Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Jennie Stephens 2013 masccc

397 views

Published on

Clark University

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Jennie Stephens 2013 masccc

  1. 1. The Smart Grid Vision & SustainabilityJennie C. Stephens, Ph.D.Associate Professor of Environmental Science and PolicyDepartment of International Development, Community and EnvironmentA Smarter Grid and a Wiser CommunityDCU Center, Worcester, MAApril 24, 2013Transmission linesBeijing ChinaWorcester Green Jobs CoalitionHull Wind Turbine
  2. 2. Mechanisms for University’s to Contributeto SustainabilityTeachingTransdisciplinary courses/degrees teaching skills of integration, synthesis, andsystems thinking – how to cope with complex interconnections, service learningResearchFaculty and students conduct research that contributes to confrontingsustainability challengesCampus as a Model for SocietyCampus Operations, demonstrating role, the campus as a microcosm of societyService within the CommunityUnique anchor /intermediary organizationsAbility for long-term thinking, Convening RoleStephens, JC, et al. (2008). Higher Education as a Change Agent forSustainability in Different Cultures and Contexts. InternationalJournal of Sustainability in Higher Education 9 (3): 317-338
  3. 3. IncreasingCO2 concentrationsWorld Energy 1850-20000501001502002503003504004505001850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000YearEJ/yearGasOilCoalNuclearHydro +BiomassIncreasingglobal energydemandClimate Change Primarily an Energy Problem:Reliance on fossil-fuel based energy systemsAIM NASA 2012Holdren, 2006
  4. 4. Why are energy systems difficult to change?Social dynamics of energy technology innovationSocio-technical system changeWith graduate students atHull Wind TurbineWindMarris, 2008Smart GridGeothermalCarbon Neutral, 2013
  5. 5. Health/safetyCultural PoliticalTechnical EconomicEnvironmentalEnergyTechnologyDeploymentSPEED (Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment)A framework to assess the complexity of perspectives influencing energytechnology deployment: How is discourse of technologies framed?Environmental Communication ResearchHow are emerging energy technologies talked about? What frames?What factors influence perceptions of emerging energy technologies?
  6. 6. GenerationTransmissionDistributionConsumptionblackhillsenergy.comStorageSMART GRID: A Shared Vision of Electricity System ChangeIncreasingly used term - incorporates multiple technologiesInformation Communication Technology (ICT),Renewables, Energy Storage Technology, SensorsAdvanced Metering Infrastructure – Smart Metersand more……Smart GridA shared vision of change,but different priorities in- What technologies?- How much change ?
  7. 7. Source: FERC, 2012Smart Grid Research:How does social and political context for Smart Grid compare regionally?What are different priorities and can they be aligned?METHODSFocus GroupsInterviewsMedia AnalysisPolicy AnalysisFinancial Support: NSF Science, Technology & Society Program NSF-SES1127697NSF RAPID Grant Science, Technology & Society (NSF-SES 1316442)
  8. 8. How is “Smart Grid” presented in the media?NumberofNewspaperArticlesA20072009201219982002American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
  9. 9. Different Smart Grid TechnologiesTechnologies   Examples  Transmission  and  Distribu/on   power  lines,    transformers,  voltage,  AC,  DC,  relays,  capacitors  Smart  meter   Smart  meter,  advanced  meter  Energy  Storage   ba>eries,  fly  wheels  Sensors,  informa/on  and  communica/on  technologies     sensors,  soAware,  hardware,  SCADA  Renewable  genera/on   wind,  solar,  photovoltaic  Electric  vehicles   Prius,  Tessla  Consumer  load  appliances   programmable  dishwashers,  air-­‐condi/oning  Consumer  interface  tools   websites,  apps,  cellphone  
  10. 10. How do different actors perceive and frame Smart Grid?Extensive Focus Group Data CollectionEach focus group 5-8 individuals from the same organization, 32 completedShaded boxes represent focus groups planned – not yet occurredMinnesota  MISOTexas              ERCOTMassachusetts    ISO-­‐NEIllinois            MISOVermont            ISO-­‐NENew  York  NYISOLarge  Utilities Xcel Oncor National  Grid COM-­‐EDGreen  Mountain  PowerNew  York  Power  AuthorityMunicipal/Coop  UtilitiesGreat  River  EnergyAustin  Energy,  College  Station  UtilitiesShrewsbury  Electric  &  Cable  OperationsEnergy  Services  Division  U  of  ILBurlington  Electric  Long  Island  Light  &  PowerRegional  Transmission  Organizations MISO ERCOT ISO-­‐NE   MISO ISO-­‐NE   New  York    ISOState  RegulatorsMN  State  Energy  OfficeTX  Public  Utility  Commission  MA  Dept.  of  Public  Utilities  IL  Dept.  of  Commerce  &  Economic  OpportunityVT  Department  of  Public  Service New  York  StateConsumer/NonprofitGreat  Plains  InstituteMass  Energy  Consumer  Alliance  Citizens  Utility  Board,  Perfect  Power  InstituteVT  Public  Interest  Research  Group  Techies/Academics UM  EE  StudentsTAMU  engineer  studentsWorcester  Polytechnic  Institute  Illinois  Institute  of  Technology   U.  of  VT SUNYEnvironmental  groupTheodore  Roosevelt  Conservation  PartnershipConservation  Law  Foundation  Illinois  Sierra  ClubVT  Energy  Investment  CorporationEnvironmental  Defense
  11. 11. Key Actors Priorities & PerspectivesConsumers Reliability, low-rates,limited influenceGovernment (National, State, Local) Jurisdictionally complex regulationPrivate Sector Accountable to shareholdersElectric Utilities Maintaining reliable service,responding to consumersTechnology companies Innovative & entrepreneurialEnvironmental advocates Low carbon shift & renewable energyEnergy system researchers Technologically optimisticKey Actors’ Smart Grid Priorities Linked to Institutional Structures
  12. 12. Tension: Centralization vs. DecentralizationCentralized – Supergrid with LongDistance TransmissionMore centralized control,advantages of scaleDesertecDesertec - Eumena 2012Decentralized Local EnergySystemsMore local control, morecommunity connections,distributed powerSmart Grid Enterprise 2013
  13. 13. Different Perspectives on How MuchChange in the Smart Grid VisionRadicalChangeIncrementalChangeTechnological nirvanapotential to solve allenergy related problemsUpgrades, modernizationof current systemImproving status quo
  14. 14. Superstorm Sandy – Oct (28-30) 2012NASA GEOS-13 View, October 28, 2012 Cover page. Bloomberg Businessweek.November 1, 2012.$65.6 billion – estimated cost of devastation and disruption•  Highlighted vulnerability of energy systems – our increasing reliance on electricity for basicneeds: communication, health, food, etc.•  Reintroduced climate change into political discourse of the 2012 Presidential election –previously conspicuously absent•  New awareness about energy infrastructure investments and climate change preparednessShift to include climate adaptation as well as climate mitigation
  15. 15. Smart Grid and Sustainability•  Smart Grid an umbrella term – shared vision▫  Development influenced by different socio-politicalcontexts▫  Multiple technologies included in the vision•  Key actors motivated by different priorities▫  Decentralization vs. centralization▫  Incremental vs radical change•  Smart Grid has climate adaptation potential as wellas climate mitigation potential▫  Superstorm Sandy highlighted our vulnerability anddependence on electricity systems
  16. 16. AcknowledgementsTarla Rai PetersonTexas A&MElizabeth WilsonU of MinnesotaThanks to many who havecontributed and participatedFinancial SupportNSF Grant Science, Technology and SocietyProgram (NSF-SES 1127697)NSF RAPID Grant Science, Technology & Society(NSF-SES 1316442)Logistical SupportPamela Dunkle & Marsh InstituteClark UniversityResearch CollaboratorsResearch TeamRia LangheimES&P MS ‘13Xiao ChenES&P MS ‘13Ryan CollinsES&P MS/MBA ‘15Will MaxwellEcon/ES&P BA ‘15Melissa SkubelES&P BA’13ES&P MS ‘14Sophia Ran WangES&P MS ‘13James MeadowcroftCarletonAndrea ParkerSUNY-ESFLauren ZeimmerES BA’13ES&P MS ‘14
  17. 17. Landscape for work in sustainability is changingConventional rules, normsand relationships amongactors may no longer bepractical.Working together amongkey actors essential –trying to understand eachother’s priorities Photo courtesy of Didac FerrarPublications available upon requestEmail: jstephens@clarku.eduWebsite: http://wordpress.clarku.edu/jstephens/

×