How do Planets And Stars Originate?Summary: Creation of planets and stars is generally held to be the result of somecatast...
(without external intervention) lead to order which is than determined andguided by laws of Physics.Theories abound where ...
Evolution has to be involution rather than revolution i.e. a change from withinrather than a change from without.Generally...
Professor Ian Campbell & Hugh O Neil of Australian National University on29.03.2012 reported to Eagle.com that earth does ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

How do planets and stars originate

1,215 views

Published on

Summary: Creation of planets and stars is generally held to be the result of some catastrophe. However, this is not correct. It has to be in accordance with natural laws and one such law is Titus – Bode Law. Every planet and star being a discrete entity can have a characteristic chemical composition.

Author: Dr Mahesh C. Jain is a practicing medical doctor has written the book “Encounter of Science with Philosophy – A synthetic view”. The book begins with first chapter devoted to scientifically valid concept of God and then explains cosmic phenomena right from origin of nature and universe up to origin of life and evolution of man. The book includes several chapters devoted to auxiliary concepts and social sciences as corollaries to the concept of God. This is the only book which deals with origin of nature and universe from null or Zero or nothing. This article is inspired by author’s understanding of nature.
Visit:http:// www.sciencengod.com
http://www.sciencengod.com/clipboard.htm

Published in: Education, Technology, Spiritual
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,215
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

How do planets and stars originate

  1. 1. How do Planets And Stars Originate?Summary: Creation of planets and stars is generally held to be the result of somecatastrophe. However, this is not correct. It has to be in accordance with naturallaws and one such law is Titus – Bode Law. Every planet and star being a discreteentity can have a characteristic chemical composition.Western philosophers and scientists have one thing in common. Both areunanimous in their belief that nature and universe advanced throughcatastrophes, cataclysms, chaos, upheavals, accidents, random events etc. onlybecause they have no scientific explanation to offer. Even in human society‘Revolution’ is an attractive slogan as a means to advancement of human society.Theory of Catastrophism was advanced by Cuvier in 1812 to reconcile geologywith Moses account of creation in Genesis in Bible. Cuvier was a greatcomparative anatomist of 19th century. He appreciated complexities of theprocess of creation in general and origin of species in particular. To explain originsand creations, he preferred to attribute it to direct intervention of creativepowers i.e. Supernatural God.Darwin likewise attributed biological evolution to accumulation of randomvariations without ever bothering to explain as to how random variations canaccount for large number of coordinated variations which accompany origin ofspecies. He out-rightly ignored the collateral issues of identity and integrity ofspecies and varieties that permit only a limited change in any species and varietyas a result of variations.In twentieth century, Physicists attributed origin of universe to Big Bang withoutever explaining nature and source of dense matter, only because straight lineextrapolation of one particular line of thinking leads to Big Bang. All theirreconcilable differences with collateral evidence and issues were out rightlyignored. No proponent of Big Bang theory has ever bothered to explain as to howthe assumed chaos that presumably preceded Big Bang could ever spontaneously
  2. 2. (without external intervention) lead to order which is than determined andguided by laws of Physics.Theories abound where nature’s creativity is sought to be explained on the basisof Entropy that accompanies each and every irreversible physical and chemicalchange. In all these theories Entropy was assumed to be directing and drivingcreations and origins. The question of ‘How’ was out-rightly ignored. Thesetheories never explained as to how Entropy which is nothing but dissipation ordecay of thermal energy into universal heat sink, could ever account for creationeven if in general. These theorists built elaborate theories but never botheredthemselves to explain specificity of creations and origins.Pre-biotic soup, which must have preceded origin of life and should have led toorigin of life in a kaleidoscopic manner through a series of random events, has tilldate found no evidence in support of its existence. Even theories which postulateextra-terrestrial origin of life and its subsequent plantation on earth, besidesbeing irrational are struggling for evidence in their support.It is pertinent to ask oneself many questions while dealing with the issue ofnatural origins and creations.How can chaos ever lead to order without external intervention?What about self-organizing, self-sustaining character and nature of universe.What about constancy of natural laws in a universe advancing throughcatastrophes, cataclysms, chaos, upheavals, accidents, random events etc.?Why shouldn’t natural laws also keep changing in such a universe?What about scientific predictions of the past and future in a universe devoid ofconstant natural laws.Therefore all acts of natural origin and creation have to be explained with dueregard to constancy of natural laws, collateral facts and issues.Nature can’t advance through cataclysms and catastrophes.
  3. 3. Evolution has to be involution rather than revolution i.e. a change from withinrather than a change from without.Generally speaking all planets and stars and other celestial bodies revolve instable elliptical orbits. Circular orbits could have been easily explained on thebasis of balancing of gravitational force and centrifugal force. But this is not truefor elliptical orbits. Stable elliptical orbits involve precise inter-conversion ofkinetic energy of the planet into potential energy. Control and regulation of thisphenomenon is beyond comprehension on the basis of known laws of Physics.Therefore, to explain formation of any planet, star and any other celestial body onthe basis of some catastrophic, cataclysmic event is clearly farfetched.Concomitant to the said catastrophic, cataclysmic event shall be the issue of theirplacement in stable elliptical orbits and sustaining them in those elliptical orbitsas is the case with artificial satellites. How shall that be managed?Planets, stars and other celestial bodies can form only in strict compliance withapplicable natural laws and at the same time satisfying all the conditionsmandatory to their existence. Therefore their formation as a result of somecataclysm or catastrophe is highly improbable.Hence in my view planets, stars and other celestial bodies form as a result ofcondensation of solid dust and gas clouds at specific loci in space. At its specificlocus, a celestial body is naturally self-sustaining but how is a matter of furtherinvestigation. What natural laws and other factors determine such spatial locicapable of serving as home to celestial bodies is again a matter of furtherinvestigation. But one such law already known is Titus - Bode Law.Under these conditions every celestial body is a discrete entity and may haveunique laws of behavior, natural history and chemical composition. Chemicalcomposition of one celestial body may not necessarily be relatable to chemicalcomposition of another. The process of their formation has to be essentially non-catastrophic and non-cataclysmic. However some time in future it may bepossible to classify celestial bodies into various types based on similarities of theirchemical composition.
  4. 4. Professor Ian Campbell & Hugh O Neil of Australian National University on29.03.2012 reported to Eagle.com that earth does not have the same chemicalcomposition as Sun implying that earth did not originate from sun.Junjun Zhang and Colleagues at Origins Lab at University of Chicago reported on27.03.2012 that chemical composition of moon can’t be explained on the basis ofGiant Impact Theory. Visit:http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/03/new-evidence-nixes-giant-impact-theory-of-moons-origin.htmlAuthor: Dr Mahesh C. Jain is a practicing medical doctor has written the book“Encounter of Science with Philosophy – A synthetic view”. The book begins withfirst chapter devoted to scientifically valid concept of God and then explainscosmic phenomena right from origin of nature and universe up to origin of lifeand evolution of man. The book includes several chapters devoted to auxiliaryconcepts and social sciences as corollaries to the concept of God. This is the onlybook which deals with origin of nature and universe from null or Zero or nothing.This article is inspired by author’s understanding of nature.Visit:http:// www.sciencengod.com http://www.sciencengod.com/clipboard.htm

×