Implementing an Integrated Digital Asset Management System: FEDORA and OAIS in Context Paul Bevan DAMS Implementation Mana...
Structure <ul><li>Background and overview </li></ul><ul><li>OAIS Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Why OAIS? </li></ul></ul><ul>...
Institutional Context <ul><li>The LLGC DAMS is safekeeping for Wales’ digital assets but, it is an element within a wider ...
Institutional Context <ul><li>IMS Procurement high level deliverables: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improves efficiency and subst...
Institutional Context: Development Aims <ul><li>History of development with Fedora </li></ul><ul><li>Key Aims: </li></ul><...
OAIS Overview
Why OAIS? <ul><li>Useful Overview </li></ul><ul><li>Standard and ‘tested’ </li></ul><ul><li>Overlaps with TDR (medium-term...
Rights Management Dissemination Layer FEDORA  Preservation  Check (eg. DROID) Virus  Check Error  Check (Checksum) Preserv...
Rights? FEDORA iPortal Storage Solution(s) VITAL Client User Staff Layered Disseminator Structure Direct Route (eg. Google...
Modelling: Ingest
Rules for being an AIP <ul><li>Every object will have a MARC record (at some level) within the IMS </li></ul><ul><li>Every...
 
METS Creation  Existing METS  Document  (if applicable) MARC  XML Default METS Document METS SIP JHove DC Mods PREMIS Tech...
Ingest Revisited Checksum, Error Checking etc Ingest Processes (IMS, MARCXML etc) Update IMS with 856 link to Handle
Modelling: Archival Storage
Object Model (AIP): Still Image Object (PID/Handle) DS: METS DS: DC (OAI-PMH) DS: Relationships DS: Object (eg. TIFF File)...
Metadata Types & Locations Asset Virtua VITAL MARC21 METS DC
 
Archival Storage Revisited FEDORA/VITAL Developments Existing/Storage Processes
Modelling: Access
 
Access Revisited FEDORA/VITAL IMS/Virtua
Briefly: Administration?
Briefly: Data Management? ?
METS <ul><li>METS as SIP, AIP and DIP </li></ul><ul><li>Contains Metadata from: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>JHOVE/Automatically ...
Key Issues for Integration <ul><li>Seamless Transition IMS to DAMS </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Skin  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>...
IMS Linking (Developments) <ul><li>Updating of MARC Records in IMS </li></ul><ul><li>Ingest of descriptive metadata from I...
Managing the Implementation <ul><li>Implementation Group comprising mix of standards, IMS project management, technical, a...
Managing the Implementation <ul><li>Milestones: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Migration of existing Digitised Material </li></ul><...
Questions? <ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

DPC.ppt

2,343 views

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,343
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
42
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

DPC.ppt

  1. 1. Implementing an Integrated Digital Asset Management System: FEDORA and OAIS in Context Paul Bevan DAMS Implementation Manager [email_address]
  2. 2. Structure <ul><li>Background and overview </li></ul><ul><li>OAIS Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Why OAIS? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Overview </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ingest </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Archival Storage </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Access </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(Administration, Data Management) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>METS </li></ul><ul><li>Integration as a project (Issues and Tasks) </li></ul>
  3. 3. Institutional Context <ul><li>The LLGC DAMS is safekeeping for Wales’ digital assets but, it is an element within a wider Digital Asset Management Solution, which is an element within the library’s integrated systems, which come together to: </li></ul><ul><li>… preserve and give access to all kinds and forms of recorded knowledge, especially relating to Wales and the Welsh and other Celtic peoples, for the benefit of the public including those engaged in research and learning. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Institutional Context <ul><li>IMS Procurement high level deliverables: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improves efficiency and substantially simplifies the Library’s technical architecture and infrastructure. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interfaces seamlessly across different parts of the Library with links to, for example, remote document delivery systems. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Conforms to and interfaces with international standards and related activities based on an open architecture. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is open and hospitable to external user systems, e.g. for document requesting, resource discovery and inter-library loans. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is operational with successfully migrated legacy data and data from external sources. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Accommodates the functions of the National Screen and Sound Archive of Wales. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is open and hospitable to the information community in Wales e.g. for data exchange, maintenance and storage, and for the ingest of electronic resources. </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Institutional Context: Development Aims <ul><li>History of development with Fedora </li></ul><ul><li>Key Aims: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Add functionality to VITAL </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Developments in line with communities (Fedora, Vital and other DAMS) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Skills and Resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Cataloguers experience </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Re-use skills </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Single Search </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Solution to adhere to Standards; METS, PREMIS, OAIS, TDR etc etc </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. OAIS Overview
  7. 7. Why OAIS? <ul><li>Useful Overview </li></ul><ul><li>Standard and ‘tested’ </li></ul><ul><li>Overlaps with TDR (medium-term goal) </li></ul><ul><li>Granularity </li></ul><ul><li>But... </li></ul><ul><li>Not overly restrictive ( interpretation? ). </li></ul><ul><li>Complex & inaccessible </li></ul>
  8. 8. Rights Management Dissemination Layer FEDORA Preservation Check (eg. DROID) Virus Check Error Check (Checksum) Preservation Tasks (eg. Migration) Object Electronic Deposit Off-Air Recording Digital Archives Digitisation Ingest Mechanisms … Object Storage Servers
  9. 9. Rights? FEDORA iPortal Storage Solution(s) VITAL Client User Staff Layered Disseminator Structure Direct Route (eg. Google, URL) External Depositor Ingest Process Web Deposit Interface VITAL Access Portal
  10. 10. Modelling: Ingest
  11. 11. Rules for being an AIP <ul><li>Every object will have a MARC record (at some level) within the IMS </li></ul><ul><li>Every object in the repository will have a METS document </li></ul><ul><li>Every object will have DC for OAI-PMH </li></ul><ul><li>METS will be our SIP, AIP and DIP </li></ul><ul><li>METS will be the policy, FEDORA services will enact the policy. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>eg. DC Section in METS populates the DC datastream </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>eg. Structural Map held in METS, structure in RELS-EXT datastream </li></ul></ul>
  12. 13. METS Creation Existing METS Document (if applicable) MARC XML Default METS Document METS SIP JHove DC Mods PREMIS Technical – MIX Behaviour METS:Rights METS:StructuralMap etc.
  13. 14. Ingest Revisited Checksum, Error Checking etc Ingest Processes (IMS, MARCXML etc) Update IMS with 856 link to Handle
  14. 15. Modelling: Archival Storage
  15. 16. Object Model (AIP): Still Image Object (PID/Handle) DS: METS DS: DC (OAI-PMH) DS: Relationships DS: Object (eg. TIFF File) DS: Object (eg. JPEG File) DS: Object (eg. Thumbnail File) DS: Object (eg. Zoomify File) Referenced Referenced Referenced Near-Line Tape Store Fast Image Server Server
  16. 17. Metadata Types & Locations Asset Virtua VITAL MARC21 METS DC
  17. 19. Archival Storage Revisited FEDORA/VITAL Developments Existing/Storage Processes
  18. 20. Modelling: Access
  19. 22. Access Revisited FEDORA/VITAL IMS/Virtua
  20. 23. Briefly: Administration?
  21. 24. Briefly: Data Management? ?
  22. 25. METS <ul><li>METS as SIP, AIP and DIP </li></ul><ul><li>Contains Metadata from: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>JHOVE/Automatically Extracted </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RightsMD </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DescriptiveMD (minimum required for locating) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>PreservationMD </li></ul></ul><ul><li>METS functions as the rules not the enforcement mechanism </li></ul>
  23. 26. Key Issues for Integration <ul><li>Seamless Transition IMS to DAMS </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Skin </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Language choice </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Persistent Session </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Search history </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cart </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Shared Rights </li></ul><ul><ul><li>LDAP </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Single Sign on </li></ul>
  24. 27. IMS Linking (Developments) <ul><li>Updating of MARC Records in IMS </li></ul><ul><li>Ingest of descriptive metadata from IMS </li></ul><ul><li>Single Search & Sign On </li></ul><ul><li>Transparent Dissemination Experience </li></ul><ul><li>Rights Management </li></ul>
  25. 28. Managing the Implementation <ul><li>Implementation Group comprising mix of standards, IMS project management, technical, and digitisation staff. Carried over from pilot. </li></ul><ul><li>2 DAMS Implementation Managers (Systems & Technical) </li></ul><ul><li>Key interactions with other personnel as required. </li></ul>
  26. 29. Managing the Implementation <ul><li>Milestones: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Migration of existing Digitised Material </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Switch over to VITAL for delivery of assets </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ingest of other existing formats (eg. VDEP, Websites, A/V) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Implementation of further disseminators required for access. </li></ul></ul>
  27. 30. Questions? <ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>

×