Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Group11 final

510 views

Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Group11 final

  1. 1. PIAGET &VYGOTSKYGROUP 11 KIM, NA-RI KIM, MOON-JEONG AN, JEONG-YOON LEE, JAE-MIN PYO, MIN-KYOUNG 1 / 18
  2. 2. CONTENTS- Comparison between PIAGET – VYGOTSKY• Similarities• Differences  Key factors  Strength & Weakness  Types of Learning  Strategies  Role of Learner and Instructor-Role Playing• Summary-conclusion- Q&A 2 / 18
  3. 3. SIMILARITIES  Common focus on understanding childrens functioning  Children = Active stand in their own development  Learn by exploring and testing their surroundings.  The periods of development are experienced by each child 3 / 18
  4. 4.  Key factors DIFFERENCES Strength & Weakness  Types of Learning  Strategies  Role of Learner and Instructor Piaget VS Vygotsky 4 / 18
  5. 5. KEY FACTORS PIAGET VYGOTSKYAssimilation Socio-cultural interaction Accommodation Language Equilibration 5 / 18
  6. 6. STRENGTH piaget vygotsky•The child’s spontaneity •Make passive student active•Appropriate learning according to •Prompt many types of learningchild’s cognitive development•Direct experience for raising •Use language as a learning toolchild’s comprehension 6 / 18
  7. 7. WEAKNESS piaget vygotsky•Standardized stages •No exact guidelines• No explanation after final • A lot of time and resources stages required•Overlooked social and cultural •Problems to examine individualcharacteristics participation 7 / 18
  8. 8. TYPES OF LEARNING PIAGET VYGOTSKY • Audio-visual aids • Anchored instruction • Digital multimedia • Cognitive apprenticeships • Individualized learning • Problem-based learning (PBL) 8 / 18
  9. 9. STRATEGY PIAGET VYGOTSKY• Proper learning environment • Scaffolding according to learners’ – Quiz developmental stage(4) – Hint • Verbal activities – Role play• Experimentation with – Dialogue physical object 9 / 18
  10. 10. ROLE PLAY KIM, NA-RI / STUDENT#1 KIM, MOON-JEONG / STUDENT#2 AN, JEONG-YOON / NARRATION LEE, JAE-MIN / STUDENT#3 PYO, MIN-KYOUNG / TEACHER 10 / 18
  11. 11. ROLE OFLEARNERS PIAGET VYGOTSKY Participation in classes individually. Collaborative participation in classes Discover and Construct knowledge Interact and Construct knowledge 11 / 18
  12. 12. ROLE OF INSTRUCTORS – Co-learner of collaborative •Consider the child’s present cognitive level learning • Provide guidelines and stimulate •Consider student’s cultural the students background •Present materials and situations that allow them to discover new •Give scaffolding to students learning •Design collaborative learning • Make students participate in active learning •Make students apply information to real world-Facilitator ofknowledge. 12 / 18
  13. 13. PIAGET Todays my learner just graduated kindergarten.They are in a concrete operational stage. so. how I’m gonna teach them? Hum.. 13 / 18
  14. 14. VYGOTSKY 14 / 18
  15. 15. SUMMARY PIAGET VYGOTSKY Physical Social interaction Educational Tools Scaffolding Developmental Stage 15 / 18
  16. 16. CONCLUSION Key factor strategy implication• Assimilation + • Proper • focus on the accommodation instructing process of child = equilibration according to ren’s thinking.(c developmental ognitive constru• Zone of stage ctivism) Proximal development • scaffolding • more advanced learning than current level.(social constructivism) 16 / 18
  17. 17. 17 / 18
  18. 18. 18 / 18

×