SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Successfully reported this slideshow.
Activate your 14 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
41.
Thanks For Listening
email joel@joelburgess.com
twitter @joelburgess
facebook “level design in a day” group
Editor's Notes
This slide is the premise from the talk – I was stumped by this question.
Because it is too broad and complex, I had to narrow my focus.
We have lots of open games“Open” quality has a long history – all platforms/backgroundsSandbox gets lumped in – SEGUE: Common Ground is Player Agency Emphasis
We have lots of open games“Open” quality has a long history – all platforms/backgroundsSandbox gets lumped in – SEGUE: Common Ground is Player Agency Emphasis
What makes Open games so interesting?Best positioned to fulfill the core promise of videogamesSEGUE: What does this mean to us as creators?
Player Control is inversely proportional to designer controlTrust & Understanding SEGUE: Designer – Player Relationship
Talk about the core problem of maximizing fun without the player feeling forced into it
Paths, Signage, Signs of Life
Talk about a classic set-up and how it’s used traditionally
Talk about what is needed to bring this sort of scenario up to expectations for Open Games