1. 1
A PLATFORM FOR AUTOMATING
UNIKERNELS COMPILATION AND
DEPLOYMENT
UNIK

2. 2
VIRTUALIZATION STACK
Redundancy in the stack
– e.g. Isolation
Application Config
Application
Language Runtime
Shared Libraries
Docker Runtime
OS User Processes
OS Kernel
Virtual HW Drivers
Hypervisor
Hardware Drivers
Hardware
The aim is to run single
Application with a single user
on a single server

3. 3
KERNEL COMPLEXITY - PROTECTION
Application safe from user
Application safe from
application User safe from user

4. 4
INEFFICIENCY
• Needless permission check, it is hard and an updated
model from time sharing computer from the 50s, 60s
• Microservices architecture duplicate what Linux
did for us
• Kernel include a lot of unnecessary drivers that
not being used: floppy, USB …
• Update and patches using yum bring a lot of
unnecessary components

5. 5
SECURITY
• Very large attack surface
• A lot of exploits target linux.
It is harder to attack
hypervisor - not expose to
the internet
• Microservices architecture
Sharing – Kernel, Memory,
filesystem, hardware
The only thing make it safe is kernel extension
like: cgroup

6. 6
LINUX KERNEL LANGUAGES

7. 7
SOURCE LINES OF CODE
Small Applications: 10Ks
Medium to large applications: 100Ks
Really huge applications: 1Ms

8. 8
2.4
5.2
11
12.6
13.5
15.9
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
Linux kernel
2.4.2
Linux kernel
2.6.0
Linux kernel
2.6.29
Linux kernel
2.6.32
Linux kernel
2.6.35
Linux kernel 3.6 Linux kernel pre-
4.2
2001 2003 2009 2009 2010 2012 2015
Linux Kernel SLOC

9. 9
59
104
215
283
324
419
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Debian 2.2 Debian 3.0 Debian 3.1 Debian 4.0 Debian 5.0 Debian 7.0
2000 2002 2005 2007 2009 2012
Debian SLOC

10. 10
HOW DID WE GET HERE ? EVOLUTION !
Unix was supported us the entire way!

11. 11
DECADES OF BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
What can linux run on ?
What can run on linux ?
Anything !
Anything !

12. 12
TRADE OFF
VS
Compatibility Efficiency

13. 13
Make it works.
Make it right.
Make it fast.

14. 14
Or is it ?
But how ?
What can we do to make it better ?
Rewrite ?
does it make sense to write one from scratch ?
Probably not – it is too much work !

15. 15
True, linux is monolithic, and I agree that microkernels are
nicer... As has been noted (not only by me), the linux kernel
is a minuscule part of a complete system: Full sources for
linux currently runs to about 200kB compressed. And all of
that source is portable, except for this tiny kernel that you
can (provably: I did it) re-write totally from scratch in less
than a year without having /any/ prior knowledge.
– Linus Torvalds, 1992

16. 16
{uni-} {kernel}
a bridge between
applications and
the actual data
processing done
at the hardware
level.
One; having
or consisting
of one.

17. 17
Application
Kernel
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
libc
libz
iconv
openGL
gtk
libgmp libtlc
Libstd++ libgcc

18. 18
Application
Kernel
UNIKERNEL APPROACH
libc
libz
iconv
openGL
gtk
libgmp libtlc
Libstd++ libgcc

19. 19
• Based on library OS
• Contains only what is needed
• Single process (micro services architecture)
• Single address space
• No virtual memory isolation
• No context switching
• No usermode/kernelmode
• Real immutable infrastructure
UNIKERNELS

20. 20
App Binary
App Config
App Deps
Virt, HW Drivers
Langue runtime
ApplicationRuntime
Packaging Tool Unikernel!
UNIKERNEL CREATION

21. 21
UNIKERNEL STACK
• Unikernels deploy directly
against the hypervisor
• Unikernels have their own
network stack
• Unikernels have their own
virtualize memory presented
as hardware
• Unikernel are completely self
contained & ideally
immutable
Hypervisor
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
1
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
2
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
3
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
4
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
5
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
6
1
0
.
1
0
.
1
.
7

22. 22
HOW CAN UNIKERNELS HELP ADDRESS OUR
PROBLEMS? Application Config
Application
Language Runtime
Shared Libraries
Docker Runtime
OS User Processes
OS Kernel
Virtual HW Drivers
Hypervisor
Hardware Drivers
Hardware
Minimal layers of isolation
and abstraction
Includes only what is really
needed
Less code, fewer bugs, easy
to reason about

23. 23
DOCKER STACK VS. UNIKERNEL STACK
Application Binary
+ Library OS
Hypervisor
Hardware Drivers
Hardware
Application Config
Application
Language Runtime
Shared Libraries
Docker Runtime
OS User Processes
OS Kernel
Virtual HW Drivers
Hypervisor
Hardware Drivers
Hardware

24. 24
DOCKER STACK VS. UNIKERNEL STACK
Application Binary
+ Library OS
Hypervisor
Hardware Drivers
Hardware
Application Config
Application
Language Runtime
Shared Libraries
Docker Runtime
OS User Processes
OS Kernel
Hardware Drivers
Hardware
Hardware isolation

25. 25
UNIKERNEL ADVANTAGES
• No other users, no multi-user support
• No permission checks – you can utilize 100% of your hardware
• Isolation at the virtual hardware – only ! share only hardware
• Minimal virtual machine ~1 gb in size, minimal unikernel is
tiny, kb in size
• Very short boot time
• A tiny custom surface of attack, less likely to be effected by
a public exploit
• Real immutable infrastructure – perfect fit to micro services architecture

26. 26
Backward compatibility Forward compatibility
POSIX compliance Language specifics

27. 27
BENCHMARK

28. 30
COOL DEMOS

29. 31
is an open-source
tool written in Go for compiling
applications into unikernels and
deploying those unikernels across a
variety of cloud providers,
embedded devices (IoT), as well as
a developer laptop or workstation.

30. 32
unik build --path example-app/ --base unikernel-type --language language
--provider provider-name --name image-name
unik run --instanceName instance-name –imageName image-name
UNIK WORKFLOW

31. 33
UNIK IS NOT OPINIONATED !
Unikernel types Cloud providers
Processor architectures

32. 34

33. 35
UNIK INTEGRATION WITH DOCKER
Docker API can be used to create unikernel via UniK

34. 36
UNIK INTEGRATION WITH KUBERNETES
Unikernels support was added to Kubernetes by the UniK team by adding UniK as a
container runtime to K8s - in the same way that Docker and rkt are container
runtimes, UniK is now also available as a "container" runtime for k8s.

35. 37
UNIK KUBERNETES ARCHITECTURE
unikernels
Now one can
deploy a unikernel
apps alongside
regular kubernetes
containerized apps.

36. 39

37. 41

38. 42
INTERNET OF THINGS
UniK will Push
Unikernel
To Raspberry Pi
Unikernel will
communicate with
the Panini toaster
Toaster will make
Panini
We will eat Panini
bread

39. 43
WORRIED ABOUT IOT DDOS?
THINK UNIKERNELS
Could such attacks be prevented
if IoT devices were running bare
metal unikernels?
Read our blog !

40. 45
.NET ON UNIKERNEL

41. 46
SERVERLESS

42. 47
OpenSource

43. 48
UNIK COMMUNITY

44. 49
EMC-Advanced-Dev
http://www.github.com/emc-advanced-dev
Idit Levine
CTO of Cloud Platform Team &
Office of the CTO, EMC
@idit_levine
Scott Weiss
Software Engineer, EMC
@ilackarms
Yuval Kohavi
Software Engineer, EMC
@uvgroovy

45. 50
@Idit_Levine

46. 51