
Our Sum Production is
within Bridge Parameters
corresponding to 82488
824.881 slide 16
Correction after analysis slide
26 and second correction not
shown, see also slide 26
Changed slide 26

4. 18L SA SD
6L
Timeline 1
Green Energy and its
advancing requirement is
the first primary product
with local window
property testing
Timeline 2
The beginning of Ark wheel
assembly has localized
access through the supply
chain and product
replicationWindow
Timeline 3
Site Access allows repair,
maintenance and
upgrade with more
advanced writing of
instance applications
Timeline 4
Remote Development
includesAppliances
branch remotely through
PortalAccess and IP
Warehouse Assimilation
7/30/2022 BrijConsulting, LLC Jean Marshall 4
T1
T2
T3
T4
Year 3.6 Year 34.4
Year 10.4 Year 44.4
.09
8.4 42.6
48.9
The Lens Path and the Critical
Path on slide 4 are related but
periodically weighted to using
wave for producing glass only
Glass
Complexity

5. M2
M3
M4
M1
M2
M3
M4
M1
M2
M3
M4
M1
MILESTONET3-M1 MILESTONET2-M1 MILESTONET1-M1
Streamline Warehouse:
Contiguous Instances
MILESTONET3-M2
Wave and Lens: to Plait and make
Scalable Configurations
MILESTONET2-M2
Streamline Instances: Deciduous
MILESTONET1-M2
Branch Mobility
MILESTONET3-M3 MILESTONET2-M3
Utility Wall
MILESTONET1-M3
MILESTONET3-M4 MILESTONET2-M4
More Complex Threads and
Encryptions
MILESTONET1-M4
5 Instances of the Incumbent Load
producing complex Products with
T&MM Mu Sic
T3 T2 T1
TP
T4
Wall and Attribute, Pipes and
Plaits
Forms and Secants: Engineering
Storyboard and Glass Concept
Machine, including Mix
Thread and Encryptions: Two Step
Compositions
Green Energy and Wall Utility Design
MILESTONE MILESTONE
Branch Capability and Partnering
Build Cases, Appliances and
Conveyances
Land/Wall T-pipes
Year 49.5
Year 3.6
Year 10.4 Year 34.4 Year 44.4
9,143
9,683 26,181 30,824
1,723

6. Value in Billions
464/2=232 tan
1
From “T Pluribus Unum”

7. 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1 2
lens/pipe
'Factors', 'CriticalYear' by 'lens/pipe'
Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4 Series5
28 x 2 forms and secants
[SA + SD]
T1
T2
T3
T4
ω
ω
1
2
3
4
5
The Partner Branch comes after the 5 instances
of the incumbent product is achieved and full
remote Production is assimilated
T2
T1
T3
T4
TP
TP
Shift fromT2 toT1

8. T3 T2 T1
TP
T4
ε1
ε1
2.3644-2.35=
.0144W
B
L
A
Summary
2.3644-2.126=
.2384/2= .1192 IB
IB
IB
713.52-713.26= .26
50+21 = 71Var
Rate
694/3=231 tan
Site Development is Remote Requirement,
the critical Tan Line, per “T Pluribus Unum”
2
2
2795.9-2100= 695.9 – 694.8 = .7 Remote
Capability relies on Lens Completion
TP Partnering
Requirement depends on
Variable (Unit
Completion) of All Work
23 x 2
Lens
Split tan line = 23 variable lens || 644 All Cost Interior Units
64 x 2 = 128 chi factor
LC
LC
557
P 522
ROA

9. Cost Study for Path Demarcation
Slide8 Slide11
Slide 11
P
P
Wt. Shift

10. AssociatedViews
im
48.48 + .0535 x 2 = 48.5864 Critical Path
200x
See “Supply Side Portfolio”
From “T Pluribus Unum”

11. Split
tan
line
6.43 x 10
z
X 10
2.3644
New Load
Slide 9
See portion ofTable Appendix I
1.20 weighting of fixed to variable shifts
557
T’s
522 + 21 = 543 ROA
T’s

12. Lens Contribution
Future
Sqrt=
Tan =
Sqrt =
Lens
Lens
^2
Future
See portion ofTable Appendix I
Scale used in Slide 8
The Site Access Cost more directly
approximates the Bridge Cost
/.004=7.1995
B
L
A
B L
A
T’s

13. z2
Appendix I From “T Pluribus Unum”
Used in Slide 7
Used in slide 6
2
4
From Study it appears
that the (4) Interior
Margin and the (2)
Center Metric
indicative of Branch
Timing, relate to units
and costs described as
variable. We have
attributed the (4)
Interior Margin to the
Forms and Secants and
the (2) Center to the
Lens and Pipes.
Noted:

14. Plan
Attainment
FromT&MM
Appendix II

15. The Stairway to Heaven
Most-High
mystery
enshrined in the child Mary
the fifteen stairs
angels ascending and descending
house of God and the
portal of heaven.
The hidden City will appear, Rev. 21

16. 713.52-712.07= 1.45 || Payback 194
Shift from the Digital Path
824.881 slide 3
Ω
Ω Omega ends are
Secant ends
Note:Our Pre-production is not ending on a
finished Omega (our Outcome is incomplete)
Ω
412 slide 21

17. CURVED LENS
and CRITICAL
PATH
NEGOTIATING
THE CURVE
FINDING
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS
P-
Model

19. Future notes include:
1. Find the carriage burden for
the incumbent load
2. Study the bifurcation of the
curve; we had worked with
bifurcation processes
3. Path
Markers
4. Hidden
Margins
Bifurcating
.02424 to
.020402 x 2 =
.040804
hypotenuse
From “T Pluribus Unum”
T’s
Path Markers
Bifurcation occurs to meet
external demand

20. R
y = 8129.5e0.0856x
R² = 0.2884
y = 2972.5x2 - 23132x + 52939
R² = 0.414
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
Milestones
Year 3.6
Year 10.4
Year 34.4
Year 44.4
Year 49.5
Year 50+
Sum Productions
T4
T3
T2
T1
TP
Ne
w
All
Achieved New Products
Thread and Encryptions Forms and Secants
Wave and Lens Wall, Pipes, Plaits
Expon. (Achieved) Poly. (Achieved)
adjusted
y = 7968.8e0.0957x
R² = 0.2972
y = 2995.1x2 - 23270x + 53131
R² = 0.4195
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
Milestones
Year 3.6
Year 10.4
Year 34.4
Year 44.4
Year 49.5
Year 50+
Sum Productions
T4
T3
T2
T1
TP
Ne
w
All
Milestone Plan
R
Final
Confirmed in
our Final
MilestoneTable
on Slide 27
graphically the
450 units and
Secant
Production

21. It turns out that the
future products depend on all
aspects
Ω
The Candle Stone
path shows more
ROA gained
From “Portal Projects”
Does this ROA
matter?
Yes, integral

22. Contiguous Production
106/
3.95
Weight of the Path
Form divided
Single form Margin
remainds, part of the constructed but unfinished
product on the books– i.e., unfinished Scrum
The first question to ask
when utilizing secant
information is are the
instances contiguous?
If not, they can not be
compared.They must be
truly adjacent in a fashion
that allows a union plait.
To do: Discuss
The
analogous
process
leads into
the next
timeline
and cannot
be ignored
2646-2684=-38 var. cost

23. ulterior
(ʌlˈtɪərɪə) adj1. lying beneath or beyond what is revealed, evident, or supposed: ulterior motives.
2. succeeding, subsequent, or later
3. lying beyond a certain line or point
The majority of the significant events happen in T1 and T2
To Do: Discuss
TEST
T’s
412 slide 16
Retest
x
377 x 2 = 754
+3 gate units
R

24. From “Supply Side Portfolio”
.7565 x 1000

25. (See Final Production Roadmap, slide 27)
(Incl. for next process)
forward looking statements
Incumbency of process
Events are timed with Push Product (i.e., Secants)
Lens Power amplitude
starting set
ulterior
(ʌlˈtɪərɪə) adj1. lying beneath or beyond what is revealed, evident, or supposed: ulterior motives.
2. succeeding, subsequent, or later
3. lying beyond a certain line or point
The major significant events happen in T1 and T2
To Do: Discuss
278 note

26. In our final adjustment we
made the correction for
partnering
Ω
824.881 slide 16 exceeded

27. Ω
Coming up,
See “Glass
Cars and
New Ark
Product
Map;” we
will use this
Roadmap to
get started
Next

28. 1. Portal Prosperity: An overview of Glass Theory and Ark
Design develops property reconcilement for Conveyance
2. Crossover Conveyance: Beginning with Remote Signature,
threading the advancing fingerprint with a glass path and
integral site management, moving into SIMULATIONS in
Real Time
3. Converge- The Remote Build: Tasks to consider the
process of converging to the Remote Build Site and what
considerations are given to producing a remote service or
build out of a productive requirement, introducing sandbox
theory. Phase I only considers the Kitchen Tech. Phase II
is involved in whole home Media and Tech in Glass.
Phase III develops the land and its attributes. This is three
separate papers.
1. Studying T&MM: the requirement for certification of mobility
for competent conveyances
2. Portal Projects: the evidence, timing and intelligent use of
portals
3. Calling it Green: Components of Green Energy, short
review: Calling it Green requires new uses of potential and
^studies in wave glass and graphical relationships can raise up
a green energy fluency that will lead to energy self-sufficiency
4. Dimensions in Multivariant Fabrications: Determining Forms
and Contents of Green Energy and Blue Wave Cascade;
relating elements to current science and future requirements
5. Wave and Lens Assimilation: The means to compile and to
build in Glass Systems is described. The use of secant math.
6. Math Solutions for Wave and Lens Assimilations: See also
Commentary for Math Solutions
7. Supply Side Portfolio: Timing and Model of Glass and Green
events to fulfill path… Does the Tan Line help?
8. Partners in T Pluribus Unum: Measuring with Diacritical
Marks
1. Portfolio Wheels: Study of Secants and Wheels in the Dynamic
requirement for Media to write and produce in Ark Science and
Dimensional Systems, Introduction of the Story “Eru finds a Golden
Pen.”
2. Ark Media: The Dialogue of the Story and the Construction of
Storyboards, Mix and Remix specifications, beginning crosswalk and
encryptions
3. Builds and Simulations: Discuss Matrix Trees, Migratory Patterns and
the use of Secants to Build tooling
4. The Corner of Mu Sic: an update of our Digital Paper on Mu Sic to
include Ark encryptions and design considerations
5. The Glass House: Magi and Marcus Engineering plans to invest in a
Plait Glass facility for building and research in remote Ark Science.
Start of Tooling and Secant Design for the Construction Industry
6. The Remote Build: Planning a Theoretical Production for untried
Architecture
7. Glass Mix Z-Form: Production Walk-Thru Glass Mix and Forms, leads
into the Write Process
8. Bridging the Instance: Now operating multiple instances must bridge
the operations, learn about deciduous models and deliberate the
outcome of operations for the 2022 Plan of Magi and Marcus
9. Architectural Builds and Designs: Looking into Delivery Mechanics and
the Products themselves
10. Pipes and Plaits in Ark Mode Design: How the Plait Pipe System
assists with Land Products. See Number Theory
11. Continuous Modeling: Moving away from the Contiguous Model to a
strategy of seamless integration of methods and modes of operation.
See Number Theory.
12. The Glass Warehouse: From Start to Finish the streamlined operations
of the Marcus and Magi Engineering remote architectural process
13. Branch- Sound and Image Construction: Characterizing the branch
capability of new applications, appliances and mode[ls] of operations
1. Ark in Glass: Changing the Schema for Ark Mode crossover, beginning study of
Secants and Wheels for the “cube-ified glass” engineering of Imaging, sound and
motion characteristics.
2. The New Stone: Simulations and Re-instancing to package, confect and view glass
media
3. Dimensional Building: Dimensional Arrays, Z strength, Product Media,
Interdimensional Matrices.
4. The Dynamic Instance: Product Media Discussed
5. The Glass Build: Base Build and Modules Assembled, considering impact of
dimensional systems
6. Glass in the Making: Costing and Loading, Assembly and Assimilation, IP Defined,
Logos
7. Art of the Science: What can be made? Assimilation discussed, look at basic
product ideas
8. Digital Glass Production: Pipe Transit and RIK Declare, Batch Appliance (Dialogue
paper)
9. Imposition of Value Engineering: Establishing and Justifying the Load for Pipe
Transit
10. The Digital Plait Position: Engineering Design of the Load and Thruput
11. ^Mu Sic in the Advancing Age: Use of Fingerprint and Encryption for Operational
Loads
12. Engineering Objects: The Purpose of this Paper is to Consider the means to raise
up a Digital Portal Production System using appliances gained through Plait Object
and Gate driven configurations that work with Digital Mechanics. Six-Layer Glass
and Appliances
13. Instancing at the Gate: Use of Gates and Instances, bridging of the engineering
process
14. Interpolative Scope: Use of a Demand and Production Scope for building and
delivery of product, learning to specify material, looking for union of Vector
15. Functional Glass: Fitness for Function and Moral Intelligence, Bayesian Analysis
16. The Glass Wall: This is a very difficult staging of advanced engineering to depict
…Motivated by sound it creates a means by sound to cascade light for safe and
wireless power
17. The Glass Wave: Learning to Plait Gates, Reconcile Metrics to Scorecard, and load
value of Scrum
18. Scrum Costing w/notes (Book It Daniel): establishing scrum standards (Dialogue
paper)
19. Gate Plait Green (Mark It Mark): first scalable plait arrangement overcomes
bottleneck (Dialogue paper)
20. Scorecard Integration (Map It Ralph): A review of mappings to date, marking old
vs. new (Dialogue paper)
Motion Projects-8
Remote Theory-5
Ark Model-13 Digital-20
Go to https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/presentations
https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/commentary-for-math-solutions-
for-wave-and-lens-assimilationpdf
New
This Paper: #47
Dimensional Building in Ark Design
Product Roadmap