ABC Pool Remix Copyright Law


Published on

A presentation for the 2nd Year Sociology students at the University of Wollongong on copyright laws for ABC Pool. Includes examples and Case Studies.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Defamatory is more complicated. Firstly we have to establish if the usual person could identify the person being defamed. If yes, we need to establish what imputations there are, i.e. homophobic tendencies, paedophilia, etc. For each imputation, we need to establish if there is a defence. Typical defences are honest opinion, expressed as one’s view, or truth. Honest Opinion needs to have a base to relate it to and not just a rant – i.e. John Laws was caught in the Cash for Comments scandal but there is no evidence to suggest he is a paedophile (unless the artists knows a truth – which becomes complicated again).
  • ABC Pool Remix Copyright Law

    1. 1.
    2. 2. Remix – What is it?<br />
    3. 3. Rossco – Outside Broadcast<br />Original Image by Rossco CC BY SA<br />
    4. 4. Seldom Party - Raise Your Hands<br />Original work by Seldom Party CC BY<br />
    5. 5. AgedMusic – Raise Your Hands<br />Original Work by Aged Music CC BY<br />
    6. 6. AgedMusic - Jobs<br />Original by AgedMusic CC BY NC<br />
    7. 7. The ABC Release Process<br />Archives<br />Rights Management<br />Commercial<br />ABC Open Archives CC BY NC<br />
    8. 8. Reuse Copyright<br />Splits into 2 areas:<br />Moral responsibilities<br />Copyright Provisions<br />Mukumbura CC BY NC SA<br /><br />
    9. 9. Moral Responsibility<br />You should credit the original author<br />They have the choice to be credited<br />Toddwshaffer BY NC<br /><br />
    10. 10. Copyright Provisions<br />1. Fair Dealing (Australia)<br />2. Incidental Use: eg magazine cover (not featured material)<br />3. Extract of Reasonable Use: public speech, education literature<br />4. Insubstantial Use: it can’t be the heart of the original work<br />
    11. 11. Fair Dealing Provision<br />3 provisions:<br />Reporting of News<br />Review and Criticism<br />Parody and Satire<br />Mang78 CC BY NC<br />
    12. 12. Parody and Satire<br />Can’t be funny for funny sake<br />It must comment on a societal issue<br />M.J Vanz CC BY NC<br /><br />
    13. 13. Parody<br />“… is an imitation of a work and will therefore often include parts of the original copyright material – for comic effect and ridicule” <br />(ABC 2011)<br />
    14. 14. Satire<br />“… often involves attacking an idea or attitude, an institution or a social practice through irony, derision or wit”<br />(ABC 2011)<br />
    15. 15. Vague and Grey Area<br />No concrete precedence<br />Always a case by case scenario<br />
    16. 16. Pool and the ABC’s Position<br />Consider the profile of the person being remixed<br />Can you get permission?<br />Does it have a legal defense<br />Risk Management<br />
    17. 17. Case Study – Main$treaM<br />Copyright<br />Defamatory<br />Obscenity<br />
    18. 18. Case Study - Main$treaM<br />“Cockcheek Part 1”<br />Original work by Main$treaM CC BY<br /><br />Legal decision:<br />“Not OK because too highly obscene.”<br />
    19. 19. Case Study - Main$treaM<br />“Max Prophet$ Toyota”<br />Original work by Main$tream CC <br /><br /> Legal decision:<br />“OK, it’s not obscene, not copyright, and it’s parody.”<br />
    20. 20. Jonathon Hutchinson<br /><br />@dhutchman<br />HTTP://<br />