Advertisement

Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf

Agri-Food Business Marketing & Recruitment Consultant at de Paor Consultancy
Mar. 28, 2023
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Advertisement
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf
Upcoming SlideShare
Forage guide 2020_mon_30thForage guide 2020_mon_30th
Loading in ... 3
1 of 52
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Forage_Guide_2023 (4).pdf

  1. FORAGE AND NUTRITION GUIDE €5 2023 IRISH FARMERS MONTHLY Forage_Guide_2023.indd 1 27/03/2023 16:48
  2. 48 www.mchale.net Superior Forage Solutions FIXED CHAMBER BALER RANGE 15 Knife Chopper Unit (Selectable Knives Optional) Wizard Plus Control Console AS STANDARD AS STANDARD Irish Sales Rep.- James Heanue- 087 247 2399 CALLTODAY * Offer Available in Ireland Only. Terms and Conditions Apply. For Full Details Contact McHale. 2.1m Pick Up with Adaptive Intake AS STANDARD 15 Knife Fixed Chamber Baler NEW Adaptive Intake AS STANDARD + Automatically adjusts for light and heavy crops + Larger Rotor + Camless Pick Up (Optional) + Larger Augers Adaptive Intake Features CALLTODAY Finance* Available Forage_Guide_2023.indd 48 16/03/2023 15:03 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 2 27/03/2023 16:48
  3. 3 4 Introduction 6 News 12 Machinery news 16 More Intensive N Regulations Penalises Productivity 18 Making Better Quality and More Cost-E�fective Baled Silage 22 Managing Young Stock at Grass 25 Silage Harvesting in Ireland 27 Grazing the Green Stu�f: A Double-edged Sword 29 Renewable Energy: What’s in it for Farmers? 31 Leading Dairy Tech Company Helps Tackle Farm Emissions and Improve Sustainability 33 Optimise Milk Fat Production for Economic Reward 37 New Technology for Livestock Farmers 39 Plan Ahead for Better 2023 Silage 40 Farming for the Future 42 Increasing E���ciency Sustainably Reduces Cost 44 Carbery Milk Quality and Sustainability Award Winning Dairy Farmer 46 Pro��table Lamb Production 48 Feeling Social 49 Digest-It Slurry Treatment Editor: Liam de Paor Design: Niall O’Brien Commercial and Advertising Manager: Anna Douglas Advertising Manager: Brian Murphy Machinery Correspondent: Noel Dunne Chief Executive: Rebecca Markey Publisher: David Markey Accounts: Tricia Murtagh Administration & Subscriptions: Sue Nolan Publishers: IFP Media Forage & Nutrition Guide 2023, IFP Media, Castlecourt, Monkstown Farm, Monkstown, Co. Dublin A96 P924. Tel: +353 1 709 6900 • Fax: +353 1 709 6933 Email: info@ifpmedia.com • www.irishfarmersmonthly.com Copyright IFP Media 2023. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form without the express written permission of the publishers. 3 Increasing E���ciency Sustainably Reduces Cost Carbery Milk Quality and Sustainability Award CONTENTS t 9 23 15:03 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 3 27/03/2023 16:48
  4. 4 While the total number of cattle dropped by 1.5 per cent in December 2022 compared to the same period last year, the number of dairy cows rose slightly to 1.51 million (+0.3 per cent). The number of other cows fell by 27,900. The total number of cattle aged 1-2 years grew by 34,500, while cattle aged 2 years and over rose by 5,200. The provisional ��gures for sheep numbers show a slight increase of 2,800 compared to December 2021. The number of breeding sheep was down by 43,500 while the number of other sheep increased by 46,300. So, livestock numbers are at a record level while silage stocks are lower due to much higher fertiliser prices and a consequent fall in its usage. According to the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, total fertiliser sales are expected to be approximately 20 per cent lower than 2021. However, the good news is that, due to new technology, livestock farmers can signi��cantly improve silage quality and greatly reduce in store DM losses by using a quality silage additive and the innovative Film&Film system for baled silage. Last year, farm gate prices for cattle, lamb and beef were excellent and the future looks good for the agri sector as the world population continues to grow. 2023 is not a great year for lamb producers, however sheep are a complementary enterprise for many beef and tillage farmers. Overhead costs are low compared to other livestock and sheep can graze land unsuitable for cattle on hilly land or on soft ground. Hopefully, in due course, a pro��table market will be found for wool, perhaps in the insulation sector. As the standard of living improves, families in Africa, Asia and the Middle East can a�ford to consume more dairy products and eat more of our grass-fed meat. By 2050, food production will have to increase by 50 per cent to feed the growing world population and to improve the health of the undernourished people in the third world. Unfortunately, as Matt O’Kee�fe explains in his article, more intensive N regulations are penalising productivity on dairy farms. Dairy farmers, in particular, are under intense scrutiny by urban-based environmental activists who see food production as a problem, while often ignoring the need to feed the world or the fact that EU imports of beef and feed soya are farmed on former Brazilian forest land. Fortunately, agri IT is enabling farmers to save labour and time while improving all aspects on beef, crop, lamb and milk production. The young farmer today is better educated than ever and we are turning out a record number of ag graduates from 15 third level institutions on the island. Another issue to note is that, with a rapidly aging farmer population, it is much easier for progressive young farmers to lease extra land from their elderly neighbours, many of whom have no successors. As always, excellent advice and research information is available from Teagasc, UCD, AFBI, as well as other research institutions in Britain. This publication has some excellent examples of how modern technology is helping farmers to cope with these issues, reduce costs and to improve farm incomes. Livestock farmers need to plan for more feed security through some diversi��cation from grassland. Leasing, renting or purchasing extra grassland is not a viable option for most beef or milk producers. However, using a TMR system to bu�fer feed their stock during poor grass growing conditions, or when problems arise from an early winter or a late spring, is certainly an option. To ensure adequate future feed supplies, they could contract with local tillage farms to grow barley, purchase straw, grow fodder beet, forage maize and ��eld beans – all of which would ensure a tasty and nutritious diet for their valuable stock. Aside from ��eld beans, another option to reduce imports of soya beans is to grow Lucerne silage. As it is a legume, it needs no N, is high in protein (18–25 per cent) and grows well under drought conditions. It is also a good complement to maize silage because it is high in the nutrients that are low in maize. Using more homegrown feed ingredients can also reduce our carbon footprint. For example, a typical feed compounders ration containing Irish grain and protein has a carbon footprint of 46 per cent lower than one containing imported maize and soya. I hope you enjoy this issue, Liam de Paor, Editor. INTRODUCTION Welcome to this year’s issue of the Forage & Nutrition Guide – where we have compiled a wide selection of features and interviews focused on this sector and we hope you find them informative. Forage_ Forage_Guide_2023.indd 4 27/03/2023 16:48
  5. 48 In 2021 and 2022 feeding Equaliser® Cream improved milk income on Irish farms by €2422 per month*, with an average uplift in milk butterfat of 0.33% within 7 days and 0.51% within 1 month of feeding. www.provimi.eu/uk-equaliser @CargillAnimalNutritionIreland T Michael Luttrell (Republic of Ireland) +353 86 254 8827 Gordon Richardson (West and Northern Ireland) +353 87 6191616 E reception@cargill.com Contact us today to maintain your herd performance this spring! *Average daily income per cow improved by 80c. Monthly figures based on a 100 cow herd. So good the cows want it back in their ration Forage_Guide_2023.indd 48 16/03/2023 15:03 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 5 27/03/2023 16:48
  6. 6 BREWER’S YEAST REDUCES METHANE PRODUCTION IN COWS Brewer’s yeast used to make beer is typically discarded once it’s no longer needed. Sometimes, though, the leftover yeast is mixed into livestock feed as a source of protein and vitamins. Now, there may be even more reason to continue the practice, according to the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in the USA. Laboratory results the team published in the journal Frontiers in Animal Science suggest that using leftover brewer›s yeast as a feed additive may benefit the environment by helping cows belch less methane into the air. Agriculture accounts for 11 per cent of all US greenhouse gas emissions (5,981 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent), with ruminant animals including cows responsible for more than a quarter of that total, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Methane from cows is a waste by-product arising from the fermentation activity of certain kinds of microbes, called methanogens, in the rumen. Another group of rumen microbes, known as “hyper-ammonia- producing bacteria,” are behind the animal’s excretion of ammonia, a potential air- and water-quality concern. The microbes’ production of methane and ammonia from food the cow eats also robs the animal of amino acids needed for growth and milk production, explained Michael Flythe, a research microbiologist with the ARS Forage-Animal Production Research Unit in Lexington, Kentucky. Flythe’s co-investigation of the preventive role that brewer’s yeast may play is part of an ongoing effort to develop natural alternatives to using expensive protein supplements and monensin (a special class of ionophore antibiotic only approved for use in cattle) to keep the gas-producing microbes in check. A prior focus on that front has included incorporating red clover into the animal’s diet. Most recently, Flythe teamed with Robert Bryant (ASR) and Rhys Burns, Christopher Feidler-Cree and Denia Carlton and Langdon Martin — all of WWC (Warren Wilson College) — to explore the preventive potential of leftover brewer’s yeast, which ferment grains used in making ale, lager and other types of beer. According to a 2019 study, brewers in the EU generate 6 million tons of SBGs annually and 1m tonnes of spent brewer’s yeast. During the brewing process, the yeast, known as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, absorb humolones, lupolones and other compounds from hops that contribute to beer’s flavour and aroma. Humolones and lupolones are both biologically active molecules that inhibit certain bacteria and other microbes, including those that trigger the cow’s release of methane and ammonia. But until recently, little research had been done to learn whether leftover brewer’s yeast enriched with hops compounds could be just as effective at controlling the rumen microbes’ noxious ways. To find out, the researchers took samples of spent brewer’s yeast used to make six different kinds of beer at a local brewery and added them to flasks containing live cultures of either methane, or ammonia-producing microbes. After a 24-hour incubation period, the researchers sampled the gases and analysed them, observing a direct correlation between the concentration of hops compounds in the spent yeast and the amount of gas produced. The team also used baker’s yeast and monensin as controls for comparison. Not surprisingly, the baker’s yeast, which had not been exposed to hops during the brewing process, failed to tamp down microbes’ production of the gases. However, the spent brewer’s yeast — flush with the hops compounds it had absorbed — curbed the microbes’ methane production by 25 per cent on average — a reduction comparable to monensin. Although spent brewer’s yeast is sometimes used as a livestock feed additive, Flythe said cow feeding trials would still be necessary to fully assess its potential to reduce methane and ammonia on a farm scale. Those results, in turn, should give a better idea of the yeast’s potential role as part of a larger, integrated approach to making animal agriculture more environmentally sustainable, Flythe added. G F B W M • • • • Forage_ Forage_Guide_2023.indd 6 27/03/2023 16:48
  7. 48 GET IN LINE NOW FOR THE BEST SMALL SQUARE BALER ON THE MARKET is a global brand of AGCO Corporation. W W W . M A S S E Y F E R G U S O N . C O . U K MF 1840 & MF 1842S IN-LINE BALERS • COMPACT DIMENSIONS AND UNRIVALLED PERFORMANCE • CENTRE LINE DESIGN FOR STRAIGHT THROUGH CROP FLOW ENSURING PERFECT SHAPED BALES • 2.0M WIDE LOW PROFILE PICK-UP WITH A NARROW TRANSPORT WIDTH OF 2.64M • EVEN WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON EACH SIDE, FITTED WITH FLOATATION TYRES AS STANDARD TO REDUCE GROUND COMPACTION Forage_Guide_2023.indd 48 16/03/2023 15:02 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 7 27/03/2023 16:48
  8. 8 VIRTUAL FENCING FOR GALLOWAY CATTLE ON TORY ISLAND BIODIVERSITY PROJECT Using a combination of Global Positioning System (GPS) sensors, wireless technologies and remote mapping, virtual fencing aims to keep animals contained in certain areas. When the livestock approaches the virtual boundary, a GPS collar will emit a sound that increases in volume. The animal gets an electrical pulse if they cross the coordinates of the perimeter fence. In order for the technology to be successful, the training process for the animals and farmers is a key factor to ensure that animal welfare and environmental obligations are to the fore. Cattle have been reintroduced to Tory Island for the first time in 25 years. As part of the Corncrake/Traonach LIFE Project, five Galloway heifers made the 9-mile trip from Seanie Boyle’s farm on the mainland to their new home. A virtual fence is used to keep them grazing on the target fields and from damaging the lawns of local residents. Tory Island is one of the most remote inhabited islands of Ireland, with a population of only 120 people. It is hoped that the hardy Galloway breed will create the ideal habitats for corncrakes to nest and rear chicks. To date, the grazing project is working well as the cattle now have the rank grass grazed back and under control. The corncrake is part of Ireland’s heritage, celebrated in poems and stories for over 1,000 years. Tory Island is a critically important summer breeding ground for their ever- dwindling population, before the birds migrate to southern Africa for the winter months. According to Dr John Carey who manages the project, corncrakes do not favour unmanaged or poorly grown grassland. Farmers are helping to preserve the species, and there is a legal obligation on Ireland to protect corncrakes, so farmers are providing an important biodiversity service. CASE STUDY FOR DIGEST-IT Dairygold milk supplier Mitchell Hayes from Blarney, Co. Cork, has used Digest-it to ease slurry management as it reduces agitation time by 75 per cent. In addition, there has been a marked reduction in odour, including ammonia emissions. With Mitchell wanting to maintain grass production with less reliance on bagged fertiliser, the improved nutrient content of Digest-it-treated slurry enables this improvement in sustainability to occur. “Our current focus is to maintain our level of production, while relying less on imported artificial fertilisers and reducing the inputs.” Mitchell Hayes farms near Blarney, Co. Cork and is a milk supplier to Dairygold Co Op. He has a spring calving herd of 250 cross bred cows and grows 14-16t DM/ha of grass pa. He started off by using Digest-it slurry additive on two tanks in winter 2021. He was so pleased with the results that this year he is using it on all his slurry tanks. The initial advantages were ease of management of the slurry and the reduction of odours at the time of spreading, and the fact that the nutrient became more available to the plants. “It also reduces our ammonia emissions.” Digest-it treated slurry grows more grass in a cost-effective way and represents an important action to become less dependent on chemical fertiliser and to improve dairy herd sustainability and profit. Better still, it only costs 3 euros per 1,000 gallons of slurry. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 8 27/03/2023 16:48
  9. MUCH LOWER CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR DIETS USING IRISH BEANS & CEREALS Speaking at the Quinns of Baltinglass 2023 Sustainable Tillage conference, William Quinn spoke of the changes that Quinns have made and are planning to make so they are as sustainable as possible, which will benefit their livestock customers as well as the environment. Valerie Hobson, head of feed at Quinns, also spoke about the carbon footprint equivalents (CO2 e) of feed using native grains versus imported grains. Quinns is a large buyer of native cereals (180,000 tonnes pa), while also being a feed miller. They also use as much Irish beans as they can to replace imported soya and they also purchase Irish-grown oilseed rape. Field beans are a high protein crop well-suited to the Irish climate with a relatively high yield potential (6-8 t/ha for winter and 4.5-7.5 t/ha for spring varieties). Annual production has increased from 3,000ha to 11,000ha in recent years aided by a protein crop support scheme. According to Teagasc field beans are an excellent break-crop, as it is an N-fixing legume, which benefits the succeeding cereal crop in rotations. This crop has the potential to displace approx. 1.2Mt of imported protein feed. Quinns emphasise the importance of the Irish tillage sector and the ability to have traceable feed ingredients. On average, all their feed mixes include 40 per cent Irish-grown ingredients and this could be as high as 60 per cent in some cases. Valerie outlined how a typical beef ration containing Irish grain and protein had a carbon footprint of 281kg of CO2 e/t. That’s 240kg/t of CO2 or 46 per cent lower than a comparable ration containing imported maize and soya, which had a carbon footprint of 521kg of CO2 e/t. carbon per tonne. The Quinns’ nutritionist also outlined the differences in the carbon footprint of dairy rations. An Irish cereal and bean-based 19 per cent dairy pellet came in at 1,298kg of CO2e/t, while the maize/soya-based 19 per cent dairy pellet had a carbon footprint of 2,098kg of CO2 e/t, meaning the Irish cereal/bean- based pellet has 60 per cent less emissions. Valerie suggested that it will not be long before carbon figures will need to be declared on feed rations. This surely has to be a positive thing and the way forward for sustaining Irish tillage. Quinns have been producing animal feeds for over 25 years and invested €5m during 2017 in their feed mill and a further €1m during 2022 in new facilities. They sell over 100,000 tonnes of feed pa to farmers in the neighbouring counties. Thirty per cent of the bags used for packaging are made from recycled plastics and this will increase to 50 per cent in due course. KRONE EASYCUT R MOWERS Designed for the professional farmer and contractor, these extra heavy-duty centre-pivot mowers are available in 2.8m (9ft), 3.2m (10ft) and 3.6m (11ft), with and without conditioner. Like all Krone mowers, they boast Safecut and a fully welded cutter bar. The Krone CV conditioner features lock-out tines, Hardox plates and a 640mm diameter rotor. Unlike many other mower beds, the Krone features a one-piece fully welded casing made of high quality, heavy gauge steel for huge strength and durability. This is manufactured in-house by Krone and they do not allow any other brands to use it. According to the company, the wedge shape gives a clean cut, even in lodged crops. The bed features a host of smart features like the famous SafeCut disc protection, the patented Krone system protects the disc and complete driveline. On impact, the roll pin shears and the disc spins up and out of the way of neighbouring discs. 10 minutes and a 20c part gets you back working and could save €000’s in repairs. Quick change blades are another handy feature that come standard on all Krone mowers. All EasyCut Krone Mowers come as standard with the DuoGrip suspension system. This system suspends the mower at its centre of gravity which allows it to float on even the hilliest terrain. Krone mowers are designed to sit low and centre when in transport position. Whether it be 7 foot or 12 foot, the Krone mower sits over centre, which ensures it doesn’t stick out on narrow roads and is also very stable at high transport speeds. 9 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 9 27/03/2023 16:48
  10. 10 KVERNELAND 15.6M HIGH CAPACITY TEDDER Kverneland’s latest addition to their Tedder range is the high capacity 85156 Tedder. With close to 16m working width and 14 rotors, it is designed with high output and excellent crop quality in mind. All elements of the 85156 C are dimensioned with intensive usage in mind, focusing on providing more productivity and reduced downtime for all silage conditions. The tedders continues Kverneland’s focus on silage quality, with the small diameter rotor ensuring maximum drying potential is realised. “By increase drying speed we aim to secure a high value nutrition content” says John Doyle, Product Manager, Kverneland Group Ireland. “Ideally, we hope to get the best possible result within the shortest time frame.” The 14 small diameter rotors of the 85156 are designed for maximum spreading quality across the full working width of the Tedder. The rotor design provides a generous overlap between the rotors, giving an efficient pick-up and turning of the crop. All Kverneland tedders feature the Super-C tines, made from 10mm spring steel of equal length. According to the company, this gives the added advantage that the load is spread evenly on both tines, providing longer lifespan of the tines. For heavy conditions the angle of the rotor can be set aggressively while for fragile crop, a gentler angle can be chosen. This versatility also allows farmers to adapt to changing weather conditions ensuring their crops dry evenly and efficiently. One particular feature on the full Tedder range offered is the positioning of the rotor gearbox on the frame means reduced stress on the Tedder frame. Another important feature is Kverneland’s reputation for durability. Additionally, the tedders are equipped with maintenance free drive-line and rotor heads, greasing points are kept to a minimum, while border tedding comes as standard. Large wheels and tires provide excellent manoeuvrability, even on rough terrain. Importantly, for such a large working width the Tedder folds into a transport width below 3m and is driven like a trailer on road following behind the tractor. I F f T s e Forage_Guide_2023.indd 10 27/03/2023 16:49
  11. It's Fendt. Because we understand Agriculture. fendt.com Fendt is a worldwide brand of AGCO. Fendt brings the future to the field. The Fendt forage harvesting range – with the same reliability, power and precision you would expect with everything from Fendt. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 11 27/03/2023 16:49
  12. NEW PÖTTINGER HIT V 11100 Grassland specialist Pöttinger meets the requirements of high output and cost effective farming with the new ten rotor linkage mounted tedder. With its 1.42 metre rotors and 10.70 metre working width (DIN), the HIT V 11100 combines excellent tedding quality with maximum output. The short three-point headstock places the centre of gravity very close to the tractor. Thanks to the compact design of all Pöttinger linkage-mounted tedders, safe operation on steep inclines, even at the headland, and safe handling during road transport are ensured. The new HIT V 11100 is equipped with a ball eye and linkage rod combined with two hydraulic centring cylinders as standard. The machine tracks perfectly during tedding. The high centring force of the hydraulic cylinders ensures smooth guidance of the ten rotors without swaying. When lifting the machine at the headland, the tedder first dips slightly at the linkage rod (slotted hole). The two hydraulic centring cylinders on the headstock then retract as far as they will go. The tedder glides smoothly into the centre position. The dipping action during lifting also causes the rotors to tilt back. This ensures that the tines do not scrape against the ground, keeping the forage clean as a result. The HIT V 11100 only needs a space 3.40 m high and 2.99 m wide when parked. The heart of the machine is the innovative DYNATECH rotor. The rotor has an ideal diameter of 1.42 metres. The six swept tine arms pick up the forage cleanly and deliver a perfect spread pattern due to the ideal spreading angle. PÖTTINGER MOWER COMBINATION DELIVERS IMPRESSIVE PERFORMANCE The new mower combination combines high output with the best possible ground tracking and the greatest reliability thanks to intelligent technology. The NOVACAT V 10000 is available with a headstock for 3.0 or 3.5 metre wide front mowers. This makes working widths of up to 9.62 and 10.02 metres possible. As an option, the NOVACAT V 10000 can be equipped with the proven COLLECTOR cross conveyor belt and CROSS FLOW auger for merging swaths. The NOVACAT V 10000 is a front/rear combination that is exceptionally adaptable and convenient to operate thanks to an extensive electronics and hydraulics update: The hydraulic cylinders integrated into the booms shift the cutter bar by up to 370 mm on each side. As a result, they ensure optimum overlap and perfect mowing quality on slopes, when cornering and on flat surfaces. The ground pressure automatically adapts to the working width. Optimum hydraulic weight alleviation guarantees soil conservation and the best forage quality. In addition, wear is significantly reduced and fuel costs are lowered. This automatic adjustment system is available as an option on the NOVACAT V 10000. The patented Y DRIVE input gearbox features an output shaft on the opposite side. This has the advantage that longer standard PTO shafts can be used with less of an angle in operation. The NOVACAT V 10000 is equipped with the very latest ISOBUS-capable SELECT pre-select control system as standard. The job computer is located directly on the machine. An ISOBUS cable or the new SELECT CONTROL terminal can be connected to the job computer. All functions can be preselected and then performed using the tractor’s remote valves. The second control option is the optional ISOBUS-compatible system. The NOVACAT V 10000 can be controlled either using an ISOBUS tractor terminal or the new third-generation POWER CONTROL, EXPERT 75, or the CCI 1200 control terminal. The hydraulic oil supply is via load sensing. With this control option, all functions such as individual lifting of the mower units, working width adjustment, side guard folding and transport interlock are controlled directly, with some integrated into automatic function sequences. A new feature is Section Control activation, using the standard job computer. In combination with AEF TC-SC (Task Controller Section Control) certified ISOBUS terminals and PÖTTINGER CONNECT, the individual mower units are automatically raised and lowered at the headland, depending on the GPS position. Another innovation is the optional automatic inclination system. On slopes, the mower units are shifted automatically so that no streaks are left standing even if the mower combination drifts sideways. 12 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 12 27/03/2023 16:49
  13. MCHALE V6760 The new McHale V6760 has been added to the popular V6 variable chamber range of machines. According to McHale, in designing the new McHale V6760, user friendliness was at the forefront of the machine’s development. The McHale V6760 is the highest spec machine in the V6 range. This fully automatic machine is ISOBUS compatible with the option of using McHale’s ISO-PLAY 7 or ISO-PLAY 12 terminals. The new V6760 features a 5-tine bar cam track pick-up as standard or a 6-tine bar cam-less pick-up with a double crop roller is available as an optional extra. The pick-up choices on the McHale V6760 have a number of features which allow for higher intake. The newly designed lateral feed augers direct the crop into the large diameter rotor which allows for maximum throughput. The McHale V6760 comes with an Adaptive Intake which has been specifically designed to allow the intake area to automatically adjust to changes in material flow. A 540 rpm gearbox is equipped on the V6760 as standard. To optimise machine performance, a 1000 rpm gearbox is available as an optional extra. Other new features on the McHale V6760 include: The new Intelli- Chamber Control increases the opening and closing speed of the chamber; Electronic variable density pressure regulation, results in increased bale density; Load cell bale shape indicators fitted on each door lock measure the bale load on each side, and displays accurate bale shape feedback to the operator; the McHale V6760 has a hydraulic bale kicker which lowers or raises as the chamber door opens or closes; the new net system has a larger brake, allowing for 25 per cent more stretch which improves performance when baling in high densities; when connected to an ISOBUS tractor, the V6760 will auto unblock by lowering the drop floor automatically once the software detects a blockage; the automatic knife drop feature is available on the McHale V6760 and can be enabled by the operator using the control terminal in the cab. 13 MCHALE FUSION 4 RANGE The new McHale Fusion 4 Range of Integrated Baler Wrappers includes the McHale Fusion 4, the McHale Fusion 4 Pro and the McHale Fusion 4 Plus with film binding technology. All machines in the Fusion 4 range deliver a number of new features with the higher end Fusion 4 Pro and Fusion 4 Plus being ISOBUS compatible allowing the operator to experience the highest level of customisation and machine performance. The new Fusion 4 range introduces advanced pick-up featuring enhanced throughput, increased bale density and faster wrapping speeds. A focus has also been placed on operator comfort whilst still ensuring the reliability and heavy-duty build quality that McHale is renowned for remains. The new Profi-Flo pick-up has been designed to increase crop intake through more efficient crop flow and has been engineered to ensure end users are operating with a high-performance pick-up that is designed to suit various working conditions. The new tapered feed channel encourages the crop to flow from the pick-up, towards the rotor and into the bale chamber, maximising throughput. To reduce maintenance, all Profi-Flo pick-ups are fitted with a heavier driveline which reduces chain load and increases chain life. Customers can choose between a 5-tine bar cam track pick-up or, the optional, 6-tine bar camless pick-up which has increased in width. Behind the tines, customers will notice a number of changes to improve the flow of crop into the chamber. McHale have also introduced the Adaptive Intake which has been specifically designed to allow the intake area to automatically adjust up and down to changes in material flow. Martin McHale - McHale Marketing & Sales Director said: “The new Fusion 4 range has focused on higher output and comfort for the operator. There is an increase in throughput thanks to the new Profi-Flo pick-up along with higher bale density and faster wrapping speeds. The design team have also enhanced the baling experience for the operator using ISOBUS technology on the Fusion 4 Pro and 4 Plus.” Forage_Guide_2023.indd 13 27/03/2023 16:49
  14. 14 TAMA – TOGETHER WE GROW FOR CHANGE TAMA group continues to follow its environmental strategy of ‘Reduce – Reuse – Replace’. Over the years, Tama has already reduced and re-used waste from its own manufacturing operations, looking at every stage of plastic production to develop more sustainable netwrap and twines. Being aware that, for the foreseeable future, plastic is an essential part of agriculture and the baling sector in particular, Tama understands that agricultural plastic waste is a challenge that urgently needs to be addressed. Cooperation Changing to more sustainable manufacturing methods will protect the land so that future generations of farmers will be able to continue to grow the food we all depend on. TAMA implemented a collection and recycling process in cooperation with Adivalor in France and Healix in the Netherlands.This starts on the farms with the removal, shaking (i.e. cleaning) of netwrap and twine and the subsequent collection via Adivalor. This plastic waste is then taken to the Healix recycling plant in Maastricht, where the recyclable material is cleaned and re-processed into high quality in��nity polymers. These polymers are then repacked and shipped to Tama’s manufacturing factories and returned to the ��elds as new crop baling products. Having been thoroughly tested in markets across the globe to ensure consistency in strength and quality, TAMA’s latest high-performance twines now use signi��cant percentages of recycled content. Commercial Director for Tama Europe Matthieu Defois stated: “These products are compatible with all balers and o�fer the same high performance and quality as our other Tama crop baling products.” Healix The founder of Healix, Marcel Alberts, has been active in the ��bre and technical textile industry for almost two decades. Using his knowledge and expertise, Marcel set up Healix to be a world leader in the transformation of plastic ��bre waste. Using new and innovative recycling techniques Marcel has built a facility that is unparalleled in cleaning and recycling plastic ��bre waste. Healix transform used ropes and nets from both the ��shing and farming industries into virgin-like polymers for the manufacturing supply chain. The proven techniques, process, and design of the recycling plant, enable the creation of high- quality end products. The plastic ��bre waste is processed into granules in three steps: 1. Big bales of used twine are shipped to the Healix facility in Maastricht direct from farms across Europe 2. Using specialised machinery, the ��bres are reduced in size and the small particles are thoroughly washed and dried to make sure they are clean. 3. Finally, the particles are melted, ��ltered and processed into granules, which are then shipped to Tama to be transformed back into new Crop Baling Products. What this means for Ireland In Ireland we have probably the best collection scheme in the world, run by the Irish Farm Film Producers Group (IFFPG). It provides a cost-e�fective compliance scheme to members and a comprehensive recycling and collection scheme to farmers throughout the country. Farmers bring their waste plastic to one of the hundreds of collection sites around the country in ½ ton bags ready for recycling. However, often the returned materials contain far more than just used plastic: from stones, tools, straw soilage and moisture, we’ve found it all and it’s all costing you more money! By shaking out the soilage and moisture from the waste before recycling, it can be up to 2/3 lighter which means 2/3 the cost at the collection centre! Remember, you are charged by the ton! In addition, by separating the waste (netwrap separate from twine), it can be returned to the Healix factory in Holland where it will be transformed into the raw materials used to remake netting, twine & stretch��lm. By 2025 Tama aims to be the world’s most e���cient crop bailing products producer by returning an average of 65 per cent of used crop baling products direct to the farm, using an average of 30 per cent recycled materials in its baling products and signi��cantly reducing our need for the production of virgin materials. Our factories already have ZERO waste in the production process. All waste material is collected and recycled back into our products. This is just a small part of our drive for a more sustainable and environmentally friendly business model and we ask all end-users to join us in keeping agricultural plastic out of land��ll and protecting the land for generations to come. ADVERTORIAL Forage_Guide_2023.indd 14 27/03/2023 16:49
  15. A FIRST-OF-ITS-KIND ECOLOGICAL SOLUTION FOR CROP BALING PRODUCTS Recycle Reuse Collect Tama Ireland +353 021 2379222 www.tama-ireland.ie *Tama Cycle twine contains post-consumer recycled material and Tama Cycle netwrap contains pre-consumer recycled material. THE FIRST MADE WITH PCR POST-CONSUMER RECYCLED MATERIALS* Forage_Guide_2023.indd 15 27/03/2023 16:49
  16. The change from a ��at-rate nitrogen (N) excretion rate for dairy cows, to a banded system with higher yielding cows incurring a higher rate, will mean that milk producers with highly productive herds will be forced to reduce stocking rates, lower average milk yields or secure additional land to accommodate the new stocking thresholds. If anyone was in doubt as to the impact of complying with these new environmental impositions, Noreen Lacey, Head of Banking with Ifac, laid that doubt to rest when she prefaced her presentation to the IGA dairy conference attendees, held earlier this year, by commenting that it is likely that this new NAP (Nitrates Action Programme) will act as a virtual milk quota for dairy farmers in the future, with a forced reduction in cow numbers inevitable on many farms. More food from less land Outlining the need for farmers worldwide to produce 60 per cent more food by 2060 for an increasing global population at the same time as land demand for housing, a�forestation, energy crops, rewetting as well as increasing deserti��cation in parts of the world, is reducing land availability for food production. Noreen noted that the challenge becomes even harder when one considers the process now being pursued in Ireland and Europe of lowering inputs, speci��cally N, as well as cow banding, which essentially lowers the stocking rate potential on many farms. Involuntary cow cull on the cards Noreen con��rmed that Ireland must reduce agricultural emissions by between ��ve and seven million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2030. The new NAP Programme, introduced this year, will change the organic N levels deemed to be produced per cow, with a new banding limit brought into e�fect for all herds. Combined, as the Ifac Executive emphasised, with the upcoming review of Ireland’s current nitrates derogation regulations, these are set to act as a signi��cant restraint to dairy expansion and per cow and per ha milk production for a large section of Irish milk producers. Noreen gave a range of practical examples of how these seismic changes will impact on farmers depending on their individual herd and farm pro��les. As a generalisation, she concluded, the new NAP will increase the deemed organic N excretion rates produced per cow based on milk yield and will move about 17 per cent of herds from 89 kgs of organic N excreted per cow to the high band of 106 kgs per cow, forcing some dairy farmers to involuntarily reduce their stocking rate. Land rental prices run amok The arguments for the introduction of this banding system are clear. The Agriculture Minister, Charlie McConalogue, has stated that it is a necessary aspect of securing a new Nitrates derogation at EU level as well as being a part of Ireland’s Nitrates Action Programme. There are now only a few countries and regions within the EU utilising the derogation and it is essential that Ireland continues to bene��t in the coming years. Even with the introduction of the banding system, essentially lowering stocking rates on farms with higher yielding herds, there is no assurance that Irish milk producers will not have to manage lower nitrates limits per ha in MORE INTENSIVE N REGULATIONS PENALISES PRODUCTIVITY Matt O’Keeffe reports on some key points made recently by Noreen Lacey, Head of Banking at Ifac, about the impact of new environmental measures on dairy farming systems. 16 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 16 27/03/2023 16:49
  17. the coming years. Unintentional consequences already include a rapid increase in land rental prices across the country and especially in the most intensively stocked south- eastern and southern regions of the country. Additional high-cost land rental drives up production costs signi��cantly and, if production is static, the end result is a fall in net income. The increased demand for land to lease, apart from driving up prices, is also driving out previous lessees, unable to compete at current prices. Add in rewetting and forestry targets and there will be less land available for food production in the years ahead. There is another law of unintended consequences as milk producers especially, attempt to maintain production by purchasing additional forage and/or concentrates to make up for shortfalls in grazing availability without lowering stocking rates. Instead of opting for fewer cows, many farmers caught in the lower end of a band may decide to drive production on through these mechanisms. Whether this will deliver increased pro��tability is another matter entirely. Options for 2023 There are several banding options available for 2023, though the restrictions are likely to be more onerous in coming years. Operating on an understanding that higher yields equate to higher nutrient excretion rates, the banding mechanism attempts to re��ect this. A rolling average for the three years 2020, 2021 and 2022 is being accepted this year in calculating a herd’s banding. Otherwise, last year’s (2022) average yield can be used. The third option is to rely on average yield for the current year. That option will only be available for 2023, so restricting yield for this season is only a stop-gap measure, with potentially signi��cant long-term implications for herd health, fertility and output as well as ��nancial returns for the current year. Potential income collapse Referencing the pending Nitrates Derogation Review, Noreen Lacey sees the possibility of the maximum 250kg/ Ha organic N limit being reduced to 220kg. In that scenario she calculated that a forty-hectare farm with one hundred and twelve cows could face a herd reduction of twenty-nine cows if the herd is in the highest yield 106 kg N/ Cow band. The IFAC Executive then did some number crunching to con��rm the ��nancial impacts of either, or both, cow banding and a lowering of the derogation. Cow banding for the high yielding herd example will reduce income by a potential 33 per cent, she calculates. Add on a Nitrates derogation reduction to 220kg and Noreen foresees a farm income collapse of 53 per cent based on the farm only being able to carry eighty-three cows when hit with a double whammy. Noreen identi��es mitigation strategies include renting additional land to o�fset lower stocking rates. Cost and availability, she notes, are problematic, to say the least. Reducing milk supply/ yield, to ��t into a lower cow band, was also discussed, noting that this could be hazardous from an animal health and welfare stance but would o�fer some lessening of the doomsday income collapse. A new quota system The biggest impacts will be felt by the higher yielding herds. As Noreen hinted, there is potential for the regulatory system to impact far more milk producers severely in the time ahead. Even another potential banding above 6,500 kgs per cow would have catastrophic e�fects on those herds above that ��gure. Meanwhile her advice to milk producers was timely: “Everyone’s circumstances are unique and there is an onus on producers to review their individual situations and put an appropriate plan in place that achieves the ��nancial and environmental objectives of the business.” 17 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 17 27/03/2023 16:49
  18. 18 MAKING BETTER QUALITY AND MORE COST-EFFECTIVE BALED SILAGE Lloyd Dawson, of Berry bpi, outlines the advantages of an innovative new dual wrapping method. Due to signi��cantly higher fertiliser prices, many farmers are now conserving less silage for their livestock. This means that they are now more dependent on compound feed which has also increased signi��cantly in price due to the war in the Ukraine. In addition, numbers of dairy cows, cattle and sheep in Ireland have also increased, so there are more livestock to feed. For example, in the June 2022 CSO livestock survey the number of dairy cows increased by 1.4 per cent; the total number of cattle aged two years and over increased by 2.4 per cent, and sheep numbers increased by 6.4 per cent. However, due to ongoing technology improvements, the baled silage system is far more cost e�fective and environmentally friendly. Silage quality is better and there are more kilograms of dry matter (DM) available per bale for feeding to valuable livestock. The relatively new Film&Film (F&F) system is an innovative dual wrapping method, which combines the use of SilotitePro balewrap and Baletite netwrap replacement ��lm. This results in better shaped and more compact bales which can better withstand handling and have a longer storage life. Using baler ��lm instead of netwrap, the F&F wrapping system helps to reduce silage losses by virtually eliminating mould growth and preventing silage becoming enmeshed during feedout. By using ��lm to bind the bale together, removal and recycling of the ��lm is made easier as the farmer is only left with one product to recycle and can avoid the time-consuming job of separating netwrap from the stretch ��lm. Baletite enhances the ensiling process and protects the contents of the bale by Forage_Guide_2023.indd 18 27/03/2023 16:49
  19. 19 creating additional layers of protection around the bale. It provides an air barrier that helps to prevent the growth of white mould, which can cause valuable silage losses. Using Baletite as an alternative to netwrap results in better shaped bales, by exerting a tighter grip around the bale circumference. Excellent trial results have been obtained in Wales by Dr Dave Davies of Silage Solutions Ltd, who acts as an independent consultant to the Silage Advisory Centres. Dr Davies is a former Senior Research Scientist at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (IGER) at Aberystwyth in Wales. In a trial he conducted on a commercial farm in Wales, under real working farm conditions, Dr Davies demonstrated that Film&Film wrapped bales had: - 7.5 per cent less dry matter (DM) losses compared to netwrap bales due to an enhanced fermentation process. - 80 per cent less DM losses compared to netwrap bales due to mould formation on the bale. The reduced losses that resulted using the F&F wrapping system meant that the farmer gained more forage to feed to his herd. For a dairy farmer, preserving forage more successfully could provide a signi��cant ��nancial bene��t as follows: • This farmer gained an average of 7.35kg DM per bale using the Film&Film wrapping system. • As 1kg of DM = 11.8 MJ ME (Metabolisable Energy), this means that the farmer gained 86.73 MJ ME per Film&Film bale (7.35 kg DM x 11.8 MJ ME). • To produce one litre of milk you need: ± 5.8MJ/litre MJ ME. • Therefore the 86.73MJ ME averagely gained for each of these bales could give an additional 15 litres of milk production. • For a cattle farmer this was equivalent to an increase of 1.9kg of live weight gain per bale. • The value of the extra silage conserved is around €5/bale. This calculation is based on data supplied in December 2022 by Dr Tom Butler of FBA Laboratories. It is important to note that the above trial was undertaken under commercial farm conditions and not on a research institution farm where bales are carefully handled and stored under ideal conditions by well-trained research sta�f. Bales wrapped using this system also have a longer storage life, are easier to handle or stack, and are more valuable to farmers buying extra forage for their livestock. The high holding force of Baletite in this wrapping system maintains the pressure that has been applied during baling. Indeed, trials undertaken by the Institute for Research in Agriculture (ILVO) in Belgium found that bales wrapped using the Film&Film System on average contained 10 per cent more silage, and these bales were on average 2cm smaller in circumference than traditional netted bales. The cost of baling and wrapping with four layers of wrap in Ireland was circa €12 per bale in 2022, and agri contractors charge an additional €1 for using a netwrap replacement ��lm. So the extra feed value not only covers this but it also pays for more than a third of the total cost. A very good reason indeed to switch from netwrap to the F&F wrapping system. This F&F system is also recommended by the Kuhn winner of ‘Machine of the Year’ in the AgriTechnica forage harvesting category in 2018, and a LAMMA Silver Award winner in 2019. Check out their videos on YouTube. A typical contractor comment is as follows: “The ��lm and ��lm bales keep their shape better in storage and are less prone to damage. A lot of my customers are using bale splitters so this makes life a lot easier as no separation of balewrap and netting is needed. On top of this, farmers are ��nding that silage quality is better and there is virtually no mouldy silage. So there are lots of advantages indeed.” Improved Baling and Wrapping Technology Information such as customer name, number of bales, average bale weight and moisture content can be printed out by some of the modern balewrappers. This information is very useful for any farmers feeding the bales to their livestock or negotiating bale prices with other farmers. Nowadays, most bales are chopped and these are eight to 12 per cent heavier than conventional round bales, which saves on stretch ��lm, takes up less storage space and are easier to feed out. When crop is chopped, it results in more material compressed in the bale. This leads to a reduction in transport and ��lm costs per kg of silage wrapped. Chopping the forage allows for optimum fermentation as the sugars in the crop will be readily available from the dry crop. This results in the production of superior quality fodder that can be easily digested. Chopped forage is easier to distribute from diet feeders and straw blowers as the Forage_Guide_2023.indd 19 27/03/2023 16:49
  20. 20 short material can be processed and distributed more quickly than longer material. Although the optimum percentage dry matter for bales may vary for dairy, beef and sheep, avoiding over-wilting is important for any livestock in order to optimise nutrient value. A notable di�ference in Ireland, is that bales are usually made at 25-35 per cent dry matter, rather than the usual 35-45 per cent DM or higher as typical of bales in Britain. This makes them heavier, weighing about 850-900kg compared with 600-650 kg, but cuts wilting time. This also reduces in-��eld nutrient losses and is a boon during changeable weather. Baling at 25-35 per cent DM provides an opportunity to improve the fermentation for a better preservation and makes them less susceptible to heating and spoilage problems that a�fect drier silage. Many independent research trials show that using a proven silage additive can result in more silage recovered from the grass that was baled or clamped. For farmers aiming to make high- quality silage, the inclusion of a quality additive can signi��cantly improve silage fermentation and quality. This is important as increasing silage quality will lead to a higher level of production on beef, dairy and sheep farms. For example, based on trial results, one proven additive had the following bene��ts: • Metabolisable Energy (ME) increased by an average of 0.7MJ/kg of dry matter. • Silage digestibility improved by an average of 3 D units. • DM intakes increased by ��ve per cent on average. Given the increase in energy content, digestibility and DM intakes, the use of additive treated silages obviously leads to an increase in animal performance as measured by higher milk yield (an average of 1.2 Litres/cow/day in 15 various trials.) or better liveweight gain (19 per cent higher). Based on research trial results you can triple your return on investment from using a silage additive. Excellent Recycling Results When baled silage was ��rst introduced, bales were around 50 per cent of the current weights and ��lm was only stretched 55 per cent. Now it is stretched 70 per cent, so less balewrap is now used per kilogram of grass wrapped and there is also less ��lm to recycle after use. The ��ve key elements for a good performing silage stretch ��lm are: cling capacity; puncture resistance; tear resistance; elongation at break; and tightening force. Silotite Pro 1800 also bene��ts from an enhanced oxygen barrier – critical to ensuring excellent crop conservation. Bene��ts include 20 per cent more bales wrapped per reel, signi��cant time savings for the busy silage contractor, and enhanced silage quality for livestock. Its unique sleeve packaging means that it has 45kg less packaging/ pallet, with no bulky boxes to move around. The packaging is made of the same material as the ��lm inside, so it can all be recycled together. Both Baletite and balewrap can be recycled together, saving valuable time and labour costs, unlike netwrap which has to be recycled separately. The Silotite range of stretch ��lms now includes Silotite Sustane, which uses 30 per cent recycled materials: a mixture of mechanically or advanced recycled materials from industrial, agricultural and consumer ��lms that have been recycled. Silotite Sustane can also be recycled again, meaning that the contribution to sustainability goes even further, to create even more recycled products. The Irish Farm Film Producers’ Group (IFFPG), a not-for-pro��t body, has recycled over 400,000 tonnes of farm ��lm waste since its establishment in 1998. The scheme, which is funded by both industry and farmers and approved by the Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications, is an excellent example of what can be achieved when all the key stakeholders in a sector come together to work for the environment. Irish farmers achieved a record 90 per cent recycling rate for farm ��lms in 2021 and in doing so recycled the equivalent of ��lm from 18 million silage bales. The majority was collected at over 200 bring- centres, held during the summer at locations such as livestock marts, coops and agri-merchant premises. Over a third of collected material was supplied to Irish recyclers for processing into a range of new products. In total, 37,000 tonnes of silage wrap and silage covers was recycled in 2021: 3,000 tonnes more than in 2020 which was also a record year. For the average farmer who makes 300 bales of silage, the total recycling cost is approximately €60, while the average distance to the local bring centre is only 11km. These factors, as well as a desire by farmers to be environmentally responsible, have resulted in the recycling rate for farm ��lms being consistently the highest for any recycling stream in the country. Berry bpi, manufacturers of Baletite and Silotite, is a leading recycler of bale wrap products and other packaging in Europe, with the scope and expertise to recycle over 150,000 tonnes a year. Every tonne of polythene recycled saves 1.8 tonnes of crude oil, reduces energy usage by two thirds, entails 90 per cent less water and cuts sulphur dioxide emissions by 33 per cent. Useful products manufactured from recycled balewrap and silage covers include calf pens, fencing posts, ��oor slats, garden furniture, gates, pet housing, rubbish bags and water piping. A n ✓S ✓I ✓R ✓A t: 0 e: w: Forage_Guide_2023.indd 20 27/03/2023 16:49
  21. Add Molasses for a natural preservation ✓Stimulates fermentation and facilitates natural silage preservation ✓Improves dry matter digestibility (DMD) and silage intakes ✓Reduces spoilage and increases clamp storage capacity ✓A rich source of natural sugar and energy t: 069-65311 Harbour Road, e: info@premiermolasses.ie Foynes, w: www.premiermolasses.ie Co. Limerick. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 21 27/03/2023 16:49
  22. 22 MANAGING YOUNG STOCK AT GRASS The weaning to breeding period for dairy heifers is vital to improving lifetime herd performance and profitability, according to Dr Debbie McConnell, Dairy Technical Representative for Lakeland Agri. Replacement dairy heifers are the lifeblood of any dairy farm and countless research studies have shown that by improving heifer management and calving animals at 24 months of age, lifetime herd performance and pro��tability can be increased. For example, data from herds in Northern Ireland shows that on average, animals calving at 24 months of age will give one extra lactation and an additional 7,300kg milk over their lifetime, relative to an animal calving at 36 months of age. Considerable emphasis is placed on early life management and pre-weaning nutrition for replacement dairy heifers as this is the time when the highest level of feed conversion e���ciency can be achieved. However, the period following this, from weaning to breeding, also deserves focus as it plays a crucial role in ensuring animals reach puberty and subsequently can be successfully bred at 15 months of age, and calf down at 24 months. This period has a strong in��uence on skeletal growth, with poor nutrition here leading to short and small framed animals. In addition, puberty is mainly driven by bodyweight rather than age meaning that insu���cient nutrition can delay breeding of heifers. To allow animals to calf down at 24 months of age, achieving target liveweight gains right throughout the growing period is key. Target liveweight at key stages and average daily liveweight gain (DLWG) will be dependent on the mature weight of the cow (see Table 1). Grazing the weaned dairy replacement Appropriate post-weaning nutrition relies on supplying su���cient protein to facilitate muscle weight gain and skeletal growth. Good skeletal development at this stage will result in taller heifers that experience fewer calving di���culties. Grazed grass can provide a high protein and low fat diet, which is well tailored to the nutritional requirements of youngstock, however it must be carefully supplemented in the ��rst few months to ensure animals achieve su���cient intakes. Immediately post weaning, the animal’s rumen is still in development and not able to process forages fully. Indeed, the rumen typically doesn’t reach full functionality until around nine months of age so during the animal’s ��rst summer at pasture, concentrate provision is often required in the early months to ensure liveweight gains are met. In the immediate post-weaning stage (two to three months of age) the rumen also has a limited capacity and so providing an energy-dense, high-protein diet is critical. At this stage, supplementation rates of 2kg concentrate can be required dependent on grass quality. To transition weaned young calves onto pasture, using a paddock of stemmier, coarser grass initially or providing some supplementary forage can help maintain ��bre levels in the diet. This is important as it can take a few weeks for the rumen microbes to adjust to fresh grass, particularly when grazing highly digestible, low ��bre pastures. Once animals are well transitioned to grass, aiming for covers of 1,000- 1,400kg/ha with fresh grass o�fered every few days is optimal. Calves Table 1: Liveweight targets for dairy heifer replacements at di�ferent ages depending on mature bodyweight. Age Mature bodyweight (kg) 550 650 8 weeks (weaning) 80 90 6 months 150 175 12 months 275 325 15 months (mating) 330 390 24 months (pre-calving) 495 585 Average DLWG required from birth to calving (kg/d) 0.7 0.75 Forage_Guide_2023.indd 22 27/03/2023 16:49
  23. 23 are selective grazers and supplying fresh grass often will ensure liveweights are maintained. In a recent study conducted by the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) which ran between June and October, heifers aged three to seven months were allocated to either: 1) a continual grazing system, in which animals remained for the duration of the grazing season; (2) a six-day rotation system in which animals were rotated through six paddocks every six days; and (3) a three-day rotation system, in which animals were rotated through 12 di�ferent paddocks every three days. Target pre- and post-grazing sward heights were set at 1,000 and 100 kg DM/ha, respectively. Heifers managed in the continuous grazing system gained 0.64 kg/day whilst rotationally grazed heifers achieved an extra 0.04 – 0.16 kg/day. This highlights the bene��ts of a rotational grazing system, however it must be remembered that young animals should always be o�fered clean, high quality grass. If grazing in the same area as older animals, implement a leader-follower rotational system where young animals are allowed onto a paddock before the older animals as this will allow them to get the best grass and help minimise the risk of picking up gastrointestinal parasites. It is also important to consider trace element status of animals at grass, so work with your veterinary surgeon to determine if supplementation is required. As animals progress, aim for total intakes of approximately 2.4 per cent of body weight in dry matter (4.8 kg DM/head/day for 200 kg heifers). A recent AFBI study of heifers managed in a rotational grazing system and allocated to pasture allowances of either 1.8 per cent, 2.4 per cent or 3 per cent of bodyweight showed that grass utilisation decreased as pasture allowance increased and live weight gain increased. The study indicated that o�fering pasture at a rate of 2.4 per cent of live weight helps achieve a good balance between heifer performance and grass utilisation. To keep animals on target over the summer months, weighing animals at turnout and regularly (every two to four weeks) will allow adjustments to be made if animals are underperforming. Where animals are behind target liveweights, consider batching separately to allow for higher feed rates to increase daily liveweight gain. It is also important to take account of weather conditions at pasture and o�fer additional feed in wetter and cooler conditions. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 23 27/03/2023 16:49
  24. 24 SILAGE HARVESTING IN IRELAND Are we getting better or just getting faster, asks Dr Joe Patton, Head of Dairy Knowledge Transfer at Teagasc. In recent years, vintage silage making displays have become a ��xture on the summer agri-events calendar in many parts of the country. On these days, young and old gather to watch single-chop and double-chop harvesters, and all manner of early self-propelled machines, put through their paces in heavy June meadows. Veterans of silage seasons past nostalgically marvel over familiar machines, while the younger minds must wonder how such contraptions got the silage season ��nished at all. Seeing the old silage kit at work demonstrates the signi��cant pace of development in ��eld technology over the last few decades. It is also important however to gauge what this has delivered in terms of improved feed quality on the ground. A quick look at the numbers (Table 1) suggests that despite all the improvements in equipment, national average silage quality remains stubbornly in the lower ranges. For example, dry matter digestibility (DMD), which determines the intake, weight gain and milk yield potential of the crop, has not really moved in 40 years or more. National average quality silage of 63-65% DMD is suitable only for suckler cows requiring weight loss in the winter period. It will not repair body condition score (BCS) on dry dairy cows, it will not put weight on weanlings, and will certainly not ��nish cattle or put milk in the tank. The conclusion could reasonably be made that as an industry we have just got faster at making bad silage, but not better at making good silage. With all that said, there are many excellent beef and dairy farms that year-after-year make high yields of good quality grass silage at ��rst and subsequent cuts. This drives down feed costs and boosts animal performance in weanlings, ��nishing cattle and milking cows. These farms have a proven formula, based on good science, good timing, and attention to detail. So what are the main things which make these farms di�ferent to the average? DM % pH DMD % Cr Pro % 1970-81 (Wheeler et al., 1983) 21.7 4.3 63 12.7 1985-88 (Wilson et al., 1990) 19.7 4.1 65 14.9 1990-92 (Keating et al., 1993) 22.1 4.1 67 15.3 1993-96 (Keating et al., 1997) 22.4 4.1 67 14.3 2012-14 (McElhinney et al., 2016) 27.0 4.2 61 12.3 Table 1. National average grass silage quality from mid 1970s until 2014 (Source Teagasc Grange) Di�ferent times, same result: Silage quality has largely remained unchanged over decades in Ireland. Beef Cattle - Weight gain Silage Quality DMD% 75 70 65 60 Harvest date 20 May 2 Jun 15 Jun 28 Jun Silage tDM per ha 4.6 6.0 7.0 7.7 Intake (kg/day) 9.0 8.3 7.6 7.0 Liveweight gain (kg/day) 0.83 0.66 0.49 0.31 Table 2. E�fect of silage harvest date on quality and animal performance Forage_Guide_2023.indd 24 27/03/2023 16:49
  25. 25 Understanding the meaning and value of feed quality Setting out with the objective of making quality feed is probably the most important factor, as every management decision can ��t into place after that. The importance of having quality silage has been demonstrated in countless experiments and real farm situations. Table 2, for example, shows the e�fect of higher DMD on growth rate in weanling Angus/Hereford cattle. The di�ference in growth rate from 20th May to 15th June silage would total over 45kg per head in a standard four-month winter, and making up that di�ference with concentrate for growing or ��nishing cattle would be expensive indeed. The requirement for high DMD with regard to milking is self-evident. Knowing that delaying harvest will spoil a good silage crop Grass silage is like a perishable food in terms of quality. Every day past heading date can reduce DMD by up to 0.5 units, so 10 days’ delay from late May into early June can turn your main winter forage from high quality to maintenance-only feed. Di�ferent types of stock do require di�ferent levels of silage quality within a system – for example dry beef cows 66 to 68 DMD for example but growing cattle 72+ DMD – so the problem is often that one single date does not suit all stock on the farm (Figure 1). The best operators tend to focus on securing the best silage needed ��rst. They are generally ready to harvest for quality silage quality in mid-May, and plan for some lower quality material if needed taken later in June or as part of a second cut. This can easily be done in a baling system or using pits plus bales combined. ‘One big cut’ for convenience will not deliver the right quality. Getting the balance right between yield and quality Crop DM yield at harvest remains the single most important factor determining the cost per tonne of silage in the pit. The target yield for a mid- late May cut is 5 to 5.5 tonnes DM per hectare (9.2 to 10 tonnes per acre fresh). Fixed costs per hectare (e.g. contractor fees) are diluted to some extent by the extra tonnage, and so too are some costs associated with fertiliser and slurry. The drive to secure adequate stocks for winter has meant many farms have largely abandoned any consideration of feed quality when making ��rst cut silage. Later bulky cuts have become the norm. But does this approach actually work? Firstly, the dilution of contractor fees is surprisingly small. A 10-day delay into June (assuming 80kg DM growth) will reduce contractor cost by about €1.55 per tonne fresh silage. Would you pay €1.55 more per tonne for 74 DMD versus 69 DMD silage? Based on di�ferences in cattle performance it is more than justi��ed. If it’s a bale system in operation, the cost per tonne di�ference is even less. Secondly, it is vital to consider the yield of forage DM across the year as a whole, not just from Silage DMD Suitable For Fresh calved dairys cows in winter milk Buffer feeding milking cows early spring/late autumn Finishing cattle 76+% 71-73% 68-70% <67% 74-76% Dry cows requiring BCS gain-2.75 at dry off Dairy weanling/In-calf heifers Growing cattle Dry dairy cows requiring little or no BCS gain Dry suckler cows requiring BCS gain Poor quality feed Dry dairy cows - meal feeding required to gain BCS Dry suckler cows requiring no BCS gain Figure 1. Target grass maturity at ��rst cut for di�ferent stock types 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Total DM yield kg/ha Total UFL per ha May 29th May 29th Jun 29th Jun 29th Jun 23rd Jun 23rd 2nd cut 1st cut 2nd cut 1st cut Figure 2. E�fect of ��rst cut date on total silage DM and UFL (feed energy) yield in a two-cut system Forage_Guide_2023.indd 25 27/03/2023 16:49
  26. 26 a single cut. Figure 2 shows the e�fect of di�ferent ��rst-cut dates on total grass silage DM and forage energy (UFL) yield per ha, in a two-cut system with a ��xed second cut date in late July. There was no advantage in total DM production to delaying ��rst cut due to poor yield at second harvest. Delaying second cut further for the later ��rst cut swards would have reduced availability of autumn after-grass and negated any silage yield bene��t. It has been clear from recent fodder crises that farms that fail to cut ��rst cut by early June at the latest were more likely to run short of silage in a bad year due to poor annual yields and problems salvaging second cut crops later in the year. Those farms routinely producing high quality silage are usually less likely to run short despite earlier ��rst cuts – silage yields are maximised by increasing growth rate in spring (through better management), not by simply delaying ��rst cut harvest. Managing soil fertility and fertiliser as year-round project Grass silage removes a lot of NPK nutrient from the ��eld without any slurry recycling as in a grazing situation. The fertiliser requirements for grass silage crops are well established and widely available (Table 3). Getting these correct will ensure that high yields of ��rst and subsequent crops are ready to cut before quality declines. We often see in practice that crops are not ready to cut by mid to late May, despite being closed since early March, leaving farmers with the decision to ‘give it a week to bulk up’ to the detriment of quality and second cut yield. This is a good indicator of inadequate crop nutrition, as clean ryegrass crops with adequate nutrients applied should be well ready to cut by mid to late May in a normal year. Farms producing high quality silage recognise the value of meeting the crops’ nutrient needs. This is treated as a year- round process, involving soil testing, targeted use of slurry, build-up of P and K through the year, and liming at the correct time. The one-size ��ts all approach of spreading some slurry plus three bags of ‘silage-cut’ type products performs poorly in comparison to a fertiliser plan designed to meet the NPK requirement on a ��eld-by-��eld basis. Not assuming nitrogen is too high to cut A common reason for putting o�f cutting silage is concern about nitrogen. A useful guide for fertiliser N is that grass uses 2.5 kg N (2.0 units) per day on average, so ��nal N should be applied approximately 50 days before planned cutting date. However, this should not be used to decide cutting date. If weather conditions are suitable for cutting, test the grass crop for sugars rather than sticking rigidly to the ‘2-unit rule’; the crop can be safely harvested sooner depending on conditions. Keeping the sward fresh Old permanent pasture with low perennial ryegrass content is less responsive to fertiliser nutrients for ��rst-cut crops, leading to delayed harvest and poor DMD. Lower sugar content makes preservation more di���cult. The decision to reseed should be based on sward composition and performance. A rule of thumb is that silage ground should be reseeded every seven to eight years (��ve to six years for multiple-cut systems). This can be di���cult especially if silage ground is on short-term rental contracts. In conclusion Silage making technology has come a long way but the fundamentals of good swards, good soil fertility and cutting at the right growth stage have remained constant over time. There is much work to do to improve feed quality by looking again at these basic principles. There are enough good examples on working farms to see the bene��ts of excellent sward management. Soil index 1 2 3 4 P Required kg/ha 40 30 20 0 K Required kg/ha 175 155 20 0 N Required kg/ha 125 Sulpher Required kg/ha 12-14 (10% of N applied) Table 3. NPK required for ��rst cut crops at di�ferent soil indices. *Note a maximum of 100kg per ha K should be applied at ��rst cut with the remainder applied in autumn on low index ground. Apply 10kg per ha of sulphur for ��rst cut where forage analysis shows a requirement. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 26 27/03/2023 16:49
  27. 27 “Butterfat levels fall in the grazing season every year and this spring and summer won’t be any di�ferent,” says Dr Philip Ingram. “We can see levels drop by as much as 0.5 per cent and continue below the herd’s potential through summer. This will mean a signi��cant price drop on many milk prices and isn’t good news, particularly with concentrate feed prices still riding high, and milk prices easing. “But there are solutions that can keep butterfat, and the milk cheque, on track.” He highlights new results that support the use of a specialised rumen bu�fer Equaliser Cream, that is already being used successfully on many units. Cargill monitored the e�fect of this rumen bu�fer on 25 Irish and British dairy farms in 2021 and 2022. Thirteen farms introduced Equaliser Cream early, before the usual dip in butterfat, and 12 farms introduced it after experiencing low butterfat. Rates used were between 75g and 150g per cow per day, and the proportion of grazed grass in the diet ranged from 0 per cent to 75 per cent. Those farms introducing the bu�fer early responded best with an average improvement in butterfat of 0.4% in May, compared with the same month in the previous year, shown in Figure 1. This e�fect persisted through the grazing season and herds continued to give more butterfat while Equaliser Cream was in the diet. The 12 farms feeding the bu�fer after milk fats dropped saw an improvement within a week of 0.33 per cent, with an average increase in one month of 0.51 per cent. Based on milk prices at the time of this trial, using Equaliser Cream improved milk income by €2,422 per month for an average 100-cow herd. GRAZING THE GREEN STUFF: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD Cows out at grass is a welcome sight on many dairy farms, but, when it comes to maintaining milk quality, it might not all be plain sailing, says Dr Philip Ingram, Ruminant Technical Manager at Cargill. Dr Philip Ingram, Cargill ruminant technical manager. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 27 27/03/2023 16:49
  28. 28 Milk value per cow, per day improved by 80c. “These results showed the positive bene��ts of including Equaliser Cream – either in the bu�fer feed or concentrate, in spring and summer while cows are on fresh grass,” says Dr Ingram. “And if it can be added ahead of a dip in butterfat levels, there are even greater bene��ts. But in both cases, the response is quick and prolonged throughout the season, providing a cost-e�fective solution to depressed summer butterfat levels.” Prevention versus cure There are two main factors responsible for this fall in butterfat in milk, associated with fresh grass. These are its high oil content, particularly in young grass in the ��rst and second leaf stages, and the low structural, highly digestible ��bre in fresh grass that causes a reduction in rumen pH and creates acidic conditions. The combination creates a ‘perfect storm’ in the cow’s rumen. Under these conditions, dietary oil is converted to conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). This is an oil that disrupts the fat production pathways and causes a depression in butterfat. “Equaliser Cream has a two-pronged action,” says Dr Ingram. “It is highly e�fective as a bu�fer in maintaining rumen pH and supports the reduction of CLA production by normalising the oil conversion pathways. It works by preventing rather than curing the problem in the cow. Most bu�fers tackle rumen pH as a means of helping to prevent milk fat depression, but they are not consistently e�fective.” It is also useful to understand the stages of grass growth when oil levels are highest and manage the grazing around this. “Grazing management should support rather than hinder butterfat production. Lush, green grass will have the highest oil content,” he adds. “And the higher the leaf-to-stem ratio, the higher the oil content of the grass, so grazing management needs to be mindful of this. “Also, swards with low covers, that might follow a cold snap or a drought, will be ‘oil-rich’ too. Predicting grass growth patterns and measuring growth will help to avoid needing to graze these swards. Instead, if grass growth is looking short, increase the platform if possible or add more compound or bu�fer feed to ��ll the gap.” The timing of fertiliser applications is also crucial. It should be applied as soon as cows leave the sward to maximise the time between spreading and cows returning to graze. This is because nitrogen promotes leaf growth and, therefore, fatty acid content. There needs to be time for the balance of oil in the grass to return to near normal before cows are back grazing. Every grazing season varies, and grass growth slows down and speeds up depending on temperature and rainfall, but the risks will be there. Improving the rumen environment will support butterfat production, and with some forward planning, farmers can manage grazing to avoid the high oil ‘hotspots’, says Dr Ingram. “A boost to the milk cheque through the summer months could then be on the cards.” 4.40% 4.20% 4.00% 3.80% 3.60% 3.40% 3.20% 3.00% Equaliser Cream - year on year response Previous year - no cream Average Farm 13 Farm 13 Farm 11 Farm 10 Farm 9 Farm 8 Farm 7 Farm 6 Farm 5 Farm 4 Farm 3 Farm 2 Farm 1 Average - no cream Current year - cream Average - cream Figure 1: Response from including Equaliser Cream (Cargill Ireland and UK) Spring summer grazing can depress milkfat signi��cantly. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 28 27/03/2023 16:49
  29. 29 RENEWABLE ENERGY: WHAT’S IN IT FOR FARMERS? Barry Caslin, Teagasc Energy & Rural Development Specialist, investigates the opportunities that renewable energy for today’s farmer. Renewables need land and lots of it. We have no clear vision or strategy as to how much of the 4.9m ha of Agricultural Area Used (AAU) land will be diverted towards wind, solar, grass for biogas and energy crop or forestry pulpwood for biomass heating projects. The publication of the Governments Climate Action Plan has been positive towards on-farm renewables. Opportunities will exist for farmers to generate renewable electricity and sell the excess to the grid. The Government has also acknowledged the need to develop an agri biomethane sector to displace natural gas in the heat and transport sectors. Renewable energy options have been o�fering many bene��ts for farm businesses across Europe for decades. An energy diversi��cation enterprise can be used on farm to reduce electricity and heating bills, with any excess electricity or heat sold to generate an additional income. On-farm renewables can help to reduce the overall farm greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint. There are a number of renewable options available which o�fer opportunities to utilise natural resources within the farm – from forestry to slurry, and rivers to wind. Technologies Suited to Farms The renewable energy technologies which o�fer the best diversi��cation opportunities for farms are: • Wind energy • Hydropower • Anaerobic digestion/biogas • Biomass • Solar photovoltaic • Heat pumps The uptake of these varying technologies will depend on access to capital for investment. The on-farm resources available and the amount of risk you are willing to take will also in��uence the decision to adopt such technologies. Various incentives are now currently available to encourage the use of renewables on-farm. Biomethane The 2021 Climate Action Plan set a target of 1.6TWh of biomethane by 2030. This would require in the order of eighty 20 GWh Anaerobic Digestion (AD) plants (equates to feedstock provision of approx. 37,000 t of slurry and biomass). Minister Ryan has increased this target by 256 per cent to 5.7 TWh by 2030, as part of the 25 per cent reduction in emissions from the agriculture sector, which forms part of the carbon budgets outlined in the Climate Action Plan. This would satisfy about 10 per cent of our current natural gas demand and industry has reported that 2.1 MtCO2eq would be abated. The minister says this would require 285 20 GWh plants or a smaller number of larger-scale plants. The main opportunities expected are for farmers to supply grass on a contractual basis to feed these AD plants. Incentives Available The Targeted Agricultural Modernisation Schemes (TAMS) is funded through pillar II of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). This is 50 per cent funded by the EU and 50 per cent by the Irish exchequer through the Department of Agriculture Food and Marine. The TAMS 3 scheme will provide an investment grant to farmers to improve the energy e���ciency of farm buildings or their equipment. The investment grant can cover up to 60 per cent of total installations costs for up to 62kWp for solar PV system. The Pig and Poultry Investment Scheme is also funding up to 62kW PV. TAMS will have a dedicated fund with an upper ceiling of €90,000 over the TAMS period of 2023-2027. This means that you will not be eating into your TAMS money for building work by investing in solar technology. Farmers who avail of TAMS supports will now be able to export small amounts of electricity through the Micro generation Support Scheme (MSS) which covers installations up to 50kW. This will be a market rate payment through the Clean Export Forage_Guide_2023.indd 29 27/03/2023 16:49
  30. 30 Guarantee (CEG) mechanism. You will be selling via your electricity (utility) supplier. The Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS) This is a key renewable electricity policy which provides ��nancial support to renewable electricity projects. It is a pivotal component of the Government Climate Action Plan and is essential for achieving Ireland’s 80 per cent renewable electricity target by 2030. Supported by the PSO levy; competitive auctions will decide which generators will receive contracts. The ��rst RESS auction in 2020 saw 82 onshore wind and solar farm projects secure funding. The second RESS auction which opened in December 2021 for projects between 500kW to 600GWh per annum, aims to increase the technology diversity to include on-site storage. Unfortunately RESS will not be favourable to on-farm technologies such as biogas Anaerobic Digestion (AD) or biomass Combines Heat and Power (CHP) as higher cost technologies will have to compete against lower cost technologies such as wind and solar in the auction process. Such higher cost technologies will be necessary to provide continuous renewable electricity supply compared to the intermittent nature of solar PV and wind which only generate energy when the sun shines or the wind blows. The current opportunities for farmers are to lease their land to solar, wind and energy storage developers. Hopefully RESS 3 will present better opportunities where speci��c categories for smaller scale projects between 50kW and 500kW or a speci��c ring-fenced category for biogas CHP. The Support Scheme for Renewable Heat (SSRH) This was launched by the Dept. of Environment Climate and Communications (DECC) in June 2019. The scheme supports renewable heat generation while ensuring that biomass is sourced through sustainable forest management as governed by the strict criteria in the RED II Directive. Fossil fuels can be displaced with indigenous resources such as biogas, bioliquids, energy crops, wood-chip and ��rewood. This o�fer opportunities for farmers to supply forestry pulpwood together with biomass energy crops such as willow and create alternative land uses to cattle-rearing. The Scheme for Renewable Heating (SSRH) – is administered by SEAI and unfortunately not being widely accessed, despite our climate crisis and emissions reduction targets. In January 2022 just €350,000, or 2 per cent, has been paid out under the SSRH scheme, which had a budget of €19.3m. While administrative issues have been quoted as a barrier to get involved, this scheme is very relevant to the hospitality sectors but hotels have had other ��res to quench over the past two years. The Microgeneration Support Scheme (MSS) This scheme aims to get 380MW of renewable electricity into our electrical grid by getting panels on approx. 70,000 buildings. Under the proposed scheme renewable systems between 6kW and 50kW will qualify for a Clean Export Premium (CEP) per kWh of renewable electricity generated for 15 years. This CEP tari�f is expected to begin later in 2022 and will pay a tari�f of €0.135 / kWh which is higher than the current average wholesale electricity price. We still do not know the full details about selling electricity to the grid. It is expected that farmers and anybody with available land or roof-space will be allowed to export excess electricity back to the national grid. DECC Minister Eamon Ryan stated that ESB networks have developed a more e���cient grid connection process for these systems between 6kW and 50kW (MSS projects). Small Scale Generation Scheme A new renewable electricity scheme to provide alternative income streams for farmers is set to be launched in the third quarter of 2023. This could be a potential on-farm diversi��cation option for farmers to get involved in. The Small Scale Generation Scheme will provide a 15 year Government backed funding to develop projects ranging from 50kW to six megawatts (MW) in electricity production capacity for both self-consumption and for export. The scheme will use a support mechanism called a two way feed-in-premium (FIP) which will ensure a rate of return of investment of 6 per cent. A wide range of renewable technologies will be eligible for the scheme including, wind, hydro, hybrid battery storage, biomass and biogas projects. Strategy Needed Ireland has massive green energy potential. There is a great deal of enthusiasm for renewables within the agri-sector. All of the renewable technologies such as wind, solar, AD, biomass will all require farmers involvement by dedicating their land in the clean energy transition. While we have a Climate Action Plan developed we need a clear strategy which can show how agri-renewables can contribute to the aim of building a cleaner, greener Ireland. It also needs to set out how far we can go in capitalising on the opportunities o�fered and where we see the future for agri-renewables. A good strategy would demonstrate how the Irish Government, working in collaboration with industry and other stakeholders, will continue to support development to achieve a sustainable and viable market for agri-renewables to help us deliver the transition to a low carbon economy. I look forward to seeing farmers, across Ireland making the most of our natural resources and with the right incentives in place helping us to transform the way Ireland produces and uses its energy. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 30 27/03/2023 16:49
  31. 31 LEADING DAIRY TECH COMPANY HELPS TACKLE FARM EMISSIONS AND IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY Mary Mulvihill of Dairymaster writes how milking technology is helping to transform the dairy farming industry in Ireland. The dairy industry includes over 17,000 dairy farmers and supports a further 60,000 jobs, with dairy economic output valued at €11.3 billion and exports valued at €5.2 billion in 2020. There is a substantial multiplier e�fect across the rural economy due to the dairy industry as every €1 of dairy exports represents a 90 cent spend within the Irish economy. In stark contrast, every €1 of goods exported by multinational companies represents a much smaller 10 cent spend within the Irish economy. The Irish dairy industry is known for its high-quality products, including milk, butter, cheese, and other dairy products. Many Irish milk producers have embraced sustainable practices and are focused on producing high-quality, nutritious food while minimising their environmental impact. One of the key challenges facing the industry at farm level is the shortage of skilled labour and the di���culty in attracting younger generations into the industry. At present, there is a clear lack of labour availability on Irish dairy farms. Having an adequate number of milking units is pivotal in encouraging e���ciency on farms by reducing milking times, reducing labour and ensuring a better work/family life balance. Agri technology and modern equipment also reduce the physical burden of daily tasks on the farm, making dairy farming a more attractive career. Dairymaster (DM) has always put a strong emphasis on energy e���cient products, time and labour-saving technologies and sustainable solutions to future proof the farm. These topics are becoming increasingly important for dairy farmers and Dairymaster continues to invest in R&D to provide next-generation technology and products. So much so, that the company has extensively rebuilt its equipment and herd management platforms and have a new suite of software. DM LiveVue gives the farmer a full picture of everything that is happening in real-time in the parlour, from information on the cows entering or leaving the platform and the status of cows currently milking, to the camera views at cups o�f or in the collecting yard. Technology across the dairy unit has advanced signi��cantly in recent years and has become an integral part of the management process on farm. The DM Swift��o Commander o�fers a level of intelligence and a lot more information for monitoring and controlling each cow’s milking and feeding, as well as animal health at each cow milking point – when and where it’s needed. There is no longer a need for running up and down the parlour with notepads or walking to the o���ce to look up information. Changes made at the milking point are automatically saved at source, making life easier for the farmer. Simple and easy to read visualisations of cow ID, group numbers, milk yields, milking duration, milk and wash temperature, SCC and SCC as a percentage of the herd, makes it easy for the farmer to see what is going on at individual cow level. The system integrates seamlessly with other Dairymaster products such as ClusterCleanse, MooMonitor+ and much more. With a push of a button, you are in full control of whether to draft or retain cows, manage a cow’s feed and more. In addition, the system automatically prompts the farmer when a cow is in heat or alerts the farmer when a freshly calved cow is in front of them. It uses milk composition data to identify cows at risk of ketosis and ��ags this information to the farmer. DairyVue360 is a complete farm DairyVue360 is a complete farm management system. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 31 27/03/2023 16:50
  32. 32 management system, which can record, analyse and display data for both the equipment and the cows remotely and via mobile. It can seamlessly integrate external data such as milk recording and combine milk productivity data with health and fertility data to help the farmer make better decisions for the future of the farm and herd. Fertility and herd health management in Irish dairy farming can have a signi��cant impact on the carbon footprint of the industry. Farmers need to select the right genetics when breeding cows to ensure that they produce high-quality milk. Farms that installed the MooMonitor+ system have seen a reduction in the number of inseminations, shorter calving intervals and increased genetic gains, as well as higher submission and conception rates. Improved reproductive performance can be converted into direct monetary values for the farm, from reduced A.I. straw usage, more calves per cow per year, higher production and reduced labour costs. The MooMonitor+ is a wireless wearable sensor that allows farmers detect individual cow heats and health events with ease through advanced data analysis. It monitors cows daily and identi��es speci��c types of behaviour such as feeding, rumination, resting time, and di�ferent types of activity intensity. This helps them identify issues and make informed decisions about the management of their herd. Rumination data gives the farmer a great indication of animal welfare. Cows love to ruminate; it shows how the cow is feeling and re��ects their digestive performance. It can also enhance heat detection accuracy even further and indicates when a cow is getting sick. The system pushes Health Alerts making a farmer aware when it detects health problems. This allows early intervention, reduced animal health products usage and better recovery rates on farm. As farms continue to develop, certain areas must be identi��ed for improving productivity and reducing costs. Moreover, given the cost of electricity, equipment such as plate coolers, variable speed drives, e���cient milk cooling tanks have a huge role to play in saving energy and, in turn, saving money. The Dairymaster VSaver rapidly optimises pump speed according to air demand for the parlour. As a result, motors use less current during normal operation. Typically, where the VSaver is installed, there is 50-80 per cent less energy consumption. Teagasc estimate two-thirds of on-farm electricity usage is consumed for milk cooling and water heating. With the cost of electricity and with signi��cant recent increases it is vital to reduce usage. The annual electricity demand for milk cooling on Irish farms is approximately 100,000 MWhr. It’s also important to look at older bulk tanks and cooling units in terms of the type of refrigerant that’s being used. Older refrigerants with high Global Warming Potential are now banned. Dairymaster’s SwiftCool milk tank keeps the milk in better condition and reduces the amount of electricity being used. Excellent thermal performance means milk temperature changes <0.5C if left unpowered for an entire day, saving you money. With night mode function, further savings of up to 25 per cent of annual cooling costs can be made. The need to have enough hot water on the farm is more critical nowadays with the use of chlorine-free detergents, yet heating water is an energy intensive process. However, in addition to reducing the cooling costs through higher e���ciency, there is also the possibility of recovering signi��cant amounts of heat from the milk. The SwiftCool Duo recovers 100 per cent of the condensation heat generated by the cooling unit. This allows the farmer to heat water very quickly and for every litre of milk cooled, you have the potential of heating a litre of water to 55 degrees Celsius – doing most of the work for the boiler. Milking technology is transforming the dairy farming industry in Ireland, it’s giving farmers the capability and functionality of doing herd management as they go about their daily tasks, improving e���ciency, productivity, and sustainability. By utilising these technologies, farmers can optimise their management practices, reduce energy and improve cow welfare, ensuring the long-term viability of their farms. The MooMonitor+ is a wireless wearable sensor that allows farmers detect individual cow heats and health events. The SwiftCool Duo recovers 100 per cent of the condensation heat generated by the cooling unit. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 32 27/03/2023 16:50
  33. 33 OPTIMISE MILK FAT PRODUCTION FOR ECONOMIC REWARD Dr Enda Neville, Ruminant Technical Manager at Celtic Sea Minerals, explains how Acid Buf can help to increase milk fat production in dairy cows. Milk fat is an important constituent of milk. Despite playing second ��ddle to milk protein in economic terms, it still makes a signi��cant contribution to farm-gate milk price. At recent prices of €5/kg of milk fat, a 0.3 per cent increase in milk fat for a cow yielding 28 litre per day is worth €0.42/ cow per day or an increase of 1.5 c/l. For the average 100-cow herd, this equates to €42 per day. Fat is the most variable component of milk and most sensitive to dietary changes (Stockdale et al., 2003). However, there are many factors underpinning milk fat production in dairy cows, such as breed, genetics, milk yield and stage of lactation. Rumen acetate, derived from microbial digestion of ��bre, is a precursor for milk fat production at the mammary gland. Historically, it was thought that a reduction in milk fat was caused by a lack of rumen acetate. This may still be partially true for high-starch diets but research from the last two decades has Giving cows access to an e�fective ��bre source, such as straw to help to maintain milk fat production. Table 1. The percentage di�ference in fat concentration per litre between cows fed Acid Buf and cows fed a control diet. 4.4 4.2 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 Fat % Acid Buf Control Bernard et al., 2014 Cruywagen et al., 2014 Neville et al., 2019 Neville et al., 2022 Average Bernard et al., 2014 Cruywagen et al., 2014 Neville et al., 2019 Neville et al., 2022 Average Table 2. The di�ference in total milk fat per kilo between cows fed Acid Buf and cows fed a control diet. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Fat % Acid Buf Control Forage_Guide_2023.indd 33 27/03/2023 16:50
  34. 34 broadened our understanding of milk fat synthesis. Rumen biohydrogenation is a process carried out by rumen microbes that convert unsaturated fats from the diet into milk fat. When excessive levels of unsaturated fats and oils are consumed, compounds called biohydrogenation intermediates are produced that reduce milk fat synthesis when absorbed by the mammary gland (Bauman and Griinari, 2003). The production of these compounds is exacerbated when rumen pH is low. Research has shown that maintaining the rumen pH above 5.8 reduces the production of these compounds, even when feeding high levels of unsaturated fat (Fuentes et al., 2009). Milk fat production is often reduced in dairy cows consuming pasture-based diets due to high levels of unsaturated fat in the ryegrass and a low rumen pH (O’Grady et al., 2008; Plaizier et al., 2022) caused by the lack of e�fective ��bre. While it is di���cult to avoid the high levels of unsaturated fatty acids in ryegrass, it is still possible to minimise or prevent a reduction in milk fat. Strategies that promote optimum rumen conditions will help to maintain milk fat production and can include the following: • Feeding Acid Buf; • Giving cows access to an e�fective ��bre source, such as straw; • Avoiding rapidly fermentable grains; • Avoiding ingredients containing high levels of unsaturated or free-fatty acids; and • Ensuring cows graze-out paddocks and consume the bottom 4-6cm of the grass plant. Acid Buf is a natural marine- derived feed additive that optimises rumen function and increases milk fat production. Acid Buf has been scienti��cally tested by several research institutes and validated by farmers in 52 countries around the world. The unique physical structure of Acid Buf allows it to become fully soluble in the rumen, prevent periods of low rumen pH and optimise rumen conditions (Cruywagen et al., 2015; Neville et al., 2019). Acid Buf has been scienti��cally proven to increase milk fat production in dairy cows. A recent review found that dairy cows fed Acid Buf produced milk with 0.31% higher fat concentration per litre and 0.16kg more total milk fat compared to cows fed a control diet (Bernard et al., 2014; Cruywagen et al., 2015; Neville et al., 2019; Neville et al., 2022). This represents a return- on-investment of 8-10:1 The recommended feeding rate for Acid Buf in grazing cows is 50 to 80g per day and can be added through the concentrate. Acid Buf is distributed in Ireland by AB Vista and ProNutri. Forage_Guide_2023.indd 34 27/03/2023 16:50
Advertisement