Advertisement
Interventions that fail to sustain: Evidence from a training and certification intervention in Tanzania
Upcoming SlideShare
CCIH 2015 Maggie Ehrenfried Breakout 2ACCIH 2015 Maggie Ehrenfried Breakout 2A
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Interventions that fail to sustain: Evidence from a training and certification intervention in Tanzania(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Interventions that fail to sustain: Evidence from a training and certification intervention in Tanzania

  1. Interventions that fail to sustain:evidence from a training and certification intervention in Tanzania Charity Kinyuaa *, Silvia Alonsoa, Emma Blackmoreb , Vusilizwe Thebec a Animal and Human Health Program, International Livestock Research Institute b International Institute for Development and Environment, London, UK c University of Pretoria, South Africa Main findings •The training and certification intervention (T&C) in Tanzania did not achieve wide reach and the target outcomes 4 years after implementation. •Delivery mode, incentives for stakeholders and financing were inadequate. Study purpose •Training and certification (T&C) of dairy vendors can help address food safety challenges in informal markets. •T&C schemes have yielded positive impacts on food safety awareness and practices but have largely failed to sustain in the long term. •We assessed the extent of reach and level of achievement of the T&C intervention in Tanzania and factors that influenced its success. Pictures Findings Conclusion-3 game changers •Achievement of potential positive impacts of milk safety could be enhanced by improving training design and delivery. •Appropriate incentives for policy makers and training recipients should be integrated into the intervention. •Long term funding to support participants and trainings must also be secured. Charity Kinyua c.kinyua@cgiar.org ● Box 30709 Nairobi Kenya ● +254 728 115 129 Nairobi Kenya ● ilri.org The MoreMilk: Making the most of milk project is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, and UK Aid from the United Kingdom government. This document is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. June/July 2021 Methods • We used the theory of change (ToC) framework to assess reach, achievement of the outcomes and realization of assumptions defined in the T&C ToC. •We conducted interviews with consumers, vendors, middle-men, producers and selected dairy sector key informants’ in Arusha, Dar es Salaam and Dodoma. ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund. Limited reach of T&C intervention (15% of respondents participated ) Enabling policy environment non existent Awareness raising limited by lack of finance and incentive within Tanzania Dairy Board (TDB) No difference in knowledge in milk safety/ quality between trained and untrained traders Training content was relevant to traders Training Participation challenged by cost, inconvenient location and poor timing The certification incentive prior to registration to become a legal trader with TDB not effected Use of special containers was more prevalent among untrained trader, washing hands and use of lactometers was more prevalent among trained traders Direct benefits of e.g. enhanced milk quality among trained traders Cost free practices adopted Milk safety important to 91% of consumers but no means to verify No difference in milk spoilage between trained and untrained traders Only 15 % of traders trained as opposed to the expectation that majority of traders would be trained Milk quality not measured. We assessed Milk spoilage as a proxy. Traders reported no difference in spoilage between trained and untrained traders Photo by cottonbro from Pexels Photo by Valentyn_Volkov from findaphoto www.ANH-Academy.org/ANH2021 #ANH2021
Advertisement