Changes in failure rate. (A) Data plotted as percent change in failure rate in the same course, under active learning versus lecturing. The mean change (12%) is indicated by the dashed vertical line. (B) Kernel density plots of failure rates under active learning and under lecturing. The mean failure rates under each classroom type (21.8% and 33.8%) are shown by dashed vertical lines. Impact factor 9.7 (second most cited journal)
Voorbeelden Rink, Erwin noemen
Annotatie op tekst / illustratie
13.00 – 13.45 hrs: Startup
13.45 – 14.15 hrs: first design round
14.15 – 14.30 pitches, evaluation and scoring
14.30 – 14.45 break
14.45 – 15.15 second design round, concluding
15.15 – 15.30 pitches, evaluation and scoring
15.30 – 16.00 next steps
Are the activities contributing to the final exam?
Are students supported to spend and divide their time over
the course schedule? (formative assessment)
Return-on- investment: how many runs of this course can be
done in this way? Will this course be sustainable in this
Who will continue with this design?
Do you as a staff member have enough support to continue?
Do activities contribute to the story line of the course?
Are the activities focused on the right level of learning
Do the course objectives, activities and assessment tie in with
the curriculum of the programme?