Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Evolution of storytelling - Noah Falstein

1,394 views

Published on

Published in: Entertainment & Humor, Design
  • Be the first to comment

Evolution of storytelling - Noah Falstein

  1. 1. Evolution of Storytelling Noah Falstein CCO, Suddenly Social
  2. 2. My Backgroundn  Began as a game programmer, 1980n  16 years in companies – LArts, 3DO, DWIn  15 years freelance design worldwide in console, PC, serious games, social, mobilen  Now Suddenly Social with creators of Habitat, about 1/4 of Lucasfilm Games in 1985 © Copyright 2012 Suddenly Social
  3. 3. Evolving Stories…n  Stories and games seem to go togethern  And of course in many ways they don  But in others, they are 180 degrees apart, and can fight each othern  Understanding evolution, game design, and psychology can help us align themn  Let me demonstrate… © 2012 Noah Falstein
  4. 4. House on Firen  Let me tell you a story…n  Is this MY story – or YOURS?n  What’s going on here? © 2012 Noah Falstein
  5. 5. Evolution of Storytellingn  Games are very old © 2012 Noah Falstein
  6. 6. Evolution of Storytellingn  Storytelling is likely even older © 2012 Noah Falstein
  7. 7. Evolution of Storytellingn  They seem to have a lot in common © 2012 Noah Falstein
  8. 8. Evolutionary Rootsn  Question of human nature, behavior n  Many designers turn to psychology and evolutionary biologyn  Need a theory for the hunter-gatherer society where our ancestors lived for millennian  But it should also help explain modern entertainment in all its varietyn  And of course, video games!n  Maybe help point the way forward as well © 2012 Noah Falstein
  9. 9. The Core Assumptions ofNatural Funativityn  Why would early humans take play so far? n  Play as kids to learn survival, then Work/Rest as adults n  But evolution favors fittest, and neotenous genes present n  How to be more fit – use energy, must have payoff, must not be too dangerous n  Like many evo things, have multiple uses, like languagen  People who didn’t experience fun were less likely to survive to become our ancestorsn  Only the context has changed a bit: © 2012 Noah Falstein
  10. 10. Hunter/Gatherer, Then: © 2012 Noah Falstein
  11. 11. Hunter/Gatherer, Now: © 2012 Noah Falstein
  12. 12. Video Game Hunter? © 2012 Noah Falstein
  13. 13. Video Game Gatherer? © 2012 Noah Falstein
  14. 14. Evolution Premisen  Entertainment is all about gaining survival (and reproduction) advantagesn  Stories are the first Virtual Realityn  We learn from others’ experiencesn  Games are about choice and actionsn  We learn by getting better at skillsn  Games are Doing, Stories are Tellingn  For more info google “Natural Funativity”
  15. 15. Gameplay trumps Storyn  So “Show, don’t tell” becomes “Do, don’t show”n  Many great games with lots of interactivity, no story – Tetris, Bejewelledn  No great games with lots of story, no interactivity. Count ‘em. None!n  But there are fabulously successful things with no interactivity and great storiesn  We call them Movies
  16. 16. Diablo II –Great Game, Lousy Story
  17. 17. But the intrinsic “storytelling”was enough
  18. 18. So is it hopeless?n  We can mix stories in gamesn  Stories can make games more funn  They can intensify emotional response or enable new feelingsn  They can add a new dimension to an already good gamen  It’s just hard – so you should have a good reason – and a good writer!
  19. 19. Story and Gameplayn  Let’s look at good gameplay and game design and see how it can blend with good storytelling © 2012 Noah Falstein
  20. 20. Definition of a Great Gamen  A great game is a series of interesting and meaningful choices made by the player in pursuit of a clear and compelling goaln  Dissecting this helped with a lot of early ideas about Natural Funativity © 2012 Noah Falstein
  21. 21. A series of … choices inpursuit of a … goaln  Must have choice, or it is not interactive n  Chris Crawford says “Verbs, not Nouns” n  I prefer “Do, don’t show”n  Must be a series of choices or it is too simple to be a gamen  Must have a goal or it is a software toyn  With Sim City, The Sims or Facebook players may bring their own goalsn  Storytelling supplies goals © 2012 Noah Falstein
  22. 22. Interesting and Meaningfulchoicesn  Choices may be dull and uninteresting because it was easy to code that wayn  Or it may be the reflection of a lazy designern  Meaningful choices are perceived by the player as having significant consequences – illusion is enoughn  May not have actual consequences… © 2012 Noah Falstein
  23. 23. Clear and Compelling goaln  Clear goals, because it is not fun to flounder aimlesslyn  Avoid the “protagonist with amnesia” and other clichés in your storyn  Compelling goals are goals that follow the concepts in Natural Funativityn  Survival is always a compelling goaln  So is romance – finding a mate © 2012 Noah Falstein
  24. 24. Structure: A series of choicesn  No choice – simplest, but least interesting possible structure – this is a linear sequence or narrative © 2012 Noah Falstein
  25. 25. Evolution of gameplayn  So let’s look at how video game structure has evolved over the years, and what has been proven to work © 2012 Noah Falstein
  26. 26. A series of choicesn  Meaningless choicesn  Obviously fold back into same pathn  Players discover this quicklyn  But good for simple action game © 2012 Noah Falstein
  27. 27. A series of choicesn  Infinite choicesn  Quickly become unmanageable © 2012 Noah Falstein
  28. 28. A series of choicesn  Choose wiselyn  Kill off player with any wrong choicen  Better but frustrating © 2012 Noah Falstein
  29. 29. For example… © 2012 Noah Falstein
  30. 30. And more recently… © 2012 Noah Falstein
  31. 31. Classic game structuren  A convexityn  Starts with a single choice, widens to many choices, returns to a single choice © 2012 Noah Falstein
  32. 32. Convexity qualitiesn  Go from one to many to onen  Can be a level, an act, an episoden  Can be any kind of choice – geography, weapons, tools, skills, technologies, quests – or story dialog choicesn  One example – exploring an islandn  Another – technology build tree © 2012 Noah Falstein
  33. 33. Fractal structuren  Large scale structure repeated on medium, smaller scales, like a coastlinen  In the case of convexities, each circle is not a single choice, but a convexityn  Frontierville example – To gain experience, build cabin, need tools, visit friends, tend their crops, request gift © 2012 Noah Falstein
  34. 34. A series of convexitiesn  Many games are chains of convexities B B B B A A A A An  Points of limited choice (A) alternate with points of many choices (B) © 2012 Noah Falstein
  35. 35. Story Tension Diagrams © 2012 Noah Falstein
  36. 36. A series of convexitiesn  Many overlapping convexities in great gamesn  Examples include Halo, Zelda games, Civilization, Diablo II, Starcraft, Bioshock, Frontierville, many othersn  Player can be starting one task or area, in the middle of another, and at the end of a third, all simultaneously © 2012 Noah Falstein
  37. 37. Why is this structure so good?n  Give the player choice but not an infinitely expanding set of choicesn  Mix of some “any order” choices (B) and some in fixed order (A), blending freedom with linear storytellingn  Can be structured so players see most of the game, minimizing wasten  Can have difficulty go up in new levels © 2012 Noah Falstein
  38. 38. Psychological advantages ofclassic structuren  Alternating intense learning (A) with time to practice (B) is the best way to master new skillsn  Gradual learning and introduction of new skills at the heart of fun game playn  “Easy to learn, difficult to master”n  Stories – series of acts, building to crisis © 2012 Noah Falstein
  39. 39. The concept of Flown  U of C professor Mihaly Csikszentmihalyin  One of his books is “Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience”n  Flow is a state of exhilaration, deep sense of enjoymentn  Usually when a person’s body or mind is stretched to its limits to accomplish something difficult and worthwhile © 2012 Noah Falstein
  40. 40. The Flow Channeln  Start with relatively low level of challenge to match starting skill levelsn  Gradually increase challengen  Fast enough to prevent boredomn  Not so fast as to induce frustration © 2012 Noah Falstein
  41. 41. The Flow Channel Too Hard (Frustrating)Increasing Difficulty si on y Pr ogres lt eD ifficu G am Ideal Too Easy (Boring) Increasing Time (and Player Skill) © 2012 Noah Falstein
  42. 42. The Flow Channeln  Flow state is common while developing same skills noted in Natural Funativityn  Best to introduce skills one at a time, let player master them, move on to newn  This results in staggered increase in difficulty (wavy difficulty line) © 2012 Noah Falstein
  43. 43. Difficulty Increase Varies B B B B A A A A A A = Rapid Difficulty Increase, B = Slower Increase © 2012 Noah Falstein
  44. 44. Typical game mechanismsn  High difficulty increase: Boss monsters, climactic battles, quest resolutionsn  Low difficulty increase: Bonus levels, new resource- and treasure-rich areas, series of easy “minion” enemiesn  Overlap introduction of new skills, areas to explore, tools, enemies © 2012 Noah Falstein
  45. 45. Story Tension Diagrams © 2012 Noah Falstein
  46. 46. Conclusionsn  Games, stories about evolutionary advantagesn  They blend on some levels, conflict on othersn  Use them in harmony and you will succeed, use them in conflict and player will feel frustrated © 2012 Noah Falstein
  47. 47. Thank You!n  Noah Falsteinn  Send me a Linked In request, mention this presentation or conversationn  nfalstein on twitter, skypen  noah@suddenlysocial.net (note .NET) © Copyright 2012 Suddenly Social

×