Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Ashley Patel
<ul><li>The challenges in preparing for Solvency II </li></ul><ul><li>Adequate financial resources </li></ul><ul><li>Super...
Solvency II – Three-pillar approach New focus for supervisor Level of harmonisation Group supervision More pressure from c...
<ul><li>Governance – ORSA, Risk Management, Systems.  </li></ul><ul><li>Supervision of insurance firms – Risk based, prosp...
<ul><li>Technical Provisions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Best estimate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Risk margin  </li></ul></ul><u...
 
 
<ul><li>Pillar 2 is very important from a supervisory perspective </li></ul><ul><li>SII seeks to promote high and consiste...
<ul><li>Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Art. 44 requires firms to assess the level of risk ...
<ul><li>Adoption of new information and control infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Embedding this new infrastructure in the ...
<ul><li>Harnessing market discipline for supervisory purposes </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisory Disclosure (Art. 31, 52) </li>...
<ul><li>Risk Based Approach – Probability vs Impact </li></ul><ul><li>Off-site and On-Site Review </li></ul><ul><li>Emphas...
 
 
<ul><li>Do you really understand what Solvency II is about? </li></ul><ul><li>Have you completed your gap analysis? </li><...
<ul><li>Many challenges in preparation for Solvency II </li></ul><ul><li>Preparations should not focus on Pillar I require...
Thank you Thank you
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Overview Of Solvency Ii Ashley Patel ( Global Fpollp)

488 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Overview Of Solvency Ii Ashley Patel ( Global Fpollp)

  1. 1. Ashley Patel
  2. 2. <ul><li>The challenges in preparing for Solvency II </li></ul><ul><li>Adequate financial resources </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisory Review Process </li></ul><ul><li>Disclosure </li></ul><ul><li>Timeline </li></ul><ul><li>Questions for you </li></ul>
  3. 3. Solvency II – Three-pillar approach New focus for supervisor Level of harmonisation Group supervision More pressure from capital markets, investors and shareholders Market-consistent valuation of assets and liabilities Economic Capital Validation of internal models <ul><li>Quantitative capital requirements </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Technical provisions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Minimum capital requirement (MCR) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Qualitative supervisory review process </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Corporate Governance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Principles for internal control and risk management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ORSA </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Capital add-ons? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Disclosures </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Enhance market discipline through public disclosures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Annual FCR and Solvency reports </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provide additional (non-public information to the supervisors </li></ul></ul>Pillar 1: Pillar 2: Pillar 3:
  4. 4. <ul><li>Governance – ORSA, Risk Management, Systems. </li></ul><ul><li>Supervision of insurance firms – Risk based, prospective approach, proportionality </li></ul><ul><li>Burden of Proof </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrating Adequate Financial Resources – Pillar 1 </li></ul><ul><li>Use and Approval of Internal Models – Use Test, Data </li></ul><ul><li>Disclosure </li></ul>
  5. 5. <ul><li>Technical Provisions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Best estimate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Risk margin </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Firms should hold capital to cover a 1/200 event (99.5% confidence level) over a 1 year horizon </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enables undertakings to absorb significant losses </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Breach -> supervisory action </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Unacceptable capital level below this point </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Should result in a proportion of the SCR (25-45%) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>High quality capital </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Breach -> potential withdrawal of licence </li></ul></ul>
  6. 8. <ul><li>Pillar 2 is very important from a supervisory perspective </li></ul><ul><li>SII seeks to promote high and consistent risk management standards </li></ul><ul><li>Art 43 requires firms to </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Have effective risk management systems </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Consider all risk exposures, both current and possible </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have a risk management system that is fully integrated into the organisation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>It is not just about the SCR! </li></ul>
  7. 9. <ul><li>Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Art. 44 requires firms to assess the level of risk in their business and the level of solvency required to mitigate those risks </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Other issues : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Outsourcing (Art. 38) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Responsibility of management body (Art.40) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>General Governance – Requirements set out (Art. 41) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Fit & Proper – Requirements set out (Art. 42) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Internal control system requirement (Art. 46) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Internal Audit requirement (Art. 46) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Actuarial Function requirement (Art. 47) </li></ul></ul>
  8. 10. <ul><li>Adoption of new information and control infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Embedding this new infrastructure in the business </li></ul><ul><li>Verifying and documenting the new procedures </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrating to the Financial Regulator that the internal model is used in the governance, risk and capital management processes of the firm (Use Test) </li></ul><ul><li>Doing the above for a small firm </li></ul>
  9. 11. <ul><li>Harnessing market discipline for supervisory purposes </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisory Disclosure (Art. 31, 52) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Laws, regulations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>SRP methodologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Exercise of options </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Capital Add-ons </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Company Disclosures (Art. 51,53-56,256) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Solvency and Financial Condition Report </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Very detailed report </li></ul></ul>
  10. 12. <ul><li>Risk Based Approach – Probability vs Impact </li></ul><ul><li>Off-site and On-Site Review </li></ul><ul><li>Emphasis on On-Site Review </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Convergence in approach </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Directly assess compliance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Presentations, interviews, file review </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Supervisory Actions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Stress Testing </li></ul>
  11. 15. <ul><li>Do you really understand what Solvency II is about? </li></ul><ul><li>Have you completed your gap analysis? </li></ul><ul><li>What operational, business and strategic issues does Solvency II create? </li></ul><ul><li>Will your firm be ready for Solvency II? </li></ul><ul><li>What questions will the Financial Regulator ask you? </li></ul><ul><li>What clarity do you need on Solvency II? </li></ul>
  12. 16. <ul><li>Many challenges in preparation for Solvency II </li></ul><ul><li>Preparations should not focus on Pillar I requirements </li></ul><ul><li>Pillars II and III are very important </li></ul><ul><li>Different approach to supervision </li></ul><ul><li>Undertakings should ensure clarity on Solvency II </li></ul>
  13. 17. Thank you Thank you

×