Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

IT 2.0 Transformation 101

Next-Gen IT 2.0 Consulting leverages proprietary CAPstone Strategy to achieve 2x Innovation, 4x Velocity, 10x ROI.

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all
  • Be the first to comment

IT 2.0 Transformation 101

  1. 1. IT 2.0 Transformation™ 101 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 1 The “IT 2.0” Remedy From 29% success to 90% Success!
  2. 2. What is “IT 1.0”? (THE PROBLEM: 29% success, $3T Losses) • Project Success (“modern resolution”): On-Time, On-Budget with Stakeholder Satisfaction • New CHAOS database of project statistics: Outcomes of 50,000 projects worldwide since 2002. (60% from USA, 25% from Europe, and 15% All Other Countries) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 2 HOW DO YOUR PROJECTS COMPARE? 2 1 1 IT Waste Worldwide (approx. 3.9% GDP): Corporate annual IT losses of $3 Trillion 2
  3. 3. “IT 1.0” Juggernaut (THE PAIN: Which do you experience?) • “IT 1.0” SYMPTOMS – Do you wonder why so many IT projects fail to deliver ROI? – Do your IT costs seem to grow exponentially over time? – Is IT delivery consistently a bottleneck? • “IT 1.0” INFIRMITY – IT is a Cost-Centre – Digital Transformation Stuck in Analog… – IT Systems Suffering Performance & Reliability Issues… – Biz Views IT as Funnel Catcher, not Indispensable Partner… – IT Security Initiatives Neutralized By Growing Complexity… 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 3
  4. 4. What is “IT 2.0”? (THE REMEDY: Win Faster with 90% Success!) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 4 IT 1.0: “Fail Fast/Often” From 29% success. (Biz vs IT Misalignment) IT 2.0: “Win Faster” To 90% Success! (Biz & IT Alignment)
  5. 5. Why “IT 2.0”? (THE GAIN: 2x Innovation, 4x Velocity, 10x ROI) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 5
  6. 6. “IT 2.0” Antidotes (Not Shown) (THE HOW: Remediates 24+ IT 1.0 anti-patterns) Enterprise – EA 2.0 (Tactical Biz-IT Alignment vs Strategic Biz-IT Alignment)Enterprise – EA 2.0 IT – IT 2.0 (Object-Oriented vs Architecture Oriented) Business – BA 2.0 (Operations/Tactics/OLA/Mgmt/Expense Oriented vs Innovation/Strategic/SLA/Leadership/Investment Oriented) IT – IT 2.0 Business – BA 2.0 IT ANALYSIS/DESIGN (ARCHITECTURE & FINANCE) Unimodal Ops/DevOps vs Multimodal Inno Labs Aware (SOS – Grtnr,TDS,Lockhd) Projects Pushed vs Programs Pulled (CREM - Lean) Ad-Hoc Mgmt Sponsor vs Strategic Ldrshp Sponsor (SLA – Ldrshp Simonton) Pseudo Engineer vs EntreLead Chief Arch/Eng (SPS – EntreLdrshp, TDS) Object Oriented vs Architecture Oriented (AOA/D – Sys. Thinking) Biz Req Elictatn/Tracbilty vs Biz Plan/Drivers Linkage (SOBA – Biz Plan) Waterfall/Agile Process vs Split-Spiral Practice (S3AP – Spiral Risk Mgmt) Internal Arch vs External Arch (ToD – Aerodyn Sys Eng) Func. Tradeoffs vs Non-Func Tradeoffs (NFTA - QoD) First Concept Eng vs Super Concept Arch (LAS – AOA) Critical-Path vs Critical-Loop/Chain (CLPM – CCPM, Deming) Point-based Services vs Set-based CapabilityTradeoffs (CTC - TDS/Lean, ITSI) SME (Cust/Usr) Rep vs SME (Cust/Usr) Partnering (SPS – LSS/VoC, Agile) 1-Stage RFI/Q/P vs 2-Stage Design + Impl (RF2P - AOA) IT 1.0 Anti-patterns vs IT 2.0 Antidotes (Mitigation Strategy) Comp. Adv (Ext) Srcing vs Core Comptncy (Int) Srcing (S2 – Neo/GBS, BPO) Offshoring/Outsourcing vs SmartShoring/Sourcing (S2) IT-based PMO/VMO-CIO vs GRC-based EMO-CINO/CTIO (SOS – PMI, Neo/GBS) ORG SHAPING (CORE ORG DYNAMICS) SOURCING (CONSULTING) TEAM SHAPING (CORE TEAM DYNAMICS) Functional Mgmt (Adm) vs Process Leadership (Tech) (SOS – BPM, DFSS, LSS) Dissimilar Culture Matrix vs Similar Culture Program (SOS - SOURCING) Lang-based Use-Cases vs Graphics-based Eval (SOBA – UML) Compliance-based PnP vs Target-based KPIs (SOBA - Lean Strtp AARRR) Order-TakerScoping(Cost)vs Financial MVPDeScoping (ROI) (SOBA–LeanS/MVP,ToR,DCF) Non-Technical BA vs EntreLead BA-Arch (SPS) OCM vs OCL Leader Awareness (SLA - CQ Troutlein) PM+BA+PseudoEng vs EntreSpnsr+EntreLead+SME (SPS) ORG CHANGE LEADERSHIP (OCL) EXECUTION (PORTFOLIO) Voice of Exprt (VoE) UX/UI vs Voice of Custmer (VoC) UX/UI (SOBA – LSS/VoC, D-Thnk) Low-cycles(Indiv&Team)<3vs High-cycles(Indiv&Team)>=3+ (SPS - Tuckman, Dreyfus) Assumed Vision/Verbal vs Shared Vision/InfoGraphic (SLA – OCM, Gravitation) Expense-driven SDLC vs Investment-driven SDLC (S3AP – SOP 98-1 Accntg) Struct-based Perf Mgmt vs Knowldg-based Perf Mgmt (SOS – TDS/Lean) BIZ ANALYSIS/DESIGN (ARCHITECTURE & FINANCE) Exprt Jdgmnt Concept vs Weighted Eval S-Concept (SOBA – SQFD, Dunning-K) Ad-Hoc QoD/QA/QC vs Design for QoD (OLA/SLA) (SOBA – LSS/SFMEA, FTA) Long-cycle Delivery vs Staged Short-cycle Delivery (CDSM – Iceberg Effect) Staffaug/WO(T&M) vs Consulting/SOW(CPP) (S2) Bottom-up 1-Stage/Pt Est vs Top-down 2-Stage/Pt Est. (SOBA – Opt-Bias,Dunning-K) Object-based Diagrams vs System-based Diagrams (UMN – UML, OMT, Booch) Single Modality Anti-Pattern PMO/VMO - CIO Anti-Pattern Teaming Reuse Anti-Pattern Administrative Mgmt Anti-Pattern Administrative Perf Mgmt Anti-Pattern Ad-Hoc Sponsor Anti-Pattern Blind Change Leader Anti-Pattern Blind Workforce Anti-Pattern Drum Multi-tasking Anti-Pattern Planning Criticality Anti-Pattern Microscopic Modelling Anti-Pattern Microscopic Thinking Anti-Pattern Architecture Definition Anti-Pattern Microscopic Tradeoffs Anti-Pattern Microscopic Interfaces Anti-Pattern Concept Singularity Anti-Pattern B/N/LDUF SDLC Anti-Pattern CapEx Accnting Design Anti-Pattern Estimate Singularity Anti-Pattern Pseudo UX/UI Anti-Pattern Ad-Hoc Scoping Anti-Pattern Ambiguous Requirements Anti-Pattern Blind Compliance Anti-Pattern Ad-Hoc QoD Anti-Pattern Pseudo Concept Anti-Pattern Req. Elicitatn/Traceabilty Anti-Pattern Fail-Fast/Often Delivery Anti-Pattern 1-Stage Sourcing Anti-Pattern Locl Ops Commdty Srcing Anti-Pattern Intl Ops Commdty Srcing Anti-Pattern Comp Adv Sourcing Anti-Pattern Pseudo SME Anti-Pattern Pseudo Cycles Anti-Pattern Pseudo Team Anti-Pattern Pseudo Engineer Anti-Pattern Pseudo Architect Anti-Pattern IT 1.0 Anti-patterns IT 1.0 Anti-patterns The chart on the left lists 36 IT 1.0 anti- patterns identified as root causes for the dismal worldwide 29% success rate and $3 Trillion in annual failed IT projects over the previous 2-decades. IT 2.0 Antidotes 36 IT 2.0 antidotes were researched, developed, tested, and refined for over 2-decades to mitigate the root-causes of IT 1.0 failure and are available for purchase as IT 2.0 GoldPapers™ on an 64Gb USB 2.0 Gold Bar Drive. IT 2.0 GoldPapers™ 64Gb USB 2.0 Gold Bar Drive Contains: • EA 2.0 NDA • 36 IT 2.0 Antidotes • ROI Calculator • Project Success Calculator http://www.it2catalysts/contact
  7. 7. “IT 2.0” Practices (THE MAGIC: Delivers 90% Success) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 7 Executive Leadership Strategic Sponsorship Strategic Program Shaping™ (SPS) Servant Leadership Algorithms™ (SLA) SDLC Process Scalable Split-Spiral Scalable Split-Spiral Architecture Practice™ (S3AP) Theory-Of-Design Algorithms™ (TODA) Business Analysis Focus on Biz Drivers & Non-Func Req. Statement Oriented Business Analysis™ (SOBA) Non-Functional Tradeoff Analysis™ (NFTA) Software Design Architecture Oriented Architecture Oriented Analysis & Design™ (AOA/D) Lateral Architectural Simplicity™ (LAS) IT 2.0 Best Practices IT 2.0 Transformation™ GoldPapers (Proprietary Methods) Resourcing & Procurement Smart Sourcing, CPP, & CTC Independents Smart Sourcing™ (S2) RFP 2.0 Procurement™ (RF2P) Project Mgmt Critical Loop & Critical Resource Critical Loop Project Management™ (CLPM) Critical Resource Enterprise Management™ (CREM) 90% SUCCESS RATE IT 2.0 Transformation™
  8. 8. “IT 2.0” Effectiveness (THE MOVE: Towards Disruptive Innovation) IT 2.0 Transformation™ Utilizes the Scalable Split-Spiral Architecture Practice (S3AP), the only IT Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) based on 20-years of R&D to leverage both Theory-Of-Design algorithms (TODA) and proven practices from both Lockheed “SkunkWorks” and Toyota “TDS”. Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 8
  9. 9. “IT 2.0” Comparison (THE DIFFERENCE: From 29% to 90%) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 9 29% Biennial Average 90% Biennial Average “Waterfall/Agile” “IT 2.0 Transformation™” IT 1.0 Success Rates as defined by Standish Group Biennial CHAOS Report -Disruptive Innovation! -Maximum Velocity! -High-ROI Results!
  10. 10. “IT 2.0” Case Study (THE RESULTS: Mobile Technology Startup) • BACKGROUND – Mobile Technology Startup in Denver, CO • THE PROBLEM – Strategic projects were stressed (late & over-budget) – Customers were upset and complaining • THE INTERVENTION – IT 2.0 Consulting® (between 2013-2015) • THE RESULTS – 4 Projects Recovered – New jobs created – Upset customers converted to repeat business – ROI = 1.5 to 2.1 (150% to 210%) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 10 “Implementing IT 2.0 Consulting® was like flipping a switch…” -Patrick B., CEO
  11. 11. Contact Us Today! (THE SUPPORT: 90 minute response time) 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 11
  12. 12. “IT 2.0” No Risk Engagement (THE OFFER: Value in 2-Days or Less or its Free) • SERVICES (24-Point Assessment, Advisory, Training, Audits): – Minimum Engagement is 3-Days of IT 2.0 Consulting® (fully refundable) – Money Back Guarantee: Full, prompt, & courteous refund if not 100% satisfied! • GIVING BACK: – When you do business with IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC 10% of all proceeds donated to charity! • CONDITIONS: – Expires 2/28/17 – Must be a New Customer (US Corporations only) • GETTING STARTED: – Redeem at – Click Contact 12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 12 Money Back Guarantee Full, prompt, & courteous refund if not 100% satisfied by end of 2nd day! $