The radio shack court

975 views

Published on

Presentation offered to the Judicial Technology Advisory Committee of the Canadian Judicial Council

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
975
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
11
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The radio shack court

  1. 1. The Radio Shack Courtroom<br />The Case for<br />Paperless Courtrooms<br />Dominic Jaar<br />Consulting<br />
  2. 2. Reality Check<br />2<br />
  3. 3. Reality Check<br />3<br />
  4. 4. Reality Check<br />4<br />
  5. 5. Reality Check<br />5<br />
  6. 6. Reality Check<br />6<br />
  7. 7. Reality Check<br />7<br />Normal<br />
  8. 8. Reality Check<br />8<br />Normal<br />
  9. 9. The Cost of Paper<br />Environmental<br />Space<br />Inefficiency<br />Duplication<br />Search<br />Evidence Integrity<br />Money<br />$0.25 x #Pages x #Exhibits x 4 copies<br />Archive<br />Access to justice<br />9<br />
  10. 10. Judges’ responsabilities?<br />Maintainaccess to justice<br />Reducecosts<br />Learn to judge in a paperlessenvironment<br />Require technologies to beused in the courtroom<br />10<br /><ul><li>Improveaccess to justice</li></ul>- Justice B.T.Granger, The Future isNow, CBA Annualconference, Quebec, July 23, 2008<br />
  11. 11. Lawyers’ Obligations?<br />Maintainaccess to justice<br />Reducecosts<br />Learn to practice in a paperlessenvironment<br />Learn to use technologies in the courtroom<br />11<br /><ul><li>Improveaccess to justice</li></ul>- Dominic Jaar, The Radio ShackCourtroom, Judicial Technology AdvisoryCommittee, St. John’s, August 24th, 2008<br />
  12. 12. Why Technologies<br />Reduce<br />Delays<br />Costs<br />Improve<br />Access to justice<br />Image of justice<br />Efficiency<br />Enhance persuasiveness<br />12<br />
  13. 13. Issues<br />Lawyers’ Inherent Conflict of Interest<br />Printing = profit centers<br />Billable hours<br />Efficiency<br />Education<br />Courtrooms not designed for technologies<br />Judges’<br />13<br />computer literacy<br />IT Support<br />
  14. 14. The Radio Shack Courtroom<br />14<br />Justice B.T. Granger, Taking the next step and why you should, Computer Educational Skills Training Seminar, National Judicial Institute, Halifax, December 11-13, 2007<br />
  15. 15.
  16. 16. DIY Courtroom<br />16<br />
  17. 17. DIY Courtroom<br />17<br />
  18. 18. DIY Courtroom<br />18<br />
  19. 19. Issues for lawyers<br />Whichjudge has been assigned<br />For or against technologies<br />Equipement<br />Tech savvy<br />Which court room<br />What type of case<br />Presentation vs e-evidence<br />When to be techno<br />19<br />
  20. 20. New requirements<br />Collaboration<br />Lawyers<br />Judge<br />Clerks<br />Set-up time<br />Methodology<br />Standards<br />Education<br />20<br />
  21. 21. Resources<br />ABA LTRC: Litigation and Courtroom Technology Info Center<br />Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial and Trial [PDF]<br />Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Lawyer's Guide to Pretrial and Trial<br />Using Litigation Support Software in the Courtroom by Justice B.T.Granger [PDF]<br />ABA TECHSHOW, April 2nd and 4th, 2009<br />LegalIT, Canada’s Premier Conference on Law and IT<br />21<br />April 20 and 21st, 2009<br />Montreal<br />
  22. 22. 22<br />Questions?<br />

×