We've updated our privacy policy. Click here to review the details. Tap here to review the details.
Activate your 30 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
Activate your 30 day free trial to continue reading.
Download to read offline
Simply providing feedback does not ensure that students have read it, understood it or engaged and learned from it. This is one of the reasons that feedback dialogue is gaining recognition as an important principle of effective feedback 1 and assessment for learning 2. In this workshop participants will: 1) discuss the value of feedback dialogue to student learning and the student experience and 2) compare and contrast two Jisc funded projects aiming to promote feedback dialogue.
Case study 1
Interactive Assessment and Collaboration via Technology (interACT): involved the redesign of feedback practices across an online distance learning postgraduate programme in medical education using cover pages and dialogue wikis to promote self-evaluation and student-tutor dialogue.
Case study 2
Making Assessment Count (MAC) has developed a flexible process centred around online self-review questionnaires that students can use to either think about an assignment they are about to address or reflect on an assignment they have completed and received feedback on.
We discuss the two approaches to promoting feedback dialogue including: why, how, evidence and lessons learned.
Simply providing feedback does not ensure that students have read it, understood it or engaged and learned from it. This is one of the reasons that feedback dialogue is gaining recognition as an important principle of effective feedback 1 and assessment for learning 2. In this workshop participants will: 1) discuss the value of feedback dialogue to student learning and the student experience and 2) compare and contrast two Jisc funded projects aiming to promote feedback dialogue.
Case study 1
Interactive Assessment and Collaboration via Technology (interACT): involved the redesign of feedback practices across an online distance learning postgraduate programme in medical education using cover pages and dialogue wikis to promote self-evaluation and student-tutor dialogue.
Case study 2
Making Assessment Count (MAC) has developed a flexible process centred around online self-review questionnaires that students can use to either think about an assignment they are about to address or reflect on an assignment they have completed and received feedback on.
We discuss the two approaches to promoting feedback dialogue including: why, how, evidence and lessons learned.
You just clipped your first slide!
Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips.The SlideShare family just got bigger. Enjoy access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, and more from Scribd.
Cancel anytime.Unlimited Reading
Learn faster and smarter from top experts
Unlimited Downloading
Download to take your learnings offline and on the go
You also get free access to Scribd!
Instant access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, podcasts and more.
Read and listen offline with any device.
Free access to premium services like Tuneln, Mubi and more.
We’ve updated our privacy policy so that we are compliant with changing global privacy regulations and to provide you with insight into the limited ways in which we use your data.
You can read the details below. By accepting, you agree to the updated privacy policy.
Thank you!