Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Navigating Patents- Law and Process to File

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Navigating Patents- Law and Process to File

  1. 1. Overview of International Intellectual Property Laws Treaties and Use August 18, 2009
  2. 2. Treaties <ul><li>Multiple parties/nations </li></ul><ul><li>Highly negotiated </li></ul><ul><li>Compromise </li></ul><ul><li>Vague language </li></ul><ul><li>Inconsistent between treaties </li></ul><ul><li>Culture and value standards </li></ul>
  3. 3. WIPO <ul><li>Administers intellectual property treaties (~24) </li></ul><ul><li>Aids in setting up national laws on IPR </li></ul><ul><li>Maintains records of various international agencies – IP search sites </li></ul><ul><li>184 members </li></ul><ul><li>Geneva headquarters </li></ul>
  4. 4. Paris Convention <ul><li>7 July 1884 </li></ul><ul><li>Method to have 1 year priority </li></ul><ul><li>Global novelty </li></ul><ul><li>Many negotiated amendments with different nations signed to different ones </li></ul><ul><li>173 members </li></ul>
  5. 5. PCT <ul><li>Subset from Paris </li></ul><ul><li>24 January 1978 </li></ul><ul><li>Originally for formalities – paper, margins </li></ul><ul><li>141 members </li></ul>
  6. 6. WTO <ul><li>1 January 1995 </li></ul><ul><li>153 members </li></ul><ul><li>Major task is trade issues among nations </li></ul><ul><li>WTO members must treat all members alike – duty, fees for import, security, health </li></ul><ul><li>Membership is IMPORTANT for fair trade practices </li></ul>
  7. 7. WTO - 2 <ul><li>Developed Countries – US etc – should be fully in compliance from 1996 </li></ul><ul><li>Developing Countries – CA? CN? – should be fully in compliance since Jan 2000 </li></ul><ul><li>Least Developed Countries – 32 [UN 49] – compliance extended until 2016 </li></ul>
  8. 8. WTO - 3 <ul><li>Enforcement is provided including loss of membership, penalties (CN?) </li></ul><ul><li>Disputes are only between nations </li></ul><ul><li>Usually on bans to import or unfair practices – dumping, piracy of IPR, protection of home industry </li></ul>
  9. 9. TRIPs <ul><li>A part of GATT so that when nations had to sign to join WTO they had to accept TRIPs too </li></ul><ul><li>More uniform IPR protection globally for innovators </li></ul><ul><li>Cut down on piracy (copyright) and counterfeit (patents/trademarks) and have stiff penalties (WIPO/Paris/PCT has no enforcement) </li></ul>
  10. 10. TRIPs - 2 <ul><li>Basic principles – minimum standards </li></ul><ul><li>Adequate protection – years, types </li></ul><ul><li>Enforcement by nations must be strong in local systems </li></ul><ul><li>Settle disputes between WTO members </li></ul><ul><li>Transitional provisions for compliance </li></ul>
  11. 11. TRIPs - 3 <ul><li>Patents </li></ul><ul><li>At least 20 years from filing </li></ul><ul><li>All technology areas must be patentable unless public order or morality issue (applied to all uniformly) </li></ul><ul><li>Include microorganisms, drugs, process includes the product – Budapest Treaty </li></ul><ul><li>Geographical Indications (Article 22-24) </li></ul><ul><li>Plant varieties – UPOV Convention </li></ul>
  12. 12. US Provisional <ul><li>Provisional Application </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Just as hard to write for priority claim </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Needs to be global – have at least 1 claim, inventors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Only 12 months – then another case –US utility or PCT </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Low cost $220 LE/$110 SE; >100 sheets $220/ $135 SE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Not examined </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Not published </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Never issues as a patent </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Errors on Provisional <ul><li>Disclose before filed – public or TM </li></ul><ul><li>Not well written </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Enablement </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Written description </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Does not comply with all the US laws or treaties </li></ul>
  14. 14. US Utility <ul><li>Original US Application </li></ul><ul><li>Can issue </li></ul><ul><li>Publishes at 18 months from 1 st filed (unless file a request) </li></ul><ul><li>Is examined </li></ul><ul><li>Cost higher: Filing $330 LE/ $165 SE/ $82 electronic </li></ul><ul><li>More costs for claims >3 indep.; >20 claims total, size >100 pgs $270/$135 per 50 pgs; Search $540 LE/ $270 SE; Exam $220 LE/ $110 SE </li></ul>
  15. 15. Requirements <ul><li>Novelty – absolute, global </li></ul><ul><li>Non-obvious – Philips, KSR, Festo Cases </li></ul><ul><li>Utility – useful vs. industrial applicability </li></ul>
  16. 16. US Prosecution <ul><li>Several Office Actions over time, time delays </li></ul><ul><li>RCE when needed $840 LE/ $405 SE </li></ul><ul><li>Takes effort and knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Claims can cost too </li></ul><ul><li>Patent valuable when issued </li></ul>
  17. 17. Maintenance Fees on US Patent <ul><li>Due after issue of patent </li></ul><ul><ul><li>3.5 years = $980 LE/ $490 SE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>7.5 years = $2,480 LE/ $1,240 SE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>11.5 years = $4,110 LE/ $2,055 SE </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Time Line <ul><li>0 = filed US Provisional </li></ul><ul><li>12 months = PCT or US Utility filed </li></ul><ul><li>17.5 months = withdraw publication/abandon </li></ul><ul><li>18 months = published </li></ul><ul><li>30 months = national countries files </li></ul>
  19. 19. PCT - Advantages <ul><li>File in language of Receiving Office (RO) – many national offices qualify as RO </li></ul><ul><li>Must have 1 inventor a citizen of that country or the assignee is incorporated there [IB will always accept the case from a member] </li></ul><ul><li>Up to 30 months to decide where to file national (7 Countries is break even on costs; EP = 1 with 34 ctry) </li></ul><ul><li>Get all countries at filing </li></ul>
  20. 20. PCT - Concerns <ul><li>Export license – US if an inventor is US or data generated in US </li></ul><ul><li>Security clearance if US government funding (DOD; DOE; etc.) </li></ul><ul><li>Costs – if intend less than 7 countries at national stage </li></ul><ul><li>Publication at 18 months </li></ul>
  21. 21. PCT – Where to File <ul><li>Technology driven </li></ul><ul><li>Speed to market </li></ul><ul><li>Where are the markets? </li></ul><ul><li>Obsolesce </li></ul><ul><li>Licensing </li></ul><ul><li>Value received for the cost incurred </li></ul>
  22. 22. PCT – Content of Case <ul><li>Specification – problems between countries (US – written description & enablement; EP - solution) </li></ul><ul><li>Claims – number, type, multiple dependencies, independent claims, wording (complex – meaning and translations) </li></ul><ul><li>How to draft PCT case is a separate course for IP lawyers as it is complex </li></ul>
  23. 23. PCT - Procedure <ul><li>0 Month - File Priority Case </li></ul><ul><li>12 months – file PCT Case + Non-PCT Country Cases </li></ul><ul><li>16 months – receive ISR/WO – can informally comment within 2 months; Article 19 - amend only claims [AT, AU, CA, CN, EP, ES, FI, JP, KR, RU, SE, US; IB] </li></ul>
  24. 24. PCT – Procedure - 2 <ul><li>17.5 months – stop publication; revoke priority claim; withdraw all designations but US </li></ul><ul><li>18 months – publication </li></ul><ul><li>22 months – demand; IPRP; can amend entire application; Article 34 </li></ul><ul><li>28 months – IPRP; informal comments </li></ul><ul><li>30 months – National Phase </li></ul>
  25. 25. National Phase <ul><li>Some countries give strong weight to a positive IPRP </li></ul><ul><li>Examination should be in 54 languages of members (no one examiner does this so many countries re-examine) </li></ul><ul><li>Examination standards are different so the art is applied wrong – 35 USC § 102(e) </li></ul><ul><li>Maintenance fees are national and exponentially increase with patent life </li></ul>
  26. 26. Now Global Ready? <ul><li>The world is small, so know how to work in it. </li></ul>

    Be the first to comment

    Login to see the comments


Total views


On Slideshare


From embeds


Number of embeds