Ndevr/WesCEF InSync slides

692 views

Published on

Presentation from Ndevr and WesCEF regarding GHG Accounting Software and client case study of why and how.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Ndevr/WesCEF InSync slides

  1. 1. Environmental Data Management & Compliance Dean Smith - Ndevr Robbie Lehman – WesCEF August 16 The most comprehensive Oracle applications & technology content under one roof
  2. 2. Environmental Compliance
  3. 3. National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER) Energy Efficiency & Opportunites (EEO) The National Pollutant Inventory (NPI) The Climate Change and Greenhouse Emissions Reduction Act 2007 The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme (GGAS) Climate Change (State Action ) 40 of 2008 GHG Protocol Clean Air Act GRI Solid Waste Act EPA Reporting Rules EU Emissions Trading Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) National Carbon Offset Standard (NCOS) Clean Development Program Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act) The National Pollutant Inventory (NPI) Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) Kyoto Protocol UNFCC UK Air Strategy CRC UK Reporting Rules
  4. 4. GHG Protocol
  5. 5. Relevence
  6. 6. Completeness
  7. 7. Consistency
  8. 8. Accuracy
  9. 9. Transparency
  10. 10. Ndevr GHG Solutions Any Source GHG GHG
  11. 11. Ndevr GHG Solutions GHG Assets AP
  12. 12. GHG Dashboard
  13. 13. GHG Dashboard
  14. 14. Facility A Emission Source Code Emission Source Description Usage Quantity Usage UOM ELNW Electricity - Nsw 109826.33 KW TFGNA Transport Fuel - General - Petrol 10.00 LT Facility B Emission Source Code Emission Source Description Usage Quantity Usage UOM DIES_TN Diesel - TN 2.56 TN EUOS Electricity Used On Site 66.64 MW LOE_TN Light oil - Exported - TN 699.84 TN NGE_PJ Natural Gas - Exported - PJ 3.60 PJ PLLO_TN Production liquids - light oil - TN 3188.42 TN PNG_TN Processed NG (Conventional) - TN 16960.04 TN UPNG_TN Unprocessed NG (CSG) - TN 2500.00 TN VENT_TN CO2-e Venting - TN 244.00 TN Facility C Emission Source Code Emission Source Description Usage Quantity Usage UOM ELNW Electricity - Nsw 82594.00 KW NGTG Natural Gas For Stationary Use - Town Gas 139.00 KL SWDCI Solid Waste Disposal - Category - Commercial/Industrial Waste 1550.00 KG TFDO Transport Fuel - General - Diesel Oil 139139.00 KL Facility D Emission Source Code Emission Source Description Usage Quantity Usage UOM EUOS Electricity Used On Site 936.68 MW PKERO_GJ Power Kerosene - GJ 1027715.76 GJ Facility E Emission Source Code Emission Source Description Usage Quantity Usage UOM ELNW Electricity - Nsw 136826.33 KW TFDO Transport Fuel - General - Diesel Oil 127178.00 KL
  15. 15. OSCAR
  16. 16. Sample GHG Clients
  17. 17. Enterprise Compliance JD Edwards OTHER Group Reporting Subsidiary/Division A B C
  18. 18. “ The integration of greenhouse gas and other environmental metrics directly within ERP applications is a logical extension and ensures that sustainability becomes truly embedded within a business ,” Vice President of Supply Chain & Sustainability Product Strategy. “ Before we had the Oracle and Ndevr solution in place, this was a very time consuming and costly process that required us to download data from our JD Edwards system and manipulate it in Excel. That process would take months , but with the integration, we can now view and use greenhouse gas and energy figures for each of our facilities on a daily basis .”
  19. 21. About WesCEF <ul><li>Division of Wesfarmers -1 July </li></ul><ul><li>Merger of CSBP and Wesfarmers Energy </li></ul><ul><li>Revenue - $1.8B </li></ul><ul><li>EBIT - $127M </li></ul><ul><li>1480 Employees </li></ul>
  20. 22. About Wesfarmers <ul><li>A West Australian based conglomerate </li></ul><ul><li>Revenue - $50.9B </li></ul><ul><li>NPAT - $1.5B </li></ul><ul><li>200,000 Employees </li></ul>
  21. 23. Wesfarmers Structure
  22. 24. Greenhouse Reporting - Historic <ul><li>CSBP and WES early adopters </li></ul><ul><li>Kwinana a major hazard facility </li></ul><ul><li>Social responsibility </li></ul><ul><li>Increasing focus on emissions & energy consumption </li></ul><ul><li>Legislation & Regulation </li></ul>
  23. 25. Greenhouse Reporting – (cont) <ul><li>EEO Act </li></ul><ul><li>NGER Act </li></ul><ul><li>WesCEF & Wesfarmers Sustainability reporting </li></ul><ul><li>Carbon scheme – whatever form it takes </li></ul>
  24. 26. CSBP CO2-e Analysis <ul><li>Threshold is 125kT of CO2 equivalent </li></ul><ul><li>CSBP output was 1.475mT of CO2 equivalent </li></ul>
  25. 27. Definition of Scopes
  26. 28. CSBP Timeline <ul><li>Early reporting commenced late 1980s </li></ul><ul><li>MS Excel model developed & evolved </li></ul><ul><li>Manual collection & input </li></ul><ul><li>Multiple reporting sets (EEO, Greenhouse Challenge Plus, Sustainability, etc) </li></ul>
  27. 29. CSBP Challenges <ul><li>Size & vulnerability of the model </li></ul><ul><li>Auditability </li></ul><ul><li>Increasing reporting requirements </li></ul><ul><li>Need for greater process control & efficiency </li></ul>
  28. 30. Why Ndevr <ul><li>The tool is built in the JDE toolset </li></ul><ul><li>References were easy to find </li></ul><ul><li>Some exposure to prior work with Ndevr </li></ul><ul><li>Pricing </li></ul><ul><li>The opportunity for efficiencies </li></ul>
  29. 31. Project Team
  30. 32. Project Timeline
  31. 33. Key Focus Points <ul><li>Determining Reporting Structures, Facilities, Business Units </li></ul><ul><li>Use of UDCs or the Hierarchy builder for structure </li></ul><ul><li>Integrating new menus into existing security </li></ul>
  32. 34. What worked well <ul><li>Good collaboration between all parties </li></ul><ul><li>A very committed effort from the Environment team </li></ul><ul><li>Testing system capabilities (eg. Scope 4!) </li></ul><ul><li>New features – storing $ values </li></ul>
  33. 35. Issues Encountered <ul><li>Our manufacturing complexity required more upfront analysis time </li></ul><ul><li>Some delay while we determined our structures </li></ul><ul><li>Significant time on the contract negotiations </li></ul><ul><li>Historic data population was time consuming </li></ul>
  34. 36. NGERs – current status <ul><li>2008/09 data into production </li></ul><ul><li>2009/10 data in test (now reconciled) </li></ul><ul><li>Cognos reporting about 90% where it needs to be </li></ul><ul><li>Note – 2009/10 audit & reporting delivered via old model </li></ul>
  35. 37. Next Steps <ul><li>Decision on whether (or when) to include the rest of the new Division into NGERs </li></ul><ul><li>Discussion with other users & Ndevr about priorities for future releases, eg. period locking, storing zero values, etc </li></ul>
  36. 38. Tell us what you think… <ul><li>http://feedback.insync10.com.au </li></ul>

×