Library and Information Science Research Coalition
May. 21, 2012•0 likes•1,210 views
1 of 19
We have a DREaM: the Developing Research Excellence & Methods network
May. 21, 2012•0 likes•1,210 views
Download to read offline
Report
Education
Technology
Spiritual
Presentation on the DREaM project delivered by Dr Alison Brettle, Professor Hazel Hall and Professor Charles Oppenheim at QQML2012, Limerick, May 22-25 2012.
We have a DREaM: the Developing Research Excellence & Methods network
1. We have a DREaM: the Developing
Research Excellence & Methods network
DREaM Project participant Dr Alison Brettle, @BrettleAli
with DREaM Project co-investigators:
Professor Hazel Hall, @hazelh
Professor Charles Oppenheim, @CharlesOppenh
2. Aim of the DREaM project
To develop a formal UK-wide network of LIS researchers
January 2011 until August 2012
3. • Overview
– Five events
• Launch conference
• Three linked workshops
• Concluding conference (9th July 2012, British Library)
– Event amplification
• Extensive use of social media
– @LIS_DREaM, DREaM online community, Vimeo, SlideShare…
5. • Workshop content
– Experts & methods
– “Unconference” half hour
– Interactive component
• “Social” aspects of
workshops
– Social evenings
– Social networking
– Event amplification
6. Workshop 1 Workshop 2 Workshop 3
Edinburgh 25th October 2011 London 30th January 2012 Edinburgh 25th April 2012
Ethnography User involvement: action Horizon scanning
research
Social Network Analysis Techniques from history Repertory grids
Discourse analysis Webometrics Data mining
Unconference half hour Unconference half hour Unconference half hour
Ethics and legal issues Research and policy Research impact
http://lisresearch.org/dream-project/dream-event-2-workshop-tuesday-25-october-2011/
http://lisresearch.org/dream-project/dream-event-3-workshop-monday-30-janua
http://lisresearch.org/dream-project/drea
8. • Impact of DREaM: participant
level
– Social network analysis
• To be reported at DREaM
conference on July 9th
– Research skills audit
– Critical incidents
– See also feedback on each
event
http://lisresearch.org/dream-project
9. • Research skills audit
– Familiarity “before” & “after”
– 5 point scale for each of 12
workshop themes
– 22 “before” submissions
– 25 “after” submissions
10. Never heard Heard but Applied in
of this unfamiliar In theory practice Expert
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Ethnography 2 0 9 1 8 23 3 1 0 0
Social network analysis 3 0 10 0 8 23 1 2 0 0
Discourse analysis 2 0 12 1 6 19 2 4 0 0
Ethics & legal issues 0 0 3 0 6 10 12 12 2 3
Action research 4 0 4 1 8 18 6 6 0 1
Research techniques from
history 5 0 9 0 4 20 3 5 0 0
Web metrics 3 0 10 0 5 23 4 2 0 0
Tying research output to
policy 0 0 8 0 5 14 8 8 1 3
Horizon scanning 4 0 7 1 7 17 4 5 0 0
Repertory grids 17 0 5 2 0 22 0 1 0 0
Data mining 0 0 11 2 10 21 1 1 0 0
Increasing research impact 0 0 5 0 8 13 8 10 1 2
11. • Critical incident analysis
– Use of unconference half
hour at third workshop to
collect data on “incidents”
of impact
– Thematic analysis: 15
responses
12. • Themes: impacts
– Influenced choice of PhD methodology or research
design
– Increased knowledge and (research) confidence
– Gave ability to demonstrate research knowledge
in the workplace
– Widened network/research relationships
– Generated new resources to share
13. Influenced Methods from DREaM 2
choice of PhD useful in planning PhD
methodology, especially
methodology or introduction to
research design ethnography and
importance of reflexivity
Able to suggest use of and discourse analysis.
“Social Network Analysis”
to colleague’s PhD student
who was looking for Adapted my research
suitable methodology to methodology for my PhD
measure impact of digital to analyse “discourses”
media. in interviews and in the
literature survey.
14. Increased [We] have input in
knowledge & areas where we might
not have previously,
(research) because we can make
confidence a contribution
“wearing [a] DREaM
hat”.
I’ve been more reflective
in my own practice, and
also considered a wider
range of methods and In chatting with academic
how they overlap or fit colleagues about another project…
together. I had insight and confidence that I
would not have had if I’d not
attended LIS DREaM.
15. Gave ability to [When] evaluating a
service to continuously
demonstrate improve and measure
research outcomes… the ideas
for designing the study
knowledge in came from DREaM.
the workplace
In general it has given When discussing the
me a profile at work importance of
which allows me to be evaluation with my
interested in research manager I mentioned
and its relation to different tactics that
practice. had been explored at
DREaM.
16. Widened [I] met Tom Haigh
(speaker) who
network & suggested I join his
research email list... I now have
useful responses to my
relationships questions and it’s an
interesting list.
It was part of
developing a closer
working relationship [I] posted details of
with my PhD regional event and [am]
supervisor. now in regular Twitter
contact with [an] LIS
DREaM member.
17. Following each workshop I
Generated have delivered short
sessions for fellow IS
new resources researchers where I shared
to share the content and how it
impacted on our
[I met a] DREaM organisation.
delegate doing academic
research. [She] shared
[a] questionnaire she Delivering the sessions
had used for similar has focused my learning My tweet on
project to [mine]. [This and highlighted ethnographic research
was] very helpful for [a] techniques to others methods was RT’d by a
current project.” who intend to apply colleague who’d found it
some for research or useful and recommended
work purposes it to other students using
the phdchat hashtag.
18. • Some conclusions
– DREaM project impact to date
• Largely tied to increase in knowledge and capabilities of
the workshop cadre
• There is evidence that participants now have a different
relationship with research
• Event amplification has contributed to potential for
impact beyond the core group
– What next?
• DREaM2 follow-on grant to capitalise on, and develop
further, the impact so far
• DREaM Conference, British Library, Monday 9th July
19. We have a DREaM: the Developing
Research Excellence & Methods network
DREaM Project participant Dr Alison Brettle, @BrettleAli
with DREaM Project co-investigators:
Professor Hazel Hall, @hazelh
Professor Charles Oppenheim, @CharlesOppenh
Editor's Notes
DREam is a UK project is funded by the AHRC – a national UK research funding body. The grant is held by Edinburgh Napier and the work is supported by LIR Research Coalition. The Board of the LIS Research Coalition dreamt up the project. Hazel developed the proposal based on earlier work by two representatives on the Coalition Board, Professor Charles Oppenheim (JISC) and Stephanie Kenna (British Library)
DREam is a UK project is funded by the AHRC – a national research funding body. The grant is held by Edinburgh Napier and the work is supported by LIR Research Coalition – Hazel and Charles – obtained funding, dreamed up the project???? Roles on LIS Coalition???
Overview of 3 workshops Methods sessions – experts from other fields, plus interactive elements – hearing about other peoples research in unconference half hour. Tasks and group work – eg discuss ethical problems All very lively and lots of enthusiasm – left each day wanting more
Outside the workshops – the DREaM online community can communicate with each other and obtain updates from the events. This is open to people outside the cadre.
Impact of Dream – Participant Level Social Network Analysis – reported at final conference. Completed a profile at beginning and the end Skills Audit Critical Incidents Focus on the latter 2 Make point that evaluation is ongoing – and furthermore that some of the impacts are likely to be long term – and difficult to quantify
Limited as its not a matched set of responses – so can only identify overall trends
Good news is that – everyone had learned something – and at the very least they all remembered the titles and subjects of the presentations!! Largest improvements seemed to be that participants now understood methods in theory – does this suggest a good depth of content of presentations?? Or a movement from unfamiliar to know in theory??? Examples that participants are beginning to use the techniques and the learning in practice – particular methods but also perhaps elements that are easier to incorporate into daily working eg increasing impact and ethics A few “experts” – longer term to become expert Useful to redo the audit in a year or even longer term – and see how things have moved NEED A BETTER WAY OF HIGHLIGHTING THESE???? THINK
Brief explanation of technique – ie asked them to describe one instance of how they had used the knowledge/experience from participation and its corresponding effect or impact
Range of impacts – should also say that enjoyment of workshops goes with out saying – difficult to capture the buzz that was in the room at the workshops – perhaps can see this from some of the videos. This methods captures some of the longer term ones.