Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Progress Report Presentation:
Debriefing Assessment in Real Time - DART
Barbara Ferdman*, M.D., Lou Halamek**, M.D.
For th...
Aim(s) - Revised
• Record multiple debriefings at a minimum of 3 sites
– Debriefers will possess different levels of exper...
Timeline
• March 1:
o Finalize DART 1 and DART 2
o Finalize scoring guide for the DART assessment tool

• May 1:
o Complet...
Progress since Jan 2013
• Quantifiable markers refined
• Project design revised
o DART expanded, now 2 versions available
...
Needs / Challenges
• Securing the time (and personnel) to devote to non-funded
research
• Identify any additional ambiguou...
How can INSPIRE help?
1. Provide site to upload recordings of
debriefings

2. In 3 months: ?
3. Over 1 year: ?

Internatio...
Contact Information
Name: Lou Halamek
Institution: Center for Advanced Pediatric

and Perinatal Education, Stanford
halame...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Alert 2014-progress-halamek

178 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Alert 2014-progress-halamek

  1. 1. Progress Report Presentation: Debriefing Assessment in Real Time - DART Barbara Ferdman*, M.D., Lou Halamek**, M.D. For the DART Research Group *University of Rochester Medical Center **Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education, Stanford University IMSH 2014: San Francisco, CA / USA International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education
  2. 2. Aim(s) - Revised • Record multiple debriefings at a minimum of 3 sites – Debriefers will possess different levels of experience and employ different methods of debriefing • Score debriefings using DASH, DART 1 and DART 2 • Compare o o o o Perceived ease of use Inter-rater reliability Construct validity Identify any objective markers that correlate with perceived quality International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education
  3. 3. Timeline • March 1: o Finalize DART 1 and DART 2 o Finalize scoring guide for the DART assessment tool • May 1: o Complete pilot testing DART 1 and DART 2 (Stanford only) o Revise assessment tools and scoring guide as necessary • August 1 o Score 10 debriefings at each site using the DASH, DART 1, and DART 2 o Begin data analysis International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education
  4. 4. Progress since Jan 2013 • Quantifiable markers refined • Project design revised o DART expanded, now 2 versions available o Scoring guide developed to reduce ambiguity for raters • Plan to seek internal funding to assist with implementation International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education
  5. 5. Needs / Challenges • Securing the time (and personnel) to devote to non-funded research • Identify any additional ambiguous verbalizations and determine optimal method of scoring to optimize inter-rater reliability • Illustrate, in a visually compelling way, the flow of a debriefing session • Seek internal funding sources International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education
  6. 6. How can INSPIRE help? 1. Provide site to upload recordings of debriefings 2. In 3 months: ? 3. Over 1 year: ? International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education
  7. 7. Contact Information Name: Lou Halamek Institution: Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education, Stanford halamek@stanford.edu 650-724-4444 International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education

×