Advertisement

Kshivets wscts2019 sofia

thoracic/abdominal/general surgeon & surgical oncologist at Siauliai Public Hospital
Sep. 11, 2019
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Kshivets wscts2019 sofia

  1. Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer and Blood Cell Circuit Kshivets Oleg, MD, PhD Surgery Department, Roshal Hospital, Roshal, Moscow, Russia
  2. Abstract • Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer and Blood Cell Circuit • Kshivets Oleg Surgery Department, Roshal Hospital, Moscow, Russia • OBJECTIVE: Significance of blood cell circuit in terms of detection of esophageal cancer (EC) patients (ECP) with lymph node metastases was investigated. • METHODS: We analyzed data of 543 consecutive ECP (age=56.4±8.8 years; tumor size=6±3.5 cm) radically operated (R0) and monitored in 1975-2019 (m=405, f=138; esophagogastrectomies (EG) Garlock=280, EG Lewis=263, combined EG with resection of pancreas, liver, diaphragm, aorta, VCS, colon transversum, lung, trachea, pericardium, splenectomy=151; adenocarcinoma=308, squamous=225, mix=10; T1=126, T2=114, T3=178, T4=125; N0=275, N1=69, N2=199; G1=157, G2=139, G3=247; early EC=107, invasive=436). Variables selected for study were input levels of blood cell circuit, sex, age, TNMG. Differences between groups were evaluated using discriminant analysis, clustering, nonlinear estimation, structural equation modeling, Monte Carlo, bootstrap simulation and neural networks computing. • RESULTS: It was revealed that separation of ECP with lymph node metastases (n=268) from ECP without metastases (n=275) significantly depended on: erythrocytes (abs, total), leucocytes (total), segmented neutrophils (total), eosinophils (%, abs, total), monocytes (%, abs, total), thrombocytes (abs), coagulation time, protein, residual nitrogen, cell ratio factors (CRF) (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), T, G, tumor size, tumor growth, histology (P=0.045-0.000). Neural networks computing, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships of lymph node metastases and CRF: healthy cells/CC (rank=1), erythrocytes/CC (2), monocytes/CC (3), lymphocytes/CC (4), thrombocytes/CC (5), segmented neutrophils/CC (6), eosinophils/CC (7), leucocytes/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9). Correct classification N0—N12 was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0). • CONCLUSION: Lymph node metastases significantly depended on blood cell circuit.
  3. Data: • Males…………………………………….….405 • Females…….............................................138 • Age=56.4±8.8 years • Tumor Size=6.0±3.5 cm
  4. Radical Procedures: • Esophagogastrectomies Lewis (R0)……………….…….263 • Esophagogastrectomies Garlock (R0)……….................280 • Combined Esophagogastrectomies with Resection of Pancreas, Liver, Trachea, Lung, Aorta, Vena Cava Superior, Colon Transversum, Diaphragm, Pericardium, Splenectomy (R0)………………………………………..…..151 • 2-Field Lymphadenectomy…….……………..…………....374 • 3-Field Lymphadenectomy.………………………………..…...……169
  5. Staging: • T1……..126 N0..……275 G1…………157 • T2……..114 N1…........69 G2…………139 • T3……..178 N2…......199 G3…………247 • T4……..125 N1-2…...268 M0…….…...543 • Adenocarcinoma………………………………………………………..308 • Squamous Cell Carcinoma……………………………………..……..225 • Mix………………….....…………………………………………................10 • Early Cancer……………………………...………………………….…..107 • Invasive Cancer…………………………..………………………..…....436
  6. Survival Rate: • Alive……………………………………....................................284 (52.3%) • 5-Year Survivors……………………………………………..…183 (33.7%) • 10-Year Survivors………………………...................................98 (18%) • Losses……………………..………………………………….….224 (41.3%) • General Life Span=1892.4±2241 days • For 5-Year Survivors=4311±2419.7 days • For 10-Year Survivors=5903.4±2299.4 days • For Losses=629.2±320.1 days • Cumulative 5-Year Survival for N0-N12…………………….………51.9% • Cumulative 5-Year Survival for N0…………..…………….………...73.9% • Cumulative 5-Year Survival for N12………………………………....27.5%
  7. Results of Univariate Analysis of Phase Transition N0—N1-2 in Prediction of Esophageal Cancer Patients Survival (n=543): Cumulative Proportion Surviving (Kaplan-Meier) 5-Year Survival of ECP with N0=73.9%; 5-Year Survival of ECP with N1-2=27.5% P=0.00000 by Log-Rank Test Complete Censored 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 CumulativeProportionSurviving ECP with N1-2, n=268 ECP with N0, n=275
  8. Results of T-testing for Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer (n=543): Variable Mean N1-2 Mean N0 t-value p Std.Dev. N1-2 Std.Dev. N0 Erythrocytes abs 3.9321 4.0480 -2.2878 0.022537 0.6013 0.5793 Eosinophils (%) 2.6119 1.9564 3.3211 0.000957 2.6603 1.8830 Monocytes (%) 3.8657 4.5855 -3.0755 0.002208 2.6670 2.7834 Thrombocytes abs 246.2164 230.4255 2.9488 0.003328 66.1781 58.4573 Coagulation Time 312.5082 267.4299 3.9177 0.000101 142.3578 125.4249 Residual Nitrogen 20.3224 14.5305 9.0438 0.000000 6.7240 8.1151 Protein 70.8358 72.4509 -2.2802 0.022987 8.6025 7.8958 Tumor Size 7.5955 4.4353 11.8861 0.000000 3.0092 3.1813 Eosinophils abs 0.1547 0.1172 2.9204 0.003641 0.1776 0.1169 Monocytes abs 0.2354 0.2933 -2.9455 0.003363 0.2100 0.2461 Erythrocytes tot 18.2003 19.4827 -2.8855 0.004063 4.9583 5.3829 Leucocytes tot 27.4540 29.6694 -2.0117 0.044743 11.8452 13.7212 Eosinophils tot 0.7306 0.5542 2.6457 0.008389 0.9488 0.5603 Segmented Neutrophils tot 17.4354 19.3848 -2.4926 0.012978 7.8233 10.2115 Monocytes tot 1.1030 1.4007 -3.0025 0.002801 1.0883 1.2166 Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells 2.7901 8.4450 -11.1571 0.000000 1.4259 8.1770 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 170.5577 466.2988 -10.3004 0.000000 84.0484 462.6386 Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 4.1185 12.4827 -10.0883 0.000000 2.1669 13.4031 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells 0.1048 0.2369 -5.2310 0.000000 0.1228 0.3951 Stick Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 0.0944 0.2351 -5.6168 0.000000 0.1358 0.3874 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 2.6124 8.0388 -10.3172 0.000000 1.4583 8.4888 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 1.1451 3.3509 -8.0249 0.000000 0.7599 4.4367 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 0.1639 0.6135 -7.2323 0.000000 0.1598 1.0054 Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 10.1004 28.9642 -11.4397 0.000000 4.6453 26.6020 Weight 65.7948 68.4364 -2.2476 0.025003 12.7561 14.5469
  9. ResuIts of GLZ Analysis in Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer (n=543): Effect N0---1_2 - Test of all effects (ECP, n=543) Distribution : BINOMIAL, Link function: LOGIT Modeled probability that N0---N1_2 = N0 Degr. of Freedom Wald Stat. p Intercept 1 8.54062 0.003473 Leucocytes 1 12.80606 0.000345 Segmented Neutrophils (%) 1 8.33307 0.003893 Residual Nitrogen 1 16.57739 0.000047 Eosinophils abs 1 7.55421 0.005987 Lymphocytes abs 1 8.08126 0.004473 Thrombocytes tot 1 22.93402 0.000002 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 1 38.68893 0.000000 Tumor Growth 2 40.52006 0.000000
  10. Results of Neural Networks Computing in Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Cancer Patients (n=543): Neural Networks: n=543; Baseline Error=0.000; Area under ROC Curve=1.000; Correct Classification Rate=100% Rank Sensitivity Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 1 12920 Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells 2 11262 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 3 7345 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 4 6154 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 5 6102 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 6 4350 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells 7 4268 Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 8 3294 Stick Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 9 3026
  11. Results of Bootstrap Simulation in Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Cancer Patients (n=543): Significant Factors (Number of Samples=3333) Ran k Kendal Tau-A P< Tumor Size 1 0.273 0.000 T1-4 2 0.268 0.000 Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 3 -0.265 0.000 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 4 -0.244 0.000 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 5 -0.241 0.000 Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells 6 -0.223 0.000 Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 7 -0.219 0.000 Tumor Growth 8 0.218 0.000 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 9 -0.215 0.000 Residual Nitrogen 10 0.199 0.000 Phase Transition Early---Invasive Cancer 11 0.195 0.000 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 12 -0.177 0.000 Esophageal/Cardioesophageal Cancer 13 0.162 0.000 Procedure Type 14 0.151 0.000 Coagulation Time 15 0.123 0.000 Combined Procedure 16 -0.112 0.000 Histology 17 0.098 0.001 Monocytes tot 18 -0.089 0.01 Monocytes abs 19 -0.083 0.01 Monocytes (%) 20 -0.082 0.01 Hemoglobin 21 -0.069 0.05 Erythrocytes tot 22 -0.067 0.05 Bilirubin 23 -0.063 0.05
  12. Results of Kohonen Self-Organizing Neural Networks Computing in Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer Patients (n=543):
  13. Equation Models in Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer Patients (n=543):
  14. SEPATH-Model in Recognition of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Cancer Patients (n=543):
  15. LYMPH NODE METASTASES OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SIGNIFICANTLY DEPENDED ON: 1) BLOOD CELL CIRCUIT; 2) CELL RATIO FACTORS; 3) BIOCHEMICAL FACTORS; 4) HEMOSTASIS SYSTEM; 5) CANCER CHARACTERISTICS; 6) TUMOR LOCALIZATION; 7) ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA; 8) SURGERY. Conclusion:
  16. Address: Oleg Kshivets, M.D., Ph.D. Consultant Thoracic, Abdominal, General Surgeon & Surgical Oncologist • e-mail: okshivets@yahoo.com • skype: okshivets • http: //www.ctsnet.org/home/okshivets
Advertisement