Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
ERASMUS+
''Ready for our lives''
Evaluation Questionnaire
Koper 6-11/10/2016
1. Gender
2. You are from.
3. Meeting organization: Information (about travel,
accommodation etc.) received before the meeting from host
partner, res...
4. Meeting organization: General organization during the
meeting.
5. Meeting organization: Duration and timing of the meeting.
6. Meeting organization: Domestic arrangements
(accommodation, meals etc.).
7. Meeting contents: The subjects discussed were relevant.
8. Meeting contents: The activities carried were relevant.
9. Meeting contents: Balance between different types of
activities (work session, social and cultural events, team
buildin...
10. Meeting contents: The meeting fulfilled the established
objectives.
11. Meeting contents: The meeting fulfilled my personal
expectations.
12. Quality of European partnership: Effective
communication amongst partners.
13. Quality of European partnership: Development of
teamwork, positive attitudes.
14. Quality of European partnership: The commitment to the
project by each partner (fulfilling the responsibilities set ou...
15. Quality of European partnership: Intercultural interaction/
respect of personal and cultural values.
16. What do you consider to be the main strength of this
project meeting?
17. Were there any weak points?
18. Can you see any problem areas for the project that
should be tackled as soon as possible?
19. If so please suggest some measures or ways for solving
the problem(s).
Koper evaluation
Koper evaluation
Koper evaluation
Koper evaluation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Koper evaluation

39 views

Published on

Evaluation of meeting

Published in: Data & Analytics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Koper evaluation

  1. 1. ERASMUS+ ''Ready for our lives'' Evaluation Questionnaire Koper 6-11/10/2016
  2. 2. 1. Gender
  3. 3. 2. You are from.
  4. 4. 3. Meeting organization: Information (about travel, accommodation etc.) received before the meeting from host partner, responding in time
  5. 5. 4. Meeting organization: General organization during the meeting.
  6. 6. 5. Meeting organization: Duration and timing of the meeting.
  7. 7. 6. Meeting organization: Domestic arrangements (accommodation, meals etc.).
  8. 8. 7. Meeting contents: The subjects discussed were relevant.
  9. 9. 8. Meeting contents: The activities carried were relevant.
  10. 10. 9. Meeting contents: Balance between different types of activities (work session, social and cultural events, team building, free time etc.), realistic timescales.
  11. 11. 10. Meeting contents: The meeting fulfilled the established objectives.
  12. 12. 11. Meeting contents: The meeting fulfilled my personal expectations.
  13. 13. 12. Quality of European partnership: Effective communication amongst partners.
  14. 14. 13. Quality of European partnership: Development of teamwork, positive attitudes.
  15. 15. 14. Quality of European partnership: The commitment to the project by each partner (fulfilling the responsibilities set out for this project meeting, quality of the presentations and products, sharing responsibility for the meeting).
  16. 16. 15. Quality of European partnership: Intercultural interaction/ respect of personal and cultural values.
  17. 17. 16. What do you consider to be the main strength of this project meeting?
  18. 18. 17. Were there any weak points?
  19. 19. 18. Can you see any problem areas for the project that should be tackled as soon as possible?
  20. 20. 19. If so please suggest some measures or ways for solving the problem(s).

×