Does cognitive heuristics helpelectorate make better decisionsand vote for right candidate?Zhou Hao 11186119Kittikun Sangn...
Introduction• Cognitive Heuristics• Our question• Why is it Interesting?   public issues   effectiveness of decision mak...
Literature Review• Political Cognitive Heuristics  Party Affiliation  Ideology  Endorsements  Polls result  Candidate...
Literature Review (Continue)• Methodology : Dynamic Process Tracing, Mock  Election• Analysis of Result• Their Discussion
Discussion• Result of using cognitive heuristic  Efficiency      Political experts  Biases      Direct Measure      P...
Reflection• Limitations of article  Research design lack in “mundane realism”  Evaluation of the candidates’ effectivene...
Conclusion• voters applied the cognitive heuristics in  decision making• It is reasonable to conclude that the political  ...
Reference• Lau, Richard R., Redlawsk, David P., 2001.  ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive  Heuristics in Political...
Cognitive heuristic
Cognitive heuristic
Cognitive heuristic
Cognitive heuristic
Cognitive heuristic
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Cognitive heuristic

1,160 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,160
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Cognitive heuristic

  1. 1. Does cognitive heuristics helpelectorate make better decisionsand vote for right candidate?Zhou Hao 11186119Kittikun Sangnin 11307345Jiayuan Huang 11472267
  2. 2. Introduction• Cognitive Heuristics• Our question• Why is it Interesting?  public issues  effectiveness of decision making process by voters  right leader?
  3. 3. Literature Review• Political Cognitive Heuristics Party Affiliation Ideology Endorsements Polls result Candidates’ Appearance• Lau and Redlawsk’s Hypotheses All voters employ heuristics Effectiveness vs. Sophistication Complexity of Situation vs. Frequency/Accuracy of Use
  4. 4. Literature Review (Continue)• Methodology : Dynamic Process Tracing, Mock Election• Analysis of Result• Their Discussion
  5. 5. Discussion• Result of using cognitive heuristic  Efficiency  Political experts  Biases  Direct Measure  Political Sophistication  Situational Factors
  6. 6. Reflection• Limitations of article Research design lack in “mundane realism” Evaluation of the candidates’ effectiveness lack in the appropriate measurement Study is held on the large scale of area, it should be carried out the small primary election
  7. 7. Conclusion• voters applied the cognitive heuristics in decision making• It is reasonable to conclude that the political sophistication result in the better use of cognitive heuristic.• In the complex environment, there is an increase in the probability of application of the cognitive heuristic by voters.
  8. 8. Reference• Lau, Richard R., Redlawsk, David P., 2001. ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making’. American Journal of Political Science 45(October):951-971.• Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, Eds. 1982. ‘Judgement Under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases’. N` ew York: Cambridge.

×