Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Pains and gains of international research collaboration with academia: Perspectives from an extramural research institute(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Pains and gains of international research collaboration with academia: Perspectives from an extramural research institute

  1. Pains and gains of international research collaboration with academia: Perspectives from an extramural research institute Kristina Roesel1,2 and Delia Grace1 1International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Kenya 2Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Tropentag 2018 Ghent, Belgium 18 September 2018
  2. 1. The extramural research institute 2. The project and its (academic) partners 3. The gains 4. The pains Who is ILRI? Outline
  3. 1. The extramural research institute CGIAR global partnership for a food secure future • Poverty alleviation through agricultural research • 15 research centres • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) • Mission: better lives through livestock!www.ilri.org
  4. ILRI Offices Main campuses: Nairobi, Kenya and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Offices in 14 other countries ILRI offices
  5. The project and its (academic) partners Safe Food Fair Food project (2008-2016, 2.4m Euro): risk-based approaches to improving food safety and market access in informal markets in sub Saharan Africa • Capacity development on risk assessment (“food safety champions”) • Proof-of-concept participatory risk assessment • Pilot testing interventions © Flickr/ILRI
  6. The project and its (academic) partners
  7. Who is ILRI? 3. The gains 1 intern 1/2 MSc 1 MSc 1 MSc, 4 PhD 1 MSc, 1 MPhil 1 BSc, 1 MSc, 2 PhD 3 MSc, 2 PhD 1 MSc 1 BSc 8 MSc 3 MSc, 1 postdoc 4 MSc 4 MSc, 1 PhD 1 MSc 1 intern2 BSc, 30 MSc, 9 PhD, 1 postdoc, 2 interns
  8. 3. The gains • R4D wants impact, not just generate university alumni • 42/43 graduated • Follow up summer 2018 • 3 passed away • 1 outdated address • 22 did not respond Male Female Total HICs 2 (3) 2 (4) 4 (7) LMICs 10 (20) 6 (15) 16 (35) 12 (23) 8 (19) 20 (42) Number of responsive survey participants (Number of invited survey participants)
  9. What are they doing now? - Research into use • Addis Ababa University • Freie Universitaet Berlin/ILRI • Government of Burkina Faso • Government of Côte d’Ivoire (lab) • Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) • Kenyatta University • Kyeema Foundation • Makerere University and CDL • Nairobi Technical Training Institute • Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority • United Nations (WHO) • University of South Africa • Université Peleforo Gon Coulibaly • Wollega University Unemployed 5% Student 10% Employed part- time* 10% Employed full- time* 70% Self-employed* 5% *Academia > government > private sector > 38% (80%) still work on food safety issues!
  10. What are they doing now? - Research into use • Continued research in livestock value chains, traditional markets and food safety (incl. intervention testing); • Routine lab testing for animal diseases, milk, water quality, animal feeds, human food products; • Developing international food safety emergency programs; • Capacity development: epidemiology, veterinary public health, One Health, zoonotic diseases, AMR and food safety; food processing and preservation; • Vice president for Community Engagement and University Industry Partnership of Wollega University: engaging communities to solve their problems by themselves and creating market chain for their products and disseminating new technologies to the community and thereby they can improve their life.
  11. 3. The gains - continued Partnership health check
  12. 3. The gains - continued • Common interest and motivation to shared success • Common understanding of project aims and objectives • Linking with other projects and the CGIAR Research Programs • Respectful and very supportive team members • Many outputs (very productive!) • Complementary (win-win)
  13. 4. The pains • Distribution of roles and responsibilities a bit unbalanced (transparency of agendas; student supervision) • Commitments and expected (international) standards not always met by local academia (study design, lab SOPs) • Mutual respect and equity (e.g. non-CGIAR partners felt that they collect data but don’t get to use/analyse it; non-CGIAR partners feel that they cannot conceptualize but have to deliver data) • Sometimes challenging to create an atmosphere of respect (responsiveness to emails and calls, meet agreed deadlines)
  14. Asante sana – Thank you!
  15. Kristina Roesel (DVM, PhD) Project coordinator “Safe Food, Fair Food” Jointly appointed scientist ILRI and Freie Universität Berlin k.roesel@cgiar.org https://safefoodfairfood.wordpress.com/ Better lives through livestock www.ilri.org
  16. This presentation is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. better lives through livestock ilri.org ILRI thanks all donors and organizations who globally supported its work through their contributions to the CGIAR system

Editor's Notes

  1. There MUST be a CGIAR logo or a CRP logo. You can copy and paste the logo you need from the final slide of this presentation. Then you can delete that final slide   To replace a photo above, copy and paste this link in your browser: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ilri/sets/72157632057087650/detail/   Find a photo you like and the right size, copy and paste it in the block above.
Advertisement