International TradeTheories

2,166 views

Published on

Published in: Economy & Finance
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,166
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
95
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

International TradeTheories

  1. 1. In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Most Compassionate INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSInternational Trade TheoriesHeckscher-Ohlin TheoryProduct Life Cycle TheoryNew Trade TheoryDiamond ModelPresented By:Khawaja Muhammad ZaheerZubair Ahmed SiyalM. Com.I (A), IMPCC, H-8/4, Islamabad
  2. 2. Heckscher-Ohlin TheoryΘ This theory is based on a different explanation of comparative advantage put forward by Swedish economists Eli Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin.Θ It is also called factor-proportions theory, factors in relative abundance are cheaper than factors in relative scarcity.Θ They stated that comparative advantage arises from differences in national factor endowments.Θ Factor Endowment: “It is the extent to which a country is bestowed with such resources as land, labor and capital.”Θ Countries have varying factor endowments and different factor endowments explain differences in factor costs, abundance of a factor lowers its cost.
  3. 3. Global Implication of Heckscher-Ohlin Theory  It implies that a country will export goods that use locally abundant factors intensively, and import goods that use its scarce factors intensively. In the two-factor case, it states: “A capital-abundant country will export the capital-intensive good, while the labor-abundant country will export the labor- intensive good.”  The assumption is that two countries are identical, except for difference in resource endowments. This also implies that the aggregate preferences are the same.
  4. 4. Global Implication of Heckscher-Ohlin Theory (Cont’d)  The relative abundance in capital will cause the capital- abundant country to produce the capital-intensive good cheaper than the labor-abundant country and vice versa.  Pattern of trade in world economies: 1. United States is the most capital-abundant country in the world by any criterion, exhibits low cost capital and imports labor-intensive products. It is also a substantial exporter of agricultural goods by virtue of its abundant arable land. 2.China leads the world in in the export of goods produced in labor-intensive manufacturing industries, such as textile and footwear. This reflects China’s relative abundance of low cost labor.
  5. 5. Practical Examples in Purview of Factor RelationshipsLand-Labor Relationship: In Hong Kong and Netherlands land prices are very high because it is in demand, it is why neither Hong Kong nor Netherland excels in the production of goods requiring large amounts of land such as wool or wheat. Australia and Canada produce these goods because land is abundant compared to the number of people .Labor-Capital Relationship: In countries where there is little capital available for investment and where the amount of investment per worker is low, managers might expect cheap labor rates and export competitiveness in products requiring large amounts of labor relative to capital. Iran, (where labor is abundant compared to capital) excels in the production of homemade carpets. Exports of emerging economies, show a high intensity of less skilled labor.
  6. 6. Pakistan’s Factor EndowmentsApart from conventional factors there is an unending list of factor endowments such as energy, natural resources, knowledge, technology etc.Pakistan is still paying tributes to the misadventure of nationalization by Bhutto regime in 1970s.Due to lack of rapid industrialization , Pakistan has exported its manpower (the labor factor).Fertile land of Pakistan has turned out to be a factor endowment. Pakistan’s exports contain chiefly agricultural produce. 60% exports consist of textile products (raw & value-added).
  7. 7. Differentiating Heckscher-Ohlin Theory from Comparative AdvantageLike David Ricardo’s theory it also argues that free trade is beneficial.Unlike absolute concept of comparative advantage, however, Heckscher-Ohlin theory argues that the pattern of international trade is determined by differences in factor endowments, rather than differences in productivity.
  8. 8. Leontief Paradox: An extension to Heckscher-Ohlin Theory Paradox- Paradox of thrift Noble Laureate Wassily Leontief raised many questions on the validity of Heckscher-Ohlin Theory in his works published in 1953. A study conducted found that U.S. exports were less capital intensive than its imports. U.S. found exporting goods that heavily use skilled labor and innovative entrepreneurship (software) and importing highly capital-intensive machinery. Since this result was at variance with the predictions of the theory, it has become known as the Leontief paradox. Ricardo’s theory predicts trade patterns with greater accuracy. Technology is not homogeneous worldwide.
  9. 9. The Product Life-Cycle Theory The product life-cycle theory was put forward by Raymond Vernon in the mid 1960s. According to the PLC theory of trade, the production location for many products moves from one country to another depending on the stage in the product’s life cycle. It was based on the observation that most of twentieth century a large proportion of world’s new products had been developed by US firms and sold in US markets first (e.g. mass-produced automobiles, televisions, instant cameras, photocopiers, PCs and semiconductor chips). Vernon argued that wealth and size of U.S Market gave U.S firms a strong incentive to develop new products.
  10. 10. Product Life-Cycle Stages1.Introduction: Innovation in response to observed need Exporting by the innovative country Evolving product characteristics2.Growth: Increase in exports by the innovating country More competition Increased capital intensity Some foreign production (outsourcing)
  11. 11. Product Life-Cycle Stages (cont’d)3.Maturity: Decline in exports from the innovating country More product standardization More capital intensity Production start-ups in emerging economies (BRIC)4.Decline: Concentration of production in emerging economies ( The term of “Rising South”) Innovating country becoming net importer
  12. 12. Stage 1: INTRODUCTIONInnovation, Production, and Sales in Same Country Products are developed because there is a nearby observed need and market for them. Once a firm has created a new product theoretically it can manufacture that product anywhere in the world. However early production occurs domestically to obtain rapid feedback and to reduce transportation cost.Location and Importance of Technology Companies use technology to create new products and new ways to produce old products, both of which can give them competitive advantage. 50 companies worldwide that spend most on R&D are all headquartered in industrial countries. (R&D Scoreboard, Financial Times, June 25,1998) Dominant position of industrial countries is due to competition, demanding consumers, the availability of scientists and engineers and high incomes.
  13. 13. Stage 1: INTRODUCTION (cont’d)Exports and Labor The firms may sell a small part of their production to customers in foreign markets who have heard about it and actively seek it. These foreign customers are of other industrial countries with high incomes. The production process is apt to be more labor-intensive in this stage than in later stages. Ability to produce with expensive labor stems from the monopoly position of original producers because innovators have no competitors first. When production becomes highly automated, the labor becomes less competitive because unskilled labor may be quickly trained to perform repetitive tasks efficiently.
  14. 14. Stage 2: GROWTH∆ As sales of the new product grow, competitors enter the market.∆ Demand grows substantially in foreign markets, particularly in other industrial countries.∆ Demand may be sufficient to justify producing in some foreign markets to reduce or eliminate transportation charges.∆ Rapid sales growth at home and abroad compels firms to develop process technology.∆ The original producing country will increase its exports in this stage but lose certain key exports markets in which competitors commence local production.
  15. 15. Stage 3: MATURITY At the maturity stage, worldwide demand begins to level off, although it may be growing in some countries and declining in others. Product models become highly standardized, making cost an important competitive weapon. Longer production runs become possible for foreign plants, which in turn reduce per unit cost for their output. The lower per unit cost creates demand in emerging markets. There are incentives to begin moving plants to emerging markets where unskilled, inexpensive labor is efficient for standardized processes. Exports decrease from the innovating country as foreign production displaces it.
  16. 16. Stage 4: DECLINE As a product moves to the decline stage, those factors occurring during the mature stage continue to evolve. The markets in industrial countries decline more rapidly than those in emerging markets as affluent customers demand ever-newer products. The country in which the innovation first emerged and exported from, becomes the importer.
  17. 17. Graphical Interpretation
  18. 18. Verification of PLC Theory along ExamplesThe PLC theory holds that the location of production to serve world markets shifts as the production move through their life cycle.Products such as ballpoint pens and portable calculators have followed this pattern. They were first produced in a single industrial country and sold at high price. Then production shifted to multiple industrial country locations to serve those local markets. Finally, most production is in emerging markets, and prices have declined
  19. 19. Limitations of PLC Theory Why shift in production location do not take place for some products?1. Products that, because of very rapid innovation, have extremely short life cycles, which make it impossible to achieve cost reduction by moving production from one country to another. For example product obsolescence occurs so rapidly for many electronic products there is little international diffusion of production.2. Luxury products for which cost is of little concern to the consumer.3. Products for which a company can use a differentiation strategy, perhaps though advertising, to maintain consumer demand without competing on the basis of price.4. Products that require specialized technical labor to evolve into their next generation. This seems to explain the long term U.S. dominance of medical equipment production and German dominance in rotary printing press.
  20. 20. Engro Corp. – Emerging Corporate LeaderEngro Corp. is the holding company of Engro Fertilizers,Engro Foods, Engro ExImp, Engro Powergen, EngroChemicals & Polymer, Avanceon Ltd. and Engro VopakTerminal.Engro Foods Limited was officially launched as a fullyowned subsidiary of Engro in 2004. Using dairy as astepping stone to enter into the food business, theCompany has established state-of-the-art processing unitsin Sukkur and Sahiwal, along with an ice cream productionfacility in Sahiwal.
  21. 21. Prospects of Pakistan based MNE Top quality brands like Olper’s, Olwell, Tarang, Omore and Owsum have been successfully launched under the helm of Company’s dairy products. To support these brands and their highest standards of quality, Engro Foods has invested heavily in milk processing and milk collection infrastructure. With an acquisition of Al Safa – a fast growing and established Halal meat brand – Engro Foods is now venturing into North American market starting from Halal Foods category. The new organization, Engro Foods Canada Ltd. with a subsidiary Engro Foods USA, LLC, intends to aggressively grow the business in this market. With the vision of Elevating Consumer Delight Worldwide, Company’s significant focus will be towards the global operations in the years to come. Engro Foods is in stiff competition with the Swiss based Nestle in packaged milk products and with Walls (Unilever) in icecream.
  22. 22. Its hard to avoid competition in global marketplace!Efficiency isachieved by firmsby keeping inview carrot ofprofits and stickof bankruptcy.
  23. 23. The Man Behind Success Story One of a very few top notch business professionals of Pakistan The most sought after CEO of Pakistan, Mr. Asad Umarengro stands for “energy for growth”.From inception, ours is a legacy ofcontinuous growth, new challenges andfulfilled promises. From fertilizers to dairyproducts, business solutions to PVC resin,power generation to commodity trade, atEngro our ambition is to become thepremier Pakistani enterprise with a globalreach.
  24. 24. Ismail Industries Limited (iil) Candyland Snackcity BisconniThe products of Ismail Industries (beingthe largest confectionary of Pakistan)exhibits growth stage owing to their vastdomestic demand and increasing exports.Snackcity, Kurleez and Fritolays (Pepsi-Cola International) are having cut throatcompetition in snack foods industry.It is due to growing popularity of Kurleezridged Crinkle Crisps that FritoLay haslaunched a new ridged chips brand“WAVY”.
  25. 25. New Trade Theory Economies of Scale First Mover Advantage
  26. 26. Porter’s Diamond Michael E. Porter is a prominent economist and a Harvard Business School fellow. His popularized works are competitive advantage and five forces model . It explains why MNCs go worldwide. The Porter’s diamond shows the interaction of four conditions that usually need to be favorable if an industry in a country is to gain a global competitive advantage. Porter analyzed case studies of more than 100 firms and found that the firm that succeeds in global markets first succeeded in intense domestic competition.
  27. 27. Determinants of Global Competitive Advantage
  28. 28. Demand ConditionsDemand conditions in the home market can help companies create a competitive advantage, when sophisticated home market buyers pressure firms to innovate faster and to create more advanced products than those of competitors.I. Size of MarketII.Sophistication of consumersIII.Media exposure of productsJapan’s electronic products are regarded at high value around the globe.
  29. 29. Factor EndowmentsFactor conditions are human resources, physical resources, knowledge resources, capital resources and infrastructure. Specialized resources are often specific for an industry and important for its competitiveness. Specific resources can be created to compensate for factor disadvantages.I. Abundance of Natural ResourcesII.Education and Skill LevelsIII.Wage RatesNetherland enjoys 59% share of the world’s cut- flower market.
  30. 30. Related and Supporting IndustriesRelated and supporting industries can produce inputs which are important for innovation and internationalization. These industries provide cost- effective inputs, but they also participate in the upgrading process, thus stimulating other companies in the chain to innovateExistence of supplier clustersGerman engineering firms such as Siemens are world leaders in sophisticated engineering products.
  31. 31. Firm Strategy, Rivalry and StructureFirm strategy, structure and rivalry constitute the fourth determinant of competitiveness. The way in which companies are created, set goals and are managed is important for success. But the presence of intense rivalry in the home base is also important; it creates pressure to innovate in order to upgrade competitivenessI. More number of companies in same industry.II.Intensity of competition.III.Public or private ownership.Italian shoes are in vogue in every nook and corner of the world since decades.
  32. 32. References1.International Business by Charles W. L. Hill2.International Business by Daniels3.Marketing by Keran4.Economics by Paul A. Samuelson and Nordhaus5.CIMA Enterprise Operations (E1) by Bob Perry6.Wikipedia - www.wikipedia.org7.Engro Corporation – www.engro-corp.com8.Engro Sustainability Report 20109.Ismail Industries Limited – www.candyland1.com.pkwww.snackcity.com.pkwww.bisconni.com
  33. 33. “If you lay all the economists end to end they still won’treach a conclusion” (George Bernard Shaw)

×