Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Ruminant livestock production systems and imperatives for sustainable development(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Ruminant livestock production systems and imperatives for sustainable development

  1. Better lives through livestock Ruminant livestock production systems and imperatives for sustainable development Jimmy Smith, Director General With Fiona Flintan, Jason Sircely, Cesar Patino, Mireille Ferrari and Susan MacMillan International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Joint XI International Rangeland Congress and XXIV International Grassland Congress 24–30 October 2021 Nairobi, Kenya (virtual)
  2. 2 Overview Ruminant production systems • Controversy • Diversity • Development opportunities Rangeland systems • Trends • Threats Three imperatives • Embrace change • Harness diversity • Engage widely
  3. Ruminant production systems
  4. 4 • Food • Environment • Livelihoods • Health Controversy
  5. 5 Diverse ruminant systems provide diverse benefits meat, milk fibre hides fertilizer fuel income social cultural ecological risk management Source: FAO, 2018
  6. 6 Essential for food and nutrition Source: Hererro et al., 2013 Food quantity: Most food in LMICs—plant as well as animal—is produced on small, mixed crop-and-livestock farms Ruminants raised on rangelands: Most red meat in some developing countries (e.g. 90% in Kenya) Food quality: Milk and meat have essential roles in nutrition, especially for the world’s vulnerable populations
  7. Environmental impacts and opportunities CLIMATE Ruminant production produces greenhouse gases and must be addressed Opportunities to ‘net off’ emissions in rangelands through carbon sequestration Note: Huge variations occur in both emissions and sequestration depending on life cycle boundaries, accounting for GHG half-life, etc. Emission intensity per unit of land area (tonnes CO2 eq per sq km) WATER Most water used to raise ruminants on rangelands is ‘GREEN’ water (rainfall) and is NOT ‘consumed’ Source: Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model, 2013
  8. The scale and importance of ruminant systems’ contributions to livelihoods is often overlooked • More than 1 billion people worldwide gain their livelihoods from livestock • Half of these depend on animals for a multitude of benefits • Over 200 million households are located in rangelands • Women head up two-thirds of the crop-livestock households in rural areas • Women who cannot own land can own animals and manage livestock businesses
  9. 9 Ruminant production in rangelands offers opportunities for One Health solutions • Investments in rangelands offer win-win- win One Health outcomes due to the intimate relationships between ruminants, people, wildlife and lands • Grazing systems designed and managed with pastoralists /ranchers minimize threats to livestock, human and environment health while restoring rangelands to their productive potential Source: ILRI, UNEP, 2020
  10. Rangeland production systems: trends and threats
  11. 11 Ruminant production systems in rangelands globally Source: Rangelands Atlas, ILRI, 2021
  12. 12 Rangelands non rangeland 46% livestock non arid 24% livestock arid 21% rangeland non livestock 9% Million sq km Total terrestrial surface: 148.3 million sq km Source: Rangelands Atlas, ILRI, 2021 Rangelands Cover 80 million sq km 84% of which is used for livestock production 31 million sq km are too dry for crops 36 million sq km are used for integrated crop-livestock , agro-pastoral systems, etc. 44% (34.8 million sq km) are covered in grasslands (42 types) Rangelands and their people offer two major opportunities yielding many co-benefits Food production Environmental stewardship
  13. 13 Rangeland trends, 2000–2015 Productivity • 73% remained stable • 17% was improved • 6% was reduced Land cover and soil • 99% remained stable • 93% had stable soil organic carbon
  14. 14 Rangeland threats Fragmentation Pressures to fragment rangelands for more intensive land uses (fencing, conversion to cropping, road/ infrastructure construction, urbanization, mining, etc.) threaten pastoral mobility around the world Climate change (2000 to 2050) • 12% of rangelands will lose >20% of their growing periods • 16% will have maximum temperatures above 35oC • 31% will surpass 1 or more of 3 climate thresholds • 75% of livestock losses in drylands are caused by drought Biodiversity losses • Rangeland biodiversity losses are increasing due to climate change, cropland expansion, fragmentation, infrastructural development and livestock grazing Marginalization • Many pastoralists suffer ecological, economic and political marginality
  15. Three imperatives
  16. 16 Imperatives to mitigate threats and realize opportunities Embrace change • Respond to increased demand for milk and meat • Address unsustainable practices • Contribute to environmental solutions Harness diversity Use research with the end in mind to: • Prioritize and target pathways for enduring and equitable development • Solve major constraints (e.g. resilience, land use, forage scarcity, lack of markets) Engage widely • Beyond science/research with those (governments, development partners) who will scale solutions • Beyond livestock partners to those working to achieve wider development outcomes
  17. 17 Pathways for enduring and equitable rangeland development Distinguish two pathways: • Where natural rangeland resources are more favourable for food production, pursue opportunities to increase sustainable livestock production and market engagement • Where rangeland resources are less favourable for food production, focus on supporting environmental stewardship Note: • Greater risk mitigation, resilience and adaptive capacity are needed in all rangelands • As circumstances evolve, a mosaic of rangeland development pathways is likely to emerge
  18. 18 Implement drought-risk financing to build resilience Those who purchased insurance: - 36% drop in distress sales of livestock - 25% reduced likelihood of having to eat significantly smaller meals - 33% reduction in dependence on food aid Taking to scale IBLI: • Kenya Livestock Insurance Program (KLIP) social protection program • Introduced in Ethiopia where adoption has grown • Humanitarian organizations launched similar schemes in eastern Ethiopia and Zambia Drought risk financing solutions • Scaling innovations in the Intergovernmental Authority on Development IGAD region and beyond Index-based livestock insurance (IBLI) Insures livestock assets Based on satellite weather data At least 50 million pastoralists in SSA vulnerable to shocks (eg drought) Loss of life, economies and dependence on aid Kenya lost USD 3.3 billion in the livestock sector 2008-11 because of drought
  19. 19 Sustainable Rangeland Management https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/101211 Almost 200,000ha under joint village management to secure grazing lands for pastoral and agro-pastoral communities
  20. 20 Key messages Rangelands are an essential part of complex and diverse livestock production systems that are essential for development Rangelands present many sustainable development opportunities Rangelands face many threatening trends To realize these opportunities and mitigate these threats: • Embrace change • Harness diversity • Engage widely
  21. THANK YOU

Editor's Notes

  1. https://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/production-systems/ruminant/en/
  2. Mario Herrero, M.; Havlík, P.; Valin, H.; Notenbaert, A.; Rufino, M.; Thornton, P.K.; Blummel, M.; Weiss, F.; Obersteiner, M. 2013. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems, PNAS. UN Nutrition 2021
  3. Ref: Preventing future pandemics xxxx
  4. https://www.rangelandsdata.org/atlas Kenya rangelands: https://www.kenyamarkets.org/good-pasture-production-key-to-quality-meat-from-rangelands/
  5. Climate data: from Rangelands Atlas Fragmentation data: Hobbs, N.T.; Galvin, K.A.; Stokes, C.J.; Lackett, J.M.; Ash, A.J.; Boone, R.B.; Reid, R.S.; Thornton, P.K. Fragmentation of rangelands: Implications for humans, animals, and landscapes, Global Environmental Change, 2008 Sayr, N.F.; McAllister, R.R.J.; Bestelmeyer, B.T.; Moritz, M.; and Turner, M.D. 2013. Earth Stewardship of rangelands: coping with ecological, economic, and political Marginality, Earth Stewardship, https://geography.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/sayre-et-al-2013-rangelands-stewardship.pdf Alkemade, R.; Reid, R.S.; van den Berg, M.; de Leeuw, J.; and Jeuken, M. 2013. Assessing the impacts of livestock production on biodiversity in rangeland ecosystems, PNAS
Advertisement