Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 24 Mid‐Mapping Charter Revisions Improvement Timeframe Value Stream Mapping: Case Studies

32,719 views

Published on

© 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 24
Mid‐Mapping Charter Revisions
Improvement
Timeframe
Future state realized by December 31, 2014
Last Step Product shipped
Boundaries &
Limitations
Must use existing resources (people, IT, etc.)
Trigger Customer submits RFQ
First Step Sales receives RFQ
Specific
Conditions
Land-based
Demand Rate 300 units (40 projects; 20 POs) per year
Value Stre
Scope
Value Stream Equipment type A
• Land‐based
• Retractable
• Multi‐stage
• Medium complexity (3 drawings, 6 new parts)
• 3 units per project
1. Added additional specific conditions.
2. Discovered current state was worse than assumed.
1
2
3
4
5
Create variance tracking methodology.
Standardize the change process to reduce the # of Change Orders.
Reduce lead time (PO to ready to ship) from 12 mos to 8 mos.
Goals & Measurable Targets
Increase average ontime delivery (to "ready to ship") from 17% to 60%.
Median current state lead time was 
actually 17 months.

Published in: Business

×