Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

SOWK 602 Week 3 Ethical Debate.pdf

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 8 Ad

More Related Content

Similar to SOWK 602 Week 3 Ethical Debate.pdf (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

SOWK 602 Week 3 Ethical Debate.pdf

  1. 1. Week 3 Ethical Decision Making Model Debate Group 4: Jayce Homewood and Jacqui Wollin Master of Social Work, University of Massachusetts Global SOWK 602: Law and Ethics Dr. Georgiana Yoshioka Mora January 27, 2023
  2. 2. Kenyon Model ● A set of 10 steps with specific questions to consider ● Reflexive model ● The process begins by describing the ethical dilemma and who the key players are ● Next it considers ethical and legal aspects by consulting guidelines and Codes of Ethics ● Then it examines any conflicts and how they can be resolved, potentially with assistance or consultation ● Next, it identifies alternatives responses to the dilemma and then examines and evaluates these in line with client and professional values ● Then select and evaluate the best course of action, the one that causes least harm ● Finally, create the action plan and assess results, then examine the consequences
  3. 3. Reamer & Conrad Model ● Six steps each with a key focus ● Determine - the ethical issues, social work values and duties that conflict ● Identify - the groups, individuals, and organization who may be affected ● Rank - most relevant values and principles to the situation ● Develop - possible course of action, confer with others, determine justification of plan ● Implement - move forward with plan, use skills and competencies such as communication and cultural competence ● Reflect - on the outcome. Would I change the plan? How do the others in the case seem to feel?
  4. 4. Kenyon>Reamer & Conrad Model ● Application to Social Work vs. Reamer & Conrad Model ○ Applicable to broader scope of ethical dilemmas ○ Considers values of professional, client, and all stakeholders ○ Evaluation is built in ○ It is a reflexive model which helps professional better understand the situation ○ Can be developed as a skill to be more readily accessible when an ethical dilemma arises. ● Better Ethical Framework vs. Reamer & Conrad Model ○ Wider scope and based on National Organization for Human Service Education (Uriz et al., 2017). ○ Can be used in interdisciplinary collaboration ○ Focused on improving quality of life in a more holistic way ○ More concrete approach to better understand the ethical situation ○ More focus on use for students ● Kenyon > Reamer & Conrad ○ Both models aim to improve quality of life for people, Kenyon’s model can be more broadly applied to the field of social work and other helping professions ○ Kenyon’s model is reflexive which allows for a deeper understanding of the ethical situation (Uriz et al., 2017). ○ Hierarchical/prioritization models such as Reamers are ‘hugely complicated’ to make universal and are also more limited when analyzing the ethics of the situation (Uriz et al., 2017. p. 35). ○ Kenyon focused on improving quality of life in a more holistic way rather than with a basic needs approach (Uriz et al., 2017).
  5. 5. Applied Kenyon Model ● Client Situation ○ A professional accepting a gift from a culturally-diverse client. In their culture, it is disrespectful to refuse a gift, however the social worker has concerns that accepting the gift would be an ethical boundary violation. ○ Using the Kenyon Model we can evaluate personal and professional values as well as values of the community and client, internal and external conflicts and consider how accepting the gift could have greater implications. It may be decided that refusing the gift has greater negative impacts on the client and community’s relationship with the social worker/agency. ● Applicable Ethical Code ○ Ethical Code 6.01 Social Welfare: “Social workers should promote the general welfare of society, from local to global levels, and the development of people, their communities, and their environments. Social workers should advocate for living conditions conducive to the fulfillment of basic human needs and should promote social, economic, political, and cultural values and institutions that are compatible with the realization of social justice” (National Association of Social Workers, 2021). ○ In Step 6, the Kenyon Model asks the ethical professional to examine alternative actions and in doing so, consider how the action impacts social justice, other populations, and society in general.
  6. 6. Reamer & Conrad > Kenyon Model Application to Social Work vs. Kenyon Model ○ Used by NASW Office of Ethics & Adjudication as a tool for practitioners, faculty, students, agency administrators, and licensing boards (ETH3338 - Section 2: Best Practice Models of Ethical Decision Making, n.d.) ○ Included on NASW Massachusetts website as model for decision making (National Association of Social Work, 1995) Reamer & Conrad vs. Kenyon ○ Kenyon model not listed on Top 10 Ethical Decision Making Models ○ Cyclical model, able to be adjusted if needed after analyzing results
  7. 7. Applied Reamer & Conrad Model ● Client Situation ○ From a past signature assignment vignette that I really appreciated. Adult female client, developmentally disabled, upset with the staff of the group home she lives in. Staff is stating she must be on birth control because she is sexually active with a number of men, but client states she wants to have a baby. Staff doesn’t believe she’s capable of raising a child, or fully understanding the decisions she is making. ○ Reamer & Conrad model helps us determine the values and duties conflicting here, who will be affected, and how to proceed with determining the appropriate course of action. ● Applicable Ethical Code ○ 1.02 Self-Determination “Social workers respect and promote the right of clients to self-determination and assist clients in their efforts to identify and clarify their goals. Social workers may limit clients’ right to self-determination when, in the social workers’ professional judgment, clients’ actions or potential actions pose a serious, foreseeable, and imminent risk to themselves or others.” (National Association of Social Workers, 2021). ○ While differing values and principles are present, Reamer & Conrad's model helps us rank them and identify the parties involved and affected
  8. 8. References ETH3338 - Section 2: Best practice models of ethical decision making. (n.d.). yourceus.com. https://www.yourceus.com/pages/eth3338-section-ii-best-practice-models-of-ethical-decision-making National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English National Association of Social Work. (2021). Essential steps for ethical problem-solving. NASW Massachusetts Chapter. https://www.naswma.org/page/100/Essential-Steps-for-Ethical-Problem-Solving.htm Uriz, M-J., Idarta, F., Viscarret, J-J. & Ballestero, A. (2017). Methodologies for ethical decision making in social work. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada 24(1):33-54.

×