Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to A platform for testing, delivering, and continuously improving tropically-adapted chickens for productivity growth in sub-Saharan Africa(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

A platform for testing, delivering, and continuously improving tropically-adapted chickens for productivity growth in sub-Saharan Africa

  1. A platform for testing, delivering, and continuously improving tropically-adapted chickens for productivity growth in sub-Saharan Africa Tadelle Dessie, Senior Scientist, ILRI TAAT Small Ruminants Value Chain Inception Meeting, ILRI Addis, 22 June 2018
  2. Some facts about the ACGG project • Project countries: Nigeria, Tanzania and Ethiopia • Funding: BMGF and contribution from partners • Program period: 5 years • Starting date: January, 2015 • End date: December, 2019 • Implementing Institute: ILRI with partners • Main beneficiaries of the project: Women, Youth and CVC actors • Main Trust of the project: Get the genetics right –provide options to contexts
  3. ACGG Vision The vision of this program is to catalyze public-private partnerships for increasing smallholder chicken production and productivity growth as a pathway out of poverty in sub-Saharan Africa.
  4. Main outcome of ACGG: Data driven understanding of the breeds and specific traits that poor smallholder farmers, especially women, prefer across the various countries and agro-ecologies
  5. What are we doing differently? ACGG Five Pillars of Change 1. High-producing genetics that is well-adapted to low- input production systems; 2. Farmer preferred breeds of chickens; 3. Public-private partnership for improvement, multiplication, and delivery; 4. Women at the center to ensure success; and 5. Innovation platforms for developing solutions across the value chain.
  6. What is different in ACGG? 1. From “silver bullets” to  researched options (informed by farmer experimentation) 2. From “we are here to offer you solutions” to “we are here to work with you to find solutions” 3. From pure focus on pushing ‘promising strains’ to recognition of importance of O x C 4. Innovation Platforms at national and community level as on- going processes for industry integration which outlive the current Project!
  7. 2520households enrolled 56, 175birds tested 5improved strains indigenous strains 5 on-station testing sites 2, 400 birds tested 2 1260households surveyed 63on-farm villages enrolled ACGG: Numbers talk -Ethiopia!!!
  8. ACGG: Numbers talk !!! 25 IP facilitators trained 6 NIP’s 6 per country Many CIP’s 6 PhD’s & 9 MSc’s 1, 882 finished • 4 ACGG global PMT’s • 4 SIAC meetings • Many country level PMT’s 63 enumerators
  9. CHICKEN STRAINS COUNTRY CHICKEN STRAIN ETHIOPIA Horro Koekoek Kuroiler Rhode Island Red x Sasso Sasso NIGERIA Fulani Funaab Alpha Kuroiler Noiler Sasso Shika Brown TANZANIA Kuroiler Sasso
  10. Fertile eggs imported, hatched, brooded and vaccinated by brooders/mother units/ mouther care units
  11. DB Validate
  12. What are the desires of SHC Farmers? Grow bigger & faster Lay more eggs Have high survival rate To have birds that - Colored birds - Birds with good scavenging ability
  13. Performance of the five ACGG test strains against indigenous chicken under on-farm conditions in Ethiopia Parameters Indigenous ACGG test strains Superiority in percent Body weight at 16 weeks in grams 408.5 Sasso-R 1108 171 Kuroiler 1204 195 Koekoek 959 135 Sasso 1150 182 Imp.Horro 714 75 Annual egg number per year (52 weeks)/ bird 45 Sasso-R 126 180 Kuroiler 154 242 Koekoek 106 136 Sasso 160 255 Imp.Horro 117 160
  14. Performance of the ACGG test strains as compared to the indigenous chicken under on-station conditions of Ethiopia Ethiopia Parameters Indigenous ACGG strains Superiority in percent Body weight at 17 weeks in grams 627 g Sasso-R 1691.56 169.5 Kuroiler 1915.46 205.2 Koekoek 1673.39 166.6 Imp.Horro 1272.81 103.0 - - - Annual egg number/year/bird 80 Sasso-R 208 160 Kuroiler 170 113 Koekoek 156 95 Imp.Horro 155 93 - - -
  15. Fitted growth curve (growth data from day old to 18 weeks of age) using the non-linear models (Gompertz equation) for estimating growth curves to describe the relationship between live body weight and age of Sasso breed at DZARC, Ethiopia
  16. week 9 week 12 week 16 week 18 Village Chicken 200 351 542 701 Improved Horro 692 936 1340 1540 Koekoek 850 1255 1794 1889 Sasso 1049 1508 1837 1903 Kuroiler 1528 1869 1974 2133 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 AxisTitle Mean body weight (g) of different chicken strains tested at Debre Zeit, Ethiopia (9 to 18 weeks of age) -200 to 250 % increase from the indigenous chicken
  17. Live body weight (g) (0 to 18 wks), at six weeks and age when two kg live body weight achieved (Kuroiler breed at DZARC, Ethiopia) 35.66 (4.59) 187.44 (5.27) 468.89 (5.55) 762.45 (5.47) 1147.69(5.83) 1528.11 (28.33) 1869.02 (40.63) 1874.28 (90.86) 2133.2 (107.51) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 week 0 week 2 week 4 week 6 week 8 week 9 week 12 week 16 week 18 Bodyweightingrams Age in weeks Week 17 700g + LBW
  18. Live body weight (g) (0 to 18 wks), at six weeks and age when two kg live body weight achieved (Sasso breed at DZARC, Ethiopia) 32.99 (4.63) 144.78 (4.71) 349.24 (4.82) 574.09 (4.81) 830.95 (4.86) 1048.93 (22.51) 1508.2 (25.77) 1870.46 (45.43) 1837.75 (69.4) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 week 0 week 2 week 4 week 6 week 8 week 9 week 12 week 16 week 18 Bodyweightingrams Age in weeks 574g LBW Week 19
  19. Male Growth Rate (90-180 d) in Ethiopia 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Cool Humid Cool Sub Humid Warm Semi Arid Averagedailygain(g/d) Horro Koekoek Kuroiler Sasso_RIR Sasso
  20. CTLGH Poultry Genomics - ACGG Ethiopia Analysis of genotypes and phenotypes for backyard poultry production Ethiopia: 25 populations [n=246] Nigeria: 14 populations [n=120] Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) completed for all 385 chickens (+ Tanzania ongoing) Tanzania: n=67 21 million SNPs have been identified across the Ethiopian populations.
  21. ACGG Partners
  22. Kind Palms Ventures Olorun Osun Farms Partners now
  23. Way forward !
  24. Chicken’s high rate of reproduction enables rapid scale Distribution could begin after 12 months 6 12Phase 2 Months 18 24 Size Multiplier flock 100* 1,970 38,800 765,000 Millions100 Number of smallholders benefitting 7,300 145,000 millions More millions No chick distribution Limited distribution (5-10%) Full dissemination This model can be implemented simultaneously in multiple geographies and countries.
  25. • Negotiate the IP and access to the preferred strains; • Design and coordination of the LTGG program; • Capacity assessment/gap analysis in the private/public sector partners; and • Develop and lead the implementation of context specific capacity building Who are the potential partners of the Long Term Genetic Gains program network ? Their role! National Agricultural Research System (NARS) The platform members (ILRI, WU, NARS etc) Private sector breeding companies in the program countries ILRI & H Genetics – Overall coordination of the program • Day-to-day management of the genetic gains work; • Multiply and sell parent stock and GPS to hatcheries; • Maintain parent stock; and • Multiply and distribute commercial germplasms to mother units and/or farmers at scale. • Germplasm testing, data collection, storage and genetic evaluation of lines, feedback and quality assurance. • Provide technical backstopping in the design and setting up of the LTGG program-data capture, genetic evaluation, and capacity building
  26. Major challenges in the chicken meat and egg value chain and Possible solutions (short to medium term) Major challenges in the value chain Possible solutions 1. Lack of animal health services (lack of quality vaccine, and treatment) 2. Lack of balanced chicken feed (with different options) 3. Lack of appropriate breeds (with options) and delivery at scale 4. Low demand for chicken products (limited ways of consuming chicken, and highly seasonal) 5. Limited Private sector involvement (in all nodes of the value chain) 1. Improving the provision and coverage of animal health services 2. Provision of affordable balanced chicken feed, and training how to prepare balanced feed 3. Appropriate genetics (GP, PS), delivery system and LTGG program 4. Strong promotions of chicken food products, and the different ways of consuming it –school feeding as a starting point . 5. Attract private sector investment in all nodes and non-food industries 1. The GO needs to follow the examples of the horticulture and leather industries Consuming just one egg a day for 6 months reduces stunting in children GO needs to develop a pakage that includes: Land, finance and other incentives for private sector companies (inside and outside) to invest in the poultry sector Campaign “One egg per person per day”
  27.  Improved dual-purpose chicken may allow, at least at a mid- term, small producers to meet the anticipated high demand fueled by future population growth and income increase but give room for commercial sector development.  It will encourage development of SMEs in rural areas to supply required inputs and services required by small scale producers  VC approaches: interesting tool to investigate the relevance of dual-purpose chicken production in developing countries, especially in relation to market and demand-led drivers.  Other factors to be considered: – Inclusiveness (gender and youth) – Potential impact of changing environment – Job creation – Other sustainable development goals… SDG1 NO POVERTY SDG2 ZERO HUNGER SDG3 GOOD HEALTH and WELL-BEING SDG5 GENDER EQUALITY SDG8 DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH SDG9 REDUCE INEQUALITIES SDG12 RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION SDG15 LIFE ON LAND Conclusions
  28. Thank you for your attention Chicken are one of the few household assets women can control
  29. • More food ≠ better nutrition • More crops ≠ less stunting • Stunting - long-term cumulative impacts - Children – health, physical and cognitive development capacity - Adults - productivity losses • 11% of gross national product in Africa and Asia lost annually due to malnutrition • Solution = balanced macro- and micro-nutrients essential The agriculture, human nutrition and health nexus chicken
  30. Nutritional challenges
  31. Yolk + energy ++ protein ++ choline ++ riboflavin + pantothenic acid White ++ protein + potassium ++ selenium Contribution to nutrient requirements for a 7-12 mo child (+ 20-50%, ++ >50%) Developed from Iannotti et al, 2014 + vitamin B6 ++ vitamin B12 + folate + phosphorus ++ selenium + zinc Portion sizes required for a woman to reach her recommended daily intake of iron (Gupta, 2016) Mahaka Village, Tanzania (de Bruyn, 2014). Achieving nutritious diets in resource-poor settings
  32. Consuming just one egg a day for 6 months reduces stunting in children Animal-source foods provide essential nutrients
  33. Chicken and egg production at Tigray region, Tahtay-Machew district, Hadush-adi village
  34. Vegetable production at South region, Doyogena district , Gemora Gewada village
  35. WaSH practice at Amhara region Gondar Zuria district, Tsion Teguaj Village
  36. Weekly sessions at Oromia region, Bako Tibe district, Oda Haro village
  37. Cookery Session demonstration, at Tigray region, Saharti-Samre district, Gijjet Village
  38. https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21679766-poultry- excrement-may-be-stunting-infant-development-chicken-out Key zoonotic diseases Avian influenza Salmonellosis Campylobacteriosis Newcastle disease
  39. Suggested system to follow: Sustainable food value chain approach (SFVC) A food value chain consists of all the stakeholders that participate in the coordinated production and value adding activities that are needed to make food products. A market-led approach A sustainable food value chain is a food value chain that:  is profitable throughout (economic sustainability);  has broad-based benefits for society (social sustainability) and  shows a positive or neutral impact on the natural environment (environmental sustainability) The SFVC concept recognizes that value chains are dynamic, market-driven systems in which vertical coordination (governance) is the central dimension and for which value added and sustainability are explicit, multidimensional performance measures, assessed at the aggregate level.

Editor's Notes

  1. ODK
Advertisement