SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 78
Download to read offline
Does The
     PTC
Make Sense?
  (Executive Version)
 Alliance For Wise Energy Decisions
               8/21/12
Make SURE to View This Presentation
    in the FULL SCREEN Mode!

        Click the “FULL” icon
   in the lower right hand corner.
Do NOT click on the Triangle
     below to run this presentation!

                Instead,
use your keyboard arrow keys to navigate.

           This will allow you
      to proceed at your own pace.
Does The Production Tax Credit (PTC) Make Sense?
This “Executive Version” is a VERY abbreviated edition of the more detailed “Professional Version” — which is intended for
Congressional Staffers and citizens with energy knowledge. References and credits are on the last three slides of the Professional Version.

The wind energy Production Tax Credit (PTC) has now been in existence for some twenty (20) years.

The Energy Policy Act of 1992 originally enacted the Production Tax Credit and the first lapse came in June 1999. The PTC was extended in
December 1999 until December 31, 2001. Once again the PTC expired in December 2001 and was not enacted again until March 2002 where
it was then extended for another two years. At the end of 2003 the PTC expired for a third time until a one year extension was granted in
October 2004. The PTC was extended through 2005 and also expanded the different types of renewable energies that would be included
under the bill. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (H.R. 6) modified the credit and extended it through the end of 2007. In December 2006, the
PTC was extended for another year by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (H.R. 6111). The PTC was extended yet again by the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (H.R. 1). The Wind PTC was extended an additional two years, expiring the end of 2012.

Every time the plea is that just a few more years will be necessary to get wind energy on its feet…

Our underlying message is that our energy decisions should be made on the basis of sound SCIENCE — not on what lobbyists say.

Hopefully you have already been to the “WindPowerFacts.Info” website, which has a collection of good reports on wind energy.

The future of this issue lies in whether or not citizens are properly educated about basic energy matters. After getting more up-to-speed,
they need to do some Critical Thinking about this matter.

After citizens get more informed — and do some Critical Thinking — they will be in a much better position to express their more informed
wishes to their federal representatives.

Anyone trying to educate their local citizenry and representatives, is welcome to use the material found here. In you have any questions
after you go through this, we will be glad to respond to any emails you send to the PTCFacts.Info website.

If you like what you see, please pass it on to other open-minded people, plus your federal representatives.

                     — ENJOY!

    Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions
— Outline of this Presentation —
1   -   Rationale for the PTC by its Advocates
2   -   Are Job Claims Accurate?
3   -   The Cost Per Job?
4   -   The NET Jobs picture.
5   -   Even More About Jobs.
6   -   The NET Economics picture?
7   -   What do Utility Companies Say?
8   -   Some Other Supporter Claims.
         — CONCLUSIONS —
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



            Part 1:
Benefits Claimed by Lobbyists
The Claimed Benefits
 for wind energy subsidies
  have radically evolved
over the last twenty years.
20 Specious Claims:
 How the supposed
     Benefits of
    Wind Energy
 have continued to
 evolve, as they are
 proven to be false.
The Wind Lobbyists’ Current Major Excuse
       for the PTC to be extended
          are purported JOBs.
How do lobbyists
    take advantage
  of good legislators?
1 - By telling them what they
    want to hear, and
2 - by counting on the fact
    that few will take the time
    to really check things out!
They also
know that
  there is
no penalty
for making
unscientific
  claims.
In short, our position is that —

 1) we do have environmental and energy issues, and
 2) these matters should be solved scientifically.


                The Soundbite:
Wind Energy = High Cost, Low Benefits
Part 1:
Benefits Claimed by Lobbyists?
             — THE TAKEAWAY —
      Since there are no scientifically proven
         net Technical, or net Economic,
or net Environmental benefits for wind energy —
the lobbyists are hanging their hat on JOB claims.
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



           Part 2:
  Are Job Claims Accurate?
Independent Studies
    Have Concluded:
Wind Job Claims are Exaggerated
Fact:
  Almost all US Wind Job Claims
  come from One Source: AWEA
   (Wind Industry Lobbyists —
whose job is to hype their industry).

  AWEA: the PTC is needed to “...save 37,000 jobs...”
A Sample Independent Study
Do Real World Facts Correlate with AWEA Claims?
Part 2:
Are Job Claims Accurate?
          — THE TAKEAWAY —
 Job claims from wind industry lobbyists
         have very little credibility.
Independent assessments have concluded
     that they are wildly exaggerated.
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



            Part 3:
         Cost Per Job?
Every Independent Study
    Has Concluded
    the Same Thing:
The Cost Per Job is OUTRAGEOUS!
The Congressional Figures




      $12.2 Billion / 37,000 jobs
       = $330,000 per wind job
A Sample Independent Study



                  $1,600,000
                  per wind job
A Sample Independent Study



                 $34,000,000
                  per wind job
Part 3:
        Cost Per Wind Job?

             — THE TAKEAWAY —
          No matter how it is calculated,
the cost per wind job is extraordinarily excessive.
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



           Part 4:
    What are the Net Jobs?
Almost All
  Independent Studies
    Have Concluded
    the Same Thing:
Wind Energy is a NET Jobs Loser
Indisputable Jobs Fact

            No Jobs claim has any merit
  unless it accurately considers the NET impact.
In their claims, there is zero evidence that AWEA
 has burdened themselves with this obligation.
Independent Wind Jobs Study
Offshore Jobs Conclusions of Independent Experts:


                                     Conclusion:
                                     Net is 30,000 ±


                                      jobs years
                                        LOST
                                     (again due to a
                                     single offshore
                                      wind project).
(Other Offshore wind studies are cited in the Professional Version.)



     OK, Offshore Wind Clearly Results
             in Net Job Losses.

           What about Onshore Wind?
(The details are explained in the Professional Version.)


              SAME THING!
When the big picture is objectively examined,
      a typical Onshore Wind Project

   will be an annual NET JOBS LOSER!
(Several other Independent wind job studies are cited in the Professional Version.)
Jobs Conclusions of this Independent Expert:
Part 4:
                  Net Jobs

            — THE TAKEAWAY —
              In the typical case,
wind development & subsidy is a NET JOBS LOSER.
    Remember: “NET” is a critical job indicator.
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



           Part 5:
    Even More About Jobs
The fact is
  That there is a lot more
     to the job claims,
than is immediately obvious.
(Several other perspectives about wind job are cited in the Professional Version.)
Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs
Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs
There is nothing — no program, no hobby, no vice, no crime —
    that does not create jobs. For example, tsunamis,
 computer viruses and robbing convenience store clerks
                      all create jobs.
             So since that claim applies to all
            it is an argument in favor of none!
     Instead of providing evidence of the merits of an
                  enterprise, a jobs claim is
     a de facto admission that one has a specious case.
                                     — energy attorney Chris Horner
Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs



                           A top government
                             official makes
                        a very blunt statement.
                              Tax credits
                        don’t create wind jobs.
Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs
  If Congress is determined to spend the $12.2 Billion
     that just a one year PTC extension would cost,
                 an important question is:
What would be the job (and other) benefits of spending
    that same amount on another energy source?
         According to the Congressional Budget Office
   if the same $12.2 Billion were given to the gas industry,
        over 9 times as many jobs would be created.
Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs



                      Less Expensive Energy
                         is a Proven Way
                        to create net jobs.
                      Subsidizing expensive energy is
                       a counterproductive strategy
Part 5:
    Even More About Jobs

            — THE TAKEAWAY —
  The jobs argument is a public relations ploy
         to distract us from the reality
that wind energy is a very poor energy option.
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



           Part 6:
    Net Economic Impact?
Almost All
     Independent Studies
       Have Concluded
       the Same Thing:
Wind Energy is a NET Economics Loser
Sample Wind Economics Study
Economic Conclusions of these Independent Experts:




                                       $1,080,000,000




Conclusion: over $1 Billion lost in one year alone!
Economic Conclusions of these Independent Experts:




Conclusion: More $ Hundreds of Millions lost!
Economic Conclusions of these Independent Experts:




                                         In one county,
                                        property owners
                                           will LOSE
                                       $640,000,000±
                                       in real estate value!
(Other Offshore wind studies are cited in the Professional Version.)



       OK, Offshore Wind Also Results
          in Net Economic Losses.

           What about Onshore Wind?
(The details are explained in the Professional Version.)


              SAME THING!
When the big picture is objectively examined,
      a typical Onshore Wind Project

will be an annual NET ECONOMICS LOSER!
And There’s More.

      The Professional Version
   has 8 extra slides that identify
 Some ADDITIONAL Economic Costs.
Almost none of these are normally included
      when the cost of wind energy
           is being presented.
In ADDITION to generous Federal subsidies (like the PTC),
   many states offer financial incentives for wind power, like:

                1. Personal Tax Incentives
                2. Corporate Tax Incentives
                3. Sales Tax Incentives
                4. Property Tax Incentives
                5. Rebates
                6. Grants
                7. Loans
                8. Industry Support
                9. Bonds, and
               10. Production Incentives.


On top of these financial incentives, state and local governments have established rules,
regulations and policies (like RPS), with the purpose of encouraging or mandating the
  development and increased sale and consumption of energy from renewable sources.

                Yet all this still isn’t enough???
E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G
about Wind Energy economics
       is problematic!
Part 6:
            Net Economics

            — THE TAKEAWAY —
              In the typical case,
wind development is a NET ECONOMICS LOSER.
Remember: “NET” is a critical economics indicator.
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



            Part 7:
What Do Utility Companies Say?
Utility Companies are
regulated by the government.
 As such they avoid saying anything
  that is not “politically correct”.
       Despite this constraint
 the TRUTH has a way of coming out.
A major utility executive’s
very disturbing assessment

 When National Grid’s CEO was challenged
  about integrating wind energy, he said:


 “Families would have to get
  used to only using power
    when it was available,
   rather than constantly.”
One of a series of ads from Idaho Power



“In the simplest of terms,
  special interest groups
 and wind developers are
  asking you to pay more
for a less reliable product.
 And that just isn’t right.”
More real world evidence
   from utility experts,
  about the real cost of
 wind energy. They say:
onshore = 2-3 times more
offshore = 4-5 times more


Note: this does NOT include
 the extra cost of the PTC!
Regarding wind subsidies,
the CEO of Ohio’s North Central Electric Cooperative says:
This is the most advanced Utility Company report
          on wind energy, ever published.
Regarding jobs and economics, this study says:
Part 7:
What Do Utility Companies Say?

               — THE TAKEAWAY —
        When utility companies have the courage
    to speak honestly about industrial wind energy,
                   they are against it.
 (There are several other Utility comments cited in the Professional Version.)
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?



          Part 8:
Some Other Supporter Claims
Even though JOBS is their
main argument for the PTC,
    some other assertions
    are periodically made...
Another justification put forward for the PTC:

         “The PTC is not Another Solyndra.”


Objective perspective:
                    That is correct — it’s much worse.

   Per government figures, Solyndra cost taxpayers $0.5± Billion.
  A one year extension of the PTC will cost taxpayers $12.2 Billion.
Another justification put forward for the PTC:

        “Some manufacturing jobs will be lost.”
Objective perspective:
                     That is correct — but that’s life.

   Modernization is continually making certain products out-dated,
           which means jobs in those industries are lost.

     Should taxpayers be subsidizing the jobs for those producing
      B&W TVs, 8-track tapes, horse carriages, hoola-hoops, etc?
Another justification put forward for the PTC:

     “Some landowners are making big profits.”
Objective perspective:
                That is correct — but at whose expense?
Other justifications put forward for the PTC:
   “The Wind industry needs to have certainty.”
        “The PTC needs to be phased out.”
Objective perspective:
             Both are correct — and both are already done.
Part 8:
Some Other Supporter Claims

            — THE TAKEAWAY —
      When looking at the BIG PICTURE
 these claims do NOT justify a PTC extension.

  (Other supporter claims are cited in the Professional Version.)
DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE?




        CONCLUSIONS
Attention Republicans:
          A PTC for 2013+ is a new TAX*
         as such it violates the ATR Pledge
* “Specialists term these synthetic government spending programs ʻtax
expenditures.ʼ Tax expenditures are really spending programs, not tax
rollbacks, because the missing tax revenues must be financed by more
taxes on somebody else. Like any other form of deficit spending … a
targeted tax break coupled with a specific revenue ʻpayforʼ means that one
group of Americans is required to pay (in the form of higher taxes) for a
subsidy to be delivered to others through the mechanism of the tax system.”
                                                              —Dr. Edward D. Kleinbard,
                                     Professor of Law at the Gould School of Law, UCLA
Attention Democrats:
    A PTC for 2013+ is a TAX BREAK,
       that will primarily be used
       by High-Income Taxpayers.

          As such it is a violation
of your party’s campaign for Tax Fairness.
Is an “All of the Above” Energy Policy wise?
       Only if it makes sense to include:
                    unreliable,
                  expensive, and
  environmentally destructive energy options!

We need an “All of the Sensible” Energy Policy.
— Conclusions —

Wind Energy is a net jobs loser and a net economics loser,
        that has no scientific proof that it has any
  net technical, economic or environmental benefits.

   Why should US taxpayers pay for such a charade?
The wind PTC
 makes as much sense
   as the government
  subsidizing ranchers
    to have cows run
in the Kentucky Derby.

More Related Content

What's hot

Government CIO and Climate Change
Government CIO and Climate ChangeGovernment CIO and Climate Change
Government CIO and Climate ChangeBill St. Arnaud
 
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day One
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day OnePowerGen Conference 2015 Day One
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day OneDavid Lipschitz
 
Virgin Green Fund Referral Request
Virgin Green Fund Referral RequestVirgin Green Fund Referral Request
Virgin Green Fund Referral RequestThane Heins
 
Energy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding Opportunities
Energy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding OpportunitiesEnergy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding Opportunities
Energy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding OpportunitiesAlliance To Save Energy
 
Future of ai 20190612 v1
Future of ai 20190612 v1Future of ai 20190612 v1
Future of ai 20190612 v1ISSIP
 
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day Two
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day TwoPowerGen Conference 2015 Day Two
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day TwoDavid Lipschitz
 
Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century: A Management and Sustainabilit...
Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century:  A Management and Sustainabilit...Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century:  A Management and Sustainabilit...
Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century: A Management and Sustainabilit...Jonathan Koomey
 
JISC Green IT parallel session April 10
JISC  Green IT parallel session April 10JISC  Green IT parallel session April 10
JISC Green IT parallel session April 10Bill St. Arnaud
 
Kinetic Presentation1
Kinetic Presentation1Kinetic Presentation1
Kinetic Presentation1JrChildress
 
Green I T Workshop Intro V2
Green  I T Workshop   Intro V2Green  I T Workshop   Intro V2
Green I T Workshop Intro V2Bill St. Arnaud
 
Rough seas ahead for "in-house" data centers
Rough seas ahead for "in-house" data centersRough seas ahead for "in-house" data centers
Rough seas ahead for "in-house" data centersJonathan Koomey
 
On Vector Green Broadband
On Vector   Green BroadbandOn Vector   Green Broadband
On Vector Green BroadbandBill St. Arnaud
 
Are people the problem or solution: reflections from the wild
Are people the problem or solution: reflections from the wildAre people the problem or solution: reflections from the wild
Are people the problem or solution: reflections from the wildNottingham Trent University
 
Educause Green It Summit Nov 13
Educause Green It Summit   Nov 13Educause Green It Summit   Nov 13
Educause Green It Summit Nov 13Bill St. Arnaud
 
Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future keynote by dr. mari...
Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future   keynote by dr. mari...Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future   keynote by dr. mari...
Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future keynote by dr. mari...TNenergy
 

What's hot (20)

Government CIO and Climate Change
Government CIO and Climate ChangeGovernment CIO and Climate Change
Government CIO and Climate Change
 
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day One
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day OnePowerGen Conference 2015 Day One
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day One
 
JISC April 10
JISC April 10JISC April 10
JISC April 10
 
Virgin Green Fund Referral Request
Virgin Green Fund Referral RequestVirgin Green Fund Referral Request
Virgin Green Fund Referral Request
 
Lead To Win May 18
Lead To Win May 18Lead To Win May 18
Lead To Win May 18
 
Energy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding Opportunities
Energy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding OpportunitiesEnergy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding Opportunities
Energy Efficiency and Economic Recovery: Stimulus Funding Opportunities
 
SURA Meeting Washington
SURA Meeting WashingtonSURA Meeting Washington
SURA Meeting Washington
 
Future of ai 20190612 v1
Future of ai 20190612 v1Future of ai 20190612 v1
Future of ai 20190612 v1
 
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day Two
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day TwoPowerGen Conference 2015 Day Two
PowerGen Conference 2015 Day Two
 
Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century: A Management and Sustainabilit...
Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century:  A Management and Sustainabilit...Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century:  A Management and Sustainabilit...
Bringing Enterprise IT into the 21st Century: A Management and Sustainabilit...
 
PDi ReGenX Innovation 2012 - 2013 Report 2
PDi ReGenX Innovation 2012 - 2013 Report 2 PDi ReGenX Innovation 2012 - 2013 Report 2
PDi ReGenX Innovation 2012 - 2013 Report 2
 
JISC Green IT parallel session April 10
JISC  Green IT parallel session April 10JISC  Green IT parallel session April 10
JISC Green IT parallel session April 10
 
Kinetic Presentation1
Kinetic Presentation1Kinetic Presentation1
Kinetic Presentation1
 
Green I T Workshop Intro V2
Green  I T Workshop   Intro V2Green  I T Workshop   Intro V2
Green I T Workshop Intro V2
 
Rough seas ahead for "in-house" data centers
Rough seas ahead for "in-house" data centersRough seas ahead for "in-house" data centers
Rough seas ahead for "in-house" data centers
 
On Vector Green Broadband
On Vector   Green BroadbandOn Vector   Green Broadband
On Vector Green Broadband
 
Are people the problem or solution: reflections from the wild
Are people the problem or solution: reflections from the wildAre people the problem or solution: reflections from the wild
Are people the problem or solution: reflections from the wild
 
Educause Green It Summit Nov 13
Educause Green It Summit   Nov 13Educause Green It Summit   Nov 13
Educause Green It Summit Nov 13
 
CENIC Green IT
CENIC Green ITCENIC Green IT
CENIC Green IT
 
Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future keynote by dr. mari...
Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future   keynote by dr. mari...Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future   keynote by dr. mari...
Technologies & policies for a sustainable energy future keynote by dr. mari...
 

Similar to Does the PTC Make Sense (Executive Version)?

Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingmitecenter
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingmitecenter
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingmitecenter
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingmitecenter
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingmitecenter
 
Mill Pond = Mill Stone?
Mill Pond = Mill Stone?Mill Pond = Mill Stone?
Mill Pond = Mill Stone?John Droz
 
Offshore Wind Energy
Offshore Wind EnergyOffshore Wind Energy
Offshore Wind EnergyJohn Droz
 
Frank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant Program
Frank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant ProgramFrank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant Program
Frank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant ProgramLeslie Feeney
 
WINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVEL
WINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVELWINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVEL
WINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVELLawrence L Stewart
 
Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...
Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...
Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...CFPuser
 
Energy & SB3 Presentation to NC Legislators
Energy & SB3 Presentation to NC LegislatorsEnergy & SB3 Presentation to NC Legislators
Energy & SB3 Presentation to NC LegislatorsJohn Droz
 
LABI 2010 Presentation
LABI 2010 PresentationLABI 2010 Presentation
LABI 2010 PresentationTana Trichel
 
State of smarter utilities
State of smarter utilitiesState of smarter utilities
State of smarter utilitiesJohn Juliano
 
Technology change & the rise of new industries
Technology change & the rise of new industriesTechnology change & the rise of new industries
Technology change & the rise of new industriesJeffrey Funk
 
DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?
DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?
DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?AJHSSR Journal
 
Energy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built Environment
Energy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built EnvironmentEnergy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built Environment
Energy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built EnvironmentAlliance To Save Energy
 

Similar to Does the PTC Make Sense (Executive Version)? (20)

Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investing
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investing
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investing
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investing
 
Whats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investingWhats wrong with energy investing
Whats wrong with energy investing
 
CEI Email 4.7.03 (c)
CEI Email 4.7.03 (c)CEI Email 4.7.03 (c)
CEI Email 4.7.03 (c)
 
Mill Pond = Mill Stone?
Mill Pond = Mill Stone?Mill Pond = Mill Stone?
Mill Pond = Mill Stone?
 
Offshore Wind Energy
Offshore Wind EnergyOffshore Wind Energy
Offshore Wind Energy
 
Frank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant Program
Frank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant ProgramFrank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant Program
Frank Hoffman's Presentation RE: 1603 Grant Program
 
WINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVEL
WINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVELWINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVEL
WINDNOVATION TAKE WIND POWER TO A HIGHER LEVEL
 
Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...
Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...
Us Structured Credit Roundtable To Securitize Alternative Energy Projects Suc...
 
Energy & SB3 Presentation to NC Legislators
Energy & SB3 Presentation to NC LegislatorsEnergy & SB3 Presentation to NC Legislators
Energy & SB3 Presentation to NC Legislators
 
LABI 2010 Presentation
LABI 2010 PresentationLABI 2010 Presentation
LABI 2010 Presentation
 
CEI Email 10.15.03
CEI Email 10.15.03CEI Email 10.15.03
CEI Email 10.15.03
 
CEI Email 7.30.03 (c)
CEI Email 7.30.03 (c)CEI Email 7.30.03 (c)
CEI Email 7.30.03 (c)
 
State of smarter utilities
State of smarter utilitiesState of smarter utilities
State of smarter utilities
 
Energy Interim Committee 9/29/2011
Energy Interim Committee 9/29/2011Energy Interim Committee 9/29/2011
Energy Interim Committee 9/29/2011
 
Technology change & the rise of new industries
Technology change & the rise of new industriesTechnology change & the rise of new industries
Technology change & the rise of new industries
 
DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?
DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?
DO GREEN PROGRAMS CREATE JOBS OR DESTROY JOBS?
 
Energy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built Environment
Energy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built EnvironmentEnergy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built Environment
Energy Efficiency: Meeting the Challenge & Fueling A Better Built Environment
 

More from John Droz

Craven County Wind Energy
Craven County Wind EnergyCraven County Wind Energy
Craven County Wind EnergyJohn Droz
 
Wind_Presentation_Beaufort
Wind_Presentation_BeaufortWind_Presentation_Beaufort
Wind_Presentation_BeaufortJohn Droz
 
Heartland_Energy_Presentation
Heartland_Energy_PresentationHeartland_Energy_Presentation
Heartland_Energy_PresentationJohn Droz
 
Wind Augmenting
Wind AugmentingWind Augmenting
Wind AugmentingJohn Droz
 
SLR Presentation NC Legislators
SLR Presentation NC LegislatorsSLR Presentation NC Legislators
SLR Presentation NC LegislatorsJohn Droz
 

More from John Droz (7)

Craven County Wind Energy
Craven County Wind EnergyCraven County Wind Energy
Craven County Wind Energy
 
Wind_Presentation_Beaufort
Wind_Presentation_BeaufortWind_Presentation_Beaufort
Wind_Presentation_Beaufort
 
Heartland_Energy_Presentation
Heartland_Energy_PresentationHeartland_Energy_Presentation
Heartland_Energy_Presentation
 
Wind Augmenting
Wind AugmentingWind Augmenting
Wind Augmenting
 
SLR Presentation NC Legislators
SLR Presentation NC LegislatorsSLR Presentation NC Legislators
SLR Presentation NC Legislators
 
Short story
Short storyShort story
Short story
 
Remember
RememberRemember
Remember
 

Recently uploaded

Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Manik S Magar
 
(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...
(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...
(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...AliaaTarek5
 
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoSample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoHarshalMandlekar2
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfMounikaPolabathina
 
Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...
Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...
Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...Rick Flair
 
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software DevelopersA Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software DevelopersNicole Novielli
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningLars Bell
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Decarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a reality
Decarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a realityDecarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a reality
Decarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a realityIES VE
 
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024Hiroshi SHIBATA
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .Alan Dix
 
A Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI AgeA Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI AgeCprime
 
Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...
Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...
Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...Scott Andery
 
Testing tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examples
Testing tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examplesTesting tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examples
Testing tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examplesKari Kakkonen
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsPixlogix Infotech
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersRaghuram Pandurangan
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
 
(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...
(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...
(How to Program) Paul Deitel, Harvey Deitel-Java How to Program, Early Object...
 
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoSample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
 
Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...
Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...
Rise of the Machines: Known As Drones...
 
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software DevelopersA Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Decarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a reality
Decarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a realityDecarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a reality
Decarbonising Buildings: Making a net-zero built environment a reality
 
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
Long journey of Ruby standard library at RubyConf AU 2024
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
 
A Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI AgeA Framework for Development in the AI Age
A Framework for Development in the AI Age
 
Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...
Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...
Enhancing User Experience - Exploring the Latest Features of Tallyman Axis Lo...
 
Testing tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examples
Testing tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examplesTesting tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examples
Testing tools and AI - ideas what to try with some tool examples
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
 

Does the PTC Make Sense (Executive Version)?

  • 1. Does The PTC Make Sense? (Executive Version) Alliance For Wise Energy Decisions 8/21/12
  • 2. Make SURE to View This Presentation in the FULL SCREEN Mode! Click the “FULL” icon in the lower right hand corner.
  • 3. Do NOT click on the Triangle below to run this presentation! Instead, use your keyboard arrow keys to navigate. This will allow you to proceed at your own pace.
  • 4. Does The Production Tax Credit (PTC) Make Sense? This “Executive Version” is a VERY abbreviated edition of the more detailed “Professional Version” — which is intended for Congressional Staffers and citizens with energy knowledge. References and credits are on the last three slides of the Professional Version. The wind energy Production Tax Credit (PTC) has now been in existence for some twenty (20) years. The Energy Policy Act of 1992 originally enacted the Production Tax Credit and the first lapse came in June 1999. The PTC was extended in December 1999 until December 31, 2001. Once again the PTC expired in December 2001 and was not enacted again until March 2002 where it was then extended for another two years. At the end of 2003 the PTC expired for a third time until a one year extension was granted in October 2004. The PTC was extended through 2005 and also expanded the different types of renewable energies that would be included under the bill. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (H.R. 6) modified the credit and extended it through the end of 2007. In December 2006, the PTC was extended for another year by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (H.R. 6111). The PTC was extended yet again by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (H.R. 1). The Wind PTC was extended an additional two years, expiring the end of 2012. Every time the plea is that just a few more years will be necessary to get wind energy on its feet… Our underlying message is that our energy decisions should be made on the basis of sound SCIENCE — not on what lobbyists say. Hopefully you have already been to the “WindPowerFacts.Info” website, which has a collection of good reports on wind energy. The future of this issue lies in whether or not citizens are properly educated about basic energy matters. After getting more up-to-speed, they need to do some Critical Thinking about this matter. After citizens get more informed — and do some Critical Thinking — they will be in a much better position to express their more informed wishes to their federal representatives. Anyone trying to educate their local citizenry and representatives, is welcome to use the material found here. In you have any questions after you go through this, we will be glad to respond to any emails you send to the PTCFacts.Info website. If you like what you see, please pass it on to other open-minded people, plus your federal representatives. — ENJOY! Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions
  • 5. — Outline of this Presentation — 1 - Rationale for the PTC by its Advocates 2 - Are Job Claims Accurate? 3 - The Cost Per Job? 4 - The NET Jobs picture. 5 - Even More About Jobs. 6 - The NET Economics picture? 7 - What do Utility Companies Say? 8 - Some Other Supporter Claims. — CONCLUSIONS —
  • 6. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 1: Benefits Claimed by Lobbyists
  • 7. The Claimed Benefits for wind energy subsidies have radically evolved over the last twenty years.
  • 8. 20 Specious Claims: How the supposed Benefits of Wind Energy have continued to evolve, as they are proven to be false.
  • 9. The Wind Lobbyists’ Current Major Excuse for the PTC to be extended are purported JOBs.
  • 10.
  • 11. How do lobbyists take advantage of good legislators? 1 - By telling them what they want to hear, and 2 - by counting on the fact that few will take the time to really check things out!
  • 12. They also know that there is no penalty for making unscientific claims.
  • 13. In short, our position is that — 1) we do have environmental and energy issues, and 2) these matters should be solved scientifically. The Soundbite: Wind Energy = High Cost, Low Benefits
  • 14. Part 1: Benefits Claimed by Lobbyists? — THE TAKEAWAY — Since there are no scientifically proven net Technical, or net Economic, or net Environmental benefits for wind energy — the lobbyists are hanging their hat on JOB claims.
  • 15. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 2: Are Job Claims Accurate?
  • 16. Independent Studies Have Concluded: Wind Job Claims are Exaggerated
  • 17. Fact: Almost all US Wind Job Claims come from One Source: AWEA (Wind Industry Lobbyists — whose job is to hype their industry). AWEA: the PTC is needed to “...save 37,000 jobs...”
  • 19. Do Real World Facts Correlate with AWEA Claims?
  • 20. Part 2: Are Job Claims Accurate? — THE TAKEAWAY — Job claims from wind industry lobbyists have very little credibility. Independent assessments have concluded that they are wildly exaggerated.
  • 21. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 3: Cost Per Job?
  • 22. Every Independent Study Has Concluded the Same Thing: The Cost Per Job is OUTRAGEOUS!
  • 23. The Congressional Figures $12.2 Billion / 37,000 jobs = $330,000 per wind job
  • 24. A Sample Independent Study $1,600,000 per wind job
  • 25. A Sample Independent Study $34,000,000 per wind job
  • 26. Part 3: Cost Per Wind Job? — THE TAKEAWAY — No matter how it is calculated, the cost per wind job is extraordinarily excessive.
  • 27. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 4: What are the Net Jobs?
  • 28. Almost All Independent Studies Have Concluded the Same Thing: Wind Energy is a NET Jobs Loser
  • 29. Indisputable Jobs Fact No Jobs claim has any merit unless it accurately considers the NET impact. In their claims, there is zero evidence that AWEA has burdened themselves with this obligation.
  • 31. Offshore Jobs Conclusions of Independent Experts: Conclusion: Net is 30,000 ± jobs years LOST (again due to a single offshore wind project).
  • 32. (Other Offshore wind studies are cited in the Professional Version.) OK, Offshore Wind Clearly Results in Net Job Losses. What about Onshore Wind?
  • 33. (The details are explained in the Professional Version.) SAME THING! When the big picture is objectively examined, a typical Onshore Wind Project will be an annual NET JOBS LOSER!
  • 34. (Several other Independent wind job studies are cited in the Professional Version.)
  • 35. Jobs Conclusions of this Independent Expert:
  • 36. Part 4: Net Jobs — THE TAKEAWAY — In the typical case, wind development & subsidy is a NET JOBS LOSER. Remember: “NET” is a critical job indicator.
  • 37. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 5: Even More About Jobs
  • 38. The fact is That there is a lot more to the job claims, than is immediately obvious. (Several other perspectives about wind job are cited in the Professional Version.)
  • 39. Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs
  • 40. Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs There is nothing — no program, no hobby, no vice, no crime — that does not create jobs. For example, tsunamis, computer viruses and robbing convenience store clerks all create jobs. So since that claim applies to all it is an argument in favor of none! Instead of providing evidence of the merits of an enterprise, a jobs claim is a de facto admission that one has a specious case. — energy attorney Chris Horner
  • 41. Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs A top government official makes a very blunt statement. Tax credits don’t create wind jobs.
  • 42. Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs If Congress is determined to spend the $12.2 Billion that just a one year PTC extension would cost, an important question is: What would be the job (and other) benefits of spending that same amount on another energy source? According to the Congressional Budget Office if the same $12.2 Billion were given to the gas industry, over 9 times as many jobs would be created.
  • 43. Another Perspective on Claimed Wind Jobs Less Expensive Energy is a Proven Way to create net jobs. Subsidizing expensive energy is a counterproductive strategy
  • 44. Part 5: Even More About Jobs — THE TAKEAWAY — The jobs argument is a public relations ploy to distract us from the reality that wind energy is a very poor energy option.
  • 45. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 6: Net Economic Impact?
  • 46. Almost All Independent Studies Have Concluded the Same Thing: Wind Energy is a NET Economics Loser
  • 48. Economic Conclusions of these Independent Experts: $1,080,000,000 Conclusion: over $1 Billion lost in one year alone!
  • 49. Economic Conclusions of these Independent Experts: Conclusion: More $ Hundreds of Millions lost!
  • 50. Economic Conclusions of these Independent Experts: In one county, property owners will LOSE $640,000,000± in real estate value!
  • 51. (Other Offshore wind studies are cited in the Professional Version.) OK, Offshore Wind Also Results in Net Economic Losses. What about Onshore Wind?
  • 52. (The details are explained in the Professional Version.) SAME THING! When the big picture is objectively examined, a typical Onshore Wind Project will be an annual NET ECONOMICS LOSER!
  • 53. And There’s More. The Professional Version has 8 extra slides that identify Some ADDITIONAL Economic Costs. Almost none of these are normally included when the cost of wind energy is being presented.
  • 54. In ADDITION to generous Federal subsidies (like the PTC), many states offer financial incentives for wind power, like: 1. Personal Tax Incentives 2. Corporate Tax Incentives 3. Sales Tax Incentives 4. Property Tax Incentives 5. Rebates 6. Grants 7. Loans 8. Industry Support 9. Bonds, and 10. Production Incentives. On top of these financial incentives, state and local governments have established rules, regulations and policies (like RPS), with the purpose of encouraging or mandating the development and increased sale and consumption of energy from renewable sources. Yet all this still isn’t enough???
  • 55. E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G about Wind Energy economics is problematic!
  • 56. Part 6: Net Economics — THE TAKEAWAY — In the typical case, wind development is a NET ECONOMICS LOSER. Remember: “NET” is a critical economics indicator.
  • 57. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 7: What Do Utility Companies Say?
  • 58. Utility Companies are regulated by the government. As such they avoid saying anything that is not “politically correct”. Despite this constraint the TRUTH has a way of coming out.
  • 59. A major utility executive’s very disturbing assessment When National Grid’s CEO was challenged about integrating wind energy, he said: “Families would have to get used to only using power when it was available, rather than constantly.”
  • 60. One of a series of ads from Idaho Power “In the simplest of terms, special interest groups and wind developers are asking you to pay more for a less reliable product. And that just isn’t right.”
  • 61. More real world evidence from utility experts, about the real cost of wind energy. They say: onshore = 2-3 times more offshore = 4-5 times more Note: this does NOT include the extra cost of the PTC!
  • 62. Regarding wind subsidies, the CEO of Ohio’s North Central Electric Cooperative says:
  • 63. This is the most advanced Utility Company report on wind energy, ever published.
  • 64. Regarding jobs and economics, this study says:
  • 65. Part 7: What Do Utility Companies Say? — THE TAKEAWAY — When utility companies have the courage to speak honestly about industrial wind energy, they are against it. (There are several other Utility comments cited in the Professional Version.)
  • 66. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? Part 8: Some Other Supporter Claims
  • 67. Even though JOBS is their main argument for the PTC, some other assertions are periodically made...
  • 68. Another justification put forward for the PTC: “The PTC is not Another Solyndra.” Objective perspective: That is correct — it’s much worse. Per government figures, Solyndra cost taxpayers $0.5± Billion. A one year extension of the PTC will cost taxpayers $12.2 Billion.
  • 69. Another justification put forward for the PTC: “Some manufacturing jobs will be lost.” Objective perspective: That is correct — but that’s life. Modernization is continually making certain products out-dated, which means jobs in those industries are lost. Should taxpayers be subsidizing the jobs for those producing B&W TVs, 8-track tapes, horse carriages, hoola-hoops, etc?
  • 70. Another justification put forward for the PTC: “Some landowners are making big profits.” Objective perspective: That is correct — but at whose expense?
  • 71. Other justifications put forward for the PTC: “The Wind industry needs to have certainty.” “The PTC needs to be phased out.” Objective perspective: Both are correct — and both are already done.
  • 72. Part 8: Some Other Supporter Claims — THE TAKEAWAY — When looking at the BIG PICTURE these claims do NOT justify a PTC extension. (Other supporter claims are cited in the Professional Version.)
  • 73. DOES EXTENDING THE PTC MAKE SENSE? CONCLUSIONS
  • 74. Attention Republicans: A PTC for 2013+ is a new TAX* as such it violates the ATR Pledge * “Specialists term these synthetic government spending programs ʻtax expenditures.ʼ Tax expenditures are really spending programs, not tax rollbacks, because the missing tax revenues must be financed by more taxes on somebody else. Like any other form of deficit spending … a targeted tax break coupled with a specific revenue ʻpayforʼ means that one group of Americans is required to pay (in the form of higher taxes) for a subsidy to be delivered to others through the mechanism of the tax system.” —Dr. Edward D. Kleinbard, Professor of Law at the Gould School of Law, UCLA
  • 75. Attention Democrats: A PTC for 2013+ is a TAX BREAK, that will primarily be used by High-Income Taxpayers. As such it is a violation of your party’s campaign for Tax Fairness.
  • 76. Is an “All of the Above” Energy Policy wise? Only if it makes sense to include: unreliable, expensive, and environmentally destructive energy options! We need an “All of the Sensible” Energy Policy.
  • 77. — Conclusions — Wind Energy is a net jobs loser and a net economics loser, that has no scientific proof that it has any net technical, economic or environmental benefits. Why should US taxpayers pay for such a charade?
  • 78. The wind PTC makes as much sense as the government subsidizing ranchers to have cows run in the Kentucky Derby.

Editor's Notes