Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Whole genome sequencing of Napier grass (C. purpureus) accessions from sub-Saharan Africa(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Whole genome sequencing of Napier grass (C. purpureus) accessions from sub-Saharan Africa

  1. Better lives through livestock Whole genome sequencing of Napier grass (C. purpureus) accessions from sub-Saharan Africa Abel Teshome (PhD), FLAIR research fellow Feeds and Forages Program, ILRI December 2021 Addis Ababa
  2. 2 Small-scale dairy farmer milk yield/day Diary farms in Ethiopia 2% of the total cattle population Dairy farms in EU/UK Carcass average/head Ethiopia:110 kg UK: 346 kg Ethiopia boasts the largest livestock inventory in Africa. However, below-par productivity in the dairy sector forces the country to spend hard currency on importing dairy products from abroad 30L 15L 5L
  3. 3 Improving livestock productivity requires: • Access to feed/ fodder/ grazing resources (improved) • Access to water • Breeding stock • Animal health services • Access to markets • Access to finance (incl. insurance) • Access to knowledge • Security Health & management Breed Forage & feed
  4. 4 Macro economy Peace & security Climate change Food Security Need to create year-round fodder resources Challenges of livestock farmers in the tropics
  5. 5 Why Napier grass? • High yield per unit area, • Perennial, • Can withstand repeated cuttings, • Energy crop, • Tolerance to intermittent drought, • Cut and carry feeding, • Pests & disease tolerant, • Salt tolerance, • Soil and water conservation, & • Ease of propagation Kingdom: Plantae Clade: Tracheophytes Clade: Angiosperms Clade: Monocots Clade: Commelinids Order: Poales Family: Poaceae Subfamily: Panicoideae Genus: Cenchrus Species: C. purpureum
  6. 6 • Morphological traits • Height • No of tillers per plant • Leaf hairiness • Agronomic traits • Number of plants surviving • Plant vigour • Yield traits • Total fresh weight (g) • Leaf dry matter (g) • stem dry matter (g) • Leaf/Stem ratio Drought tolerance trial established in Bishoftu, Ethiopia (2017 - 2021)
  7. 7 • MINING GENEBANKS: Quantify genome variation in a large and representative sample of accessions from Africa (500) • POPULATION ANALYSIS: Identify features that make specific geographic or genetic subsets particularly well suited for forward genetics, field experiments and select • ASSOCIATION MAPPING: GWAS analysis for traits of interest such as water use efficiency, nutritional quality, anthocyanin content, and dry matter yield etc. • FUNCTIONAL GENETICS: Conduct comparative genomic analysis through the use of genes that are known to contribute to the regulation of traits of interest in Arabidopsis and identify their homologues in C. purpureus. Research objectives
  8. 8 0.0e+00 5.0e+07 1.0e+08 1.5e+08 2.0e+08 A01 B01 A02 B02 A03 B03 A04 B04 A05 B05 A06 B06 A07 B07 Chromosome Position chr A01 B01 A02 B02 A03 B03 A04 B04 A05 B05 A06 B06 A07 B07 More than a million polymorphic and bi-allelic SNPs identified from 350 Napier grass accessions
  9. 9 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 G 1 _ G I A N T _ G 1 I L 1 0 2 6 _ I L R I _ I L 1 0 2 6 I L 1 6 7 8 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 2 I L 1 6 7 9 4 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 4 I L 1 8 4 4 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 8 4 4 8 I L 1 8 6 6 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 8 6 6 2 I L 1 6 8 0 5 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 5 I L 1 6 7 9 0 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 0 B A 2 4 _ B A G C E _ B A 2 4 I L 1 6 8 1 7 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 7 B A 8 0 _ B A G C E _ B A 8 0 I L 1 6 8 0 7 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 7 I L 1 8 4 3 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 8 4 3 8 I L 1 6 8 1 0 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 0 I L 1 6 8 1 5 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 5 I L 1 6 8 2 1 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 2 1 B A 1 7 _ B A G C E _ B A 1 7 I L 1 6 8 0 9 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 9 I L 1 6 8 1 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 8 I L 1 6 8 0 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 8 I L 1 6 8 3 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 3 8 I L 1 6 8 3 4 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 3 4 I L 1 6 7 9 7 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 7 I L 1 6 8 1 6 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 6 I L 1 6 8 2 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 2 2 I L 1 6 9 0 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 9 0 2 N 2 2 8 _ U S A _ N 2 2 8 − 2 I L 1 4 3 8 9 _ I L R I _ I L 1 4 3 8 9 I L 1 4 9 8 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 4 9 8 2 N 3 6 _ U S A _ N 3 6 − 2 B A 3 4 3 _ B A G C E _ B A 3 4 3 ( B A 3 4 ) I L 1 6 8 1 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 2 N 1 9 _ U S A _ N 1 9 − 2 I L 1 6 8 1 3 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 3 I L 1 6 8 3 5 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 3 5 I L 1 6 7 9 6 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 6 I L 1 6 8 3 9 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 3 9 I L 1 4 9 8 3 _ I L R I _ I L 1 4 9 8 3 C N 9 6 2 1 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 6 2 1 1 I L 1 6 8 0 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 2 I L 1 6 7 9 1 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 1 C N 0 0 1 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 0 0 1 1 B A 1 0 0 _ B A G C E _ B A 1 0 0 I L 1 6 7 8 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 8 I L 1 6 7 8 3 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 3 I L 1 5 7 4 3 _ I L R I _ I L 1 5 7 4 3 I L 1 6 7 9 3 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 3 C N 9 3 0 6 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 0 6 1 A d d _ I L R I _ A d d B A 1 _ B A G C E _ B A 1 B A 1 6 _ B A G C E _ B A 1 6 B A 2 2 _ B A G C E _ B A 2 2 B A 2 5 _ B A G C E _ B A 2 5 B A 3 0 _ B A G C E _ B A 3 0 B A 5 3 _ B A G C E _ B A 5 3 B A 5 6 _ B A G C E _ B A 5 6 B A 6 3 _ B A G C E _ B A 6 3 B A 7 _ B A G C E _ B A 7 B A 7 5 _ B A G C E _ B A 7 5 B A 8 1 _ B A G C E _ B A 8 1 B A 8 6 _ B A G C E _ B A 8 6 B A 9 0 _ B A G C E _ B A 9 0 ( B A 9 3 ) B A 9 4 _ B A G C E _ B A 9 4 B A 9 7 _ B A G C E _ B A 9 7 C N 9 1 0 6 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 1 0 6 2 C N 9 1 1 1 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 1 1 1 2 C N 9 1 2 5 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 1 2 5 1 C N 9 2 1 3 3 3 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 1 3 3 3 C N 9 2 1 9 0 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 1 9 0 1 C N 9 2 1 9 8 7 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 1 9 8 7 C N 9 2 3 8 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 3 8 2 C N 9 2 5 6 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 5 6 2 C N 9 2 6 6 3 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 6 6 3 C N 9 2 7 9 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 2 7 9 2 C N 9 3 0 1 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 0 1 1 C N 9 3 0 4 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 0 4 2 C N 9 3 0 8 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 0 8 1 C N 9 3 1 8 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 1 8 2 C N 9 3 3 2 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 3 2 2 C N 9 3 3 7 5 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 3 3 7 5 C N 9 4 0 7 2 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 4 0 7 2 C N 9 4 1 3 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 4 1 3 1 C N 9 6 2 3 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 6 2 3 1 C N 9 6 2 4 1 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 6 2 4 1 C N 9 6 2 7 3 _ C N P G L _ C N 9 6 2 7 3 I L 1 4 3 5 5 _ I L R I _ I L 1 4 3 5 5 I L 1 4 9 8 4 _ I L R I _ I L 1 4 9 8 4 I L 1 5 3 5 7 _ I L R I _ I L 1 5 3 5 7 I L 1 6 7 8 4 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 4 I L 1 6 7 8 5 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 5 I L 1 6 7 8 6 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 6 I L 1 6 7 8 7 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 7 I L 1 6 7 8 9 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 8 9 I L 1 6 7 9 2 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 2 I L 1 6 7 9 5 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 5 I L 1 6 7 9 8 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 8 I L 1 6 7 9 9 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 7 9 9 I L 1 6 8 0 0 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 0 I L 1 6 8 0 1 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 1 I L 1 6 8 0 3 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 3 I L 1 6 8 0 4 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 4 I L 1 6 8 0 6 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 0 6 I L 1 6 8 1 1 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 1 I L 1 6 8 1 9 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 1 9 I L 1 6 8 3 6 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 3 6 I L 1 6 8 3 7 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 3 7 I L 1 6 8 4 0 _ I L R I _ I L 1 6 8 4 0 P I O N _ P I O N _ P I O N nssp Genotype key Q1 Q2 STRUCTURE analysis with 105 ILRI and 3 USA origin accessions
  10. 10 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 PC 1 PC 2 EMBRAPA ILRI USA −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 PC 1 PC 2 BAGCE CNPGL GIANT ILRI PION USA PCA for 108 accessions PCA for 107 accessions PCA for two sets of sequenced accessions
  11. 11 6.0E-4 IL16800 C N 9 4 1 3 1 IL16802 I L 1 6 7 9 6 IL16788 C N 9 2 7 9 2 C N 9 2 1 9 8 7 IL1026 IL16835 IL16902 IL16817 I L 1 6 8 4 0 I L 1 6 7 9 9 BA63 IL18438 C N 96231 CN93182 B A 9 0 CN9266 3 BA81 IL16804 IL14983 PION C N 9 1 1 1 2 CN 93 04 2 CN93081 B A 2 4 C N 9 2 3 8 2 IL14389 C N 9 4 0 7 2 IL1 678 6 I L 1 5 3 5 7 IL 1 6 7 8 4 C N 9 3 3 2 2 I L 1 6 8 1 1 IL 1 6 8 0 9 BA100 B A 2 5 B A 1 IL1 680 7 N 1 9 IL16794 IL16791 C N 9 1 2 5 1 IL18662 IL14982 BA17 N 3 6 IL 1 6 8 2 1 BA80 BA97 C N 9 2 1 9 0 1 IL16819 I L 1 6 8 1 8 B A 1 6 G1 CN96273 I L 1 6 8 3 4 I L 1 6 8 3 7 I L 1 6 7 8 7 CN93011 CN96241 I L 1 6 8 1 0 IL 1 6 8 1 6 I L 1 6 7 8 5 CN 91 06 2 IL16813 IL16783 IL16792 CN93061 C N 9 2 5 6 2 N 2 2 8 IL 16 79 3 IL16812 IL14984 IL16801 CN0011 IL 16 80 5 IL16789 IL16790 I L 1 6 8 0 6 B A 7 5 IL 1 6 7 9 7 BA343 IL16782 IL16798 I L 1 4 3 5 5 B A 3 0 BA7 IL16795 IL18448 IL1 681 5 Add IL15743 I L 1 6 8 2 2 BA86 C N 9 3 3 7 5 IL 1 6 8 0 8 IL16839 CN921333 CN96211 B A 5 6 B A 5 3 BA94 IL1 683 6 I L 1 6 8 3 8 BA22 IL16803 UPGMA clustering of 108 Napier grass accessions (ILRI and USA)
  12. 12 Association mapping for agronomic traits 4 of 17 TIBBS CORTES ET AL. The Plant Genome F I G U R E 1 Genome-wide association study methods for improving computational speed and statistical power. Different methods are grouped by general strategy, and the position of each method shows the general trend of improved statistical power (shown on the x axis) and computational speed (shown on the y axis). CMLM, compressed mixed linear model; ECMLM, enriched compressed mixed linear model; EMMA, efficient mixed-model Cortes et al 2021 rMVP (R ) GAPIT (R ) Tassel (GUI)
  13. 13 Correlation between six agronomic traits Traits Acronym Plant height PH Leaf length LL Leaf width LW Tiller number TN Total fresh weight TFW Total dry weight TDW
  14. 14 Mean plant height for all accessions under under two seasons
  15. 15 SNPs significantly associated (FarmCPU method) with plant height (PH) under dry seasons
  16. 16 SNPs significantly associated (FarmCPU method) with plant height (PH) under wet seasons 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 FarmCPU.PH_wet_sws_sqrt Expected −log10(p) O b s e r v e d − l o g 1 0 ( p ) 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 FarmCPU.PH_wet_MWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p )
  17. 17 Mean total fresh weight for all accessions under two seasons
  18. 18 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 FarmCPU.TFW_dry_MWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 FarmCPU.TFW_dry_SWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) SNPs significantly associated (FarmCPU method) with total fresh weight (TFW) under dry seasons
  19. 19 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 FarmCPU.TFW_wet_MWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) 0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 FarmCPU.TFW_wet_sws_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) SNPs significantly associated (FarmCPU method) with total fresh weight (TFW) under wet seasons
  20. 20 4 of 17 TIBBS CORTES ET AL. The Plant Genome F I G U R E 1 Genome-wide association study methods for improving computational speed and statistical power. Different methods are grouped by general strategy, and the position of each method shows the general trend of improved statistical power (shown on the x axis) and computational speed (shown on the y axis). CMLM, compressed mixed linear model; ECMLM, enriched compressed mixed linear model; EMMA, efficient mixed-model association; EMMAX, efficient mixed-model association expedited; FarmCPU, fixed and random model circulating probability unification; FaST- Cortes et al 2021 rMVP (R ) GAPIT (R ) Tassel (GUI) Association mapping for nutritional traits
  21. 21 Traits Acronym Acid detergent fibre ADF Acid detergent lignin ADL neutral detergent fiber NDF crude protein CP Organic matter OM in vitro organic matter digestibility IVOMD Metabolizable energy ME Correlation among seven nutritional traits
  22. 22 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 FarmCPU.CP_dry_MWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 FarmCPU.CP_dry_SWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) SNPs significantly associated (FarmCPU method) with crude protein (CP) under dry seasons
  23. 23 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 FarmCPU.CP_wet_MWS_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 FarmCPU.CP_wet_sws_sqrt Expected −log10(p) Observed − log 10 ( p ) SNPs significantly associated (FarmCPU method) with crude protein (CP) under wet seasons
  24. 24 Upcoming project activities Repeat SNP calling with more than 450 bam files • There are additional accessions currently being squenced Develop molecular markers (SNPs/SSRs) for all Napier grass genebank accessions Paternal analysis for progenies Plan crosses based on the field trial results and genomic tools developed in this project • Crosses between hetrotic groups Comparative genomics • Correlate identified SNPs with genes in other forage/food species such as pearl millet Publish the Linux/R scripts in CGspace Manuscript development
  25. 25
Advertisement