Be the first to like this
Which Growth Stocks Are Really Value Investments?
The failure of many so-called “growth stocks” to surge ahead in today’s stock market has puzzled value investors. After all, the traditional use of measures, such as price to earnings ratio and price to asset ratio, has served many investors well over the years. But for many investments in the stock market, it is not working today! Growth stocks keep forging ahead while stocks with low price to asset ratios are lagging. The questions we want to bring up are which growth stocks are really value investments in disguise? And, which value stocks are really not so valuable?
Successful Investing by Seeing the Future
We commonly use intrinsic stock value as a guide to successful investing. This approach assumes that you can successfully predict the income stream that an investment will generate in the coming years. Then, you look at the current stock price as well as the financial condition of the company. Here is where the Generally Accepted Accounting Practice that is used to do the books may not serve a modern investor very well. There are factors that may overstate the value of a so-called “value stock” and understate the value of a so-called “growth stock”. The Wall Street Journal looks at the traditional way of measuring value stocks and offers some advice to investors.
Is “value” dead? Or have we just been measuring it in the wrong way?
It’s an urgent question, because value stocks-when defined according to the traditional criterion, low price-to-book-value ratios-have lagged behind growth stocks for at least a decade now. And though value stocks in the past have come roaring back after going through similarly long periods of lagging, some researchers are questioning whether they will do so again.
The point that the WSJ makes hinges of how “intangible assets” are treated in the world of accounting. What is important when predicting the future of a stock is being badly represented in financial statements.