Published on

An Report on Brain Tumors and Gamma Knife method

Published in: Education, Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide


  1. 1. Cairo University Faculty Of Engineering Systems And Bio-Medical Engineering Gamma Knife and brain tumors Presented By Mamoud Mohammed Tarek Presented To DR/ Mohammed Hesham Professor of physics Mathematical Department
  2. 2. Gamma knife: A type of radiosurgery (radiation therapy) machine that acts by focusing low-dosage gamma radiation from many sources on a precise target. Areas adjacent to the target receive only slight doses of radiation, while the target gets the full intensity. Uses Of Gamma Knife: The gamma knife may be used to treat brain tumors, metastatic tumors in the brain (from sites such as the breast, lung, and skin), vascular malformations of the brain, acoustic neuromas (a tumor of the hearing nerve) meningiomas (tumors on the protective layers of the brain) trigeminal neuralgia causing severe facial pain and temporal lobe epilepsy. And our research will be about how to treat the brain tumors which will talk about that: 1) What do you know about the brain tumor? 2)The types of brain tumors 3)Ways to treat brain tumors 4)The aim from the Radition Therapy 5)The mechanism of Gamma Knife method 6)Conclusion (1)
  3. 3. 1) What do you know about the brain tumors? A brain tumor, or tumour, is an intracranial solid neoplasm, a tumor (defined as an abnormal growth of cells) within the brain or the central spinal canal. Brain tumors include all tumors inside the cranium or in the central spinal canal. They are created by an abnormal and uncontrolled cell division, usually in the brain itself, but also in lymphatic tissue, in blood vessels, in the cranial nerves, in the brain envelopes (meninges), skull, pituitary gland, or pineal gland. Within the brain itself, the involved cells may be neurons or glial cells (which include astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and ependymal cells). Brain tumors may also spread from cancers primarily located in other organs (metastatic tumors). Any brain tumor is inherently serious and life-threatening because of its invasive and infiltrative character in the limited space of the intracranial cavity. However, brain tumors (even malignant ones) are not invariably fatal, especially lipomas which are inherently benign. Brain tumors or intracranial neoplasms can be cancerous (malignant) or non-cancerous (benign); however, the definitions of malignant or benign neoplasms differs from those commonly used in other types of cancerous or noncancerous neoplasms in the body. Its threat level depends on the combination of factors like the type of tumor, its location, its size and its state of development. Because the brain is well protected by the skull, the early detection of a brain tumor occurs only when diagnostic tools are directed at the intracranial cavity. Usually detection occurs in advanced stages when the presence of the tumor has caused unexplained symptoms. Primary (true) brain tumors are commonly located in the posterior cranial fossa in children and in the anterior two-thirds of the cerebral hemispheres in adults, although they can affect any part of the brain. (2)
  4. 4. 2)The types of brain tumors: (I)Benign Brain Tumor: Benign brain tumors are usually defined as a group of similar cells that do not follow normal cell division and growth patterns and develop into a mass of cells that microscopically do not have the characteristic appearance of a cancer. Most benign brain tumors are found by CT “Computed Tomography” or MRI “Magnetic Resonance Imaging” brain scans. These tumors usually grow slowly, do not invade surrounding tissues or spread to other organs, and often have a border or edge that can be seen on CT scans. These tumors rarely develop into metastatic (cancerous or spreading) tumors. Most benign brain tumors can be remove, the benign tumors usually do not reoccur after removal. The exact causes of benign brain tumors are not known, but investigators have suggested that family history, radiation exposure, or exposure to chemicals (for example, vinyl chloride, formaldehyde) may be risk factors. (II)Malignant Brain Tumor: Unlike benign tumors, the cell structure of a “malignant” brain tumor is significantly different than that of “normal” brain cells. Malignant tumors tend to grow faster and can be more invasive than benign tumors. Malignant tumors are life threatening. Sometimes malignant brain tumors are referred to as “brain cancer,” though they do not share all of the characteristics of cancer. Most notably, cancer is characterized by the ability to spread from one organ to another. It is very rare for a primary brain tumor to spread beyond the brain or spine. (3)
  5. 5. 3)Ways to treat the brain tumors: When a brain tumor is diagnosed, a medical team will be formed to assess the treatment options presented by the leading surgeon to the patient and his/her family. Given the location of primary solid neoplasms of the brain in most cases a "do-nothing" option is usually not presented. Neurosurgeons take the time to observe the evolution of the neoplasm before proposing a management plan to the patient and his/her relatives. These various types of treatment are available depending on neoplasm type and location and may be combined to give the best chances of survival: Surgery: complete or partial resection of the tumor with the objective of removing as many tumor cells as possible Radio Therapy: the most commonly used treatment for brain tumors; the tumor is irradiated with beta, x rays or gamma rays. Chemotherapy: is a treatment option for cancer, however it is seldom used to treat brain tumors as the blood and brain barrier prevents the drugs from reaching the cancerous cells. Chemotherapy can be thought of as a poison that prevents the growth and division of all cells in the body including cancerous cells. Thus the significant side effects associated and experienced by patients undergoing chemotherapy. A variety of experimental therapies are available through clinical trials Survival rates in primary brain tumors depend on the type of tumor, age, functional status of the patient, the extent of surgical tumor removal and other factors specific to each case. As we said before,we will talk about the Gamma Knife “Radio Therapy” (4)
  6. 6. 4)The aim from the Radition Therapy: The goal of radiation therapy is to selectively kill tumor cells while leaving normal brain tissue unharmed. In standard external beam radiation therapy, multiple treatments of standard-dose "fractions" of radiation are applied to the brain. This process is repeated for a total of 10 to 30 treatments, depending on the type of tumor. This additional treatment provides some patients with improved outcomes and longer survival rates. Radiosurgery is a treatment method that uses computerized calculations to focus radiation at the site of the tumor while minimizing the radiation dose to the surrounding brain. Radiosurgery may be an adjunct to other treatments, or it may represent the primary treatment technique for some tumors. Radiotherapy may be used following, or in some cases in place of, resection of the tumor. Forms of radiotherapy used for brain cancer include external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and in more difficult cases, stereotactic radiosurgery, such as Gamma knife, Cyberknife or Novalis Tx radiosurgery. Radiotherapy is the most common treatment for secondary brain tumors. The amount of radiotherapy depends on the size of the area of the brain affected by cancer. Conventional external beam 'whole brain radiotherapy treatment' (WBRT) or 'whole brain irradiation' may be suggested if there is a risk that other secondary tumors will develop in the future.Stereotactic radiotherapy is usually recommended in cases involving fewer than three small secondary brain tumors. (5)
  7. 7. 5)The Mechanism Of Gamma Knife Method: Patients Eighty-six patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma underwent gamma knife radiosurgery with a Leksell Gamma Unit (Elekta Instruments, Atlanta, GA) between November 1991 and April 1996. Selection for gamma knife radiosurgery required that the maximum tumor diameter be less than 40 mm. Gamma knife radiosurgery was recommended for patients who were elderly or in poor medical condition, who had a tumor in the only hearing ear, or who had regrowth after partial removal of a tumor. Patients with a tumor that could be treated by either surgical resection or gamma knife radiosurgery were allowed to decide which alternative they preferred after receiving an adequate explanation of the treatment options. Patients ranged in age from 23 to 79 years (mean, 53 years) and included 31 men and 55 women. Twenty-three patients (27%) had undergone previous surgical resection. Tumor volume varied from 0.2 to 20.1 mm3 (mean, 6.0 mm3) (Fig 1). Sixty-four tumors were solid and 22 had cystic components (mixed tumor). (6)
  8. 8. . FIG 1. Scattergram shows the relationship between tumor volume and peripheral dose. # indicates cystic tumor only solid component was irradiated (7)
  9. 9. Treatment Stereotactic radiosurgery was performed with the standard gamma knife technique. Axial and coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images were used for dose planning in all cases. The imaging technique included 2D Fourier transform sequences with a 3-mm slice thickness and an interslice gap of 1 mm for tumors with a diameter of more than 1 cm and 3D Fourier transform sequences with a 2-mm slice thickness for tumors with a diameter of less than 1 cm. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images were acquired 5 minutes after bolus injection of contrast medium (0.1 mmol/kg). Dose planning was done in consideration of tumor size, tumor consistency, hearing acuity, and regrowth after surgery (Fig 1). Doses to the periphery of the tumor (peripheral dose) varied from 10.0 to 17.0 Gy (mean, 13.3 Gy). Maximum tumor doses varied from 11.1 to 40.0 Gy (mean, 26.4 Gy). Treatment isodose (ie, that which enveloped the tumor volume with a maximum dose normalized 100%) varied from 30% to 90%. The peripheral dose coincided with the 50% isodose in 44 cases. The number of isocenters varied from one to 12 per tumor (median, four). Follow-up MR Imaging Follow-up neuroimaging included contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted sequences at 3, 6, and 12 months during the first year; every 6 months during the second year; and yearly thereafter. If significant changes in tumor size or clinical presentation developed, follow-up studies were increased in frequency to every 3 months until stabilization occurred. Follow-up MR studies were acquired with the same protocol as that used before treatment. Seventy-eight (91%) of the 86 patients underwent one or more MR studies at least 10 months after gamma knife radiosurgery. The last follow-up MR studies were obtained at less than 12 months in five patients, between 12 and 24 months in 19 patients, between 24 and 36 months in 23 patients, and at more than 36 months in 31 patients (range, 10–63 months; mean, 34 months). Tumor control rate was calculated in these patients. Six patients rejected neuroimaging follow-up. None of these patients showed remarkable symptoms after gamma knife radiosurgery. Two patients, ages 79 and 74 years, respectively, died of unrelated causes after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Sixtyone patients (71%) had serial follow-up MR studies. In all, 341 follow-up studies were available for detailed analysis, with a mean of 5.6 studies per patient. (8)
  10. 10. Analysis of Images Tumor volume was calculated on each MR study by the following method. Maximum tumor diameter was measured in three dimensions (transverse and longitudinal on the axial images, and vertical on the coronal images) using fine calipers. Measurements were defined as x, y, and z, respectively. Tumor volume was xyz/2 (23). Tumor control rate was estimated by comparing tumor volume at the time of treatment with that at the last follow-up. A tumor was considered to be controlled if it showed either no change or regression. The rate of measurement error tends to be in inverse proportion to tumor volume; therefore, tumors were categorized according to calculated tumor volume as small (<2 mm3), medium (2–8 mm3), or large (>8 mm3). Significant change was categorized as more than 20%, more than 15%, or more than 10% of tumor volume. These figures correspond to ± 1 mm change in each given volume (ie, a volume of more than 2 mm3 = 20%). The pattern of changes in tumor volume was examined by plotting the ratio of tumor volume at each follow-up study to that at treatment. Univariate analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between tumor volume and tumor control rate. For the purpose of evaluating the correlation between tumor consistency and tumor control rate, univariate analysis was also used to compare tumor control rates between the solid and mixed tumors. Changes in contrast enhancement of the tumor over time were analyzed on serial MR studies for each patient, the degree of contrast enhancement of the tumor was assessed visually on each MR study. T2-weighted images were inspected for new areas of signal hyperintensity in adjacent brain tissue. The correlation between occurrence of hyperintensity and initial tumor volume, peripheral dose, maximum dose, peripheral isodose, and history of prior surgery was evaluated by multivariate analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using Stat View 4.5J (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The χ2test was used to evaluate the correlation between changes in tumor volume and contrast enhancement. Univariate or multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox proportional hazards model. P values less than .05 were considered significant. (9)
  11. 11. Results Among the 78 patients in whom follow-up studies were available, 47 showed tumor regression, 16 showed no change, and 15 showed tumor enlargement. In two patients, tumor enlargement occurred after gamma knife radiosurgery, so microsurgical resection was performed at the referral hospital. The tumor control rate was 81%. The correlation between tumor control rate and tumor volume was not statistically significant. The rate of tumor regression was significantly greater for mixed tumors than for solid tumors. Changes in tumor volume were categorized into the following four patterns: 1) initial enlargement followed by sustained regression (although not necessarily reverting to initial size), termed “temporary enlargement” (n = 25) (Figs 2A and 3); 2) no change, or sustained regression (n = 21) (Figs 2B and 4); 3) repeated alternate enlargement and regression (n = 8) (Figs 2C and 5); and 4) continuous enlargement (n = 7) (Figs 2D and 6). Most tumors that showed temporary enlargement reached their peak within 1 year and regressed within 2 years. Maximum temporary enlargement was double the initial tumor volume in some cases. In six of seven patients with a pattern of continuous tumor enlargement, the enlargement persisted for more than 2 years. Follow-up MR studies in all patients with controlled tumor over 3 years showed no significant change in tumor volume. Five of the eight patients with a pattern of alternating changes had tumors that repeatedly showed enlargement and/or collapse of the cystic component. Follow-up MR studies revealed fluid-fluid levels in five of 22 patients with cystic components in the tumor. (10)
  12. 12. : (11)
  13. 13. 6)Conclusion: Serial MR studies of unilateral vestibular schwannomas treated with gamma knife radiosurgery showed that temporary enlargement of tumor occurred in 41% of cases. Temporary enlargement occurred mostly within the first 2 years after radiosurgery. Subsequent regression of tumor volume occurred during and after the second year following radiosurgery. Because such enlargement within 2 years after gamma knife radiosurgery is usually followed by regression, close follow-up with neuroimaging is desirable in these cases. Transient loss of contrast enhancement after gamma knife radiosurgery was recognized in most cases, but was not necessarily a useful prognostic sign. Gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas was effective for both small and large tumors up to 4 cm in largest diameter and for solid tumors and tumors with cystic components. However, the behavior of the cystic component can make the tumor volume unpredictable. Serial MR studies may show that the tumor is stable after the third year following radiosurgery. The EnD (12)