Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Battery Integration & Technology Compare 7-7-15

  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Battery Integration & Technology Compare 7-7-15

  1. 1. Battery Integration & Energy Storage Options Jake McKee Vice President Engineering, Solar PV E.ON Climate & Renewables Energy Storage USA July 8th, 2015
  2. 2.  Opportunities and monetizing  PG&E, PJM, TEP  Experiences in Puerto Rico  Developing, Engineering & Optimizing – Solar & Battery Projects  Design Considerations  Battery Technologies  Contracting Overview
  3. 3. OPPORTUNITIES AND MONETIZING BATTERIES
  4. 4. 4 (Source: IHS)
  5. 5. How PG&E plans to use Energy Storage (ES) procured through their RFO? -From their 2014 Energy Storage RFO Update 2-11-15  PG&E seeks ES that can be scheduled into the California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) market, or  ES capable of enhancing system reliability, such as deferring distribution system upgrades
  6. 6. 6 PJM, ERCOT - Frequency Response Projects (Source: IHS)
  7. 7. Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Energy Storage RFP  Frequency Response Real Power – ESS automatically delivers 10MW real power within 2 seconds and lasting 60 seconds then linearly ramping down to 0 in 15 seconds  Reserve Power – Deliver 10MW real power for up to 15 minutes upon manual command  Fault Response – Automatically dispatch reactive power when the utility POI voltage falls below 0.8 p.u.  Voltage Control – ESS provides proportional reactive power when POI voltage deviates outside defined deadband
  8. 8. PUERTO RICO EXAMPLE
  9. 9. PREPA and MTRs!!  Ramp Rate + Frequency Control  What if these happens at the same time?  MTRs led to a cost benefit sizing of battery  Complex language to measure violations
  10. 10. Ramp Rate Control  The PV facility shall be able to control the rate of change of power output  Rate of decrease of power!  A 10 % per minute rate (based on AC capacity)
  11. 11. Frequency Response  The PV facility shall provide an immediate real power primary frequency response of at least 10% of the maximum AC active power capacity  The time response (full 10% frequency response) shall be less than 1 second  The facility frequency response shall be maintained for at least 9 minutes 11
  12. 12. Options Considered for PR/Island Grid Requirements  Fly Wheels, lacking longevity  Diesel Generators, lacking response time  Super Capacitors, lacking longevity  Forecasting, not mature of a field to finance  Batteries  Various combinations of the above  PURE BATTERY SOLUTION WON
  13. 13. MOST PROMINENT ES TECHNOLOGY… FOR DEVELOPERS ?
  14. 14. - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 (MW) NAS Battery CAES Pumped Hydro Advanced Lithium Ion Advanced Lead Acid Flywheel Advanced Flow Battery Hydrogen SMH Energy Storage Technology Forecast, World Markets: 2013-2023 (Source: Navigant Research) Advanced Lithium Ion will Continue to Increase in Demand and Lead Other Technologies
  15. 15. (Source: IHS) Battery Installations Have Shifted Towards Li-ion
  16. 16. DEVELOPING, ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZING – SOLAR AND ES PROJECTS  Design Considerations  Battery Technologies  Contracting
  17. 17. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
  18. 18. What to Consider 18  What is the primary need for the storage?  Any peripheral uses?  Choosing a storage technology  Choosing a battery provider  Choosing an integrator  Choosing an installer
  19. 19. Goals for the Storage  Renewable Energy Smoothing (ramp rate)  Renewable Energy Shifting and Firming  Ancillary Services  Arbitrage  Peaking Capacity  Transmission and distribution investment deferment  Distributed Generation Support / Distributed Storage 19
  20. 20. BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES
  21. 21. Selecting the Battery Technology for your Project  Flow  NaS  Li-Ion  Advanced Lead Acid
  22. 22. Selecting the Battery Technology for your Project  Flow technologies  Higher Cycle Lifetimes  Low Maintenance  Quick Response Time  Applications requiring longer duration  Break point to go to flow is ~2 hours
  23. 23. Selecting the Battery Technology for your Project  NaS  High Energy Density  High Efficiency  High Cycle Life  High Energy to Capacity Ratios
  24. 24. Selecting the Battery Technology for your Project  Li-Ion  High Energy Density  Microsecond Response Time  Better Round Trip Efficiency than NaS and Flow
  25. 25. Technology to Fit the Application 25 Current grid-connected battery product offerings Manufacturer Chemistry Standard “duration” at rated capacity Target grid applications Major customers Altairnano Lithium titanate 15 minutes Frequency regulation, renewables shaping Hawaiian Electric Company Toshiba Lithium titanate 15 minutes Distributed storage - Mitsubishi Lithium ion 15 minutes Frequency regulation AES (in Chile) Saft Li-ion / Nickel- Cadmium 15 minutes to 1 hour Multiple Cowesses First Nations EnerDel Lithium titanate 15 minutes to 2 hours Multiple Wanxiang, Portland General Electric Ecoult Advanced lead acid 15 minutes to 3 hours Multiple Public Service of New Mexico A123 Systems (Wanxiang Group) Lithium iron phosphate 15 minutes to 4 hours Frequency regulation, renewables shaping AES Energy Storage BYD Lithium iron phosphate 1–2 hours Multiple Chevron Samsung Lithium manganese 1–2 hours Multiple Xtreme Power Panasonic Lithium ion 1–2 hours Distributed storage, renewables shaping Solar City ZBB Zinc-flow 2 hours Distributed storage, T&D US Military Primus Power Zinc-flow 2–3 hours T&D, capacity credit, renewables shaping Modesto Irrigation District GE Sodium nickel chloride 2–6 hours Renewables shaping, T&D, distributed storage - Enervault Redox-flow 4–6 hours Capacity credit Raytheon NGK Sodium sulfur 6–7 hours T&D, renewables shaping, capacity credit AEP, PG&E Prudent Energy Vanadium redox flow 6–8 hours T&D, capacity credit, distributed storage Gills Onions Note: Includes primary product offerings for grid-scale applications. Source: IHS © 2014 IHS Higher power Higher duration (Source: IHS)
  26. 26. Comparison of three Li-Ion Chemistries  Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC)  Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP)  Lithium Titanate Oxide (LTO)
  27. 27. Charge-Rate Should Fit the Application  A C-rate is a measure of the rate at which a battery is discharged relative to its maximum capacity  A 1C rate means that the discharge current will discharge the entire battery in 1 hour  A C-Rate should be closely sized to the capacity and time requirements/goals of the Energy Storage System
  28. 28. Nickel manganese cobalt (NMC)  Many factories (use in consumer electronics and vehicles)  Tailored to high specific power and/or energy; but not both! (Source: BatteryUniversity.com)
  29. 29. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP)  Many factories due to use in consumer electronics and vehicles  Higher current rating  Higher lifetime (Source: BatteryUniversity.com)
  30. 30. Lithium titanate oxide (LTO)  Capable of charging/discharging at higher C-Rates (4-C or greater)  Higher prices due to less applications (Source: BatteryUniversity.com)
  31. 31. Cost  Cost per MWhr  Battery  Cost per MW Battery BOP 31
  32. 32. CONTRACTING
  33. 33. Contracting the BESS  Wrap as much as possible  Battery supplier, integrator, installer, O&M A wrap? With a large balance sheet  If tied to a longer solar PPA  Battery replacement plan  Not to exceed replacement price   Lifetime NPV evaluation
  34. 34. Contracting – Nameplate Capacity (MWs, MWhrs)  What is the nameplate of the battery system?  The batteries have more capability than the nameplate since they should not be charged or discharged completely  The batteries can be run at different charge/discharge rates affecting the cycle life! 34
  35. 35. 35  Limiting factors with the batteries can be calendar life or cycle life  “Charge Acceptance” can be the weak point for batteries Charge Acceptance
  36. 36. Contracting -- Guarantees  Language to guarantee performance  Rigorous Approach Typical weather year for ramp  Standard deviation doesn’t exceed Existing grid frequency data for frequency  Cycles and DOD - standard deviation again  Number of cycles Define a Depth of Discharge (DOD) for the cycle   Guarantees come at a price
  37. 37. Pricing – MWhr/Cells are the most variable 37 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Li-ion NaNiCl Flow NaS Metal air 2010 2020 2030 Batterymoduleprice(US$/kWh) IHS battery module price forecast (real 2013$) © 2014 IHS Note: These costs are representative module prices for each technology. Data is based on public reports and IHS interviews with manufacturers and project developers. Source: IHS, US Department of Energy, Sandia National Laboratory, Electric Power Research Institute Source: IHS  The price for the cells is the most variable  Battery chemistry chosen  Project specifics  Battery supplier (Source: IHS)
  38. 38. Accounting for Your Battery.. w/ and w/ out Solar  “round-trip efficiency” of the battery system  batteries dissipate when storing over periods of time; too minor or not?  From Solar or Grid!  Sign a utility contract  These are losses from the solar production Statistical efficiency through operating projects Guaranteed efficiency Battery (round-trip) Inverter (round-trip) Transformer (round-trip) *if vendor provide the transformer Parasitic Load (round-trip)
  39. 39. Direct Grid Interconnected Project.. Utilities Procurement Still Figuring Out How to Contract  How to monitor the energy stored and the energy used by the system  Two lines and meters running to the ES  For charging  For parasitics (e.g. lights, controls, cooling)  Retail rates vs. Wholesale rates
  40. 40. Contact: Jake McKee Vice President Engineering, PV E.ON Climate & Renewables jake.mckee@eon.com

×