Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Similar to Reducing disease risks and improving food safety in smallholder pig value chains in Vietnam: What have we learned from previous work? (20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

Reducing disease risks and improving food safety in smallholder pig value chains in Vietnam: What have we learned from previous work?

  1. Reducing disease risks and improving food safety in smallholder pig value chains in Vietnam: What have we learned from previous work? Ma. Lucila A. Lapar On behalf of the Project Team Project Inception Workshop Hanoi, Vietnam 14 August 2012
  2. Demand for pork in Vietnam
  3. Meat expenditures Pork accounts for 40% of meat expenditures by Vietnamese household consumers.
  4. Preference rating for pork Vietnamese consumers have a strong preference for fresh, unchilled pork; this provides natural protection from imported pork.
  5. Changing nature of demand for pork The majority of Vietnamese consumers indicated preference for lean pork compared to other types of pork. No significant change in lean meat consumption from 10 years ago, but significant reduction in consumption of high fat meat from 10 years ago.
  6. Preferred market outlets for fresh pork Traditional market outlets remain the most preferred purchase outlets for fresh pork by Vietnamese consumers.
  7. Supply of pork in Vietnam
  8. Dominance of pork in livestock total output Year Pig Chicken Cattle Others Total 1990 65 11 14 10 100 2000 68 14 9 9 100 2005 72 12 8 8 100 2009 62 13 11 14 100 Source of data: FAOSTAT 2009. Household pig production supply at least 80% of Vietnam’s pork. But growth in supply has failed to keep pace with rising demand, resulting in accelerated increase in real pork prices.
  9. Supply of pork in Vietnam Most Vietnamese pigholding households keep very few pigs but on average the size of their herds is slowly rising. Although not shown, the percentage of pigholding households with 21 pigs or more rose from 0.3% in 2001 to 1.75% in 2006.
  10. Projected share of pork supply from large-scale producers 14% Base simulation 12% High income growth 10% High tech growth in modern sector 8% No tech growth in traditional 6% No tech growth in maize m High income elasticity of o u p n d e a g 4% c -s s r t i l modern High income elast and tech 2% growth in modern Worst case for traditional 0% sector o h e a g S r f l 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Year
  11. Competitiveness of smallholders
  12. Scale definition in household pig production Small-scale Medium-scale Large-scale Farrow-to-wean 1 sow 2-3 sows 4 sows or above Farrow-to-finish 1 sow 2-3 sows 4 sows or above Grow-to-finish Less than 15 heads From 16 to 40 heads More than 40 heads Production system definition: Farrow to wean – piglet production Farrow to finish – full cycle slaughter hog production Grow to finish – pig fattening operation
  13. Rates of return Household-based pig producers earn revenues that can cover costs and generate some positive profits.
  14. Gross margin (‘000 VND per kg output) Household-based pig production can generate gross margins ranging from 4,000 to 15,000 VND/kg liveweight of pig produced.
  15. Cost per unit output in household-based pig production Economies of scale in piglet production; no significant difference across scale full cycle slaughter hog production and pig fattening
  16. Feed-use efficiency (in maize equivalent)
  17. Increasing the proportion of own-produced feed to total feed use can decrease total feed cost. This provides cost advantage to small producers that use higher proportion of own-produced feed.
  18. Cost-efficiency and economies of scale  Own produced feed is cheaper per unit of feed value.  As farm size increases:  Proportion of purchased feed increases  Effective unit cost of feed increases  Feed costs account for at least two-thirds of total costs.  Small producers can exploit this cost advantage to improve their competitiveness.
  19. Contributions to household income and employment
  20. Share of pig income in total household income Income from pigs accounts for about 14% of rural household income, or 24% of rural household income from agriculture.
  21. Value added along the pork supply chain where household producers participate Value added generated in pork value chains where household pig producers participate is about 11,700 VND per kg liveweight (or $0.62)
  22. Share of retail price that accrues to producers (based on average pork retail price of 40,000VND/kg in 2007) Farrow to finish Grow to finish 63% 61% 65% 65% 56% 60% Small Medium Large Producers receive at least half to two- thirds of the retail price of pork. This share increases with scale.
  23. Employment generation in household pig production Smallholder pig production generates employment estimated at about 4 million full- time labor along the pork supply chain, valued at about $3.3 billion or approximately 5.5% of Vietnam’s GDP in 2007. Household labor constitutes the main labor inputs in household pig production. Women labor accounts for at least half of total labor days in household pig production.
  24. Emerging concerns of food safety Nearly half the consumers (43%) had concerns about pork. Most common was fear of disease from pork, followed by fear of chemical contamination, un-fresh pork, and bad smell. Only 1% expressed nutritional concerns.
  25. Average ranking of major concerns about meat safety HN HCMC All Diseases of livestock 1.2 1.1 1.2 Hormone used in animals 2.8 3.0 2.9 Antibiotic use 3.0 2.9 3.0 Hygiene in market outlet (including 3.8 2.6 3.2 meat seller) Hygiene in slaughtering 3.9 2.8 3.4 Concentrate feeding of animals 3.7 4.1 3.8 Other 3.5 3.1 3.2 Animal diseases tops the list of major concerns of urban consumers about meat safety.
  26. Consumer response to pig disease outbreak •About half of consumers either stop or reduce pork consumption; about one-third substitute other meats. •More consumers in HCMC than in Hanoi shift to modern outlets for pork.
  27. Proportion of pork samples that did not meet standards for different hazards •High level of microbial contamination in pork sold in Hanoi and Ha Tay. •Fecal contamination is greatest contributor to bacterial load, likely to be at slaughter point. •Pork sold in supermarkets contains significantly higher hazards than pork sold in wet markets.
  28. Hazards vs. Risk Although hazards were high, pork consumers report low levels of gastro-intestinal disease (1 episode/person/year). There is no association between amount of pork consumed and incidence of gastro- intestinal disease (p=0.60). There is strong positive association between consuming vegetables and reporting illness (p=o.006).
  29. Implications on production  efficiency Smallholder pig producers are competitive in producing pork that meet the demand requirements of Vietnam’s fresh meat market.  Household pig producers are able to generate incomes from pig raising by exploiting areas where they have cost advantage.  Expanding options for own-produced feeds, in terms of choices and quality, can enhance their competitiveness, particularly in areas that are far from commercial feed sources, and complemented with improved access to extension.  Limitations in available land and household labor will be constraints to scaling up by household pig producers.
  30. Implications on economies of scale  Within smallholder piglet production, marginal increases in scale can reduce cost and increase profitability (e.g., from 1 sow to 2-3 sows).  Due to lack of economies of scale in household pig production (except in piglet production), continued support to household pig production will likely improve overall efficiency of the industry.  It is not clear that policy support and investment in large scale operations will reduce unit cost of pork production or increase employment.
  31. Implications on food safety  Growing awareness among consumers about food safety will shape emerging demand for pork and supply response.  Food safety policy should be based on evidence; currently risk to human health by pork is not fully understood.  Food safety policy should be based on risk rather than hazards; risks must be distinguished from hazards.  Risk is multi-source, and various transmission pathways for diseases including waste water and urban/peri-urban agriculture need to be considered.
  32. The New Project: Research Questions  What are the human health risks and economic costs of pork-borne diseases in smallholder pig value chains in Vietnam? What are the critical control points / opportunities for risk management?  What is the added utility of risk-based approaches to food safety and pork-borne disease (that focus on human health impacts) compared with current hazard- based approaches (based on presence of pathogens in pork)?  What is the most appropriate role for incentive-based innovations in improving management of human and animal health risks in these smallholder pig value
  33. Goal of the Pig Risk Project  To improve the livelihoods of rural and urban poor in Vietnam through improved opportunities and incomes from pig value chains as a result of reduced risks associated with pork- borne diseases.
  34. Objectives of the Pig Risk Project  To assess impacts of pork-borne diseases on human health and the livestock sector and identifying critical control points/opportunities for risk management.  To develop and test incentive-based innovations to improve management of human and animal health risks in smallholder pig value chains.  To sustainably improve capacity to assess and manage risks to smallholder pig value chains by engaging smallholders and co-generating evidence.
  35. International Livestock Research Institute Better lives through livestock Animal agriculture to reduce poverty, hunger and environmental degradation in developing countries Project website: www.vietpigs.com.vn ILRI  www.ilri.org
Advertisement