Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Building Better Models by JMP software from... 853 views
- When a Linear Model Just Won't Do: ... by JMP software from... 901 views
- A Primer in Statistical Discovery by JMP software from... 584 views
- Building Models for Complex Design ... by JMP software from... 2037 views
- Steps For A Screening DOE by Thomas Abraham 1646 views
- MT A: "Workshop: Building a Data-Dr... by iMedia Connection 972 views

2,987 views

Published on

Published in:
Technology

No Downloads

Total views

2,987

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

19

Shares

0

Downloads

175

Comments

0

Likes

4

No embeds

No notes for slide

A statistical model is a function, f(X), that we use to predict some response or outcome, that we label Y.

Here, X represents one or more continuous or categorical predictor variables.

We write the statistical model as Y = f(X) + residual error.

The residual error is the left over part of the variation in Y that we cannot predict with the function, f(X).

It turns out that during the process of building and evaluating statistical models, the residual error plays a key role, and examining and understanding that residual error can help us greatly as be seek to build a good model.

A statistical model is a function, f(X), that we use to predict some response or outcome, that we label Y.

Here, X represents one or more continuous or categorical predictor variables.

We write the statistical model as Y = f(X) + residual error.

The residual error is the left over part of the variation in Y that we cannot predict with the function, f(X).

It turns out that during the process of building and evaluating statistical models, the residual error plays a key role, and examining and understanding that residual error can help us greatly as be seek to build a good model.

Decision tree models are nothing more than a series of nested if statements. The IF-THEN and ELSE outcomes and conditions for the nested IF statements can be viewed as branches in a tree.

Decision tree models are constructed in a way that for each branch in the tree, the difference in the average response is maximized. These models are grown by adding more and more branches in the tree, with each successive branch explaining more of the variation in the response variable.

Overall in this data, we have 27900 individuals with a 3.23% default rate. We also have 24 candidate “X” variables that can be used to model and explain the default rate.

The algorithm for the decision tree will search through each one of these candidate variables, and through each unique level or combination of levels for each variable, and will find the “split” in the data, based on one variable, that maximizes difference in the response rate. (Actually, what is found is the split that has the largest LogWorth, which is just –log10([p-value) for the statistical test of the mean difference (or proportion difference) between the two groups.

Once this step is done, to find the next branch in the decision tree, we repeat the algorithms across each “partition” of the data, across each branch of the tree. So we look in the 28 and under group and find the split that maximizes logWorth, and also in the 28 and older group. Then whichever one of those has the overall maximum logWorth, we use that split in the model.

To find the next split in the tree we repeat the process again across the 3 partitions of the data, represented by the 3 branches of the treee, to find the split that maximizes logWorth.

So with just 3 steps of the tree building process, we have gone from a “trunk” of a tree with a rate of 3.23%, to a tree with 4 branches that have rates of 8.2% to 1.9%.

We would normally continue this process of adding branches to the tree, so that we grow out a model that predicts well.

One problem that decision trees have is that it is very easy to overfit a decision tree to the data. You could imagine that if we allowed the tree algorithm to continue until we had all branches with just ONE observation in each tree, that would fit the data perfectly. One way to prevent this from happening is the set a minimum branch size requirement, so that no branch in a tree will have fewer than a specified number of rows or percentage of rows.

Another good idea is to use hold out validation. As you grow the tree, you can check to see how well that tree is predicting the validation data, and if that stops improving as you add more complexity into the tree model, you could stop adding splits to the tree.

The first idea that is applied is Bootstrapping. A bootstrap sample from a data table is a 100% sample of the data, but performed with replacement. So, for instance, if we had a data table with 1000 rows of data, then a bootstrap sample would have 1000 rows of data. But, the bootstrap sample would not be the same as the original data table, because sample with replacement will lead to some rows being sample more than once (2, 3, 4, or even more times), and some rows not being sampled at all. Typically about 38% of the data is not selected at all.

If you build a decision tree model on that bootstrap sample, it may not, by itself, be a very good tree, because the bootstrapped data used to build it is so unrepresentative of the actual data. But if we repeat this process over and over again, and average all the models built across many bootstrap samples, this can lead to a model that performs very well. This approach, of averaging models built across many bootstrap samples is known as Bootstrap Aggregation, or “bagging”. Bagged decision tree models, on average, perform better than a single decision tree built on the original data.

To improve the model performance even more, we apply sampling of factors during the tree building process. For each tree built (on a separate bootstrap sample), for each split decision, a random subset of all the possible factors is selected and the optimal split is found among them. Typically we choose a small subset, say 25% of all the candidate factors. So at each split decision, about 75% of the factors are ignored, at random. This give each factor an opportunity to contribute to the model.

Combining bagging and variable sampling results in a tree building method known as a Bootstrap Forest. This is also known as a random forest technique.

(go to the next slide)

It turns out that Neural Networks are nothing more than highly flexible non-linear models. While mathematically complex, the structure of a Neural Network model can be viewed as a network of connected blocks and nodes.

To illustrate this, consider a simple example where there is one response variable, Y, and there are two predictor variables, X1 and X2. (next slide)

On the left hand side of the graph are the factors or inputs to the model. On the right hand side is the response or output from the model.

In between is a network of nodes and links that represent the model. The types neural networks you can fit in JMP (Pro) have either one or two layers, called “hidden” layers, and within each layer you can have one or more node. The nodes have a symbol overlayed on them that represents a mathematical transformation.

The way this neural network is constructed is as follows:

You take a linear combination of the inputs into each node in the 2nd hidden layer, and then that value is transformed by the associated node’s “activation function”. So, for instance, on the top node in the first layer, you take a linear combination, a + b*X1 + c*X2, and you transform it using the “S”-shaped function, which is a hyperbolic tangent function.

For the middle node in the 2nd hidden layer, you take a separate linear combination, d + e*X1 + f*X2 into that node and perform a linear (or multiplicative scale) transformation on that value.

For the bottom node in the 2nd hidden layer, you take yet another linear combination of the inputs, g + h*X1 + i * X2, and you transform them with a Gaussian function (also known as a radial function).

What comes out of each of the nodes in the 2nd layer is a new transformed value. In this NN, those transformed values are treated like inputs to the 1st hidden layer, and same approach is used. Linear combinations 2nd hidden layer results are brought into each of the 1st hidden layer nodes, and another transformation is applied in each node.

What comes out of the end of the network, the output of the 1st hidden layer, is then used to make a prediction of the output, the Y variable, but taking a linear combination of those values. The very final part of the NN, between the 1st hidden layer and the output, is essentially a simple linear regression.

One way to think about what a neural network does is to find appropriate transformations of inputs so that you use those transformed values to build a linear regression model.

The description that I just gave about this neural network is somewhat simplistic, in that the estimation (or model building) process is done simultaneously, treating this neural network as one big non-linear model.

Also, it is important to mention that this particular Neural Network is just one of many neural networks we could fit to this data. The number of layers and the number of each type of node to use is left up to the user to specify.

These types of models are mathematically complex, but they can be easily represented and understood using the network diagram.

They are complex models that can be more computationally challenging and time consuming when you fit them

The key strength of Neural Networks are their flexibility. They can model a wide variety of relationships between inputs and outputs.

That strength is also a potential weakness of neural nets. Because they are so good at fitting data, they have a tendency to overfit. Because of that tendency, it is good you use some sort of validation strategy when you building models and deciding which network model is the right one to use. In JMP, we require you to use some sort of validation, whether it is holdout or k-fold crossvalidation.

In addition, the underlying analytic method use to estimate the model parameters is designed to help reduce the overfitting problem. There is a very nice whitepaper on the JMP web site that describes this in greater details, and the link is shown at the bottom of this slide.

For models where we are predicting a continuous response variable, the metrics we use are based on the sum of the squared error (SSE) in prediction. The most common metric we use is the R^2 (R-squared).

R^2 is defined as 1 – (SSE) / (TSS), where

TSS is the total variability in the response. If the model predicts perfectly, then SSE is zero and R^2 is one. If the model doesn’t predict any better than using the average of the response variable, the R^2 is zero. R^2 will range between [0,1] when evaluating the model on the training data, but it can actually become negative when evaluating the model on the training data set. A negative R^2 is making worse predictions that just using the average response, and is a strong indication of overfitting.

There are other model quality measures based on the SSE, such as AIC (Aikaike’s information criteria) and BIC (Bayesian Information Criteria), but we will not focus on using those metrics in this seminar.

When the response is categorical, there are generalizations of R^2 which are used to help determine the appropriate model size, but we can also use other measures to assess model quality. When you have a categorical response model, the prediction model you build is a probability model, it predicts the probability of the outcome levels for the response. You can then use those probability models to make classification decisions about the expected response. This lees to metrics such as misclassification rate, and a cross-classification matrix known as the confusion matrix.

Additionally, these probability models can be used to “sort” the data, and ROC curves summarize the ability of these models to effectively sort the data

To help explain what an ROC curve is, we will use an example where a model was built to predict the probability of a binary outcome. In this case, the variable, GB, stands for “good’ / “bad”, and is an indicator of whether and individual defaulted on a loan or not. GB==1 indicates that the individual did NOT pay off the loan, and we have model formula that predicts the probability that GB==1. What we do is sort the data, based on that model, from high predicted probability to low probability.

If the model is predicting well, then what we would expect, upon sorting the data by predicted probability, is that we would have a lot of the defaulters at the top of the sorted table, and a lot of the non-defaulters at the bottom of the table.

What is shown is the ROC curve which describes the model’s sorting ability. Zooming in on the lower left hand corner of the graph, we can see how this relates to the sorted table.

In the sorted table, the first 9 rows are sorted TOWARDS the target, that is, those rows are the highest predicted probability of default and they were actually defaulters. So, for each one of those rows, we draw the graph up, at total of 9 steps.

Notice that the next 8 rows are not sorted toward the desired target, that is they have a relatively high probability of default, but they were not defaulters. We draw the graph over, horizontally, 8 steps, one step for each one of those rows.

The next 9 rows are sorted toward the target, and again we draw the graph up 9 steps.

Because ROC curves are always on the same scale., we can also use the area under the curve (AUC) as a metric of model quality.

A model that predicts perfectly (and therefore sorts perfectly), would have a ROC curve that goes up all the way to 1, and then over all the way to 1, so it looks like an upper right angle. A model that does not better than just picking or sorting at random would have a ROC curve that looks roughly like the 45 degree lines. So the more the ROC curve is above the 45 degree line, the better the model.

Each point on this curve corresponds to a particular Probability that can be used as a threshold for making decisions about an observation. Take, for instance, the point indicated on the graph (click animation to show). If the associated probability threshold were used to make decisions about the “Good/Bad” outcome, we would expect to correctly classify about 57% of the “Bad” credit risk, but at the tradeoff cost of incorrectly classifying about 27% of “Good” credit risk individuals as a “Bad” credit risk. (an expected question...how do I find that decision threshold? Unfortunately, with JMP you have to search the sorted table to find it. In JMP 11 there will also be a “cumulative” gains chart that is easier to use to find this threshold in the table. The Y axis for the cum gains chart will be the same as the ROC curve (Sensitivity), but the X-axis will be the sorted portion of the data, which you can then use to somewhat easily find the row and lookup it’s associated predicted probability).

- 1. Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Modeling Bulding Better Models – Part 1
- 2. 2 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. What is a Model? An empirical representation that relates a set of inputs (predictors, X) to one or more outcomes (responses, Y) Separates the response variation into signal and noise Y = f(X) + E Y is one or more continuous or categorical response outcomes X is one or more continuous or categorical predictors f(X) describes predictable variation in Y (signal) E describes non-predictable variation in Y (noise) The mathematical form of f(X) can be based on domain knowledge or mathematical convenience. “Remember that all models are wrong; the practical question is how wrong do they have to be to not be useful.” – George Box
- 3. 3 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. What makes a Good Model? Accurate and precise estimation of predictor effects. Focus is on the right hand side of the above equation. Interest is in the influence predictors have on the response(s). Design of experiments is an important tool for achieving this goal. Good designs lead to good models. Accurate and precise prediction. Focus is on the left hand side of the above equation. Interest is in best predicting outcomes from a set of inputs, often from historical or in situ data. Predictive modelling (data mining) methodologies are important tools for achieving this goal. These two goals typically occur at different points in the data discovery process.
- 4. 4 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Modeling in Action What we think is happening Historical/In situ Data Collection Real World ModelY = f(X) + E Historical/In situ Data Collection Historical/In situ Data Collection Experimental Data Collection What is really happening Experimental Data Collection Experimental Data Collection Adapted from Box, Hunter, & Hunter
- 5. 5 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Predictive Models A type of statistical model where the focus is on predicting Y independent of the form used for f(X). There is less concern about the form of the model – parameter estimation isn’t important. The focus is on how well it predicts. Very flexible models are often used to allow for a greater range of possibilities. Variable selection/reduction is typically important. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_modelling
- 6. 6 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Predictive Models Example: Predict group (red or blue) using X1 and X2
- 7. 7 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Predictive Models Two competing methods. Results are for a single sample Regression Misclassification Rate = 32.5% Nearest Neighbor Misclassification Rate = 0% Example from Hastie, Tibshirani, & Freidman: Elements of Statistical Learning
- 8. 8 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Predictive Models f(X): A majority of techniques are captured by two general approaches: Global function of data » More stable, less flexible » Captures smooth relationship between continuous inputs and outputs » Examples: Regression, Generalized Regression, Neural Networks, PLS, Discriminant Analysis Local function of data » More flexible, less stable » Captures local relationships in data (e.g., discrete shifts and discontinuities) » Examples: Nearest Neighbors, Bootstrap Forrest, Boosted Trees
- 9. 9 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Predictive Models Second sample results Nearest neighbor seems to overfit sample 1 Regression Misclassification Rate = 40% Nearest Neighbor Misclassification Rate = 41%
- 10. 10 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Preventing Model Overfitting If the model is flexible what guards against overfitting (i.e., producing predictions that are too optimistic)? Put another way, how do we protect from trying to model the noise variability as part of f(X)? Solution – Hold back part of the data, using it to check against overfitting. Break the data into two or three sets: The model is built on the training set. The validation set is used to select model by determining when the model is becoming too complex The test set is often used to evaluate how well model predicts independent of training and validation sets. Common methods include k-fold and random holdback.
- 11. 11 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Handling Missing Predictor Values Case-wise deletion – Easy, but reduces the sample Simple imputation – Replace the value with the variable mean or median Multivariate imputation – Use the correlation between multiple variables to determine what the replacement value should be Model based imputation – Model with the non-missing values, replace missing values based on similar cases Model free imputation – e.g., distance based, hot hand, etc. Methods insensitive to missing values
- 12. 12 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Does JMP Account for Missing Data? Categorical Creates a separate level for missing data and treats it as such. Continuous Informative Missing/Missing Value Coding: » Regression and Neural Network: The column mean is substituted for the missing value. An indicator column is included in the predictors where rows are 1 where data is missing, 0 otherwise. This can significantly improve the fit when data is missing not at random. » Partition: the missing observations are considered on both sides of the split. It is grouped with the side providing the better fit. Save Tolerant Prediction Formula (Partition): » The predictor is randomly assigned to one of the splits. » Only available if Informative Missing is not selected.
- 13. 13 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How does JMP Handle Missing Data? Multivariate Imputation – Available in the Multivariate platform and Column Utilities: Explore Missing Values. Based on the correlation structure of the continuous predictors (the expectation conditional on the non- missing data). Model Based Imputation – Available in Fit Model and PLS (JMP Pro). Impute missing predictors based on partial least squares model.
- 14. Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Regression and Model Selection Building Better Models – Part 1
- 15. 15 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Regression General linear regression typically uses simple polynomial functions for f(X). For continuous y: For categorical y, the logistic function of f(X) is typically used. p i iiji p i p ij ji p i ii xxxxxf 1 2 1 1 , 1 0 )( 1 1 xf e
- 16. 16 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Model Selection Stepwise Regression Start with a base model: intercept only or all terms. If intercept only, find term not included that explains the most variation and enter it into the model. If all terms, remove the term that explains the least. Continue until a (typically) p-value based stopping criterion is met. A variation of stepwise regression is all possible subsets (best subset) regression. Examine all 2, 3, 4, …, etc. term models and pick the best out of each. Sometimes statistical heredity is imposed to make the problem more tractable.
- 17. 17 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Generalized Regression For many engineers and scientists, modeling begins and ends with ordinary least squares (OLS) and stepwise or best subsets regression. Unfortunately, when data are highly correlated, OLS may lead to estimates that are less stable with higher prediction variance. In addition, there are common situations when OLS assumptions are violated: Responses and/or errors are not normally distributed. The response is not a linear combination of the predictors. Error variance is not constant across the prediction range.
- 18. 18 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Penalized Regression Generalized regression (aka penalized regression or shrinkage methods) can circumvent these problems. For correlated data, penalized methods produce more stable estimates by biasing the estimates in an effort to reduce prediction estimate variability. Provides a continuous approach to variable selection. More stable than stepwise regression. Can be used for problems when there are more variables then observations, which cannot be estimated using OLS. Three common techniques: Ridge Regression: Stabilizes the estimates, but can’t be used for variable selection. LASSO Elastic Net: Weighted average of Ridge and LASSO.
- 19. 19 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Quantile Regression Makes no distributional or variance-based assumptions. Allows the response/predictor relationship to vary with response. Allows modeling of not just the median, but of any quantile. Is more robust than OLS, lessening the influence of high-leverage points.
- 20. Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Trees Overview
- 21. 21 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Trees Also known as Recursive Partitioning, CHAID, CART Models are a series of nested IF() statements, where each condition in the IF() statement can be viewed as a separate branch in a tree. Branches are chosen so that the difference in the average response (or average response rate) between paired branches is maximized. Tree models are “grown” by adding more branches to the tree so the more of the variability in the response is explained by the model
- 22. 22 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Tree Step-by-Step Goal is to predict those with a code of “1” Overall Rate is 3.23% Candidate “X’s” • Search through each of these • Examine Splits for each unique level in each X • Find Split that maximizes “LogWorth” • Will find split that maximizes difference in proportions of the target variable
- 23. 23 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Tree Step-by-Step 1st Split: Optimal Split at Age<28 Notice the difference in the rates in each branch of the tree Repeat “Split Search” across both “Partitions” of the data. Find optimal split across both branches.
- 24. 24 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. 2nd split on CARDS (no CC vs some CC’s) Notice variation in proportion of “1” in each branch Decision Tree Step by Step
- 25. 25 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Decision Tree (Step by Step) 3rd split on TEL (# of handsets owned) Notice variation in proportion of “1” in each branch
- 26. 26 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Bootstrap Forest Bootstrap Forest For each tree, take a random sample (with replacement) of the data table. Build out a decision tree on that sample. Make many trees and average their predictions (bagging) This is also know as a random forest technique Works very well on wide tables. Can be used for both predictive modeling and variable selection.
- 27. 27 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. See the Trees in the Forest Tree on 1st Bootstrap Sample Tree on 2nd Bootstrap Sample Tree on 3rd Bootstrap Sample … Tree on 100th Bootstrap Sample
- 28. 28 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Average the Trees in the Forest
- 29. 29 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Boosted Tree Beginning with the first tree (layer) build a small simple tree. From the residuals of the first tree, build another small simple tree. This continues until a specified number of layers has been fit, or a determination has been made that adding successive layers doesn’t improve the fit of the model. The final model is the weighted accumulation of all of the model layers.
- 30. 30 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Boosted Tree Illustrated … M1 M2 M3 M49 𝑀 = 𝑀1 + 𝜀 ∙ 𝑀2 + 𝜀 ∙ 𝑀3 + ⋯ + 𝜀 ∙ 𝑀49 Models Final Model 𝜀 is the learning rate
- 31. Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Neural Networks Overview
- 32. 32 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Neural Networks Neural Networks are highly flexible nonlinear models. A neural network can be viewed as a weighted sum of nonlinear functions applied to linear models. The nonlinear functions are called activation functions. Each function is considered a (hidden) node. The nonlinear functions are grouped in layers. There may be more than one layer. Consider a generic example where there is a response Y and two predictors X1 and X2. An example type of neural network that can be fit to this data is given in the diagram that follows
- 33. 33 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Example Neural Network Diagram Inputs 2nd Hidden Node Layer 1st Hidden Node Layer Output
- 34. 34 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Neural Networks Big Picture Can model: » Continuous and categorical predictors » Continuous and categorical responses » Multiple responses (simultaneously) Can be numerically challenging and time consuming to fit NN models are very prone to overfitting if you are not careful » JMP has many ways to help prevent overfitting » Some type of validation is required » Core analytics are designed to stop fitting process early if overfitting is occurring. See Gotwalt, C., “JMP® 9 Neural Platform Numerics”, Feb 2011, http://www.jmp.com/blind/whitepapers/wp_jmp9_neural_104886.pdf
- 35. Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Model Comparison Overview
- 36. 36 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Choosing the Best Model In many situations you would try many different types of modeling methods Even within each modeling method, there are options to create different models In Stepwise, the base/full model specification can be varied In Bootstrap Forest, the number of trees and number of terms sample per split In Boosted Tree, the learning rate, number of layers, and base tree size In Neural, the specification of the model, as well as the use of boosting So how can you choose the “best”, most useful model?
- 37. 37 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. The Importance of the Test Set One of the most important uses of having a training, validation, AND test set is that you can use the test set to assess each model on the same basis. Using the test set allows you to compare competing models on the basis of model quality metrics R2 Misclassification Rate ROC and AUC
- 38. Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix
- 39. 39 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Model Evaluation Continuous response models evaluated using SSE (sum of squared error) measures such as R2, adjusted R2 R2= 1 – (SSE / TSS) » TSS is the total sum of squares for the response » R2=1 perfect prediction, » R2=0 no better than using the response average Other alternatives are Information based measures such as AIC and BIC, also dependent on the SSE. Categorical response models evaluated on ability: to sort the data, using ROC curves to categorize a new observation measured by confusion matrices and rates, as well as overall misclassification rate
- 40. 40 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Demystifying ROC Curves
- 41. 41 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. ROC Curve Construction Steps The ROC curve is constructed on the sorted table (e.g. sort the data from highest Prob[Y==target] to lowest). For each row, if the actual value is equal to the positive target, then the curve is drawn upward (vertically) an increment of 1/(Number of Positives) Otherwise it is draw across (horizontally) an increment of 1/(Number of Negatives).
- 42. 42 Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Using ROC Curves The higher the curve is, the better it is at sorting. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) will allways be in the [0,1] range and can be used as a metric of model quality. ROC Curve that is above the 45 degree line in chart is better than “guessing” (sorting at random). Every point on the curve represents the true positive (sensitivity) vs the false postitive (1-Specifiity) for a particular threshold that one could use to classify observations.

No public clipboards found for this slide

×
### Save the most important slides with Clipping

Clipping is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. You can keep your great finds in clipboards organized around topics.

Be the first to comment