Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Transboundary animal diseases: Research and development priorities for resilient agrifood systems(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Transboundary animal diseases: Research and development priorities for resilient agrifood systems

  1. Transboundary animal diseases: Research and development priorities for resilient agrifood systems G20 Meeting of Agricultural Chief Scientists (MACS) Varanasi, India, 17–19 April 2023 “The climate crisis is at the forefront of threats to our ability to provide good nutrition for all people while staying within environmental limits.” CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy Hung Nguyen-Viet Co-lead, Animal and Human Health program, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and lead, CGIAR Initiative on One Health With contributions from: D. Grace, V. Nene, E. Okoth, F. Unger, R. Deka, H.-S. Lee, M. Dione, B. Bett, T. Knight-Jones, J. Smith, H. Rahman, S. Tarawali, A. Djikeng, S. Moyo, D. Schillinger and I. Gluecks
  2. 2 % growth in demand for livestock products to 2030 0 50 100 150 200 250 E.Asia Pacific China South Asia SSA High income 0 50 100 150 200 250 E.Asia Pacific China South Asia SSA High income 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 E.Asia Pacific China South Asia SSA High income 0 50 100 150 200 250 E.Asia Pacific China South Asia SSA High income Poultry Milk Beef Pork Estimates of the % growth in demand for animal source foods in different World regions, comparing 2005 and 2030. Estimates were developed using the IMPACT model, courtesy Dolapo Enahoro, ILRI.
  3. Transboundary animal diseases (TAD): Global trends, issues, challenges • Infectious, spreading across borders and cause economic, social, environmental and public health impacts • Significant impacts on trade and market opportunities, cause major morbidity and mortality in cattle, sheep, goat, pigs and poultry • Drivers: including climate change PPR • 2.5 billion sheep and goats at risk • 66 countries infected with PPR and another 50 at risk • 5.4 billion people live in affected areas and rely on small ruminants for their livelihoods • SDG contribution: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 15, 17 Major diseases outbreaks (OIE, 2015)
  4. https://animalhealthmetrics.org Costs of zoonotic disease outbreaks (US$ billion) Period Costs (conservative estimates) Annual average 6 outbreaks other than SARS -Nipah virus (Malaysia), -West Nile fever (USA), -HPAI (Asia, Europe), -BSE (US), -Rift Valley Fever (East Africa) -BSE (UK) costs in 1997-09 only 1998- 2009 6 b$ each SARS 2002- 2004 40 b$ Total in 12- year period (1998-2009) 80.2 7 b$ Source World Bank 2012 Cost of diseases Cost of COVID 10-20 trillion $ (10 years of endemic zoonoses) 128 outbreaks of TADs 2000- 2014: US$ 12 billion (OIE, 2016) FMD: US$6.5 to 21 billion/ year in LMICs >US$1.5 billion/year in FMD free countries (Knight-Jones and Rushton, 2013) ASF from 2018: US$ 55-130 billon (WB, 2022)
  5. 5 R&D opportunities and initiatives (OHHLEP, 2021) One Health approach Prevention of pandemic: $10 billon/year vs. Managing pandemic costs: $30 billion/year (World Bank, 2022)
  6. 6 Opportunities and initiatives ILRI and partners works Infographics Jenner Institute Risk and introduction of RVF into EU is significant given the increased trade of animals and the presence of the vectors in EU Rift Valley fever – a zoonotic TAD
  7. 7 ICT4Health in Vietnam Improving human health through sustainable value chains in human-animal-environmental interactions using ICT in Vietnam Project period: 2022-2025 Donor: MAFRA in South Korea Challenges addressed by epidemiology and control of peste des petits ruminants (Eco-PPR) Precise identification of PPR risks and risk spots DIVA tools for monitoring control success Targeted species: Pigs, cattle and poultry Targeted diseases: ASF, FMD, PRRS, ND, AI, Lepto and S. suis etc.
  8. 8 ASF: African swine fever Africa  Vaccine development using CRISPR Cas9 technology  Epidemiology and control of ASF  Pig value chain development  Enhanced capability for the disease surveillance (e.g. mobile PCR pen-side test) Southeast Asia (Vietnam and India) Projects:  Clinical and epidemiological features of ASF (Risk & transmission models, virus threshold) (2020–24, Lao Cai)  Economic impact of ASF (2018)  Low-costs biosecurity improvement (2019–24, Son La)  Risk pathways and risk factors identified  Recommendations on compensation schemes  Demonstration farms (SAPLING, APART project) Major challenges and gaps • Availability and quality of diagnostic assays • So far, no scalable ASF vaccine • Feasible low-cost biosecurity solutions (e.g. for small scale)
  9. ILRI under World Bank-aided APART project supporting the state 9 Risk assessment study Brochures: Assamese and English Biosecurity infrastruture Awareness & training State level workshop on ASF Regional level policy workshop on ASF Brought international ASF experts from FAO, CISA-INIA, UAB etc.
  10. 10 Strategies for future and expectations from G20 Nations: R&D • Incentivized measures (surveillance, reporting, biosecurity, animal movement, trade) • Vaccinations • Partnership among countries and international organizations • Building capacity
  11. www.cgiar.org CGIAR Initiative on One Health To protect human health by improving detection, prevention and control of zoonoses, foodborne diseases and AMR in LMICs
  12. 12 • TADs: Impact on food security, health, socio-economics. • Experiences from ILRI/CGIAR and partners to prevent and control TADs • Investing in TADs R&D: One Health approach, scaling and partnership Take-home messages
  13. 13
  14. THANK YOU

Editor's Notes

  1. FAO. 2011. Mapping supply and demand for animal-source foods to 2030, by T.P. Robinson & F. Pozzi. Animal Production and Health Working Paper. No. 2. Rome. IMPACT results generally suggested smaller changes in demand compared to FAO. Among other drivers of the results, the observed differences may be related to the underlying assumptions on how future demand will respond to prices and incomes. FAO projections could for example be assuming big shifts to Chicken Meat consumption (e.g., from pork) as incomes grow in Asia. IMPACT makes the same assumption in terms of direction, but with the expected shifts a bit more dampened. High income countries include much of Europe. In fact, if one looks at individual European nations in many cases there is a DECLINE in demand (Switzerland for beef (-22%) and pork (-14%) for example) Figures for meat consumption: https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm
  2. Over the last decade, the direct cost of zoonotic diseases has been estimated at more than $20 billion and indirect losses at over $200 billion to affected economies as a whole (WorldBank, 2010) The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease – What are they, how big are they and where do they occur? - PMC (nih.gov) This paper estimates that annual impact of FMD in terms of visible production losses and vaccination in endemic regions alone amount to between US$6.5 and 21 billion. In addition, outbreaks in FMD free countries and zones cause losses of >US$1.5 billion a year.
  3. Over the last decade, the direct cost of zoonotic diseases has been estimated at more than $20 billion and indirect losses at over $200 billion to affected economies as a whole (WorldBank, 2010) The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease – What are they, how big are they and where do they occur? - PMC (nih.gov) This paper estimates that annual impact of FMD in terms of visible production losses and vaccination in endemic regions alone amount to between US$6.5 and 21 billion. In addition, outbreaks in FMD free countries and zones cause losses of >US$1.5 billion a year.
  4. WB 2022: Prevention of pandemic costs 10 bio/year Managing pandemic costs: 30 bio/year One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems.
  5. Highlight ILRI work on vaccine trial (CRO) in Kapiti and EPI works in the context of climate change
  6. This is to pass quickly for Indian context of G20
  7. Objective is to protect human health by improving detection, prevention, and control of zoonoses, foodborne diseases and AMR in LMICs How will we achieve this? Generate evidence on risks and public and private returns to action Evaluate impacts of technologies, tools, and approaches on health risks and economic outcomes Integrating innovations into policies and programs
Advertisement