Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Similar to Safe Food, Fair Food: Summary of findings within sheep value chains in the Atsbi and Abergelle districts of the Ethiopian Highlands(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

Safe Food, Fair Food: Summary of findings within sheep value chains in the Atsbi and Abergelle districts of the Ethiopian Highlands

  1. Safe Food, Fair Food: Summary of findings within sheep value chains in the Atsbi and Abergelle districts of the Ethiopian Highlands Barbara Rischkowsky, Tamsin Dewé, Kristina Rösel, Multi-stakeholder Workshop for Targeting Action Research on Atsbi sheep and Abergelle goat Value Chains in Tigray, Ethiopia Mekelle, 19-20 March 2013
  2. Safe Food, Fair Food  Protecting the health of poor consumers and  Safeguarding livelihoods of poor livestock keepers and other value chain actors
  3. Background  Looking at risks to food safety and nutrition within sheep and goat value chains  Trying to identify opportunities for further research and intervention  Ultimate goal is to ensure adequate intake of safe and nutritious foods, while protecting the livelihoods of poor value chain actors
  4. Activities  Rapid assessment conducted alongside rapid VCA at each site  Participatory rural appraisals (PRAs) with producer and consumer groups at each site  Focus group discussions (FGDs) with mothers of young children at Abergelle Tigray and Atsbi  Topics included animal health, consumption patterns, food preparation, and perceptions of quality and safety of sheep meat
  5. Results: all sites  Animal health – Disease accounted for 30- 40% all deaths – Major diseases differed between Abergelle and Atsbi – Starvation and predation also major causes of death
  6. Results: all sites  Sheep and goat meat consumption – Very similar between sites – Peaks at major national and religious festivals – Low in intervening periods
  7. Results: all sites  Risks to safety of sheep and goat meat – Emergency slaughter and consumption of diseased animals occurs – Reported link between meat-eating and stomach pain +/- diarrhoea: intolerance or foodborne disease?  Risk mitigation – Don’t eat animals affected by specific diseases – Careful slaughter practices – Smell, colour and texture used to assess quality and safety – Cooking of ‘suspect’ meat thoroughly  Nutritional issues – Lack of meat in the diet
  8. Results: all sites  Sheep and goat milk consumption – Very important in Abergelle – Atsbi is predominantly meat site – Consumption seasonal: depends on combination of lambing/kidding and feed availability
  9. Results: all sites  Risks to safety of sheep and goat milk – Some consumption of raw milk (Atsbi: children drinking directly from the animal)  Risk mitigation – Don’t consume ‘suspect’ milk – Milk usually boiled – Processing to butter, yoghurt, cheese
  10. Results: Abergelle Amhara  Sick animals  Deaths
  11. Results: Abergelle Tigray  Sick animals  Deaths
  12. Results: Abergelle  Risky food practices – Association between milk consumption and ‘malaria’: coincidence of seasons, or unrecognised zoonotic disease?  Risk mitigation – Meat considered unsafe is trimmed and/or boiled thoroughly – Smoking of milking containers  Nutritional issues – Men given highest quality meat – Highly seasonal milk consumption – Women don’t drink whole milk: unlikely that butter and other milk products are making up the nutritional deficit – Drinking milk associated with earlier onset of puberty in girls
  13. Results: Atsbi  Sick animals  Deaths
  14. Results: Atsbi  Risky food practices – Some consumption of raw meat – Children drinking milk directly from the animal  Risk-mitigating practices – Small ruminant milk not a major part of the diet? – Milk otherwise boiled – Processing of milk into yoghurt and butter
  15. Conclusions  Meat – Risky consumption practices occur at all sites but are often mitigated by cooking – Better if all meat and offal is well- cooked - some loss of nutritional quality, but large reduction in risks – Infrequent meat consumption probably a greater risk to nutritional status (especially Abergelle) than to food safety
  16. Conclusions  Milk – Abergelle: potential for increasing milk production, possible association between milk and disease, and gender imbalance in benefits/risks indicate need for further work – Atsbi: drinking raw milk is a potential health risk for children. How frequently does this practice occur, what are the disease risks, and what could be done about it?
  17. Safe Food, Fair Food  Tamsin Dewé, Consultant tamsindewe@gmail.com  Kristina Rösel, Project Co-Ordinator k.rosel@cgiar.org All photo credits to ILRI/ Tamsin Dewé unless otherwise indicated

Editor's Notes

  1. Graph shows average consumption for three sites
  2. This data not available for Atsbi
  3. Coenurosis not represented in ‘deaths’, as animals are slaughtered or sold‘Toxicity’ refers to plant-related cyanide toxicity (we think)
Advertisement