Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Barriers to uptake of improved feeding strategies: Reflections


Published on

Presented by Werner Stür at the Africa-RISING Quick Feed Project Inception Workshop, Addis Ababa, 7-8 May 2012

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

Barriers to uptake of improved feeding strategies: Reflections

  1. 1. Barriers to uptake of improved feeding strategies Reflections by Werner StürAfrica-RISING Quick Feed Project Inception Workshop, Addis 1 Ababa, 7-8 May 2012
  2. 2. Structure of presentation• An agronomist’s point of view• Why is it not so simple?• What approach should we take?• Which tools are available?• Conclusions 2
  3. 3. An agronomist’s point of view Current situation  Production system (draught, capital preservation, risk management, not used to regular income)  Condition of animals (many are thin and in poor body condition, poor reproductive performance, low milk yields)  Feeding systems inadequate for good animal growth (competition for scarce community grazing resources is getting stronger, stubble grazing, crop residues, general lack of feed and insufficient quality)  Potential for improvements 3
  4. 4. An agronomist’s point of view (# 2) Future scenario  Urbanization and rising living standards will increase demand for meat and milk  Increasing labour cost will necessitate change to less labour intensive practices  Mechanization will reduce need for draught animals  Livestock prices are relatively stable compared to crops  Potential for increased livestock production 4
  5. 5. An agronomist’s point of view (# 3) There are technical solutions  A little more feed per animal would go a long way to improving animal productivity  Options: Reduce the number of animals, improve herd structure or grow additional feed  Forages: Introduce forage legumes to improve diet quality; or grasses to increase available feed quantity  Grow specific fodder crops  Strategic feeding of available feed resources – smarter use 5
  6. 6. Why is it not so simple? Technologies are seldom simple  Need to identify suitable technologies (and practices) for different situations  Often there are additional conditions for success  e.g. seed supply, fertilizer inputs, labour requirements or the farmer needs special knowledge to be able to apply the technology successfully  Introduction of a technology leads to changes in the production system and leads to more innovation (and this process requires time)  Find robust entry technologies and then work with stakeholders to develop new, more efficient systems 6
  7. 7. Why is it not so simple? (# 2) Smallholder farming systems are diverse  Variable soils, climate, water availability  Range of crops and animals  Different feeding and livestock management systems  Technologies need to ‘robust’ to fit a wide range of situations People and livelihoods differ  Households differ in term of labour, capital and land availability  People have different objectives, interests and willingness to take risks  Technologies need to be targeted  Farmers (and other stakeholders) need to be really want to improve animal production and are willing to invest 7 effort into doing so
  8. 8. Why is it not so simple? (# 3) Incentives for increasing production  Will the farmer get the benefit of producing a fatter animal? Or can (s)he sell the additional milk for a good price?  Can the farmer access the required inputs easily and at reasonable prices?  It is not just productivity that matters, but there may be other important factors along the value chain that need to be considered 8
  9. 9. What approach should we take? Need systems-oriented innovation  Production, marketing and input supply (value chain)  Work in partnership with key stakeholders  Iterative, not one-off  Build capacity of people involved (emphasis on learning)  Need to target interventions to particular situations, farmers and livelihoods 9
  10. 10. Which tools are available? Farmer Participatory Research (FPR) Approach  Working with farmers and other stakeholders to find ways to improve livestock production  Learning cycles over an extended period  Livestock needs to be important to farmers’ livelihood and farmers need to be really motivated! FEAST  A diagnostic tool to find out if there is an opportunity for feed interventions  If affirmative, the end point is an agreement to work farmers and other stakeholders to improve feeding systems  It does not come up with best-bet interventions to test 10
  11. 11. Which tools are available? (#2) Techfit  Identify suitable technologies for evaluation  Entry technologies – a starting point for innovation that provide significant results to motivate farmers and other stakeholders (provide a vision) Value chain analysis  Market studies; e.g. Rapid Market Assessment (RMA)  Input supply analysis Livelihood analysis 11
  12. 12. Conclusions  One-size-fits all technologies don’t work  We need a systems-oriented innovation process that  includes all relevant stakeholders  takes account of the range of farming system and livelihoods in the area  places innovation in the context of the value chain to ensure that farmers reap the benefits of innovations12