Arguments        and Counter-arguments         forOpen Access Publishing
     It is not possible to   completely finance theauthor-pays (Gold) model; inaddition to this, allocation of  funds may...
   Self-archiving (Green) model is also     available where funds run out. Institutions are working on formula to allocat...
 Journals with high impactfactors that authors want topublish in are not compliant .
 The paper should have its intrinsicvalue independent of the journal itis published in. Increased visibility   as a resul...
   Findability andacademic reputation  world-wide will      decrease.
  There are many reputable publishersand journals with Open Access business     models, such as BioMed Central,  Hindawi,...
 The peer reviewprocess will be by-passed, leading todeclining quality inpapers published.
      Peer-review does not happen in traditional  publishing only. Scholars who peer-review papers    generally do this f...
Permissions are tooliberal and authors do not want third  parties to make profit out of their      papers.
Public has the right to access research output funded by themselves, the tax    payer. As for commercial re-usepermission...
There are legal concerns andplagiarism may    spread.
     In Open Access publishing, authors retainexploitation rights rather than signing them over topublishers. Mandated Cr...
From closed…
…to Open Access
Unlock the potential of your research!
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Arguments for Open Access

989 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
989
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
664
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Arguments for Open Access

  1. 1. Arguments and Counter-arguments forOpen Access Publishing
  2. 2.  It is not possible to completely finance theauthor-pays (Gold) model; inaddition to this, allocation of funds may not be fair and there could be favouritism.
  3. 3.  Self-archiving (Green) model is also available where funds run out. Institutions are working on formula to allocate funds in an objective manner based on quantity of research output.This is the criterion used by funders too when allocating annual block grants to institutions for paid (Gold) publishing.However, self-archiving (Green) option is no less valuable than the paid (Gold) route.
  4. 4.  Journals with high impactfactors that authors want topublish in are not compliant .
  5. 5.  The paper should have its intrinsicvalue independent of the journal itis published in. Increased visibility as a result of Open Access will provide higher citation rates.
  6. 6.  Findability andacademic reputation world-wide will decrease.
  7. 7.  There are many reputable publishersand journals with Open Access business models, such as BioMed Central, Hindawi, PLoS ONE to cite some few. DOAJ – Directory of Open Access Journals indexes the contents of Open Access journals. Contents of open institutional repositories, e.g. QMRO,are indexed by OpenDOAR – Directory of Open Access Repositories.
  8. 8.  The peer reviewprocess will be by-passed, leading todeclining quality inpapers published.
  9. 9.  Peer-review does not happen in traditional publishing only. Scholars who peer-review papers generally do this for free and therefore do not necessarily profit from journals with traditional publishing models. However, they may even profit from peer-reviewing for Open Access publishers when a work is published under the paid (Gold) route. Consequently, Open Access publishing does not mean the demise of peer-review and lack of quality control – on the contrary, funders are onlyinterested in peer-reviewed work and making them openly accessible.
  10. 10. Permissions are tooliberal and authors do not want third parties to make profit out of their papers.
  11. 11. Public has the right to access research output funded by themselves, the tax payer. As for commercial re-usepermissions, this will allow companiesthat fund research to make use of thatresearch output for innovations whichwill benefit all and there will be greater research efficiency through early discussion of findings.
  12. 12. There are legal concerns andplagiarism may spread.
  13. 13.  In Open Access publishing, authors retainexploitation rights rather than signing them over topublishers. Mandated Creative Commons Licences do require acknowledgement of the author andcopyright legislation still applies. Papers which are openly accessible make the risk of un-attributedcopying or paraphrasing less hazardous than most, being easier to identify and detect from source.The accessibility and metadata tagging function ofOpen Access will make it easier to recognise those committing intentional plagiarism and breaching intellectual property and/or copyright.
  14. 14. From closed…
  15. 15. …to Open Access
  16. 16. Unlock the potential of your research!

×