Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Kshivets ny2021aats

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Kshivets lc10 ys_wjarr
Kshivets lc10 ys_wjarr
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 2 Ad

Kshivets ny2021aats

Download to read offline

CONCLUSIONS: 10-Year survival after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT “early-invasive cancer”; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) Cell Ratio Factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) EC characteristics; 9) tumor localization; 10) anthropometric data; 11) surgery type. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for EC are: 1) screening and early detection of EC; 2) availability of experienced thoracoabdominal surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for ECP with unfavorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS: 10-Year survival after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT “early-invasive cancer”; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) Cell Ratio Factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) EC characteristics; 9) tumor localization; 10) anthropometric data; 11) surgery type. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for EC are: 1) screening and early detection of EC; 2) availability of experienced thoracoabdominal surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for ECP with unfavorable prognosis.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Kshivets ny2021aats (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Kshivets ny2021aats

  1. 1. Esophageal Cancer: 10-Year Survival Kshivets Oleg Surgery Department, Roshal Hospital, Moscow, Russia P1028
  2. 2. Esophageal Cancer: 10-Year Survival P1028 Kshivets Oleg Surgery Department, Roshal Hospital, Moscow, Russia OBJECTIVE: 10-Year survival (10YS) after radical surgery for esophageal cancer (EC) patients (ECP) (T1-4N0-2M0) was analyzed. METHODS: We analyzed data of 551 consecutive ECP (age=56.5±8.9 years; tumor size=6±3.5 cm) radically operated (R0) and monitored in 1975- 2021 (m=411, f=140; esophagogastrectomies (EG) Garlock=284, EG Lewis=267, combined EG with resection of pancreas, liver, diaphragm, aorta, VCS, colon transversum, lung, trachea, pericardium, splenectomy=154; adenocarcinoma=314, squamous=227, mix=10; T1=128, T2=115, T3=181, T4=127; N0=278, N1=70, N2=203; G1=157, G2=141, G3=253; early EC=109, invasive=442; only surgery=423, adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy-AT=128: 5- FU+thymalin/taktivin+radiotherapy 45-50Gy). Multivariate Cox modeling, clustering, SEPATH, Monte Carlo, bootstrap and neural networks computing were used to determine any significant dependence. RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 1881.1±2230.6 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 52.1%, 10 years – 45.9%, 20 years – 33.7%. 184 ECP lived more than 5 years (LS=4308.7±2413.3 days), 99 ECP – more than 10 years (LS=5883±2296.6 days). 226 ECP died because of EC (LS=628.3±319.9 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68.8% vs. 48.5%) (P=0.00025 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 10YS of ECP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) N0—N12 in terms of synergetics, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), T, G, histology, age, AT, localization, blood cells, prothrombin index, hemorrhage time, residual nitrogen, protein (P=0.000-0.021). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 10YS and PT N0—N12 (rank=1), healthy cells/CC (2), PT early-invasive EC (3), thrombocytes/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), lymphocytes/CC (6), eosinophils/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), segmented neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0). CONCLUSIONS: 10-Year survival after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT “early-invasive cancer”; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) Cell Ratio Factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) EC characteristics; 9) tumor localization; 10) anthropometric data; 11) surgery type. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for EC are: 1) screening and early detection of EC; 2) availability of experienced thoracoabdominal surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for ECP with unfavorable prognosis. Significant Factors (Number of Samples=3333) Rank Kendal Tau-A P Tumor Size 1 -0.316 0.000 Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells 2 0.315 0.000 T1-4 3 -0.307 0.000 Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells 4 0.307 0.000 Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 5 0.298 0.000 Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells 6 0.293 0.000 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 7 0.289 0.000 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 8 0.280 0.000 Residual Nitrogen 9 -0.277 0.000 Phase Transition N0---N12 10 -0.248 0.000 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 11 0.240 0.000 Hemorrhage Time 12 -0.233 0.000 Phase Transition Early---Invasive Cancer 13 -0.225 0.000 Procedure Type 14 -0.192 0.000 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells 15 0.163 0.000 Chlorides 16 0.163 0.000 G1-3 17 -0.140 0.000 Tumor Growth 18 -0.117 0.001 Stick Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 19 0.105 0.01 Erythrocytes 20 0.103 0.01 Weight 21 0.100 0.01 Combined Procedure 22 0.098 0.01 Localization 23 0.070 0.05 Factors: Correct Classification Rate=100%; Error=0.0; Area under ROC Curve=1.0 Ran k Sensitivity Phase Transition N0---N12 Healthy Cells/Cancer Cells Phase Transition Early---Invasive Cancer Thrombocytes/Cancer Cells Erythrocytes/Cancer Cells Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells Eosinophils/Cancer Cells Stick Neutrophils/Cancer Cells Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells Monocytes/Cancer Cells Leucocytes/Cancer Cells 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14768 11853 10080 8933 8326 7595 6406 5490 3938 2943 2658 Cox Regression n=551 Parameter Estimate Standard Error Chi-square P value 95% Lower CL 95% Upper CL Hazard Ratio Hemorrhage Time 0.00140 0.000402 12.18223 0.000482 0.00062 0.002192 1.00140 Residual Nitrogen 0.05156 0.011110 21.54182 0.000003 0.02979 0.073339 1.05292 Protein 0.02145 0.008664 6.12841 0.013303 0.00447 0.038428 1.02168 Prothrombin Index 0.02606 0.006403 16.55867 0.000047 0.01351 0.038605 1.02640 T1-4 0.43221 0.085980 25.26934 0.000000 0.26369 0.600727 1.54066 N0---N12 0.59826 0.161755 13.67911 0.000217 0.28122 0.915290 1.81894 Age 0.02845 0.007746 13.48557 0.000240 0.01326 0.043627 1.02885 Histology -0.28768 0.124960 5.30016 0.021323 -0.53260 -0.042767 0.75000 G1-3 0.42034 0.088794 22.41002 0.000002 0.24631 0.594377 1.52248 Adjuvant Chemoimmunoradiotherapy -0.93274 0.197277 22.35461 0.000002 -1.31939 -0.546082 0.39348 Segmented Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 4.04524 1.582385 6.53527 0.010576 0.94382 7.146654 57.12473 Localization -0.53528 0.190887 7.86335 0.005045 -0.90941 -0.161147 0.58551 Leucocytes/Cancer cells -4.11797 1.590909 6.70002 0.009641 -7.23610 -0.999847 0.01628 Eosinophils/Cancer Cells 4.26504 1.671458 6.51111 0.010720 0.98904 7.541033 71.16750 Stick Neutrophils/Cancer Cells 4.33745 1.642549 6.97321 0.008274 1.11812 7.556790 76.51243 Lymphocytes/Cancer Cells 3.93332 1.604682 6.00815 0.014240 0.78820 7.078439 51.07626 Monocytes/Cancer Cells 4.34006 1.643347 6.97483 0.008266 1.11916 7.560962 76.71226 Survival Function 5-year survivalof ECP=52.1%;10-year-survival of ECP=45.9; 20-year Survival of ECP=33.7%; n=551. Complete Censored -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cumulative Proportion Surviving Cumulative Proportion Surviving (Kaplan-Meier) 10-year survival of Early ECP=95.7%; 10-Year Survival of Invasive ECP=32.1%; n=551 (P=0.000 by Log Rank Test). Complete Censored 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cumulative Proportion Surviving Invasive ECP, n=442 Early ECP, n=109 Cumulative Proportion Surviving (Kaplan-Meier) 10-Year Survial of ECP with N0=68.6%; 10-Year survival of ECP withN1-2=20.8% (P=0.000 by Log Rank Test). Complete Censored 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cumulative Proportion Surviving ECP with N1-2, n=273 ECP with N0, n=278 Cumulative Proportion Surviving (Kaplan-Meier) 10-Year Survival ECP after Adjuvant Chemoimmunoradiotherapy=68.8%; 10-Year Survival of ECP after Surgery=48.5% (P=0.00025 by Log Rank Test). Complete Censored 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cumulative Proportion Surviving Adjuvant Chemoimmunoradiotherapy, n=128 Only Surgery, n=423 Cumulative Proportion Surviving (Kaplan-Meier) 10-Year Survival of Esophageal Cancer Patients=60.6%; 10-Year Survival of Cardioesophageal Cancer Patients=30.2% (P=0.000 by Log Rank Test). Complete Censored 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cumulative Proportion Surviving Esophageal Cancer Patients, n=262 Cardioesophageal Cancer Patients, n=289 Cumulative Proportion Surviving (Kaplan-Meier) 10-Year Survival of ECP in u/3=61.4%; 10-Year Survival of others ECP=42.4% (P=0.00339 by Log Rank Test) Complete Censored 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Years after Esophagogastrectomies 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cumulative Proportion Surviving Others, n=470 ECP in u/3, n=81

×