Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Kshivets yokohama iaslc2017

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Kshivets iaslc denver2015
Kshivets iaslc denver2015
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 1 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Kshivets yokohama iaslc2017 (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Kshivets yokohama iaslc2017

  1. 1. Lung Cancer: System Approach Oleg Kshivets, MD, PhD Surgery Department, Roshal Hospital, Roshal, Moscow, Russia OBJECTIVE: Search of optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for non-small cell lung cancer (LC) pa­tients (LCP) (T1-4N0- 2M0) was realized. METHODS: We analyzed data of 708 consecutive LCP (age=57.5±8.3 years; tumor size=4.3±2.4 cm) radically operated (R0) and monitored in 1985-2017 (m=613, f=95;lobectomies=461, pneumonectomies=247, mediastinal lymph node dissection=708; combined procedures with resection of trachea, carina, atrium, aorta, VCS, vena azygos, pericardium, liver, diaphragm, ribs, esophagus=192; only surgery-S=563, adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy-AT=145: CAV/gemzar + cisplatin + thymalin/taktivin + radiotherapy 45- 50Gy; T1=269, T2=251, T3=131, T4=57; N0=460, N1=130, N2=118, M0=708; G1=178, G2=216, G3=314; squamous=394, adenocarcinoma=266, large cell=48; early LC=164, invasive LC=544. Multivariate Cox modeling, clustering, SEPATH, Monte Carlo, bootstrap and neural networks computing were used to determine any significant dependence. RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2196.3±1764.1 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 71.1%, 10 years – 63%, 20 years – 43.4%. 451LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3125.7±1560.3 days), 128LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5123.1±1547.9 days).195 LCP died because of LC (LS=560±372.1 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (58.3% vs. 34.1%) (P=0.001 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, RH, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time, weight (P=0.000-0.030). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12(rank=2),healthy cells/CC (3), lymphocytes/CC (4), thrombocytes/CC (5), eosinophils/CC (6), erythrocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), glucose (9), monocytes/CC (10), stick neutrophils/CC (11), leucocytes/CC (12). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0). CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracoabdominal surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis. Cox Regression: n=708 Parameter Estimate Standard Error Chi-square P value 95% Lower CL 95% Upper CL Hazard Ratio Weight -0.03847 0.009494 16.41380 0.000051 -0.05707 -0.019857 0.962265 Rh-factor 0.46842 0.210741 4.94059 0.026233 0.05538 0.881470 1.597475 Histology 0.28926 0.085602 11.41872 0.000727 0.12149 0.457039 1.335442 G1-3 0.34479 0.088371 15.22237 0.000096 0.17158 0.517989 1.411688 Glucose -0.30720 0.081717 14.13231 0.000170 -0.46736 -0.147036 0.735504 Prothrombin Index 0.02908 0.006817 18.19131 0.000020 0.01572 0.042439 1.029504 Recalcification Time -0.00522 0.001705 9.39082 0.002181 -0.00857 -0.001883 0.994789 Heparin Tolerance 0.00366 0.000672 29.69991 0.000000 0.00234 0.004979 1.003669 Phase Transition Early—Invasive Cancer -1.74787 0.398789 19.21033 0.000012 -2.52949 -0.966263 0.174144 Adjuvant Chemoimmunoradiotherapy -1.10726 0.204380 29.35098 0.000000 -1.50784 -0.706684 0.330463 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells -0.00401 0.001847 4.71895 0.029832 -0.00763 -0.000392 0.995997 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells -0.88030 0.403518 4.75925 0.029141 -1.67118 -0.089422 0.414657 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells -0.25257 0.074446 11.51021 0.000692 -0.39848 -0.106660 0.776800 Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 0.08529 0.030272 7.93770 0.004842 0.02596 0.144619 1.089030 Thrombocytes (tot) 0.00149 0.000383 15.25088 0.000094 0.00074 0.002244 1.001495 Phase Transition N0---N12 1.16358 0.148822 61.13067 0.000000 0.87190 1.455267 3.201377 Neural Networks: n=646; Baseline Error=0.000; Area under ROC Curve=1.000; Correct Classification Rate=100% Rank Sensitivity Phase Transition Early---Invasive Cancer 1 31912 Phase Transition N0---N12 2 23902 Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 3 2324 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 4 10104 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 5 9822 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells 6 9448 Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells 7 8308 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 8 8289 Glucose 9 7268 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 10 5583 Stick Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 11 5285 Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 12 3871 Bootstrap Simulation Rank Kendall’Tau- A P< Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 1 -0.229 0.000 Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells 2 -0.225 0.000 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 3 -0.220 0.000 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 4 -0.202 0.000 PT N0---N12 5 0.200 0.000 Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 6 -0.189 0.000 Tumor Size 7 0.158 0.000 Prothrombin Index 8 0.154 0.000 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells 9 -0.148 0.000 PT Early---Invasive Cancer 10 -0.146 0.000 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 11 -0.140 0.000 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 12 -0.138 0.000 T1-4 13 0.137 0.000 Weight 14 -0.098 0.000 Segmented Neutrophils (%) 15 0.098 0.001 Erythrocytes (tot) 16 -0.092 0.000 G1-3 17 0.085 0.001 ESS 18 0.085 0.001 Lymphocytes (tot) 19 -0.082 0.01 Lymphocytes (%) 20 -0.078 0.01 Only Surgery 21 -0.073 0.01 Glucose 22 -0.072 0.01 Heparin Tolerance 23 0.067 0.05 Eosinophils (%) 24 -0.057 0.05 Procedures Type 25 -0.055 0.05

×