Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to A sustainable livelihoods approach for the Africa-RISING ‘Quick Feed’ project in Ethiopia(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

A sustainable livelihoods approach for the Africa-RISING ‘Quick Feed’ project in Ethiopia

  1. A sustainable livelihoods approach for the Africa-RISING ‘Quick Feed’ project in Ethiopia Peter Thorne Africa-RISING Quick Feed Project Inception Workshop, Addis 1 Ababa, 7-8 May 2012
  2. Hypotheses  Households stratified by livelihood endowments access and manage feed resources in different ways.  More robust development outcomes will result from identifying practises that are transferable amongst strata and augmenting these with “external” innovations that target constraints and opportunities relevant to each stratum. 2
  3. The proposed approach Community feed Household management livelihood Household feed inventory stratification management characterisation Wider adoption: constraints to & opportunities for … Innovation Analysis Identify complementary technologies Design follow-up activities 3
  4. Sustainable livelihoods (SL) framework 4
  5. 5
  6. Small-scale commercial poultry Resource poor household 6
  7. The proposed approach Community feed Household management livelihood Household feed inventory stratification management characterisation Wider adoption: constraints to & opportunities for … Innovation Analysis Identify complementary technologies Design follow-up activities 7
  8. Household stratification  By livelihood asset endowment  Include vulnerability and risk 1. Community group discussions to identify community-specific livelihood indicators. 2. Household interviews to assess individual livelihood status against community indicators. 3. Analyse to identify key strata, differentiated on the basis of livelihood endowments 8
  9. Why use SL for stratification? Don’t have to … Endogenous (if you do it properly) Rapid – Identification of indicators (1 day) – Household interviews (1 week) Broad-based and open-ended Can feed into feasible M & E 9
  10. The proposed approach Community feed Household management livelihood Household feed inventory stratification management characterisation Wider adoption: constraints to & opportunities for … Innovation Analysis Identify complementary technologies Design follow-up activities 10
  11. Community feed resources  Develop a picture, across the community, of: – the range of available resources – access limitations and other constraints  Use existing tools – FEAST, informal household survey?  Independent of household stratification and conducted subsequently. 11
  12. The proposed approach Community feed Household management livelihood Household feed inventory stratification management characterisation Wider adoption: constraints to & opportunities for … Innovation Analysis Identify complementary technologies Design follow-up activities 12
  13. Household characterisation Select representative households in each stratum. Identify feed access issues / feed management practices that are representative of each stratum. Household interviews – based around tools such as FEAST / Techfit? 13
  14. The proposed approach Community feed Household management livelihood Household feed inventory stratification management characterisation Wider adoption: constraints to & opportunities for … Innovation Analysis Identify complementary technologies Design follow-up activities 14
  15. Innovation  Increasing access across strata  Transferability of practices amongst strata  Capitalising on existing opportunities  Reducing risk and vulnerability associated with existing practises  Identifying “external” technologies that genuinely strengthen existing practises.  Strong participation can make this the first step in implementation 15
  16. Discussion points  Do we adopt this proposed approach?  If so, how do we improve it?  Who will do it?  When?  How many households for each stage of the analysis?  How can we extend the livelihoods analysis to include vulnerability and risk? 16
Advertisement