TABLE OF CONTEXT
Introduction
a. Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1
b. Author’s Short Bio.………………………………………………………………..…………………………….……….2
Executive Summary
a. Goals and objectives………………………………………………………………………………………….…………3
b. Methods of analysis…………………………………………………………………….…………………….…………4
Risk Factors
a. Due Diligence……………………………………………………….……………….…………………………..…………7
b. Partnerships……………………………………………………………………………….……………………..…………7
c. Site Control…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..……………9
d. Construction……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..…………10
e. New Construction…………………………………………………………………………………….……..…………10
f. To‐be‐Developed……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………11
g. Adaptive Reuse………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………12
h. Time…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….…12
i. Lenders…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…12
j. Interest Rates………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………13
k. Design…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14
l. Manufactured Housing……………………………………………………………………………………….………14
m. Capital……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………14
n. Risk & Mitigation Concluded………………………………………………………………………………………15
Market Overview
a. National Overview and Key Demand Areas……………………………………………………………….17
b. Regional Economic Outlook…………………………………………………………………….……………..….23
c. Local Economy………………………………………………………………………….………….……………………30
d. Affordable Development Incentives…………………………………………………….……………………31
e. Public and Private Development…………………………………………………………..…………………..38
f. Assumptions…………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………40
g. Concerns………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………42
h. Market Delineation and Site Analysis…………………………………………………………..…………..44
Analysis of demand
a. Projected overall demand………………………………………………………………………………………..45
b. Analysis of absorption………………………………………………………………………………………………47
Analysis of supply
a. Existing Stock, Past Trends, And Future Supply………………………………………………………..48
b. Exiting Zoning And Possible Changes………………………………………………………………….…….49
Analysis of capture rate (marketability Study)
a. Competitive Advantages…………………………………………………………………………..……………..50
b. Market Segmentation………………………………………………………………………………………………51
Project Contexts: Site 1
a. Current Use……………………………………………………………………………………………..………………53
b. Geographic Location………………………………………………………………………………..………………53
c. Status Price Seller………………………………………………………………………………....……………54
d. Zoning………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………54
e. Concerns & Mitigation……………………………………………………………….……………………………55
f. Proposed Program & Land use……………………………………………….………………………………56
g. Market Rate Pro‐formas…………………………………………………………………………….……………58
h. Affordable Pro‐formas…………………………………………………………………………………….………60
i. Assumptions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………60
j. Sustainability……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……61
Project Contexts: Site 2
a. Current Use……………………………………………………………………………………………….……..………61
b. Geographic Location………………………………………………………………………………….………………61
c. Status Price Seller……………………………………………………………………………….………..………62
d. Zoning…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………63
e. Proposed Program & Land use………………………………………………….………………………………63
f. Concerns & Mitigation………………………………………………………………………………………………64
g. Market Rate Pro‐formas……………………………………………………………………………………………64
Result Comparisons
a. Least Risk……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………66
b. Most Profit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…66
c. Most Probable…………………………………………………………………………………………………….………67
d. Chosen Selection…………………………………………………………………………………………………………67
Reevaluation
a. Field Study…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………68
b. Physical Design…………………………………………………………………………….………………………….…69
c. LEED: Sustainable Building Design………………………………………………..……………………………74
d. LEED: Environmental Site Design………………………………………………………….……………………75
e. Environmental Management………………………………………………………………….…………………76
f. 9 Points of Smart Growth………………………………………………………………………………….………77
Project Financing
a. Stage 1 Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………80
b. Pro‐Forma……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………81
c. Capital Budget……………………………………………………………………………………………………………82
d. Mortgages……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…83
e. Projected Setup……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………84
f. Net Cash from Sale………………………………………………………………………………………………..……85
g. DCF, NPV, and IRR………………………………………………………………………………………………………86
h. Cash Flows During Construction…………………………………………………………………………………87
i. Relationship to the Competition……………………………………………………..…………………………88
j. Analysis of Market Segmentation………………………………………………………………………………88
k. Sensitivity Analysis…………………………..…………………………………………………………………………89
l. Assumptions………………………………………………………………………………………………………………89
m. Joint Venture Analysis…………………………………………………………………………..……………………90
n. Sources & Uses……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………91
o. Request for Proposals…………………………………………………………………………………..……………95
p. Concerns……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……96
q. Timeline………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……96
r. Marketing………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…97
s. Exit Strategies…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………98
t. Future Market Assumptions………………………………………………………………………..………………99
u. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………100
v. Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………………………………101
w. Acknowledgements & Sources……………………………………………………..……………………………103
They give
state’s m
With Sec
eligibility
for qualif
LISTING
RENTAL
100% of
110% of
120% of
130% of
140% of
B
FOR
SALE
0
Listing
Limits
$
(Miami D
The May
Miami, M
2006. Wh
trouble t
develope
portfolio
promised
e more eligib
minimum of 1
ction 8, the p
y by the hous
fied propert
G LIMITS:
L (see notes 1,2)
f FMR (1)
f FMR(1)
f FMR(1)
f FMR(1)
f FMR(2)
Bedrooms
1
400,000 $40
Dade)
yor of the M
Manuel Diaz
hile in office
hat was bein
ed with $14
dated back
d. Due to im
bility for dev
15 year. FHA
property has
sing authori
ies.
Miami, F
Bed
0
$74
$815
$889
$963
$1,0
2
00,000 $400
iami‐Dade C
were both b
e he has put
ng closely w
million that
several dec
proved unde
velopers who
A or VA insur
s to meet the
ty. Typically
L
drooms
1 2
1 $839 $
5 $922 $
9 $1,006 $
3 $1,090 $
037 $1,174 $
3
,000 $400,00
County, Carlo
born in Hava
housing as a
watched by H
the city was
ades with un
erwriting sta
o can guaran
rance is also
e below dec
, 140% of th
2 3
$1,018 $1,30
$1,119 $1,43
$1,221 $1,56
$1,323 $1,69
$1,425 $1,82
4
00 $400,000
os Alvarez, a
ana, Cuba. M
a high priorit
HUD. In 2001
s allocated u
npaid loans,
andards, the
ntee 30 year
available th
lared rent li
he Fair Marke
4 5
02 $1,522 $1
32 $1,674 $1
62 $1,826 $2
92 $1,978 $2
22 $2,130 $2
5 6
0 $400,000 $
as well as the
Mayor Diaz w
ty and fixed
1 only 100 af
unaccounted
and un‐buil
ere is not on
rs affordabil
hat subsidies
mits to be co
et Rent (FM
6
,750 $2,013
,925 $2,214
2,100 $2,415
2,275 $2,616
2,450 $2,818
6 7
$400,000 $40
e mayor of t
was recently
the housing
ffordable un
d for. Their a
lt homes tha
e post‐2001
ity instead o
s interest rat
onsidered fo
R) is the cut
7 8
3 $2,315 $2,6
4 $2,546 $2,9
5 $2,778 $3,1
6 $3,009 $3,4
8 $3,241 $3,7
8
00,000 $400
the City of
reelected in
g departmen
its were
wful loan
at were
loan in defa
of the
tes.
or
off
662
928
194
460
726
0,000
n
nt
ault.
(MapQuest) (Google)
(Miami Dade) (Google)
STATUS PRICE SELLER‐
The individual units are averaging at $340,000 and the distressed properties are being
mortgaged through mainly one bank, Wells Fargo. The typical sales comparison approach is the
most accurate way to measure the value of this building. There are other methods such as “the
cost approach” ‐putting a value on the assets and the income approach‐ using the gross rent
multiplier; calculating it based on how much the place could rent for monthly and multiplying
that by 116 months.