Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
IPCRF
Preparation
Mariches E. Begino
SHT 1
What should be considered?
Objectives should be SMART
Specific
Is the result achievable?
 Can a supervisor verify the r...
Measurable
Quantity
 Quality
Time
Cost Effectiveness
Achievable
Is the objective achievable in the
available resource of time?
Is the work within the individual
control or v...
Relevant
Employees Job
Ratee’s Objective
 Unit Objective
Organization Objective
Time Bound
Within an specific measure of time
frame
Example:
By ________/________/_________(When,
Who? What? Include a number you can
measure)will have ___________(How? Why?
...
Remember:
If QET is hard to be done, then there is a
problem with the objective ( Not SMART)
3 objectives per KRA
Turn g...
QET:
Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages
Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness
Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time...
Remember:
IPCRF is just like making LP
Objective must start with the verb last is time
If the focus is person, use numb...
CCompetency
Lets Examine:
(What is missing?)
Community Involvement
 Objective
 Prepared
and
submitted
complete
160 DLL
within the
scheduled
date of
checking.
 Quali...
Community Involvement
 Objective
 Conducted
six (6)
general
/parents
assembly
meeting with
75% parents
attendance
within...
SDO Cam. Norte
Non Negotiables
 Teaching Learning (40%)
 DLL Preparation (20%)
 Competencies (10%)
 Pupils’ Outcome (3...
IPCRF presentation
IPCRF presentation
IPCRF presentation
IPCRF presentation
IPCRF presentation
IPCRF presentation
IPCRF presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

18

Share

Download to read offline

IPCRF presentation

Download to read offline

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

IPCRF presentation

  1. 1. IPCRF Preparation Mariches E. Begino SHT 1
  2. 2. What should be considered? Objectives should be SMART Specific Is the result achievable?  Can a supervisor verify the result? What would be the result look like?
  3. 3. Measurable Quantity  Quality Time Cost Effectiveness
  4. 4. Achievable Is the objective achievable in the available resource of time? Is the work within the individual control or view?  Is the objective appropriate to the individual experience skill and work level? Is it appropriate within a job description?
  5. 5. Relevant Employees Job Ratee’s Objective  Unit Objective Organization Objective
  6. 6. Time Bound Within an specific measure of time frame
  7. 7. Example: By ________/________/_________(When, Who? What? Include a number you can measure)will have ___________(How? Why? Remember to specify results using QET Criteria)
  8. 8. Remember: If QET is hard to be done, then there is a problem with the objective ( Not SMART) 3 objectives per KRA Turn generic into specific Presence of at least 2 measure per objective
  9. 9. QET: Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time saved) Timeliness- (e.g., within 3 months)
  10. 10. Remember: IPCRF is just like making LP Objective must start with the verb last is time If the focus is person, use number not % Do not shortcut
  11. 11. CCompetency
  12. 12. Lets Examine: (What is missing?)
  13. 13. Community Involvement  Objective  Prepared and submitted complete 160 DLL within the scheduled date of checking.  Quality 5- Prepared and submitted 160 DLL 4- Prepared and submitted 150-159 DLL 3- Prepared and submitted 130-149 DLL 2- Prepared and submitted 120-129 DLL 1- Prepared and submitted 119 DLL and below.  Efficiency  Timeliness 5- Submitted DLL on scheduled time. 4- Submitted DLL One (1) day late from scheduled checking. 3- Submitted DLL Two (2) days late from scheduled checking. 2- Submitted DLL Three (3) days late from scheduled checking 1- Submitted DLL Four (4) and more days late from scheduled checkin.g
  14. 14. Community Involvement  Objective  Conducted six (6) general /parents assembly meeting with 75% parents attendance within the scheduled date.  Quality 5-conducted 6 GA meetings 4-conducted 5 GA meetings 3- conducted 4 GA meetings 2-conducted 3 GA meetings 1- conducted 1 or 2 GA meetings  Efficiency 5- conducted meetings /assemblies with 75% parents attendance. 4- with 70% to 74.99 % parents attendance. 3- with 65 % to 69.99 % parents attendance. 2- with 60 % to 64.99 % parents attendance. 1- with 5 0 % and below parents attendance.  Timeliness 5-Conducted Meetings on scheduled time. 4- Conducted meeting One (1) day late from the schedule date. 3-Conducted meeting Two (2) days late from the schedule date. 2- Conducted meeting Three (3) days late from the schedule date. 1- Conducted meeting Four (4) and more days late from schedule date.
  15. 15. SDO Cam. Norte Non Negotiables  Teaching Learning (40%)  DLL Preparation (20%)  Competencies (10%)  Pupils’ Outcome (30%)  NAT Target (10%)  Drop out Rate (10%)  Community Involvement (15%)  6 Gen. Assembly meeting (5%)  Community Involvement (15%) Plus Factor used for IPCRF can not be used in promotion
  • JESSAMACAHILO

    Oct. 23, 2019
  • neliaamoy

    Aug. 11, 2019
  • DapYonap

    Apr. 9, 2019
  • HaizelPagulayan

    Mar. 24, 2019
  • MaLynnMuchuelas

    Oct. 23, 2018
  • MaLynnMuchuelas

    Oct. 23, 2018
  • MaLynnMuchuelas

    Oct. 23, 2018
  • MaLynnMuchuelas

    Oct. 23, 2018
  • IreneGumiran

    Jul. 22, 2018
  • SheilaAntonio2

    May. 12, 2018
  • rozelmalificiado

    Feb. 15, 2018
  • AiramRalip

    Nov. 23, 2017
  • AdelinaPrimero

    Oct. 16, 2017
  • tiomars2013

    Oct. 9, 2017
  • RizafeTorralba

    Aug. 10, 2017
  • adbenigno69

    Aug. 10, 2017
  • JOYCEDELEON5

    Jul. 30, 2017
  • veronicaplamea1963

    Jan. 17, 2017

Views

Total views

6,077

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

1

Actions

Downloads

395

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

18

×