Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Sustainable livestock—Integrated approaches for multiple benefits(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Sustainable livestock—Integrated approaches for multiple benefits

  1. Sustainable Livestock – Integrated Approaches for Multiple Benefits Henning Steinfeld, FAO TropAg2017 Conference Brisbane, 20-22 November 2017
  2. Growing tension between human demands and declining environment Human activities have become the main driver of environmental change 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 1950 2010 2050 Millionpersons
  3. Bio-physical dimension • Energy capture, photosynthesis, fuels (fossil, biofuels) • 65,000 TW reaches the hydrosphere, but less than 1% is converted to Net Primary Productivity • The food sector currently accounts for 30% of the world’s total energy consumption (FAO, 2011) • Livestock energy conversion typically ranges from 1.0 to 4.3 MJ of fossil fuel per MJ of animal product (Giampietro, 2002) • Land use • Livestock systems occupy 29% of the global surface area • 3.3 billion hectares for rangelands; 25% of total land area • Biodiversity • Livestock have direct impacts on biodiversity through trampling, grazing, and defecation, the larger indirect impacts - through deforestation, GHG emissions, feed trading, and water pollution (Reid et al, 2009) • Potential to deliver benefits at multiple levels for biodiversity: land restoration, animal genetic resource preservation, biodiversity conservation • Water • About 70% (2769 km3/year) of fresh water is used for agriculture (AQUASTAT, 2016) • Water use for livestock represents 31% of the total agriculture water use (de Fraiture et al., 2007)
  4. • Nutrients • Livestock is an important source of soil nutrients, where reliance on fertilizer is low, like in Sub- Saharan Africa (Goulding et al., 2008; Rufino et all., 2006). Globally 23% nitrogen for crop production comes from manure. • Nutrient use efficiency (NUE) for Nitrogen ranges from 27-48% for the livestock supply chain in Europe (Uwizeye et al., 2016), and from 46-121% in crop-livestock systems in Africa (Rufino et al., 2006) • Climate change • Livestock supply chains emitted 8.1 gigatonnes CO2-eq in 2010 (GLEAM 2007 Version 2.0) • Emission intensities vary greatly among species and production systems (GLEAM 2007 Version 2.0) • Livestock sector significantly impacted by climate change/variability • Diseases • More than 70% of human and emerging infectious diseases derive from animals • Burden of zoonotic diseases falls mainly on the poor: 2.4B cases of illness and 2.2M of deaths / year • Inappropriate use of AM in animals production and health contributes to the rising trends in AMR of human infections • Biomass production • Humans appropriate 25% of the total net primary production (HANPP) (Krausmann et al., 2013) • Agriculture represents 84–86% of total appropriation of HANNP, with 42–46% on cropland and 29–33% on grazing land (Krausmann et al., 2013). Bio-physical dimension
  5. Socio-economic dimension • Food and Nutrition • Livestock products contribute 17% to global calorie consumption and 33% to protein consumption globally • Consumption of animal source foods provides high energy and quality diet, micronutrients and improves nutrition, immune competence, physical cognitive development and reduces stunting and death • Overconsumption of animal source foods may contribute to non-communicable disease • Value, income and employment • Agriculture (primary production) contributes $5.2 trillion or 6% to world’s GDP • Livestock global asset is valued at least $3.1 trillion • Employs at least 1.3 billion people globally and directly support the livelihoods of 750 million poor smallholder farmers (Perry and Sones, 2007; Thornton et al., 2006)
  6. Socio-economic dimension • Rural growth and linkages, political stability • Livestock sector has vertical and horizontal multiplier effects boosting economic growth in both the agricultural sector and the rest of the economy (Acosta & Barrantes, 2017) • Valuable “hanging in” strategy for rural households to increase their level of resilience to cope with shocks • Investments in the sector can act as an engine of stabilization and recovery for people living in fragile contexts • Important asset which remains both productive and moveable in case of conflicts • Environmental services and cultural values • Directly linked to regulating and supporting environmental services due to direct interaction with land, vegetation and soil and habitat • Preservation of traditional landscape • Livestock as part of culture and social traditions • Key role in identity construction of individuals, clans, and ethnic groups
  7. Classical Production Factors Natural resources Raw materials for production Agriculture workforce Capital stocks
  8. Global map of agricultural population density Global map of GDP per agricultural person Global map of land for livestock-based agriculture – number of livestock units per agricultural person Livestock systems characterization based on classical production factors
  9. Livestock systems characterization Land (green) is proxied by the number of livestock units (LU) per agricultural person; labour (blue) by agricultural population density and capital (red) by GDP per agricultural person
  10.  Each system has its own particularities – benefits, trade-offs, externalities  All systems can be improved (in terms of sustainability, efficiency, human needs & benefits, adaptation) while protecting natural resources
  11. Balancing policy objectives Food safety Environment Livelihoods Food security extensive labour capital Externalities, synergies and trade-offs Examples:  Resources have value but are often not priced  Crop-livestock integration and the recycling of carbon and nutrients  CO2 emissions vs. economic growth; maximum productivity vs. AMR, etc
  12. Guiding principles for Sustainable Livestock  Extensive: Links to markets, payment for environmental services, protection and inclusion of traditional & pastoralists users  Labour: Close efficiency gap, promote diversification and create alternative employment  Capital: Pricing of antibiotic use and GHG emissions, waste management
  13. An integrated approach to analyze the externalities, synergies and trade-offs ‘optimizing’ = multiple benefits Farmer Branding and marketing Shipping and distribution Processing Manufacturing Services Commodityflow Flowofvalue Life-cycle analysis Value chain analysis One Health ‘Molecules’ ‘Money’ ‘Microbes’
  14. Key messages  Livestock at the interface of common pool resources  Livestock are produced under very diverse circumstances, solutions for sustainability need to be equally diverse  Policies should take account of very different livestock trajectories and the varying trade-offs, incentives  Diverse factors – money, molecules and microbes – need to be included in designing development interventions at the design phase
Advertisement