J. secker mhrn presentation

173 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
173
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

J. secker mhrn presentation

  1. 1. Service users’ experiences of returning to paid employment Jenny Secker Professor of Mental Health Anglia Ruskin University/ South Essex Partnership Trust
  2. 2. Overview• Study context• Aims and methods• Participants and their jobs• Results:• Perceived barriers to work• Experience of barriers• Job satisfaction• Impact of work on participants’ lives• Conclusions
  3. 3. Study context• SESAMI (Social Inclusion through Supported Employment for people with Mental Illness; Schneider J., Secker J., Floyd M. & Grove B.)• 2-year naturalistic study designed to contribute to knowledge of what works to enable people with severe and enduring mental health problems find & keep a job• Carried out in partnership with 6 of the largest employment support providers in England• 5 main strands:• Assessment of fidelity to IPS principles & factors influencing this• Identification of work outcomes at 12 months• Predictors for moving into work• Exploration of clients’ and providers’ views about what works• In-depth study of the perceptions and experiences of those who had moved into work.
  4. 4. Aims• To explore:• Preconceived and experienced barriers to getting back to work• Job satisfaction• Impact of working on participants’ livesMethods• In-depth interviews (40 - 75 minutes)• Semi-structured with questions framed broadly to allow flexibility• Audio-recorded and fully transcribed• Analysed thematically following Miles & Huberman (1984)
  5. 5. Participants & their jobs (1)• 20 clients of 5 partner agencies (33% of those in work at 12 months after baseline)• Majority male (13/20) & White British (17/20)• Average age 41 years (range 27-64)• Length of tenure:• 9 = <6 months• 6 = 1-4 years• 5 = >6 years
  6. 6. Participants & their jobs (2)• Occupational categories:• 5 = Professional /Associated professional & technical• 5 = Administrative & secretarial• 1 = Skilled trades• 1 = Personal service• 3 = Sales & customer service• 1 = Process, plant and machine operatives• 4 = Elementary occupations
  7. 7. Anticipated barriers• Fear of disclosure often based on previous experience:It’s been my experience that people who know about it take advantage of it.• Disjointed job historyIf you’ve got a big gap on your CV it can be very troublesome can’t it, trying to explain that gap?
  8. 8. Experiences of disclosure• 14 participants had disclosed their mental health problems:I think I needed people to know that I am poorly and that’s why I behave in certain ways in certain times … and I think I needed them to make allowances for that.• Despite initial fears responses were reassuring:I don’t know why it came up but it came up and I mentioned it and she said, ‘Oh, thank you for disclosing that’, you know, ‘I appreciate that’.• But adjustments only explicitly discussed in 3 cases:1.Agreed no adjustments needed2.Time off for meeting with employment support worker3.Plan of action agreed should participant become unwell
  9. 9. Experiences of dealing with gaps in work history• Most received effective support to find constructive approaches: Because I’d been through the course and all that I was actually able to portray it in a positive light, ‘Well yeah, because I’ve had this time off work I now know I’m ready to go back and I’ve had a chance to really look at what I want to do’…• Responses were again reassuring:…They didn’t even ask me any more about it, what they were interested was how I was going to be able to deal with the job now.
  10. 10. Occupational health: an unanticipated barrier• Delays in obtaining clearanceThe only thing that was holding it up was the occupational health. I mean I was really worried about that, that I was going to be told I couldn’t start. It annoyed me because they gave me this appointment which took weeks to come through.• Focus on negativesI had to go for an appointment with the occupational health doctor and he threw up just absolutely everything that was negative about my past. He didn’t look at it as, well you know you’ve just dome two months of very intensive work and you’ve come out of that, you’ve done voluntary work and you’ve done training before that, it was just, well you haven’t worked for 5 years, how do you think you can cope with a full time job.
  11. 11. Job satisfaction (1)• 9 participants were very positive about their job:• Right balance between work demands and sufficient challenge• Supportive workplaceThat’s what I enjoy. If you’re not thinking , you’re not alive are you?She’s the type of person you could go to and just talk about anything…it’s very relaxed and so if there’s a problem I can go and talk to her.They are very supportive and the people are just the best.
  12. 12. Job satisfaction (2)• Others enjoyed aspects but also described some problems:• Working conditions• Lack of control and role clarityHe just said when can you start, there are so many hours and I don’tgive breaks. I thought he’s got to be joking, not getting breaks, but hewasn’t. And that was it, that was the interview.It can get monotonous. Sometimes the worst thing is I have to requestlots of information from other people and if they don’t return it I get intotrouble… So it is stressful.On a practical level, it would help if my boss gave me a job descriptionand we both stuck to it.• But for most participants advantages outweighed disadvantages
  13. 13. Job satisfaction (3)• 2 participants from one agency described experiences of discrimination in addition to other problems:The odd comments that he has made have been snidey, rather than supportive and helpful, ‘you’re not the full shilling’ and things like that, all very hurtful.I’m concerned about the levels of discrimination between what you would call the employer’s real staff and us, the [employment support agency] staff. When you’re equally qualified to do the job but someone’s getting £17,000 and you’re getting £11,000, you’re thinking. Does that qualify as discrimination?
  14. 14. Impact on participants’ lives (1)• Improving mental health:• Confidence• HopeI’m not as shy as I used to be, I’m more outgoing, I can talk to people, whereas before I just used to shy away and just sit in the house nearly all the time... I might not be here now if I hadn’t got a job.I feel more stable in my head… to have a job now is very good and only more positive things can come out of it.
  15. 15. Impact on participants’ lives (2)• Social recovery• Structured day• Sense of achievement• A ‘normal’ identity• Financial independenceIt’s something to keep me going, I couldn’t stay at home. I’d get very very bored, I’d go backwards in my health.I feel satisfied at the end of the day. It gives you something to live for really, doesn’t it?It’s really good to feel normal. It’s such a difference. The world of the ill and the world of the sane. Two different worlds. Yeah, it feels great.It’s great having the money coming in, earning you know, earning the money that I’m living on rather than getting it from the state.
  16. 16. Conclusions• Much of participants’ experience no different from anyone else:• A normal distribution of occupational categories• Support, role clarity and appropriate control over workload all commonly associated with high levels of job satisfaction• Tolerance of less than ideal aspects in light of advantages• (The right) job brings mental health and social benefits• Perceived barriers could be overcome through effective employment support• ‘Toxic jobs’ could result from ineffective employment support• Occupational health procedures an issue for vocational services?
  17. 17. Thank you for listening Any questions?

×