Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

The first large scale randomized control trial in Cambodia animal sourced food systems: rationale and process

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Dr. Andy Lee
Dr. Andy Lee
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 12 Ad

The first large scale randomized control trial in Cambodia animal sourced food systems: rationale and process

Download to read offline

Presentation by Fred Unger, Sothyra Tum, Rortana Chea, Sinh Dang-Xuan, Hung Nguyen-Viet, Chhay Ty and Delia Grace at the 16th International Symposium of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Halifax, Canada, 7–12 August 2022.

Presentation by Fred Unger, Sothyra Tum, Rortana Chea, Sinh Dang-Xuan, Hung Nguyen-Viet, Chhay Ty and Delia Grace at the 16th International Symposium of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Halifax, Canada, 7–12 August 2022.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to The first large scale randomized control trial in Cambodia animal sourced food systems: rationale and process (20)

More from ILRI (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

The first large scale randomized control trial in Cambodia animal sourced food systems: rationale and process

  1. 1. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada 16th International Symposium of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics (ISVEE 16) Connecting Animals, People, and their shared environments The first large scale randomized control trial (RCT) in Cambodia animal sourced food systems: rationale and process Fred Unger1, Sothyra Tum2, Rortana Chea2, Sinh Dang Xuan1, Hung Nguyen-Viet1, Chhay Ty3, Delia Randolph1 7-12 August 2022 1International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) 2National Animal Health and Production Research Institute (NAHPRI) 3Livestock Development for Community Livelihood (LDC)
  2. 2. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Why we used a randomized control trial (RCT) ✓Recognized tool to demonstrate the effectiveness of interventions ✓To provide solid evidence to policy makers (& managers) that intervention in traditional retail can work decisions will be more likely made! ✓We piloted similar intervention (e.g. Vietnam) but doubt remained by regulatory bodies those may not work when scaled or under RCT condition RCT – rationality
  3. 3. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Background information on RCT Project: Safe Food Fair Food (SFFF) Aim: To test low-costs food safety interventions for improvement of traditional animal sourced food retail Components: Risk profiling, market & nutrition survey, risk assessment, RCT, communication Location & time: Cambodia & 2020
  4. 4. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Background cont. Costs of RCT: approximately 90K - Preparations & scoping: 18k - Minor equipment: 10k - Trial including training: 24k - Lab costs: 18k - Admin/staff/overheads 20k (excluding ILRI team & related travel)
  5. 5. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada METHODOLOGY • RCT was designed in 12 trial markets (15 retailers each, 180) and 12 control markets (15 retailers each, 180) across 6 provinces. • Intervention package for trial retailers included: - Training on good hygiene practices, - Providing “incentive” in form of cheap equipment support good hygiene practice - Follow up and monitoring retailers’ practices • After one month, pork samples were collected to analyse Total bacteria count-TBC and Salmonella contamination and evaluate KAP of retailers from both trial and control groups.
  6. 6. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Steps in designing and executing the trial Feb-Mar 2020 Apr-May 2020 Jul-Aug 2020 Sep-Oct 2020 Develop tools and intervention package, provincial selection Consultative workshop from 6 province & scoping visits TOT training for selected markets (2 vet officers & market managers (1-2) Nov-Dec 2020 Jun2020 Team to finalize schedule and logistics (e.g., training) Start Trial (train retailer/ equipment in trial group by the team. Validate, finalize RCT tools and intervention packages Evaluation: Sampling and KAP (both groups) Media campaign to communicate the intervention to consumers Analysis Preparation/formative research & scoping (RCT tools, site selection, lab, logistic/field arrangement) Intervention stage (follow up in 1.5-2 month) Reporting stage Personnel involved: Research team Officers (vet/PH) Market manager VC actors Total 8 30 (3-4 province) 40 (1-2 market) 360 >400
  7. 7. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Retailer training Participation Sampling (biological and observations)(+1 month) Hygienic equipment Inox tray, easy to clean surface, disinfectant, apron, banner …
  8. 8. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Control: Current surface (carton board) Washing detergent Trial: Vendor who received training and equipment Easy to clean table surface Signpost And Training certificate Apron Tray Trial retailers: - The KAP scores of retailers in the intervention significantly improved. - Improved food safety outcomes (TBC & Salmonella) RESULTS
  9. 9. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Challenges encountered • Prolonged preparatory phase ✓Required, but could be managed through a consultative process • Identification of sufficient number of markets and retailers, high complexity and variation of markets ✓Scoping required, info on markets & vendors isn’t updated ✓List of criteria for markets to be included (e.g. exclude not permanent retail) • RCT design was new for local research team • Ownership of market authorities & incentive for change (retailers) ✓Addressed through participatory diagnostic and high level support (DG NAFPRI) • Limited funding, did not allow extended monitoring after RCT • COVID emergence
  10. 10. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada RCT related • Ensure strong support from authorities (higher and local) • Participatory process is key to get support from all actors • Provide sufficient time for preparations and have room for some flexibility (e.g. interventions might be modified to local context) • Clear plan and measures for quality control More generic on intervention • Clear strategy to include consumers and signal retailer improvement to them • Ensure incentive schemes for retailers and an enabling policy environment to sustainable influence the improvement of both food hygiene practices. Which advice can be given
  11. 11. ISVEE16 – Halifax, Canada Acknowledgement Local authorities Value chain actors & market managers Project partners

×