Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Gender in Smallholder Pig Value Chains—ILRI approach Uganda(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Gender in Smallholder Pig Value Chains—ILRI approach Uganda

  1. Gender in Smallholder Pig Value Chains—ILRI approach Uganda UNDP/FAO Training on Gender Mainstreaming for Climate Change Adaptation, Mukono, 9–12 May 2017 Rosemirta Birungi and Emily Ouma
  2. Why gender focus on pig value chains in Uganda? • Pigs are a dynamic and rapidly growing sub- sector in Uganda. • In the past three decades pig population increased from 0.19 to 3.2 million pigs • Highest per capita consumption (3.4 kg/person/year) of pork in the region -10 times increase in the last 30 years, whereas beef is declining. • More than 1.1 million households raise pigs in rural and peri-urban settings. • Pigs contribute to livelihoods and income to meet emergency needs and school fees (“live bank”)
  3. Socio-economic Description –SPVC, Uganda • A large informal sub-sector – Mostly backyard systems, managed by women and children – Low productivity (breeds, feeds & health constraints) – Uncoordinated trade & transport – Unsupervised slaughter slabs, with no meat inspection in local markets, road-side butchers, pork joints – Only 1 approved slaughterhouse in Kampala (Wambizzi) – Few investors in formal processor: Fresh Cuts, Sausage King
  4. Back Drop _ Gender issues in Smallholder Pig Value Chains • Observed dominance in participation for different Nodes, Activities & tasks of the pig value chain (Ouma, et al., 2014); Mtimet & Baker, (2013); Tatwangire, (2013). • Whereby, – women are observed dominating production activities( i.e. cleaning, feeding, giving water, treating); while, – men dominating post-production activities (processing, marketing, service delivery, brokering).
  5. Gender- neutral Assessment 2010-2013 ILRI SPVC Some Key Findings Pig Production Issues • Majority of the pig producers households (81%) were male headed. • Mukono and Masaka, had relatively higher female pig farmers comprising 24.3-25.7%. • Women play major role in initiating pig production .Men dominate other components ; drug stocking (92%), livestock feed stocking (82%), live pig trade (95%), agro-veterinary services (83%) and village boar keeping businesses.(52%) • Male headed households had higher asset index (8.1) , 3 times higher than that of female headed households,-disparity index in rural-urban value chain domain was the highest (0.58) compared to urban-urban (0.27) and rural-rural (0.16) VCs • Pig mortality rates were as high as 39% and 73% in Mukono. –with discernable differences in breeds (exotic VS local ) and domains urban VS rural)
  6. Some Key Findings –ILRI SPVC Gender- neutral Assessment …… Pig Marketing Issues • Women are not seen at all participating in live pig marketing • Men are seen to dominate live pig marketing • The quality assurance standards in the pig production process are yet to be embraced since there were few traders who grade pork products. The traders were not aware of existence of quality standards. • Majority of the farmers did not receive market information (69%) and extension services (89%) during the period of 2012/2013 production season. Common sources of extension services to pig farmers were mainly NAADS, NGOs like VEDCO, other farmers (sharing of information) and animal health service providers (AHSP).
  7. Some Key Findings –ILRI SPVC Gender- neutral Assessment …….. Pig Service delivery Issues • Disease surveillance and monitoring mechanism had not been established. The few disease surveillance activities that exited were usually limited to body temperature checks and parasite control carried out by farmers themselves and village veterinarians. • Limited access to pig health related information sharing platforms in the villages
  8. Some Key Findings –ILRI SPVC Gender- neutral Assessment ……. Institutional Issues • The membership to farmer groups and trade associations still low among the actors • Only 21% of traders belonged to trader associations, 31% of producers were members of farmer groups, and 26% of women farmers were members of women groups. • Majority of the producers were neither member of groups nor participated in collective action
  9. Some Key Findings : ILRI SPVC Gender –focused Assessment
  10. Gender- Biased Assessment - 2015-2016 ILRI SPVC 1. Changes in tasks 10 years ago; – Male dominated all activities , except collecting feeds & treating pigs – Women do tasks performed at home, – Men do tasks involving moving away from home. Present; – New set of tasks by gender – Production tasks mostly done by women as home-based enterprise, – Men mostly involve in processing & trading away from home. 2. Benefits men and women get Financial, resource , social, and psychological benefits 3. Enabling or constraining factors • Behavioral Factors • Commercialization of tasks • Women emancipation
  11. Way forward Gender Action needed in SPVC, Uganda  Understanding Gender Empowerment in pig value chain  Empowerment Intervention – ◦ Gendered Upgrading in the pig value
  12. better lives through livestock ilri.org For more information: Dr. Emily Ouma: e.ouma@cgiar.org www.ilri.org

Editor's Notes

  1. There MUST be a CGIAR logo or a CRP logo. You can copy and paste the logo you need from the final slide of this presentation. Then you can delete that final slide   To replace a photo above, copy and paste this link in your browser: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ilri/sets/72157632057087650/detail/   Find a photo you like and the right size, copy and paste it in the block above.
  2. Smallholder pig value chains in Uganda have been identified by L&F as a high potential target to translate research into major interventions that can stimulate pro-poor transformation and generate benefits at scale.
Advertisement