Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Higher Ed Digital Identity

433 views

Published on

Discussing bringing your digital identity online in higher ed for research and practice with ALS 6015: Teaching in Higher Education @profpatrice's class

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Higher Ed Digital Identity

  1. 1. Higher Ed Digital Identity: Bringing Your Scholarship & Practice Online #HEdigID @LauraPasquini 2014 AACE E-Learn #elearn14 Virtual Brief Paper New Orleans, LA Laura A. Pasquini, Ph.D. Learning Technologies – @UNTCOI College of Information The Digital Learning & Social Media Research Group, @RoyalRoads
  2. 2. about.me/laurapasquini @LauraPasquini
  3. 3. “Technology is a form of culture, a social practice... [however] they don’t arrive in our midst as neutral tools.” Nora Young, “The Virtual Self: How Our Digital Lives are Altering the World Around Us”
  4. 4. What does your digital presence or your identity online say about you? AND Why should you care?
  5. 5. Will you be “Googled well?” asks Richardson (2008). Let’s find out.
  6. 6. “The way we are defined on social media, on the Internet, and on Google has become more important than who we actually are as people.” Jon Ronson, “So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed”
  7. 7. Digital Footprints Digital footprints emerge as we communicate and interact online over social media, content sharing platforms, and by using and subscribing to tools and services (Bodhani, 2012).
  8. 8. The Digital Scholar Movement Martin Weller a.k.a. @mweller & his blog The Ed Techie: http://blog.edtechie.net https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the- digital-scholar-9781849666268/
  9. 9. The Digital Scholar “Impacts for digital scholarship include the quantity of peer-reviewed online information sources, the growth of social, peer academic networks, and the variety and range of content to draw upon for research that has broadened to include drafts of publications, conference presentations, blog posts, video and audio” (Weller, 2011).
  10. 10. The Digital Scholar Revisited "Much of the increased adoption in academia mirrors the wider penetration of social media tools amongst society in general, so academics are more likely to have an identity in such places that mixes professional & personal.” says @mweller http://blog.edtechie.net/digital-scholarship/the-digital-scholar-revisited/
  11. 11. Assessment of Research Performance Measurement of quantity and impact for research can also predict future scholarly behavior. (Vieria & Gomes, 2011)
  12. 12. Literature Review • What is shared through networks may not always be the true story. (Latour, 1986) • Challenge with assessing scientific performance at the individual level (Vieira & Gomes, 2011) • “move the evaluation from the power of the scientific journals to the quality of the single researcher (Castelnuovo, Limonata, Sarmiento & Molinari, 2010, p. 111) • Scholars and educators participate on Twitter (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2016) and identity development with open practices on social media (Veletsianos, 2013) • Academic influence in a scholarly network (Stewart, 2015) and vulnerabilities in collapsed publics (Stewart, 2016)
  13. 13. Research Identity Development – The Platforms and Social Spaces
  14. 14. ORCID ORCID: Connecting Research and Researchers http://orcid.org
  15. 15. Researcher ID http://www.researcherid.com/
  16. 16. Scopus http://www.scopus.com
  17. 17. Google Scholar Citations https://scholar.google.com/citations
  18. 18. Research Networks academica.edu researchgate.net
  19. 19. Citation Management mendeley.com zotero.org
  20. 20. The Social (Media) Scholar Beyond these specific scholarly platforms, we have seen an increase in social networking use, academic blogging or microblogging (e.g. Twitter), and online sharing of images, videos, and audio for both data and research distribution.
  21. 21. BloggingResearch (Chong, 2010)
  22. 22. TwitterScholarship (Darling, Shiffman, Côté, & Drew, 2013)
  23. 23. The “So What” for Research = Sharing Practical Implications
  24. 24. @catherinecronin
  25. 25. Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org OER Commons https://www.oercommons.org
  26. 26. Research Shorts: http://youtube.com/c/ResearchShorts The Digital Learning & Social Media Research Group http://thedlrgroup.com
  27. 27. Study In Plain English: https://techknowtools.com/2016/07/06/how-do-online- learners-overcome-challenges-in-moocs-new-publication/
  28. 28. Networked Research Collaborations & Opportunities
  29. 29. Flickr photo c/o dsearls Academic research silos BE GONE!
  30. 30. (Milton & Cox, 2004)
  31. 31. #AcAdv #phdchat #SAchat #edtech #AcWri #highered
  32. 32. Meet the #AcAdv Chat Community Follow on Twitter: @AcAdvChat Tuesdays (Bi-Weekly) 12-1 pm CST Hashtag #acadv acadvchat.wordpress.com
  33. 33. Cultivate an Active Social Network http://networkedcommunity.wordpress.com
  34. 34. Flowing from Digital Water Coolers… • Innovative Thinking & Practices • Knowledge Curation & Sharing • Interdisciplinary Studies of Student Support • Idea Generation & Growth
  35. 35. Impact & Influence
  36. 36. higheredpodcasts.wordpress.com
  37. 37. “Academics should utilize these emerging platforms to increase their influence and reach beyond traditional publishing forums. These researcher identification and citation tools are not “just for geeks,” but rather a growing expectation for scholarship development and publication notation. It is a critical time to rethink how research is produced, distributed, and acknowledged.” (Pasquini, Wakefield, Reed & Allen, 2014)
  38. 38. Flickr photo c/o furiousgeorge81 How will you manage your digital identity?
  39. 39. Ask Yourself These First 1) Where are you online right now? 2) What are your goals for being networked professionally? (and personally) 3) How will you engage in connected practice? 4) What are the characteristics or things you should consider in each digital space/platform? 5) What resources are available for you to learn more? Who can mentor/support your practice?
  40. 40. (Pasquini & Evangelopoulos, 2016)
  41. 41. #SAspe@LauraPasqui
  42. 42. project.wnyc.org/privacy-paradox
  43. 43. Stay in touch: @LauraPasquini
  44. 44. JOIN the conversation: https://techknowtools.com/2018/01/26/hedigid-twitter-chat/
  45. 45. References Bodhani, A. (2012). Digital footprints step up. Engineering & Technology, Feb2012. Retrieved from www.EandTmagazine.com. Brey, P. (1997). Social constructivism for philosophers of technology: A shopper’s guide. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 2(3-4), 56-78. [Web version] Available from: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v2_n3n4html/brey.html Castelnuovo, G. (2008). Ditching impact factors: Time for the single researcher impact factor. British Medical Journal, 336(7648), 789. Castelnuovo, G., Limonta, D., Sarmiento, L., & Molinari, E. (2010). A more comprehensive index in the evaluation of scientific research: The single researcher impact factor proposal. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 6(2010), 1745-0179. Chong, E. K. (2010). Using blogging to enhance the initiation of students into academic research. Computers & Education, 55(2), 798-807. Darling, E. S., Shiffman, D., Côté, I. M., & Drew, J. A. (2013) The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. PeerJ PrePrints 1:16(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.16v1 Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hewson, K. (2013). What size is your digital footprint. Kappan, 94(7), 14-15.
  46. 46. References (con’t) Stewart, B. (2016). Collapsed publics: Orality, literacy, and vulnerability in academic Twitter. Journal of Applied Social Theory, 1(1). Stewart, B. (2015). Open to influence: What counts as academic influence in scholarly networked Twitter participation. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 287-309. Richardson, W. (2008). Footprints in the digital age. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 16-19. Viera, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2011). An impact indicator for researchers. Scientometrics, 89, 607- 629. Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism ad the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3), 362-378. Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice. A&C Black. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter?. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1-10. Veletsianos, G. (2013). Open practices and identity: Evidence from researchers and educators' social media participation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 639-651.

×